It's tv full of boomers? Who the hell likes red letter media? The drinker, nerdotic or mauler are far better than these guys who look like they gave up on life
I've fallen off Drinker and Nerd because I feel like politics and emotion influence their judgements a little too much, but I do still like Mauler. If he says something has a solid narrative I've found it's usually worth my time, though it's not a guarantee I'll watch.
a few months ago jack was playing elden ring on a second wind stream and he absolutely tore into kevin smith. it was the most based shit i’ve ever seen in my life.
My ranks are: Mike > Jim > Colin > Rich > Culkin > Tim drunk > Jack drunk > Tim > Jay > Fat Bald > Jack > Mike's GF > Comic Book Guy > Random Guest > Specifically Patton Oswald was the worst one ever
Truthfully most are funny on their own but I think the rankings are more by who has more comedic chemistry with more people and willingness to push the comedic boundaries. Patton Oswalt was not at all funny when he went on.
If you're on 4chins and you're not roughly the same age as moot(+/- 5years) then you are a newbie and should either return to reddit or become an hero.
>jay mentions how you get the dumbest people on twitter if you mention AI >within 2 minutes he says the most stereotypical dumbest thing about AI, ie. that it steals stuff from other sources
Allllllllrighty!
I expect people with no technical knowledge (and a wide audience, like having a youtube channel with 1.5million subscribers) to have some self-preservation and shut their damn mouth.
2 minutes he says the most stereotypical dumbest thing about AI, ie. that it steals stuff from other sources
that's...literally what AI does. That is objectively what it does.
have a nice day ai Black person, stop derailing the thread
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
youre the dumb Black person that doesnt know how ai works, and is getting mad about it
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
lmao, i'm not the anon you were responding to, you stupid Black person
take your fricking moronic ai spam and post on twitter with the rest of the shitjeets no one cares
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
AI was used in the movie. RLM talked about that for like 10 minutes.
What else do you expect people to discuss relating to the video?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
They talked about it for barely a minute
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
6:00 >(escape from New York poster being compared with AI) It's a beautiful painting and is made to provoke emotions.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
They're comparing the Civil War AI posters with the Escape From New York poster. Their discussion on the AI art in Late Night With the Devil boiled down to "it's not ideal but it's a low-budget movie and it's such a small part of the film so whatever."
>art students use their eyes to look at existing works >"wow that one is cool, nice textures" >"that one is cool too, i like the colors" >goes off and makes their own thing, using some of those textures and colors
We don't call this stealing, friend. There's creative input, there's transformative processes.
It scares you that AI can be so human-like, but that doesn't mean you should shut your brain down and transform yourself into something even less than an AI!
someone could easily edit this to be about mike and jay with JC being replaced Chris Stuckmann who is actually breaking out of the youtube cirtic niche and making a real movie while Mikes attempt all fail.
People who dislike AI are unironically Narcisistic and delusional.
So disappointing to see Jay thinking "it steals" and "it's bad because is not a real artist taking artistic libery"
Except a human is capable of creating from nothing. Even being inspired by other things. But a machine is literally incapable of creating anything that isn't directly taken from an existing source.
No one has ever had an original creative thought. Every creation is just stealing two things and smashing them together. Creativity doesn't exist, its a trick, conjured by stealing from enough things to muddy the source that it seems original. AI is no different.
Every last story or artwork has a lineage of theft going back to pre-history.
All that's perpendicular to the real homosexualry, that is ai artists selling what the program made for real money when anyone with the same or similar prompt could do what they did.
You can't control the lighting, color schemes, props, costume designs, or a thousand other variables. You can only get so specific in a prompt and the models are only trained with so many images.
Like the SORA "airhead" video. They had to manually put the balloon onto people's bodies in most shots because their dataset didn't have any headless people in it. They also had a shit ton of problems getting any shots coherent enough to fit their extremely vague narrative. It's just random shots with a narrator to tie them together.
There's a reason you can spot an AI image with ease. They all look the fricking same.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>You can't control the lighting, color schemes, props, costume designs
You can literally control all of these things if you specify it in the prompt. >There's a reason you can spot an Al image with ease. They all look the fricking same.
They're already reaching a point where they're becoming indistinguishable from real life and real "art".
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>You can literally control all of these things if you specify it in the prompt.
No, you fricking can't. You can't change the degree of the lightsource at fricking all or how many lights there are. You're fricking full of shit.
And good luck getting the actual costume you want. You'll get something vague to what you're looking for but it won't be exact. Like changing a studded collar on a goth girl. There are a million designs out there and the AI can't tell the difference between them. >indistinguishable from real life and real "art".
