presented without comment.

presented without comment.

srsly, Gene Wilder had a way of looking at the camera to make you feel he was really seeing you.

well, I guess I presented WITH a comment.

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      cute.

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    cool slide thread

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      what is a "slide" thread?

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    death by chocolate river is a relatively humane way of putting a child down

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jewie israeliteface and the Goyslop Factory

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    another obvious mossad thread, sloppy.

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hates children
    >is in the candy industry
    wtf was Wonka's problem?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      loves money
      hates children
      simple as

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Have you even seen the movie? Wonka specifically gets mad at Charlie because he thinks Charlie is selling out the everlasting gobstopper.
        Wonka is in the candy game for the innovation.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well the point is more that it was entirely a test of character to send out his goon to the winners and tempt the kids to rob Wonka. There was no risk in losing the gobstopper, it was purely he couldn't find anyone worthy of his factory. However the issue is I don't think this was actually written down and Slugworth was purely a hook because they realized there was no apparent antagonist in the movie. The test of character was a last minute thing so....

          However Willy Wonka is in it because he likes kids....good kids like Charlie. Willy's chocolate bar was the highlight of Charlie's whole existence this movie. He really appreciated such a small treat in his absolutely dreary life. Willy wants to put that sweetness into the world for the few that deserve it. All the greedy little shits will get theirs as a consequence of their own actions so it doesn't matter if they eat his chocolate which they can't truly appreciate. But for the few that can, the whole thing is worth it. And Charlie is someone who knows that struggle, which is why he gets the factory.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah I get all that, I only put enough effort into my post to deny that wonka was in it for the money.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Wonka is in the candy game for the innovation.

          He was poorly misunderstood

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >rewatched the tim burton one recently
    >actually enjoyed it a lot
    huh, were people just too harsh on it when it came out? it was much better than i remembered, the wonka backstory was unneeded though

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      I will never forgive that film for giving me one of the most autistic fetishes of all time.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        you and me both buddy

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Listen close, and listen hard.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's soulless and weird. It lacks the warmth and charm of the original. Depp's Wonka comes off as an autistic freak. And this one is purely a personal opinion, but the original film is pretty much perfect and Gene Wilder's performance as Wonka can never be topped so there's no point in even trying. It's not an awful movie, but it was always going to come up short with such big shoes to fill.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Cheer up Charlie kind of hurts its perfect score, but everything else, even the skit like bits before the factory are indeed perfect though.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      The remake movie is objectively worse however it has some good quirks and writing that really enhances some of the film's themes. It is a CGI-slopfest trying too hard to be funny and weird but the characterizations of the bad kids and the way their parents didn't raise them right is modernized really well and the one thing that is better then the old film.

      Like making Mike TV an annoying know-it-all brat as opposed to just some kid that watches TV all day and especially Violet having a tiger mom who wants to live vicariously through her child- being obsessed with status and achievement which is a really good "bad parent" archetype that just wasn't present in the first film. just tell me what Violet's problem or moral flaw was in the first film? It was just Roald Dahl being autistic about chewing gum with little greater depth. That part is great, plus the chocolate river looks better in the remake but that's about it.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    People criticized Bush but what could he have done in that situation? He kept calm and didn't freak out the kids.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      I mean they probably could've told the teacher that there was an urgent presidential matter too and then had him calmly and kindly excuse himself.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      He declared global war and had everyone's buttholes searched for freedom under the patriot act. If you dissent you get tortured at Guantanamo. So yes he did scare the kids.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      He declared global war and had everyone's buttholes searched for freedom under the patriot act. If you dissent you get tortured at Guantanamo. So yes he did scare the kids.

      Yeah all those kids were actually executed at gitmo

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >well, I guess I presented WITH a comment
    dumbass

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    He looks like he's about to say "ich bin der zorn Gottes"

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why did everyone have such shit hair back then

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >sir the pizza delivery driver was in an accident

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *