Just saw Poor Things (more like prostitute THINGS) and that was so degrading for Emma. How desperate of a cry for help is it to produce and star in that trash? I knew going into it it had racy scenes but not for that it was literally the entire movie, just being a complete bawd showing bush and crack like is she okay?
This anti Emma Stone shit is really forced and inorganic, I assume it is some loser discord thing.
No, it's just paid shills trying to stir up controversy to get more people to watch the movie. Just look at
, the shilling is so low-effort they even posted the wrong link.
Don't get me wrong, I loved the movie, but the constant fake controversy is fricking tiring. I hate media corporations and I want all paid shills to die.
hi emma
Hi Emma, you are a rotten, disgusting softcore porn prostitute.
she fricked one of the new weinsteins and now we have to sit through this prostitution based media push
Didn't someone say Emma IRL is whory, in her home state?
Doubt it. Mostly ugly women are the bawdtiest cause of low self esteem. Hot women just like showing off and getting free drinks but don’t put out
she's like ugly pretty and theater girl energy, two huge bawd archetypes
Arizona anons sometimes pop in here with stories. I'm in Phoenix but was too young and from the poor part of the city so have no direct stories. But I have heard stories from old farts from Scottsdale. Everyone in Scottsdale really does have an Emma Stone story. The gist of it was that the parents were having problems and she started acting out, it turned into promiscuity around middle school and the parents killed two birds with one stone and the mom left with her to LA for high school where she could put her promiscuity to good use. Up until A-List when she broke out as a big star she would come back to Phoenix and party with her rich school friends where random chads hooked up with her. She stopped coming to Phoenix when she became a big star because why would she come back.
>two birds with one stone
see what you did there, nice work
Thanks, that tracks. Middle school = 15yo, born '88, her first TV credit is 2004. EASY A is about a bawd image, and here her magnum opus is about NYMPHOMANIA freeing her to be more than society's rules. It's her artist's statement LMAO. Surprised Margot Robbie is 2yrs younger than her.
I'm disappointed nobody in the thread kept discussing Emma or even post pictures of her.
In contrast, all Madame Webb threads are about Dakota Johnson and we roast her and her prostitutedom. Images of Dakota everywhere.
Idk, I just have Emma gossip and nowhere to ever put it. Cinemaphile argues about sex too much, but when it comes to porn everyone is civilized. It's bizarre.
>I just have Emma gossip and nowhere to ever put it.
There must be somewhere on the internet for gossipy old queens to congregate.
At least they're gossiping about celebrity sexual exploits. You virgins are arguing that "nudity shouldn't be allowed in film".
I just smoked ur ass like a pack of Juuls!
damn she looks like she's 50 here
Emma Stone in one the few actresses that never worked with Harvey Weinstein a doesn't have a single photo with him, not even at award shows.
Her parents are ultra rich, she's like Taylor Swift, a career made by her parents.
dakota johnson had no reason for any of her prostitutedome though, her whole family was in entertainment to the point of her childhood friend being fricking elvis’s daughter
Much like the actress, Emma Stone gossip is boring and that's why it doesn't get traction here. But that's what probably makes it true. Most of it is she is weird or that she got drunk at a house party and fooled around with some guy in the bathroom or a friends room - which is basically how 90% of college hookups end up. Then when she became famous her publicist kept her on lockdown and industry people rarely talk about On-Set drama or who slept with a producer.
So what's your gossip, anon?
Most celeb gossips are obsessed with exposing them, like rapes, LGBT, drug addiction, being an abuser, etc. I just find how the person + roles dovetail to be interesting.
Only AZ story I have heard about her is that Alice Cooper's wife was her ballet teacher and that Emma never ever stopped talking. I think the Coopers may have been producers on Cruella, but my google is broke so I won't be looking it up to check.
Movie was good. This is a forced meme
I just read the description online and it sounds like Podesta art came to life. Wtf
All the sex scenes probably totaled to MAYBE like 7 min all together in a 2hour and 20min movie.
How many of them are there?
about 20 I think. But they are short like 10 seconds long, the biggest one I think is the lesbian scene that is a good 40sec-1min long
There are alot of naked people though
Why would you lie like this? Half the movie at least is softcore porn.
moron.
