Agreed. I always noticed it's Chuds that like Tarkovksy and Kubrick. Nolan and PTA are some of the best directors but sensitive right wingers and they don't like Hollywood or sexuality. Oppenheimer is the best movie ever made. None of Tarkovksy holds a candle to it. Also wouldn't surprise me that Tark is being shilled all of the sudden because Russians literally use this site to spread propaganda.
>hard eight
only good film. >boogie nights
Main character is a posed homosexual giving hand jobs, not really a plot and poorly thought out. Le big dick porn reddit movie. >magnolia
Le gay Fargo guy and pseud shit like raining frogs. >punch drunk love
only PTA movie with a plot, possibly chud tier with sandlers tism. >there will be blood
IM ACTING, the movie. Drags on and doesn't have a clue about pacing or score. only good part was the ending. >the master
IM ACTING II, Phoenix edition. Le scientology bad allegory. No plot or conclusion. No kino moments. >inherent vice
Trash just like the novel. Le doc goes around LA on an adventure with crooked cop and dentist guy, weed dude, no point and just ends flat. >phantom thread
Garbage. >licorice pizza
Garbage. Should have ended with Cooper getting vengeance. Shoehorned with gay mayor guy.
PTA is the director who makes shit just to cater to the times. He wants praise and acclaim from Hollywood. Anyone who compromises like that fails to make good art.
not kino. sexual slop. doesn't stimulate aesthetic feels. Andrei Rublev rejecting the girl and calling the love making going on bestial pleasure, now that's kino.
There is nothing to be involved with in PTA's films. They're mediocre at best. LA con man, the director. And he's right that most of his movies are pozzed and even if they weren't they still lack cinematic qualities that make movies good. Paul is a vulgar try hard that falls flat every single time. Meanwhile Tarkovksy knocks it out of the park. You're the one that's not into movies. I doubt a zoomer brain like you could make it through Andrei Rublev or Barry Lyndon and appreciate it. I've watched both dozens of times. I've watched all of PTAs films and aside from PDL, they're all shit. The unique thing about Kubrick and Tarkovksy was they simply didn't care what others think whereas PTA craves recognition. He wants to be fashionable, and rich and party of the LA elite scene. All of his movies lack soul and substance.
Doesnt help that this homosexual betrayed his country and ran away, while everyone else was forced to fester in a dying failed state. Soviet Union scrubbed all mentions of his name and distribution/exhibition after he ran away.
>elements are allowed to breathe
Funny since that’s exactly the opposite of what Nolan has allowed his last two films to do. Everything is way too tightly packed together.
>Also wouldn't surprise me that Tark is being shilled all of the sudden because Russians literally use this site to spread propaganda.
Russians only appreciate him because he is popular in the West.
If you read into how he made movies he absolutely comes across as a massive moron. He kept making idiotic choices despite his people warning him about the consequences. He almost single-handedly destroyed Stalker and The Sacrifice, probably others as well
I’ve yet to hear a convincing argument for why slow cinema is a good genre. It’s just fricking boring. One of the few examples where I really think people are tricked into thinking they like it
"slow cinema" is not a genre. I have a thing for movies where people just talk and nothing really happens (12 Angry Men, Tape, Locke, Waking Life, The Man from Earth) but they're quite different
communism is the only reason he got to LARP as a filmmaker, he burned so much money by destroying film and cameras than no producer would give him the time of day
I found Stalker extremely engrossing which is insane on account of how boring it really is. I feel like there is some kind of black magic going on with that film. Solaris was okay, looked very cool, not nearly as fascinating as Stalker. I don't think I've seen anything else by him.
I think he does go a bit too roundabout sometimes.
Nostalgia, The Sacrifice, and Stalker are straightforward enough.
He increasingly escaped his pretentiousness the more he created.
Funny, back in Soviet Union nobody liked his work, not even intelligentsia. If you went to a cinema to see his snoozefest you'd get bullied for being a homosexual.
couple yrs ago i tried watching a film this homosexual made. i think it was stalker. three dudes meet me and two of them argue about science or something. then they go to some train tracks and then there's a 3 minute footage of them just sitting in a truck or maybe train idr and just watching outside. that's it. i had to turn it off lmfao might as well watch paint dry
Why does Cinemaphile absolutely despise anything that is good and anything that came out before like 2005? Games, movies, etc. You people always shit on zoomers but you sure as frick act like them
Oppenheimer and There Will Be Blood are peak reddit films by people who claim to be fans of cinema. Usually they like avatar or marvel but they think these are examples of high art when they're not.
Don’t forget this self-indulgent homosexual. Mallick, Tarkovsky and Nolan films appearing anywhere on someone’s favorites list is a sure sign you’re dealing with a midwit pseud who has never and will never touch a quality vegana.
lmao I have a wife and two white children and you’re a Biblecel who will die alone and unloved as you’ve failed to procreate as your God commands. L + ratio + you will burn in hell for not being fruitful.
