Rotten Tomatoes works by whether a film critic likes a movie or not. If only ten critics review a movie and 9 of them like it, its a 90% rating. Its not that its a 9/10 movie, its that the higher the rating the safer and cookie cutter dogshit it is nowadays.
That said when nothing forgettable films like Moonlight get 96% I dont understand it.
>That said when nothing forgettable films like Moonlight get 96% I dont understand it.
I think everyone knows the reason for that, they just don't like saying it
Did Chadwick Boseman make a deal with the devil, his life in exchange for a critically acclaimed movie? Because this is the only explanation I can see for black panther having such good reviews. It's not a bad movie but is it better than any of the other slop marvel have released in the last 15 years?
black panther had an absolutely massive corporate shill campaign behind it to boost its relevance. this becomes very obvious when you realize how inflated its numbers were domestically in the US compared to global, and compare how it did when they ran the MCU theatrical re-releases during covid (none of them did particularly well, obviously, but black panther specifically was the lowest earner in re-release due to lack of free ticket campaigns for africans and no virtue signalling value for white liberals)
BP was shit, and this is coming from some1 who generally likes the MCU.
i rewatch the films (up to endgame and also the loki show) every year, and i always skip BP and captain femism
boseman was actually a fairly decent actor, but the movie was shit.
>That said when nothing forgettable films like Moonlight get 96% I dont understand it.
Why not? When you have a binary rating system like that it makes perfect sense. >not sure inflation is the right word.
Take a look at IMDB. It's not about the rating system at all. People just see a show and rate it as 10 if they like it even a bit.
that's not inflation, it's devolution and decay of the concept of ratings systems. it's the takeover of swipe right or left, upvote or downvote, black and white thinking ideology that zoomers have been indoctrinated with from birth.
they got rid of the list because it was embarrassing to Rotten Tomatoes
same reason Letterboxd freaked out and changed their scoring system after the zoomer/twitter userbase voted Computer-Generated Black Spiderman 2 the best movie off all time based on averge score
Top lists like this are meaningless.
The power of these websites is the ability to do advanced searches and pull up the information that is actually relevant to you..... However i'm not sure RT allows that anymore. But IMDB etc do.
I trust people that rate things either 1 or 10 more than curve autisits that think 5/10 is acceptable to give to a good movie because it's "average". 5/10 is bad
average isn't bad. it may have bad parts that balance out the good parts. that's why it's average. 5/10 is an "I didn't love it, but I didn't hate it" score. the only thing worse than "1 or 10" incels are the midwits who's baseline is 6/10 because they feel bad about giving something an "average" score if they didn't find it totally appalling.
Nobody cares about your pseud movies from prehistoric times, none of them are actually good they were only highly rated because of hipsters who went to film school and were brainwashed by their grandboomer teachers.
I assume they got rid of it citing "recency bias" and the fact that any and all internet ratings and polls are polluted with jeet shill farms. Who's idea it was to allow that nation onto the internet is beyond me.
>The Godfather
>The Wizard of Oz
>Metropolis
>The Cabinet of Dr Caligari *
>Mission Impossible Fallout
Only kino, everything else sucks horse wiener
>any Mission Impossible movie
>kino
pick 1
first M:I is kino
A Hard Day's Night was 60s kino
>Well if he's your grandfather, who knows? Hahahaha
People only pretended that shit was any good because they loved the Beatles.
Beatles are shit so no it wasn’t kino. Frick this overly shilled boyband
You must have not seen Laura featuring Vincent Price
not sure inflation is the right word.
Rotten Tomatoes works by whether a film critic likes a movie or not. If only ten critics review a movie and 9 of them like it, its a 90% rating. Its not that its a 9/10 movie, its that the higher the rating the safer and cookie cutter dogshit it is nowadays.
That said when nothing forgettable films like Moonlight get 96% I dont understand it.
>That said when nothing forgettable films like Moonlight get 96% I dont understand it.
I think everyone knows the reason for that, they just don't like saying it
Did Chadwick Boseman make a deal with the devil, his life in exchange for a critically acclaimed movie? Because this is the only explanation I can see for black panther having such good reviews. It's not a bad movie but is it better than any of the other slop marvel have released in the last 15 years?
black panther had an absolutely massive corporate shill campaign behind it to boost its relevance. this becomes very obvious when you realize how inflated its numbers were domestically in the US compared to global, and compare how it did when they ran the MCU theatrical re-releases during covid (none of them did particularly well, obviously, but black panther specifically was the lowest earner in re-release due to lack of free ticket campaigns for africans and no virtue signalling value for white liberals)
BP was shit, and this is coming from some1 who generally likes the MCU.
i rewatch the films (up to endgame and also the loki show) every year, and i always skip BP and captain femism
boseman was actually a fairly decent actor, but the movie was shit.
>That said when nothing forgettable films like Moonlight get 96% I dont understand it.
Why not? When you have a binary rating system like that it makes perfect sense.
>not sure inflation is the right word.
Take a look at IMDB. It's not about the rating system at all. People just see a show and rate it as 10 if they like it even a bit.
that's not inflation, it's devolution and decay of the concept of ratings systems. it's the takeover of swipe right or left, upvote or downvote, black and white thinking ideology that zoomers have been indoctrinated with from birth.
Wouldn't INFLATION mean the reviews would rate it higher?
they're just shills
Literally every movie on the right is complete dogshit
What happened to the movies on the left? Shouldn't they still be at the top? Please explain.
dont have black people in them so not allowed to exist. in two generations no one will have heard of them.
There are way more reviews for the movies on the right than on the left, so the ones on the left have slid way down in the rankings
What does the top 15 movies look right now.
they got rid of the list because it was embarrassing to Rotten Tomatoes
same reason Letterboxd freaked out and changed their scoring system after the zoomer/twitter userbase voted Computer-Generated Black Spiderman 2 the best movie off all time based on averge score
Letterboxd looks like a shitty cringy place full of the most reddit homosexual cuck kind of people you can possibly find
Top lists like this are meaningless.
The power of these websites is the ability to do advanced searches and pull up the information that is actually relevant to you..... However i'm not sure RT allows that anymore. But IMDB etc do.
>spam ratings with gays and Black person marketers
>Wow, aren't modern movies the best, goyim?
Hollywood had successfully convinced the general public that not liking movies is a right wing dog whistle
naturally, if movies are left-wing propaganda
>2020 was 7 years ago
>2020
>nothing but capeshit and wokebait movies
how can some "people" still watch that
I trust people that rate things either 1 or 10 more than curve autisits that think 5/10 is acceptable to give to a good movie because it's "average". 5/10 is bad
average isn't bad. it may have bad parts that balance out the good parts. that's why it's average. 5/10 is an "I didn't love it, but I didn't hate it" score. the only thing worse than "1 or 10" incels are the midwits who's baseline is 6/10 because they feel bad about giving something an "average" score if they didn't find it totally appalling.
are movies getting worse? No it´s the viewers that are wrong
Nobody cares about your pseud movies from prehistoric times, none of them are actually good they were only highly rated because of hipsters who went to film school and were brainwashed by their grandboomer teachers.
Did they delete the top 100 page?
I wanted to see what 2024 looked like
I assume they got rid of it citing "recency bias" and the fact that any and all internet ratings and polls are polluted with jeet shill farms. Who's idea it was to allow that nation onto the internet is beyond me.
The list on the right is unironically better.
Only movie I've even seen on the right is Fury Road
Dunkirk is good, but not the 13th best movie of all time.
>Adjusted Score