Fricked the right israelite
multiple masturbation scenes, the section where she's literally just fricking a bunch of different dudes, like 3 Ruffalo montages, the lesbian scene, and the casual nudity just sprinkled throughout
i went by myself and I usually keep my hands between my knees at the theater but made sure I didn't this time incase someone thought I was doing something down there
Bush is nice, but when it’s someone like Emma I need to see the details
Someone give me the lowdown. What does Emma show? Pussy lips or butthole? Are there any fellatio scenes in the movie?
Bush and ass but no holes. No bjs but she gets eaten out by a black chick.
>Bush and ass but no holes. No bjs but she gets eaten out by a black chick.
Just what I thought. Everyone claims these movies are so daring and sexually explicit. But no pussy lips, butthole, or even simulated blowjob means the whole movie catered to her sheltered and prudish view of sexuality, even if it doesn't serve the character.
It actually serves the character, the character doesn't know the word sex so she calls it "vigorous jumping" if i'm not mistaken
The point is she is a prostitute. So being so PG-13-ish with the sex scenes just shows how watered down the movie really is. But advertise a movie as a mainstream porn and all the moron coomers rush out to see it.
I didn't seen it being adivertised as a porn movie, quite the contrary, all the official material don't even mention it, it is the twittergays that are pulling their hair outs because they saw some breasts and mark ruffalo's hairy arse on screen
>I didn't seen it being adivertised as a porn movie
You must be new to viral marketing. Literally the ONLY thing I heard about the movie was all it's daring and explicit sex. Not a single thing about plot or premise. Just, if you want to see Emma Stone naked and fricking tons of guys, go see this movie.
The only thing I head the movie was that Emma stone was a frankenstein-like creature and I saw some of the posters, and I knew Dafoe was in int. Then, after I watched the movie, I became aware of the twitter screeching about the sex scenes
To be fair I dont use twitter very often.
Its quite a bizarre phenomenon, people are screeching about "modern films" being full of unnecesary sex scenes, but statistically speaking, there are less sex scenes now than decades prior, and if anything, and this is pretty anecdotical, the sex scenes ive seen in recent film seem less "unnecesary" too
maybe you don't see a difference between explicit sexual scenes (now) and innuendos (back then) because of your brain damage. I pity you, POOR CREATURE
No, there just are statistically less sex scenes now, poor things has a lot, but that is one movie
even if it's just one soft porn-like scene with an explicit content is worse than 100 innuendos. And I don't say worse because I'm a bigot, I actually don't care about porn itself or erotic movies. It's the normalization of things that shouldn't be normalized that disgusts me.
Lmao what planet are you on? The sex scenes are way beyond pg-13 and almost border on NC-17.
>The sex scenes are way beyond pg-13
That's why I said "PG-13-ish" and not "PG-13" you fricking twat. Go back to 3rd grade, homosexual.
wake me up when she shows it all
She is aging so bad. Like this b***h is 5 years younger than Jonnah Hill and looks so much older than him
She looks better than like 99% of 35-year-olds that I have ever seen in my life. Probably 99.99% of 35-year-olds.
she still a used up 35 year old moron
thats how girls are. a 30 year old girl will look a lot worse than a 30 year old male.
>shakira
She looked hot as frick in this movie idk what to tell you
How come like 98% of the posts about this movie are insincere? Like 2 percent are from people who saw it and loved it and the other 98% are people who haven't seen it who are pretending to be outraged by the premise. Is this just normal Cinemaphile contrarnianism for the lulz? Oh you read this far? Then yes it is fake outrage for teh ebin lulz and keks and nzozzles.
My wild theory is that the majority of the posters here actually can't get tickets since the movie is 18+
it would explain the quality of the board also.
The movie is overrated and childish, baby's first dark whimsical film. The problem isn't so much that there's a lot of sex, but that the film acts like the sex is adding weight to the story when it's just tryhard edginess.
The fact that you call the sex edginess proves the movie's point
You did not watch the movie
>it's just tryhard edginess
oh I be EDGING HARD while watching it alright
Webms of the sex scenes showed up on here months ago, newbie.