>so repulsive and lonely he cannot comprehend anyone finding love and carrying on their genetic line
Enjoy the abyss and being cared for by Black person hospice staff in your old age
Christopher "I never heard of Tarkovksy until 2017 and I thought he was alright" Nolan? Christopher "I'm citing Tarkovksy as one of my inspirations for Oppenheimer because I used Le color filters at times but I hate his lack of dialogue so I made my movie words words words" Nolan? Kys.
Agreed. I always noticed it's Chuds that like Tarkovksy and Kubrick. Nolan and PTA are some of the best directors but sensitive right wingers and they don't like Hollywood or sexuality. Oppenheimer is the best movie ever made. None of Tarkovksy holds a candle to it. Also wouldn't surprise me that Tark is being shilled all of the sudden because Russians literally use this site to spread propaganda.
chud here, pta is also good
>hard eight
only good film.
>boogie nights
Main character is a posed homosexual giving hand jobs, not really a plot and poorly thought out. Le big dick porn reddit movie.
>magnolia
Le gay Fargo guy and pseud shit like raining frogs.
>punch drunk love
only PTA movie with a plot, possibly chud tier with sandlers tism.
>there will be blood
IM ACTING, the movie. Drags on and doesn't have a clue about pacing or score. only good part was the ending.
>the master
IM ACTING II, Phoenix edition. Le scientology bad allegory. No plot or conclusion. No kino moments.
>inherent vice
Trash just like the novel. Le doc goes around LA on an adventure with crooked cop and dentist guy, weed dude, no point and just ends flat.
>phantom thread
Garbage.
>licorice pizza
Garbage. Should have ended with Cooper getting vengeance. Shoehorned with gay mayor guy.
PTA is the director who makes shit just to cater to the times. He wants praise and acclaim from Hollywood. Anyone who compromises like that fails to make good art.
>No kino moments
Amy Adams jerking him off into the sink while whispering in his ear "you gonna cum for me? Cum for mommy"
not kino. sexual slop. doesn't stimulate aesthetic feels. Andrei Rublev rejecting the girl and calling the love making going on bestial pleasure, now that's kino.
>tl;dr
Filtered by the parents teacher association.
Please leave Cinemaphile because you are clearly not into movies.
There is nothing to be involved with in PTA's films. They're mediocre at best. LA con man, the director. And he's right that most of his movies are pozzed and even if they weren't they still lack cinematic qualities that make movies good. Paul is a vulgar try hard that falls flat every single time. Meanwhile Tarkovksy knocks it out of the park. You're the one that's not into movies. I doubt a zoomer brain like you could make it through Andrei Rublev or Barry Lyndon and appreciate it. I've watched both dozens of times. I've watched all of PTAs films and aside from PDL, they're all shit. The unique thing about Kubrick and Tarkovksy was they simply didn't care what others think whereas PTA craves recognition. He wants to be fashionable, and rich and party of the LA elite scene. All of his movies lack soul and substance.
all kino
I won't lie, I got filtered by Solaris (only saw it as a teenager) and Stalker
Andrei Rublev is probably my favourite film of all time though
I mean I'm a left wing trans woman so no, you're wrong
Doesnt help that this homosexual betrayed his country and ran away, while everyone else was forced to fester in a dying failed state. Soviet Union scrubbed all mentions of his name and distribution/exhibition after he ran away.
'Betraying' this piece of shit country has been a good thing for over 100 years at this point
This. Add James Cameron to the list of the greatest
Wtf I love chuds now
lol no
>elements are allowed to breathe
Funny since that’s exactly the opposite of what Nolan has allowed his last two films to do. Everything is way too tightly packed together.
>Also wouldn't surprise me that Tark is being shilled all of the sudden because Russians literally use this site to spread propaganda.
Russians only appreciate him because he is popular in the West.
If you read into how he made movies he absolutely comes across as a massive moron. He kept making idiotic choices despite his people warning him about the consequences. He almost single-handedly destroyed Stalker and The Sacrifice, probably others as well
I’ve yet to hear a convincing argument for why slow cinema is a good genre. It’s just fricking boring. One of the few examples where I really think people are tricked into thinking they like it
"slow cinema" is not a genre. I have a thing for movies where people just talk and nothing really happens (12 Angry Men, Tape, Locke, Waking Life, The Man from Earth) but they're quite different
Because it’s the closest thing to the highest forms of art, which are poetry and painting.
>poetry and painting.
that's a fun way to spell literature and music
>music
>stalker is supposedly a groundbreaking sci-fi film
>released in 1979
>2 years after star wars and eraserhead
>10 years after 2001
haha. people act like it was made in the 50s for some reason.
Only clinically moronic morons think it’s science fiction
Stalker is his most Reddit film, obviously you got filtered by >muh science fiction
it's funny watching solaris soon after rewatching 2001, it's so dull and dated by comparison
I hate most movies made in the 70's because it reminds me of shit we were forced to watch in school.
hes based. he thought terminator is absolute kino masterpiece and he hated women, communists and gays, was a christian too.
communism is the only reason he got to LARP as a filmmaker, he burned so much money by destroying film and cameras than no producer would give him the time of day
Filtered. The Mirror and Andrei Rublev is the pinnacle of film.
I found Stalker extremely engrossing which is insane on account of how boring it really is. I feel like there is some kind of black magic going on with that film. Solaris was okay, looked very cool, not nearly as fascinating as Stalker. I don't think I've seen anything else by him.
