Cinema bros we are so back
https://deadline.com/2024/04/quentin-tarantino-final-film-wont-be-the-movie-critic-scrapped-1235888577/
Quentin Tarantino Drops The Movie Critic As His Final Film
Cinema bros we are so back
https://deadline.com/2024/04/quentin-tarantino-final-film-wont-be-the-movie-critic-scrapped-1235888577/
Spoiler: it's not his final movie because he's making one afterwards.
Indeed it’s over. I was waiting for 4 years for this.
oops. I posted the article with reading it. He scrap the movie critic. His final film will probably release in 2029 or later.
It’s over cinema bros
oops again *without
>He scrap the movie critic
Doug Walker bros...
His next movie is The Movie Director.
cool. means he still gives a shit about what he does.
I wonder if he has dropped the film because he'd prefer to write it as a book instead
it's joever
His self-imposed 10 movie limit is stupid to begin with. He thinks everything he makes is incredible and he can't sully his film record, when he's already made several duds. Just make what you feel like making. By the nature of film, some people will like the movie and some won't.
His inspiration is from seeing directors he respects end their careers making movies that don't live up to their peak filmmaking period, but these directors he's thinking of made dozens of films, some over a hundred in their career. What the frick kind of cinephile doesn't want to make as many movies as he can? His ego will be what buries his career in the future.
He is correct tho. I mean look at Woody Allen, Scorsese, Schrader. They come out with bangers but end up repeating themselves and not focusing on quality. Meanwhile Kubrick, Leone, and Lynch all take their time and have a collection of highly crafted and diverse films. Prince vs MJ.
And then you have Alfred Hitchwiener, Howard Hawks, John Ford who didn't get caught up in their own image to the point where they felt every single movie they made had to be perfect, and they just made a bunch of enjoyable movies for decades to the best of their abilities.
If you have talent as a director, you don't have to limit yourself to 10 films. Tarantino's problem is that he isn't creative to begin with and he knows he can only copy and stretch other peoples' films so many ways.
Hitchwiener destroyed his reputation with those stinkers later in his career dude. That's what Tarantulo is trying to avoid, and I can see why
Oh yeah, nobody regards Alfred Hitchwiener today, huh?
And Frenzy and Family Plot were good.
Again, it's his own ego saying "people must remember me as a genius! I must leave a legacy behind of 10 perfect films!" That's not a good director, that's just an egomaniac.
Not only has he already fricked that up with several dumb movies like Django and Hateful Eight, his reputation isn't going to be as one of the best directors of all time. In the future, he will be on the same plane as every other director that ever worked, and it will be clear to anyone looking back at film history that Tarantino just copied better films and didn't contribute anything truly original.
Hitchwiener proves the point. Everybody remembers like 5 or 6 of his movies. Nobody gives a frick about husband trying to murder his wife #12 or whatever the frick they remember Psycho and Vertigo.
yeah and neither of those movies was one of his first ten, they were like 40th
The “point” is absolutely moronic and Hitchwiener disproves it. If Hitchwiener had stopped after 10 films, he never would have made any talkies.
>Hitchwiener
>destroyed his reputation
Yeah, it’s a shame he had to turn in his lifetime achievement awards and the French disavowed him and he’s no longer taught on university syllabuses and his films no longer regularly top every kind of ‘best of’ list because he directed fricking Topaz.
I feel like in a 100 years, if anybody still remembers Quentin, it'll be for one or two films and the rest will be seen as outdated, needlessly offensive trash. Compare his 90s films with the films he made after the millennium and it's like night and day.
He will only be remembered as a footnote for Pulp Fiction's influence on 90s """alternative""" Hollywood flicks.
His only 3 good films are dogs, H8, and Hollywood.
B8
Btw OP I'm also nonWhite and trans.
>H8
It will be Pulp Fiction and that's that. Which isn't bad. Scorsese will have Goodfellas and Taxi Driver and at the longest stretch, Raging Bull.
>Goodfellas
i hope not as both Casino and Irishman are better
>His self-imposed 10 movie limit is stupid to begin with. He thinks everything he makes is incredible and he can't sully his film record, when he's already made several duds.
This. His latter films already dropped in quality substantially. He might as well stop now by that logic.