>nooooooo reeeeee why isn't everybody praising muh mature feminist porno
>How come like 98% of the posts about this movie are insincere?
It's because 98% got literally filtered. Usually that's a joke, but it actually applies to every film here, that is even a little bit artsy-fartsy.
Poor Things, Beau if Affraid, Blonde, Everything Everywhere All at Once... People just don't really appreciate TRVE KINO here.
>he didnt mention barbie
filtered
Barbie was a very straight forward movie, in every respect. I'm not sure that you are supposedly seeing in it?
>mark rufflo plays some kind of sex pervert
just like real life
SEX BAD
help me out there leftiesisters, a woman fricking around is degrading and we must blame the patriarchy or is it feminist and empowering?
its about free will. see sports/UFC or anything else that takes a physical toll. if you force someone to fight in a ring for money its obviously fricked up, if someone of their own free will trains to become a fighter out of joy for the sport its a good thing.
where the movie fail at is treating sex as a shallow transaction, they briefly touch on the human and emotional connection that elevates sex to a more fulfilling experience than using a fleshlight.
>where the movie fail at is treating sex as a shallow
All sex is transactional, you little homosexual.
I didn't say it wasn't transaction, said a shallow transaction. The transaction two partners make that involves building a life together is different than the shallow transaction of a hookup. There is a reason why you mock when someone has been cucked after years of being in a relationship like will smith
>its about free will
not according to leftiehomosexuals
what is it about then?
empowering or degrading, can't you read?
in a binary it is? if you see a woman/man fricking 10 guys for 10 dollars a pop you think they are a prostitute degrading/devaluing themselves but when they save their virginity for their spouse its empowering their virtuous believes no? how do you view people having sex?
how about taking responsibilities for your free willed actions then
which responsibilities? also how do you view sex if not as either empowering(making a choice of free will) or degrading?
nta but sex is always degrading. It's an animalistic act like pooping, or eating like a pig. Thinking that it could be empowering is just a huge cope of weak willed npcs. That's why Humans developed shame about all these lower bodily acts, they remind us of our dual nature of animals and higher spirits. Hippies and "it's all natural!!!" morons are just 100% proud animals and need to be treated accordingly
Are the leftiehomosexuals in the room with us, anon?
are the right-wing naht-zee drumpf supporters in the room with us, homosexual?
No one mentioned those you schizo
>SHE'S 35 BUT SHE IDENTIFIES AS A CHILD YOU SICK FRICK
The ending of poor things didn't make sense. They put a goats brain in her husbands body as a "punishment" and a final har har, but like, assuming they disposed of his brain the husband is dead. He is not being humiliated in any way. They didn't punish him, all they did was put a poor goat into a human body which I assume the goat can't be too happy about.
I've tried explaining this to people but no one seems to understand why it doesn't work, they just see the husbands body acting like a goat and assume the husband is being ridiculed when its just a goat being victimized
Generally speaking, the defiling of someone's body after death is seen in poor taste and an offense. You can say his brain doesn't care, that his spirit is in the afterlife or reincarnated or whatever, and people still want to treat bodies with some respect - or frick them if they have ill intent. It's part of our cultures.
I guess Zoroastrians letting their bodies rot in towers is an exception but even then they do it for a weird reason and with a ritual they think is fine.
okay I can see the desecration being the humiliation, guess I just find it unsatisfying. kinda how after a villain murders a characters wife, burns his home and rapes his daughter, then he just gets shot in the head and dies in a second. a lot more satisfying when you see the villain plans fall apart or dies an agonizing slow death
yeah I was expecting a goat body with the husband's head, would've made more sense
It wasnt really punishment, they outright say, "we dont want to kill him, but if we just cure him and set him free, he will try this shit again". Then again, i think we are reading too much into what is essentially a family of frankensteins, the goatman isnt out of place in a garden full of chickenpigs and goosedogs
Probably obvious, but everything after the wedding scene didn't happen in the book
I just finished the book and it had a great ending. What you just described isn't in the book at all... and even seems to have missed the fricking point of the book. Neither Bella nor Godwin are vengeful people. Candle is just an idiot.