AI art sticks out like a sore thumb. I can instantly tell if something is AI or not.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>AI art sticks out like a sore thumb. I can instantly tell if something is Al or not.
Sureeee. Just like these people could
Just reminds me of this
right?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>I can instantly tell if something is AI or not.
the moronic jeets can't, however
nowadays you can't even look up an actress on google to jack off anymore, 50% of the results is moronic ai art by these subhumans
sites like pixiv actively use this shit to dime you by having you PAY not to see ai art because they realize what obnoxious spam cancer it is
it's fricking killing the internet
thats just the one they let plebs use
internally they can turn off all the gay filters and censors
they are very well aware that the censorship hampers its effectiveness
theres are already papers to the effect
and the efficiency and competitiveness of open-source models also attests
yeah i'm sure all the rule34 frozen art is really gonna lead to world domination
call me when it can fix my pipes and put down tiles better than mexicans, you dumb Black person
Tech worshipping morons like you should jump off a bridge. AI doesn't benfit your life in any way whatsoever, why shill for it for free? It's gay and soulless.
It benefits everybody. Is it provides art, music, it can automate the job instantly for millions of people across the globe in any language for free.
Will a real artist help a kid in somalia making his own movies for free?
Also, hoe fricking ironic to be talking shit about devices on your eletronic device
Also, imagine if a genius kid is born in a shithole country. The kid makes math breaktrhoughs but can't convey his ideas without visual aid. Or great games, buildings, etc.
AI will change the world
> It's gay and soulless
And modern art isn't? What's the last thing to come from Hollywood or any other American "artistic" industry that couldn't be described as gay and soulless?
>the 1% of nepo babies who get millions of free money to pretend to be artists and do drugs and frick b***hes in Parisian galleries are bad therefore actual people who have to work for a living (99% of artists who have produced literally everything you see around you) are also bad
Also the funniest shit is that movie posters have been using stock photos for at least the past decade with photoshopped faces onto one another sometimes an actors face may be shopped onto someone else's body which they've been doing for decades. AI is just the natural evolution and will continue even past that
>Also the funniest shit is that movie posters have been using stock photos for at least the past decade with photoshopped faces onto one another sometimes an actors face
Yeah and are they somehow good? Have the photos been stolen? Can you still sell stock photos? moron.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I didn't say they were good and do you honestly believe every single stock image is bought through proper legal channels, you're not some NFT guy are you
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>do you honestly believe every single stock image is bought through proper legal channels
Yes, if you're working for a legitimate magazine you even get access to their libraries.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Which will just evolve naturally with AI that's why unions have already struck deals with it because they understand that it's the next evolution for art slop. Even A24 the horrorslop you dick sucking redditors like have started using AI in their script and movie posters
You're just moronic because you think you're in the age where you "notice" something when it's been happening for decades
Yes, those people are also bad. The vast majority of what those 99% pump out is just "what if existing IP was female/black/gay/transgender", not really too different from what you say AI does when you think about it. Go spend a couple of hours on twitter and see what most artists are actually like. They are insufferable. Artists with actual talent will still be able to thrive in a world with AI.
Theres been that whole reveal of the AI masterpiece "airhead" being done mostly manually while having issues with the AI shitting out incoherent videos incapable of following the narrative.
Ah too bad way harder to just replace humanity than you thought 🙁
They all had to just accept that we are doing to humans what Quentin Tarantino was doing to movies and quit their jobs :~~*(
>bad human art is good because it's impressionistic >good ai art is bad because it's not impressionistic
is this what film school teaches you?
6:00 >(escape from new york poster being compared with AI) It's a beautiful painting and is made to provoke emotions.
omg they are speaking truths but they don't maybe have the best vocabulary because only a loser gets an art history degree 🙁 IM mad
So what about this video is supposed to be fake? It's clearly an editing mistake where they were trying to mask something distracting out, but it's not fake. They're all there on the couch. They're all discussing the video they're watching. You keep posting this over and over again and it's just kind of sad that you seem to think you're making some sort of point.