>drop
The availability of a product or service to the general public. The term is most often used in relation to the release of a music album, a DVD video release, or hardware or software, but can be used for other products (i.e., concert tickets.)
>Drop
let or make (something) fall vertically.
>Drop
Abandon, throw away
To be honest it sounded like a rehash of what he did with OOATIH (which I still enjoyed) so I don't really mind him scrapping it for something else has long as it is kino.
should've made Keanu Cowboy Bebop back in the day
this dude hasn't made a good movie in forever
i remember i was so excited for django and hateful eight, i didn't even bother watching his newest one
hack
Django and H8 are fricking shit
His last one is one of his best though, give it a try.
Well yeah, not destroyed, but certainly sullied. Most critics agree that Topaz, Frenzy and Family Plot are really sub-par.
>Well yeah, not destroyed, but certainly sullied
Not at all. He's still regarded as one of the best directors in history with dozens of great movies because he didn't say "I'm only going to make 10 films in my entire career and then stop."
>Most critics agree that Topaz, Frenzy and Family Plot are really sub-par.
I haven't seen Topaz yet but Frenzy is a great slasher film and Family Plot was definitely above-average for that kind of movie, it's just not North By Northwest. Sub-par as a Hitchwiener film is still better than most movies out there, and needing to appeal to critics' tastes, especially contemporary critics, is not the sign of a great director. It's alright if some of your movies don't change the world.
Howard Hawks is the director he had most in mind when he set that rule. Hawks' last movie was Rio Lobo, which wasn't as good as his best movies. Before that, he made El Dorado, which was very good. Some time before that, he made Rio Bravo, which is one of Quentin's favorites. Rio Bravo was Howard Hawks' 36th film.
Hitchwiener made something like 60 films that ran the gamut from amazing, awful, and everything in-between. Having three relatively mediocre duds at the end of career is irrelevant, they're not even his worst films. (Id take Torn Curtain, Topaz, or or Family Plot over some of his silents or early talkies anyday, and Frenzy is really solid and widely considered a return to form)
He's still widely admired because he made at least a dozen stone-cold classics while revolutionizing how movies were made. The fact that not every single movie he made was great is not only meaningless, but practically inevitable given how many he made.
The Fluffer
How dare Tarantino take his time and not push out endless content like everyother filmmaker we hate REEEEEEEEEW
his final film will be a puppet show, and every puppet will be a girl's foot with googly eyes glued to the sole.
He saw how low De Palma's reputation fell and is trying to avoid that
Good. The Movie Critic's first idea (a Taxi Driver with an autist movie critic as mc, who goes onto kill the inception of 80's "blockbuster hollywood") was good, but I've heard it evolved into a continuation of his alternative hollywood history of OUATIH, with Pitt reprising his Cliff Booth character. In this new version of the movie, much of it was dedicated to on-screen depictions of fictional movies in this universe (a new ending to Rolling Thunder, Cliff Booth/Rick Dalton's The Fireman, etc.).
>arantino had been honing The Movie Critic for months. Set in 1977 California, it initially drew inspiration from a cynical movie critic that the filmmaker grew up reading. But sources say it morphed along the way into a film that would feature Brad Pitt as Cliff Booth, the stuntman he portrayed in an Oscar-winning performance in Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. It is unclear if this film was going to be a prequel or a 1970s-set sequel to Hollywood.
frick it's true. In his alternative universe, Quentin's self-insert Booth ended up becoming a film director and had several hits in the 80s. Lame.
this homosexual is ironic 90s joke that keeps going for far too long. he is foot fetishist, loves israel and makes shit movies. he should have gone the cobain route
He has now put so much pressure on himself that he will end up writing a dozen 8-9/10 scripts and film none of them, and then at 75 and becoming dementia addled, he will end up rounding out his career with a 2/10 film.
I like how no one can ever agree what his best films are. Or his worst. They hit differently depending on where you're at in your own life.
TaranKINO
He better do season two of Video Archived Podcast. I had so much fun watching the movies him and Roger Avery discussed.
He should make as many films as he can. You don't want to be 80 complaining about capeshit
It dropped? Where is it?
He dropped it but it was too fire and burned up
The real reason it's taking long? He no longer has Harvey Weinstein to rubberstamp whatever he wants so he has to try now.