I just thought that it was literally murdering the dude (unless they put his brain into some harmless blob or a jar) while getting away with it. They could just say to the police that he’s mentally ill and has been acting a bit weird lately, they wouldn’t understand the procedure anyway.
I thought for sure that they'd swap the brains of the "evil" guy with Godwin. So God gets a healthy body, while "evil" guy just dies.
The goat thing didn't make any sense.
she follows in Godwin's footsteps and becomes a monster, albeit a beautiful monster
it's a depressing view of humanity and i don't get why people are praising it as a feminist work
>i don't get why people are praising it as a feminist work
because it really is, and very banal
so the takeaway is that a woman, unfettered by socialization, is capable of everything a man is (conveniently ignoring the demented premise of brain transplanting and that Bella doesn't seem hindered by biology)
that does sound too straightforward. Am i missing something cause yorgos' movies go over my head lol
the very basic takeaway is that women are subjugated by muh evil patriarchy and therefore poor victims of men (who deserve to die in an asylum or act like a goat forever). Society in itself is le bad because they should be free to be rude and jerk off in public, frick everything and then have a beta provider cuckold to marry them and paying for they lesbian lover (the only one that really gives her an orgasm). Oh, don't miss that being charitable and feeling bad about poor Black folk dying in pits, wanting to change the world is socialist (they repeat it 4 times at least) and that's a good thing.
Of course, I can't believe Yorgos to be such a pleb so I think there's a complex subtext of Freudian psychology (the child sexual impulses triggering all the people here), themes related to fatherhood/creation, the limits of science etc etc. The black lesbian repeating she's a socialist felt almost like a parody of woke activists. But even if I'm right and Yorgos isn't a full blown feminist moron, the vast majority of the public is reading only the blatant woke propaganda from this movie
Take your meds
Nice opinion, very convincing analysis of this film
let's see your take
Also: there's a clear pro-life message at the end, where she says she's grateful to live her life anyway. Apparently feminists didn't notice that the child who is Bella was hated by her mother, even killing herself to abort her baby
she's going through her artsy fartsy phase
she didn't have enough after birdman apparently
pointless nude scenes the movie
There’s no such thing as pointless nude scenes, only sex scenes can be pointless
she aged out of her "cool college girl" roles
getting naked is drumming up relevancy and trying to shed old roles
how many sex scenes with colored folk are in the movie? if there are too many i'm not going to watch it
Only one lesbian scene. The mudslime Ramy's character is betrothed to Emma's but they never frick, and the literal homosexual Black person Jerrod Carmichael is in some comically bag dialogue driven scenes. Besides Willem they're the only dudes in the movie who don't frick Emma
>Besides Willem they're the only dudes in the movie who don't frick Emma
Idk about Willem, the way he lays in that bed for the good night stories... The cuckold husband never fricks her tho
Dafoe was an eunuch, he said so himself
>implying he didn't lick her clit in her sleep and then burped an acid soap bubble
we need more quirked up softcore theatrical releases
any webms?
Almost like its a core subject of the film
How come every thread about this shit movie is only comments? were are the sexo pics?
yes i am a coomer why would you ask?
The sex scenes aren't portrayed as sexy at all, the only one that is, is the lesbian scene. Most of the scenes are Emma jumping like an actual spastic moron.
What a gay
I love how in feminist movies they always need to add some "she's learning philosophy too, not just being a who'a"
yeah. she is whoring to get a degree or whatever.
Thats the point homie
I love Emma so much bros
Puritan cucks can't deal with a bit of sex in their movies
coombrain
t. Henry Cavill tiny hands
Stop trying to whiteknight, it's cringe. She knew what she was doing, it worked out fine and women (not just actresses) are exhibitionist by nature and much more sexual than you seem to assume
I don’t even care about the porn aspect. Just explain to me why it’s ok to feature a movie where a child’s mind in an adult body is having a ton of sex and that’s okay. Meanwhile dudes in their late twenties banging 18-21 year olds are called groomers.
I agree. Inb4 /misc/, but this movie is a hipster chess piece on the Weimar agenda, using "gothic fantasy" as novelty to smuggle, deliver and plant pedo ideas into the mainstream.
