Men(which is most comic readers) don't care what women say(writer) if they are hot and can look at their breasts(cheesecake artist). And the few readers who aren't straight guys can also enjoy such series either for the writing or for how "empowering it is to be sexual but owning it" or some meaningless shit.
It's a win win for everyone.
Provided the writer isn't some kind of anti-sex anti-male weirdo, a female writer and a cheesecake artist can bring out the best in each other. When the girl power empowerment stuff takes the form of hot girls kicking ass rather than trying to push some kind of message or political agenda, and the artist and writer are both in tune with each other and playing to each other's horniness, we get something everyone can enjoy.
The writing shows you these are fully well rounded people, the art shows you they are beautiful, the conclusion is their inner goodness manifests as physical beauty.
If the characters are well written what's wrong with them being hot?
And why is the solution to make the girls ugly instead of making the guys equally hot?
Unironically ask this to a leftist irl or in actual conversation and you will hear some insane mental gymnastics. They basically believe female sexuality is good until a man likes it, then it is bad and the existence of beauty only serves to feed mens ego. If no men are present then it is girl power unless its a man you like or want to seduce. Also, the solution isnt to make everyone beautiful because that makes irl uggos feel left out and media that isnt inclusive is inherently bad.
I do not believe any of this but with indirect language and implications this is what they (modern comic writers) believe.
The reason it's like this is because they are not speaking in good faith. They shun "boy locker room talk" yet slobber at gay shit.
The real answer is that they HATE straight shit and love LGBT as the default morality. All that other fluff goes out the window when they get what they REALLY want.
Yeah. A lot of that is reactionary to reveals like Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein shit.
Well what can we do about it? They hold all the cards. They literally dictate all of media. Look at Resident Evil 4 Remake. That's the result of THAT MENTALITY IN ACTION. We can't ignore them bevause they choice is losing your customers and not getting attacked, or getting harassed until you break.
Unironically ask this to a leftist irl or in actual conversation and you will hear some insane mental gymnastics. They basically believe female sexuality is good until a man likes it, then it is bad and the existence of beauty only serves to feed mens ego. If no men are present then it is girl power unless its a man you like or want to seduce. Also, the solution isnt to make everyone beautiful because that makes irl uggos feel left out and media that isnt inclusive is inherently bad.
I do not believe any of this but with indirect language and implications this is what they (modern comic writers) believe.
The reason it's like this is because they are not speaking in good faith. They shun "boy locker room talk" yet slobber at gay shit.
The real answer is that they HATE straight shit and love LGBT as the default morality. All that other fluff goes out the window when they get what they REALLY want.
You say this because you know it's true. You know that journalists are the reason media is so bad today. Dare to make anything they don't approve of and you are hit wirh a major harassment campaign that THEY start while any minor criticisms get you arrested.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Sure thing champ. Whatever you believe. The "they started it" infantile argument is laughable too. Grow up sonny.
1 year ago
Anonymous
We're arguing now? How is "take your meds bruh >:)" an argument?
1 year ago
Anonymous
>The "they started it" infantile argument is laughable too
Are you illiterate? You quite literally made an argument against ~~*them*~~. That's what I pointed out. We both know who you mean you mouthbreathing hick.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Are you? Do not respond to me with your babble again.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Nobody mentioned them until YOU did.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>explicitly mention them >nobody mentioned them
1 year ago
Anonymous
Are you comparing israelites to scum sucking parasites known as journalists?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Don't pretend you don't think "they" control them you concern trolling freak. Have a fricking backbone.
1 year ago
Anonymous
If they were, the economy wouldn't be in shambles, honestly.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Which is it? They control everything? Or they don't control everything but somehow they're still an issue. Once again you have no backbone. Conservitard arguments shift on a sentence by sentence basis.
1 year ago
Anonymous
All this because I don't like how journalists control media, which is the truth since the Hogwarts Legacy harassment campaign was started by them.
1 year ago
Anonymous
If journalists control media then wouldn't that mean Hogwarts Legacy wouldn't have been made in the first place? Seeing as how video games are also media? That they would have control over?
inb4 >They let the game get made so that they could complain about it
1 year ago
Anonymous
To be honest, even I have no idea. It's the same with Atomic Heart. They know the game was in development for years, why didn't they stop it dead in its tracks if they cared so much of how evil it is?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Occam's razor would suggest they're pissing in the wind and don't have the power anons attribute to them.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Or that power is more limited than they or their enemies think since they can only do it for certain companies but not all.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Except we constantly see this doublethink at play. The sjws journalists are liars and cheaters and all powerful except they never really accomplish anything beyond occasionally changing a company's twitter logo for a month or writing an article that gets mocked. If you have to keep making excuses for their lack of effectiveness this often maybe it's time to just admit they're not the threat you thought?
