>Prehistoric art is le real, doesn't matter if none of it was discovered before the 19th century
>Prehistoric art is le real, doesn't matter if none of it was discovered before the 19th century
>Prehistoric art is le real, doesn't matter if none of it was discovered before the 19th century
It's fake.
They didn't have lions in Germany.
but they've always had furgays.
That's clearly a bear.
so what, all it proves was there were gay cavemen
>me thag & grog go hunt mammoth...m-maybe you and janny stay here gather berries, OP, craft something cute for cave..
jar jar binks?
yeah, because then it was just "Art"
History was invented in the 19th century. Before then, it was just old art.
reee
good point. but ive always suspected 99% of "history" is fricking bullshit.
wtf is the link to television? at least its not pol shit. or is it
All of archaeology is bullshit. Why would ancient cities all be buried under several feet of soil? Does soil just start growing on top of things? How come we don't constantly have to shovel dirt off our houses to keep them from all being buried too?
There was a giant flood that covered everything in water and silt
This is where flood mythology comes from
A flood happened 4000 years ago?
I want you to keep wondering. You're almost thinking.
>ITS ART OK
the original pepe
>Prehistoric art is le real,
nobody say this. we don't know. could be some sort of voodoo shit. ritual stuff to keep away demons , make rain or facilitate hunting. why is this conversation is happening and people are into it , anyway? conspiracists have another thing to be angry about?
if its voodoo shit its still art, why would it not be?
it depend on your definition of art. religious art i guess? then what, who is angry at any of this
religious art is most art prior to 1900
op is just schizo and probably didn't even mean to post this on Cinemaphile lol
of course cavemen made art. art comes as naturally to humans as anything else does. same with ritual and religion, these are all defining and distinguishing characteristics of human beings
2 explanations for the venus figures found in prehistoric europe having such exaggerated features
1. man horny
2. women created them from a first person perspective since they didnt have mirrors, proportions are distorted
what do you think?
>what do you think?
3. women actually looked like this back in the day
hair wrong
goddamn furries have been around for tens of thousands of years
>dude I saw a man with a lion head in the forest, the world is weird
>my identity is constructed around a 90s mascot fetish
not the same
its just furry shit bro, youll seethe but cool your head and just see the facts.
>be peasant in the year 1210
>go to a cave
>find some weird carvings
>leave
Why would there be a record?
maybe there was but history is erased and rewritten like every 200 years. so very possibly there was all sorts of prehistorical art, but every item we have has been constructed in the last 150 years. bet youve seen some of this in real time in the last years.
moron
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_lions_in_Europe
Lemme guess, it's either a Transwarp Key, a lion-themed Zord or one of the GoLion Lions?