>be me >Make a movie about The creation of the automobile >takes place in 1700 or something >The mustache twirling villain says: >"pff, this is ridiculous! Just use a horse!" >the crowd starts to agree: >"It needs to be manufactured and it needs gas to work!! It will never replace horses!" >main character replies >"...but guys, they said the same thing about the printing press!" >villain replies: >"history will prove me right!" >audience laughs > I go to Cinemaphile >there's actual cartoon characters out there who don't realize how goofy they truly are.
the AI discourse is so incredibly boring, it's just different flavors of nerds arguing about something they can't even stop, the genie is already out of the bottle, AI for better or for worse is here to stay and it's only going to get more and more prominent in our daily life's and anyone who rejects it will be left behind
>if you don't let AI replace you as an artist >let
this implies you even have a choice in the matter
>AI for better or for worse is here to stay and it's only going to get more and more prominent in our daily life's and anyone who rejects it will be left behind
is that the same thing you said about VR when peddling your latest tech scam fad? how about 3D televisions? lmao
>is that the same thing you said about VR when peddling your latest tech scam fad? how about 3D televisions?
if it's just a novelty then why are so many people rallying against it? just let the fad pass and fall into obscurity, no?
>AI for better or for worse is here to stay and it's only going to get more and more prominent in our daily life's and anyone who rejects it will be left behind
is that the same thing you said about VR when peddling your latest tech scam fad? how about 3D televisions? lmao
But we're at most 10 years away from an AI that will be able replace most if not all white collar work.
And at the same time, probably integrated with robots to kill blue collar.
Nobody gives a FRICK about whether or not you worhtless gays make money on stupid fricking drawings.
>i-it's just a fad, chud.
Now this is a true cope.
VR and 3D TVs had high points of entry that 99% of people couldn't afford and the content was limited. AI is something everyone has access to for free and has much wider application. It's already becoming incredibly common in every workplace as an assistant.
>if you don't let AI replace you as an artist >let
this implies you even have a choice in the matter
[...] >is that the same thing you said about VR when peddling your latest tech scam fad? how about 3D televisions?
if it's just a novelty then why are so many people rallying against it? just let the fad pass and fall into obscurity, no?
VR and 3D TVs had high points of entry that 99% of people couldn't afford and the content was limited. AI is something everyone has access to for free and has much wider application. It's already becoming incredibly common in every workplace as an assistant.
No it won't. Cellphones to smartphones was 25 years basic smartphones- palm pilots and blackberry was less than 20. They are baby dripping disruptive technology
Worst part about RLM is when the fat guy gives his take on how a movie should did something, like at 10:30 in this video and he start saying "the camera should done this..".
>Why do they bother to review movies after they’ve left theaters?
You're not going to believe this, anon, but RLM got famous for reviewing a movie that came out 15 years earlier
Yeah but it seems odd to have a review show for new releases like this and not at least TRY to release the review when it could actually help the movie they seem to like
They barely discussed the film and spent 30 minutes saying “I would’ve filmed it like this and the way it was shot and edited took me out of it but I liked it” over and over again. What the frick happened to these hack frauds? They’re just phoning it in for that YouTube check?
That has been the stand Half in the Bag routine since 2020. >It was okay I guess, here's how I would've done the movie instead. I'm falling asleep Jay can we just wrap it up already
mike has gone from being the best part of RLM to being dreadful
he's so low energy >yeah man i don't care about anything anymore, i can barely find the willpower to make this movie stream, frick going to the cinema, frick movies
wow thanks mike i'm so excited!
i hope against hope that god grants me a miracle and makes chris stuckmann's shitty movie half-decent because that would break these old gays
He is the weak link I've realized, he's always just out of it and admits to barely watching movies anymore. He's fine with other stuff like re:View and trivia videos because he actually cares about those movies but there's no point in watching Half in the Bag most of the time now
Mike Stoklasa only does RLM because the paypiggies give him 60K. Mike would rather be sucking off Nepo babies or doing VA work. He has completely checked out.
surely it's an ethical question
it's either ethical to use A.I art or unethical. You can't just say a film company gets a pass to use it because they're small that doesn't make sense.
>You can't just say a film company gets a pass to use it because they're small that doesn't make sense.
It makes complete sense.
I understand small, indy film makers cutting corners to save on expenses. But when a movie company spends $300m making and marketing a movie, and expects to gross $500m+, then I don't think they should be using the cheap AI option
No it doesn't. So it's only unethical if you can't afford it? Either it's wrong and shouldn't be done or it's fair game.
If you're fine with a small Indy studio acting unethically to save on expenses I would ask to what end. Would you risk your crews health by shooting extremely long hours? Or your actors safety?
You're struggling to understand because you have ridiculous black and white thinking and are unable to comprehend nuance and circumstance
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
what's the nuance? a small indy studio partakes in unethical practices because the require doing so to make their movie. It's part of the sausage making of creating a film.