You picked his worst films
How can you watch Rublev and call it pretentious lmao. It’s pure spiritual kino
My only education is twitter and Cinemaphile and I agree
I think he does go a bit too roundabout sometimes.
Nostalgia, The Sacrifice, and Stalker are straightforward enough.
He increasingly escaped his pretentiousness the more he created.
Funny, back in Soviet Union nobody liked his work, not even intelligentsia. If you went to a cinema to see his snoozefest you'd get bullied for being a homosexual.
The intelligentsia liked him. Not all, but a small circle.
that small circle being his mother, his uncle, his cousin (his dad knew his movies sucked)
Cыглы
хpюкни
Tы oбoзнaлcя.
>Cвинopyc вoзвpaщaeтcя к мoнгoльcким иcтoкaм
Бaзa
how do you say sneed in russian
Cниид
Cнeeд
Хpюкни
I like it when films moving water
You can't inb4 your own op.
Rublev > Spartacus >>>>>>>> Barry Lyndon
2001>Solaris
e-girl>Shota so e-girlta > Ivan's Childhood
Tarkovsky would be a decent watchable director if he didn't flood his pictures with his father's shitty poetry voice-over
>Tarkovsky
>Godard
>Tarr
>Fellini
The big four of "I pretend to like their boring artsy movies to look like I have taste".
couple yrs ago i tried watching a film this homosexual made. i think it was stalker. three dudes meet me and two of them argue about science or something. then they go to some train tracks and then there's a 3 minute footage of them just sitting in a truck or maybe train idr and just watching outside. that's it. i had to turn it off lmfao might as well watch paint dry
Why does Cinemaphile absolutely despise anything that is good and anything that came out before like 2005? Games, movies, etc. You people always shit on zoomers but you sure as frick act like them
>he still hasnt figured out the (you) cycle
I watch old anime, play retro games and watch old movies, including Soviet ones. And I still think Tarkovsky is a pretentious shit.
>i play bing bing wahooo and watch anime
>i think tarkovsky is pretentious shit
kek, of course you do.
>I watch old anime
Oh no, I dont like your reddit director, whatever will I do? Probably watch old movies made by white people and asians, not commie subhumans.
>tarkovsky
>reddit
Nope. That would be PTA.
What the frick even is a reddit director? Someone like Nolan or Wes Anderson?
Oppenheimer and There Will Be Blood are peak reddit films by people who claim to be fans of cinema. Usually they like avatar or marvel but they think these are examples of high art when they're not.
>He hasn't figured out that they're all zoomera trying to fit in
it's a bunch of zoomers with adhd who can't focus on anything unless there's quips and explosions. it's summer and school is out
Don’t forget this self-indulgent homosexual. Mallick, Tarkovsky and Nolan films appearing anywhere on someone’s favorites list is a sure sign you’re dealing with a midwit pseud who has never and will never touch a quality vegana.
>Mallick, Nolan, PTA
REDDIT
>Tarkovksy, Kubrick
Cinemaphile
All of the listed are reddit t b h
>t b h
The redditor reveals himself.
If I was a redditor I'dve said "desu", but nice try hipster
Now that's based, shame he never worked with Seagal
If you weren't a redditor you wouldn't say t b h or the replacement word for it in the filter.
"desu" is gay, weeb culture is gay, (You) are gay
I say neither. I am not a weeb. I dislike homosexuals. The fact remains that you are a redditor.
>I dislike homosexuals
probably why your home has no mirrors in it
This.Cinemaphile is a Michael Bay board.
have a nice day troony
lmao I have a wife and two white children and you’re a Biblecel who will die alone and unloved as you’ve failed to procreate as your God commands. L + ratio + you will burn in hell for not being fruitful.
kek, sure thing troony
kys
>so repulsive and lonely he cannot comprehend anyone finding love and carrying on their genetic line
Enjoy the abyss and being cared for by Black person hospice staff in your old age
>>so repulsive and lonely
yes, you very much are, a troony on top of it
Trailer trash doesn't count.
Christopher "I never heard of Tarkovksy until 2017 and I thought he was alright" Nolan? Christopher "I'm citing Tarkovksy as one of my inspirations for Oppenheimer because I used Le color filters at times but I hate his lack of dialogue so I made my movie words words words" Nolan? Kys.
anon, people who know who these are aren't having sex period
Don’t project
when's the last time you came upon a chad and he knew anything outside of mainstream cinema? that's what I thought
You're just a tastelet. Stick to capeshit.
>buzzwords
I accept your concession
Don't reply to me, incel
>AAAAHH I AM SUFFERING JUST LIKE LE JESUS DID AND IT'S SLOW-BURN AND LE ATMOSPHERIC
Wow... so this... is the height of films as frickin art...
Reddit post. Go watch Marvel.
I thought Rublev was so good that I'm at peace for being semi-filtered by the rest of Tarkovsky.
i thought that was Charles Bronson
heh, so did i at first.
Mirror is probably the greatest film ever made.
wrong it sucks
Last word
You can come to Moscow and tell all of that shit to his face