1 year ago
Anonymous
I don't know what to think anymore. You're probably right, but then lately it seems they brag about everytime something changes to their favour and they parade about it like they're a goddamn hero. It gives the impression that they hold a lot of sway in game development, especially since a lot of lead devs start parroting them.
Just lose yourself into older stuff and ignore new stuff. Its hopeless like you said and you will find each decade the standard of quality gets lower so its actually more rewarding to go back and appreciate everything. The people making this stuff agree with you and me too, theyve just given up as well and are just trying to make a quick buck the way I see it.
>Look at Resident Evil 4 Remake.
I'm not moronic enough to use Cinemaphile. What are you homosexuals having a meltdown about now? Because a porn discord I'm on has posted screens that show Ashley is still stacked.
They completelly change the characters personalities so that they are more MCU like, even turning Ashley into a generic Hollywood female lead.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>DAE MCU
Shut the frick up holy shit. You definitely watch video essays.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Oh sorry. Let me rephrase that. "Whedon speak". Better?
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Action movie: the game has action movie dialogue.
Honestly you guys freak out about so many little things that just sounds like it could either be >she's not screaming LEON like an alarm clock every five seconds and that's feminist.
or >Forspoken
or anywhere in between.
I don't think Gail writes a ton of comics anymore. She did that Jessica Jones thing for Marvel, but I can't remember the last thing she did before that. Domino?
Serious answer for a bait thread is that progressive female writers actually try to give their female characters a personality and agency and believe it or not those things actually make the characters attractive and likeable so it adds onto their pleasing aesthetic value.
Men(which is most comic readers) don't care what women say(writer) if they are hot and can look at their breasts(cheesecake artist). And the few readers who aren't straight guys can also enjoy such series either for the writing or for how "empowering it is to be sexual but owning it" or some meaningless shit.
It's a win win for everyone.
I think you're under selling men and projecting your own failings onto them.
I am a straight man who can enjoy TnA, despite mediocre writing, anon-chan.
True. I didn't read a single word here
>I didn't read a single word here
This is why I don't take Simone BoP fans seriously. You guys are just in it for the huehue artists.
Well yes, comics are a visual medium after all.
Provided the writer isn't some kind of anti-sex anti-male weirdo, a female writer and a cheesecake artist can bring out the best in each other. When the girl power empowerment stuff takes the form of hot girls kicking ass rather than trying to push some kind of message or political agenda, and the artist and writer are both in tune with each other and playing to each other's horniness, we get something everyone can enjoy.
The writing shows you these are fully well rounded people, the art shows you they are beautiful, the conclusion is their inner goodness manifests as physical beauty.
We need more of this.
The fact that companies don’t realize this yet is baffling.
If the characters are well written what's wrong with them being hot?
And why is the solution to make the girls ugly instead of making the guys equally hot?
Unironically ask this to a leftist irl or in actual conversation and you will hear some insane mental gymnastics. They basically believe female sexuality is good until a man likes it, then it is bad and the existence of beauty only serves to feed mens ego. If no men are present then it is girl power unless its a man you like or want to seduce. Also, the solution isnt to make everyone beautiful because that makes irl uggos feel left out and media that isnt inclusive is inherently bad.
I do not believe any of this but with indirect language and implications this is what they (modern comic writers) believe.
The reason it's like this is because they are not speaking in good faith. They shun "boy locker room talk" yet slobber at gay shit.
The real answer is that they HATE straight shit and love LGBT as the default morality. All that other fluff goes out the window when they get what they REALLY want.
Don’t lump all leftists into this. Especially us Gen X’ers. All that’s mostly a late milennial and zoomer thing.
Yeah. A lot of that is reactionary to reveals like Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein shit.
I just meant modern liberals, im not gonna start classifying people into zoomer, boomer, doomer, whatever the frick. lol.
Well what can we do about it? They hold all the cards. They literally dictate all of media. Look at Resident Evil 4 Remake. That's the result of THAT MENTALITY IN ACTION. We can't ignore them bevause they choice is losing your customers and not getting attacked, or getting harassed until you break.
Take your meds you giga homosexuals.
You cant hurt my feelings. Tell me to have sex too, its all you have.
You genuinely need to go offline for a while jesus.
You act high and mighty on Cinemaphile, I don't give a frick what you think.
High and mighty? You're the one with a persecution complex trying to "stick it to the man" online. Get well.