It's also dreadfully unoriginal art school hackery. What if Barbie were Edward Scissorhands but sex was her agency? Reminiscent of that horrible 00s movie Thirteen, that existed to initiate and groom young girls into a bawd life, and because Emma Stone is running on the last fumes of her youth, this is a low effort to score points by imprinting on zoomers that fricking is a female's best outlet for expression. At least many potential viewers gleaned that it was gross and edgy. Surprised Marina didn't cameo, seeing that Dafoe has a portrait of "her as Christ" on his study.
If they’re trying to make pedo shit mainstream, why do so many dudes get shamed for being “groomers”?
Because chad is not going to date some 30s year old walled rostie and if they are getting some 18s year old dick then nobody is
This is also what I found the most unsettling. I always thought the purpose of age of consent is to protect the children's innocence while they develop and avoid predators taking advantage of their naitivity. So seeing what is supposed to be a toddler jerking off and having sex is really disturbing.
This schlock isn't only the straight forward feminist crap leftoids slobber about, but it's about freudian theories too. Freud thought that children have sexual impulses like adults
You fricking zoomers, what is it with you guys and being prudish about sex scenes? Is your generation this sexless? Didn’t you all grow up in the age of hookup culture?
no. they grew up with every guy around them getting metooed for looking at women.
They're unnecessary.
A lot of things aren’t necessary. My question was why does it offend you
Frick off, virgin
have a nice day cumbrain.
You said that already
Imagine being offended by breasts
What a child
>have a nice day cumbrain.
You keep dodging the question, kid
Isn’t it a school day
have a nice day cumbrain.
I’m sure the sixth time you say it it’ll be funny
Have sex instead of craving movies to show it, incel.
>A lot of things aren’t necessary
In that case, for her next movie she needs to have shitting scene, where she is shitting on the toilet, full view and with full sound.
Is that unnecessary for the plot? does it offend you
1. Sex isn’t inherently unpleasant to look at unlike shitting. You equating the two says a lot about you.
2. Sex can be related to the plot.
>Sex isn’t inherently unpleasant to look at unlike shitting
That's Irrelevant is a "natural" function of human body and so it must be shown on every movie too just like sex
>Sex can be related to the plot.
90% of all sex scenes can be removed with no changes to the main plot.
Sex scenes are for midwits, women and coomers
How is that irrelevant when we’re talking about making something in a visual medium. Of course being pleasant or unpleasant to look at is relevant you moron.
Sex at least CAN be relevant. Shitting isn’t. Your argument sucks and you’re moronic
Piss, shit, cum.. etc etc
all normal function of the body, that some people like others more if irrelevant
>NOOO B-BUT HOLY DOLLY SEXO!!
a vegana is just a hole to cum in, is seeing an anal tear fissure after anal sex pleasant looking for you
It being a normal function does not make it pleasant to look at or related to the plot, the two reasons movies have sex
Frick off until you get a brain
a different time
have a nice day cumbrain.
Sex scenes are always badly done and unaesthetic. They only appeal to the lowest common denominator, either honest coomers or dishonest fart-huffing midwits like (you).
it filters ples (you)
Based orthography filtering the midwit coomers.
I can speak 4 languages, ferme ta bouche, cabron
>Didn’t you all grow up in the age of hookup culture?
That's the point fricking boomer, never heard "enough is as good as a feast"? Now die, it's time to make room for new morons
>Read the book last week
>Really enjoyed it
>Bella's sexcapades are just the result of two men's warped letters and imagination about her
>Bella herself has a completely different PoV
>Movie looks like it only focuses on the fictionalized portion of her life where she's an insatiable sex fiend as imagined by two lonely horndogs
I look forward to seeing it, but does the movie end with Bella telling her side of events and her love for Godwin? Also the sex scenes in the book are only ever implied, movie looks explicit.
I don't know anon, looks like the book is completely different because I only recognise the names but all you said is alien to me (I watched the film)
Emma Stone is a rotten softcore prostitute.
Well, I was wrong, it wasn’t funny
have a nice day cumbrain.
Seriously, why does sex offend you
have a nice day cumbrain.
She really got paid to frick in front of a camera and she acts like this was some huge honor worth celebrating. And morons on here really simp for these delusional prostitutes. I hate this world.
there's a reason better civilizations that this one considered actors lower than prostitutes instead of people worth admiring
based
if you like trite, corny, on the nose woke propaganda... YES! It's 100% WOKINO
So is this a good movie?
Anyone know where to watch it? In normal quality, I don't want that fricking goslots waternark
Trash with pro pedo message.
My smooth brain take on the movie as I have no fricking idea about cinema.
I enjoyed the dialogues a lot and the settings, props and costumes were great. The camera was weird at times which was interesting. If the movie was trying to push a message I didn't get it. The only thing I got is that it's easy to be a pretty woman because you can prostitute yourself to solve all your problems and improve your life. The idea to put a baby's brain in an adult's body is abhorrent and seeing it have sex is morally questionable. I would argue that this is worse than e-girls. I didn't get Bella at all. She starts as a selfish and cruel child, leaves her family just to have sex and see the world and suddenly she feels sad because the world is bad. The same girl who was excited to see her new friend getting thrown out of the boat and with no empathy suddenly grows a moral conscience after seeing dead babies. She would have probably killed them herself for fun a month before that. She even wanted to punch a baby to shut it for fricks sake. But everything ends well, the cuck from university stais loyal to her, they kill Bella's father because he is an butthole with no consequences and they have a happy weird family ending. I didn't enjoy the plot that much. The only character I like were the cynic and the old lady from the boat. I don't regret watching it because I enjoy weird stuff from time to time, but I wouldn't recommend this to anyone I know and I have no intention
to ever see this again.
>The same girl who was excited to see her new friend getting thrown out of the boat and with no empathy suddenly grows a moral conscience after seeing dead babies. She would have probably killed them herself for fun a month before that. She even wanted to punch a baby to shut it for fricks sake
She is rapidly developing, it is striaght up saind she is. Besides, people can have conflincting emotions, most people hate seeing sad shit but news and shows about about the most violent crimes ever are always extrmely succesful
>She is rapidly developing, it is striaght up saind she is.
I know and I didn't believe that as she still behaved like a child and she still didn't know how to walk properly in the previous chapter. And at that point her violent tendencies had been reinforced several times. She killed the frog, squeeze the eyes, threw tantrums and used violence to get her way, tried to punch a baby, cheered the attemp to murder her friend... She might develop fast but I no point I saw her being even slightly moral. I can't remember a single thing she did before that point that would have been considered a good action. So understand that it took me by surprise when she actually cared about human suffering.
>She might develop fast but I no point I saw her being even slightly moral.
Wich is accurate, children can be cruel is not just a saying, the parts of your brain responsible for empathy take longer to develope than the rest, many children kill bugs or small animals (at least the ones not inmediately recognized as "cute"), because the curiosity to see the animal squished trumps the empathy for its life
I understand that and I believe that portrayal of child cruelty correct. Children are vicious and evil. They lie, hurt and only think about their present self-satisfaction, following their instincts. It just seemed out of character for me.
I see your point and I get it. But understand that I haven't seen her until that point to care about another human being (other that god). So it took me by surprise and made it seem out of character for me. I was like "Now you care? Really?" I believed her to be a heartless animal. It was too sudden for me. Even a single scene of her caring about the well being of anyone would have prevented me from having this impression of her.
Like said, people can and have contradictory feelings. For example, there are millions of people who watch content about cops killing people and son, they get a kick out of that, they can say it is because it is justice being served but that is just to try and rationalize the feeling that they do crave for violence. Does that mean that they are bad people? Not really.
Bella just doesn't have a society filter, she enjoys violence and at the same time she can feel compassion.
For the I must pucnh that baby scene, everyone, every single person had a moment like this, wether it was a baby crying in a plane, or a dog that won't stop barking. The difference is that we have filters and we know it is not socially acceptable to say these things out loud, but like i've said, Bella lacks this filter, this is kinda the main point of the movie
>what fi grown woman had no society hangups whatsoever
>suddenly grows a moral conscience after seeing dead babies
The other anon is right that she's rapidly developing, and I don't have a problem with her growing a conscience, but that scene definitely felt forced. They covered up sloppy character writing with loud music. There should have been a lot more build-up, maybe a few "the world is fricked up scenes" leading to her having an epiphany, rather than her changing on a dime.