Tell me to get well more. Tell me to have sex, meds, I have your whole routine. Tell me to go outside. I love it, you have no idea.
Yeah. You really need to go offline bud. Pure online induced schizo brainrot.
Yet you posted that.
Yeah bud. Your qweeen lynda is actually a raging leftoid SJW. Just giving you all the facts.
I don't even know who that is.
You say this because you know it's true. You know that journalists are the reason media is so bad today. Dare to make anything they don't approve of and you are hit wirh a major harassment campaign that THEY start while any minor criticisms get you arrested.
Sure thing champ. Whatever you believe. The "they started it" infantile argument is laughable too. Grow up sonny.
We're arguing now? How is "take your meds bruh >:)" an argument?
>The "they started it" infantile argument is laughable too
Are you illiterate? You quite literally made an argument against ~~*them*~~. That's what I pointed out. We both know who you mean you mouthbreathing hick.
Are you? Do not respond to me with your babble again.
Nobody mentioned them until YOU did.
>explicitly mention them
>nobody mentioned them
Are you comparing israelites to scum sucking parasites known as journalists?
Don't pretend you don't think "they" control them you concern trolling freak. Have a fricking backbone.
If they were, the economy wouldn't be in shambles, honestly.
Which is it? They control everything? Or they don't control everything but somehow they're still an issue. Once again you have no backbone. Conservitard arguments shift on a sentence by sentence basis.
All this because I don't like how journalists control media, which is the truth since the Hogwarts Legacy harassment campaign was started by them.
If journalists control media then wouldn't that mean Hogwarts Legacy wouldn't have been made in the first place? Seeing as how video games are also media? That they would have control over?
inb4 >They let the game get made so that they could complain about it
To be honest, even I have no idea. It's the same with Atomic Heart. They know the game was in development for years, why didn't they stop it dead in its tracks if they cared so much of how evil it is?
Occam's razor would suggest they're pissing in the wind and don't have the power anons attribute to them.
Or that power is more limited than they or their enemies think since they can only do it for certain companies but not all.
Except we constantly see this doublethink at play. The sjws journalists are liars and cheaters and all powerful except they never really accomplish anything beyond occasionally changing a company's twitter logo for a month or writing an article that gets mocked. If you have to keep making excuses for their lack of effectiveness this often maybe it's time to just admit they're not the threat you thought?
I don't know what to think anymore. You're probably right, but then lately it seems they brag about everytime something changes to their favour and they parade about it like they're a goddamn hero. It gives the impression that they hold a lot of sway in game development, especially since a lot of lead devs start parroting them.
What are you on about?
Just lose yourself into older stuff and ignore new stuff. Its hopeless like you said and you will find each decade the standard of quality gets lower so its actually more rewarding to go back and appreciate everything. The people making this stuff agree with you and me too, theyve just given up as well and are just trying to make a quick buck the way I see it.
>Look at Resident Evil 4 Remake.
I'm not moronic enough to use Cinemaphile. What are you homosexuals having a meltdown about now? Because a porn discord I'm on has posted screens that show Ashley is still stacked.
They completelly change the characters personalities so that they are more MCU like, even turning Ashley into a generic Hollywood female lead.
>DAE MCU
Shut the frick up holy shit. You definitely watch video essays.
Oh sorry. Let me rephrase that. "Whedon speak". Better?
>Action movie: the game has action movie dialogue.
Honestly you guys freak out about so many little things that just sounds like it could either be
>she's not screaming LEON like an alarm clock every five seconds and that's feminist.
or
>Forspoken
or anywhere in between.
Leaning towards the latter given how they act.
Gravity?
Why hasn’t Gail and Benes collaborated again?
I don't think Gail writes a ton of comics anymore. She did that Jessica Jones thing for Marvel, but I can't remember the last thing she did before that. Domino?
Why hasn’t Gail and Benes collaborated again?
Waiting to see an example
I like the words too
I want to be that scanner
Why is it called Birds of Prey
Who are they preying on
The fact that he tells people to touch grass and make acccusations while not denying ant of the arguments in this thread says everything.
This thread will be deleted. Mark my words.
Do you really need me to sit and tell you I think you're full of shit when clearly that's the case? Does mommy still wipe your ass? Jesus.
Well, you're telling us to wipe our arse with a rusty nail, so you tell me.
Serious answer for a bait thread is that progressive female writers actually try to give their female characters a personality and agency and believe it or not those things actually make the characters attractive and likeable so it adds onto their pleasing aesthetic value.
>shit writing and mediocre art
>work so well
No.