>bawd showing bush and crack
oh no!
anyway, I don't give a frick unless she spreads her holes
Harvey is gone. There's a power vacuum. Women are putting on a display for the next Hollywood pimp.
White woman are trash and we all know were trash goes
>OH MY GOD....IS THAT...LE STRAIGHT WHITE SEX?!?!?! IN "MY" MODERN CINEMA???? AAAAAAHHHHHH, SAVE ME IBRAM X KENDI!
a shame she is so walled,and that she had to make out with that boneless nu male rufallo.
she should have done this 10 years ago with the goose.
that would have been something.
I think the sex scenes are inspired but the movie overall is mediocre. Checkmate.
>hfw you stick a finger in her butt
Have you seen Buffalo 66?
I've seen Ruffalo 69'ing her on the film.
two old men with shit on their wieners is high art in burgerland. why does the applause generated from this "film" surprise you?
I don't have a problem with sex or even the protagonist being a literal prostitute, but I did find the movie to be a bit annoying. Not 100% bad by any means, but it's one of those faux-cinema films that's designed for an ADHD audience. We've been getting a lot of those. Almost every scene is designed to be quirky. The humor/pacing of the dialogue is designed for a modern audience. It doesn't have superheroes or explosions in it but it's not a movie you're meant to take all that seriously. It's something you consume and then forget the day after. Not something I'd likely ever rewatch.
the movie describes it's themes and ideas as bluntly as possible and you were too dumb to recognize why anything was happening anyway
This was more kino, but this scene doesn't make sense. In that time the perv would have been lynched by the other people. Funny how feminist have to made up scenes like this to show how bad was muh patriarchy.
Isnt the movie about the brain of a baby being transplanted into body of her own mother? After that she gets fricked the whole movie? Is this about right?
Yeah, and it got nominated
Just a bit confused because I see all these wall of texts being posted, when it all just comes down to this.
By all means enjoy your kinky softcore porn. But its like the big elephant in the room that by for all intents and purposes a toddler gets dicked the shit out of her.
>a toddler gets dicked the shit out of her
One poster here tried to tell me it doesn't count as this because they mention she matures preternaturally fast
he's moronic, the point was she is literally a newborn with sexual urges and no filters.Read about Freud theories and you'll understand this crap
Funniest movie I've ever seen
The production design was neat but I thought the story was boring.
I had no idea Mark Ruffalo could be this funny. If this movie was made 15 years ago im sure Cloney would have gotten the role
What bugs me is that wait till they're way past their prime to get the breasts out. Sweeney and DaDDario deserves credit for whipping them out in their prime.
Expected to see Qualley bloody and naked and we were ROBBED, Emma hogged all the scenes
>younger
>better looking
>more docile, no tantrums or nympho feminist shit
imagine being that trurbo cuckold mutt not marrying Qualley and waiting for the psycho lesbian walled roastie
>a israelitewood star
>is also a literal prostitute
woooah, who could see this coming?
if shes fine with sucking israelite deformed dicks for roles shes already fricked in the head
>Poor Creatures
The title refers to the mauled animals at Godwin's or the homies dying in Alexandria?
I actually think it refers to the men trying to control Bella
If you want my serious take, I think it refers to humanity as a whole, considering that Godwin was abused by his father as much as his creations, and according to the edgy homie dandy philosophical takes. The ending proves he was right. She didn't get better, she didn't change the world, she became the same as her evil (?) crazy creator
But muh socialism though
As I previously said that sounded like a parody. Obviously leftoids can't meme and can't into subtlety, so they thought it was a straightforward feminist manifesto promoting Karl Marx. I refuse to think Yorgos is such a hack, there's a nihilist subtext to the whole thing. Still disgusted by the woke crowd praising the movie tho
Good take
Emma stone says the phrase: A finger in the arse
In this movie
Worse thing is that she says it while fricking a man in front of his two 12ish yo children, who are forced to look at the scene and learn how to have sex. No, I'm not shitposting
This scene got cut in britain, I think
I'm an eurogay, strange you got a cut version