A large studio uses A.I art because it's much faster easier and cheaper. It's part of the sausage making of being a large company making a film.
what's the nuance? a small indy studio partakes in unethical practices because the require doing so to make their movie. It's part of the sausage making of creating a film.
A large studio uses A.I art because it's much faster easier and cheaper. It's part of the sausage making of being a large company making a film.
>why should a big movie studio be banned from using A.I generated art but a small studio should be allowed to?
They should both be banned, what are you on about?
I'm referring to what Jay said in the review. He said he understands if small companies do it. You can't regulate A.I art. As another anon said the genie is out of the bottle.
Jay can only cum when he chokes a woman within an inch of her life. He accidentally killed a prostitute in 2020 this way, but he got away with it because the police was too busy with the coofdemic and the BLM chaos and failed to gather the necessary evidences to prosecute.
it drives me nuts when Mike starts talking about story and narrative especially when he starts creating or fixing one. I think he has a very basic understanding of narrative and it comes across as very clumsy.
he's terrible at it too
i watch some boomer on youtube who claims he was once a tv executive and his feedback on stuff is far more concise and reasonable than anything mike's ever said
not to mention, he's like 60-70 and fivefold more lucid than Mr. Mike over here
WAKE UP MIKE
WAKE UUUUUUUUUUP
>Literally 3 minutes talkin about the actual movie >The rest is their ""Hilarious"" ongoing storyline, AI autism or boring shit about the technical aspect of recording found footage stuff
Reminder that anti-AI gays are all about supporting small artists. But according to them if you're a broke artist trying to make do with tools that are available, you don't deserve to get any work.
Not arguing if it is or isn't. But there are absolutely ways that you can use AI as a tool within someone's art.
Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI voices is what the anti gays do. Same with them going after LNWTD (a low budget indie film) using 5 seconds of AI imagery. They don't actually care about small artists.
>Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI
What the frick talent are they showing? If I go and buy a box of chocolates and tell people I designed the cover am I showing my talent? LMFAO moron?
>came up with the idea of selling chocolates in a box >I paid a cook to do the chocolates >I pay a handyman to box them >I pay designer to come with with the brand >I shouldn't make any money because others made all the work
Communism
>Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI voices is what the anti gays do.
when did this happen? I'm not trying to be cheeky, genuinely wondering as to avoid it myself with my own projects. I'm not going to hire a fricking VA for some generic battle grunts and yelps for characters, and SFX voice packs cost too much and sound gay
What I'm referencing is a Scooby Doo stop motion fan film that got a ton of shit from anti AI gays for using AI voices. The guy was just trying to show off his talents and gather enough Patreon money so he could hire actual voice actors and work on more projects. But they all attacked him and even got voice actress Grey DeLisle involved who tried to get him blacklisted.
Seeing how they reacted to that and LNWTD has made me hate these homosexuals with a passion.
I don't like AI, but amateur voice actors are the biggest gays when it comes to opposing AI. If anyone deserves to be replaced it's them. They have literally nothing outside doing impressions and they want to treated like gods because of it.
They're not just gays in the AI sphere as well.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not starving to death >treated like gods
Frick off Sanjeeshmaputra
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
They WANT to be treated like gods.
And voice actors have been stealing art longer than AI, and I don't mean the gay "inspiration is stealing" logic. I mean they'll take someone's comic without permission, read out the speech bubbles and monetize it for themselves.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>And voice actors have been stealing art longer than AI, and I don't mean the gay "inspiration is stealing" logic. I mean they'll take someone's comic without permission, read out the speech bubbles and monetize it for themselves. >LE MUH WHATABOUTISM
Frick off Rabbisraeli Trandragore, go mass report every single one of their videos on Youtube or wherever and post results if you're really bothered by that.
yea that shit was unwarranted. even me being extremely anti AI. this guy let everyone know it was AI and would eventually get proper VA once he had the money. I dont understand why he got so much backlash. you dont get people on your side if you attack them. that just makes it worse for your cause.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yeah when people who want to kill you start death camps you just want to go along with it and be nice to them maybe they'll kill you last?
>Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI voices is what the anti gays do.
when did this happen? I'm not trying to be cheeky, genuinely wondering as to avoid it myself with my own projects. I'm not going to hire a fricking VA for some generic battle grunts and yelps for characters, and SFX voice packs cost too much and sound gay
They all listen to music made with samples but are too young to remember that being almost equally controversial. But what else would you expect from people who draw furry porn for a living?
Mike Stoklasa desperately wants to be israeli and be accepted by the israelites in Hollywood. He thinks being a self-hating White liberal will make the israelites accept him as one of them.
The only thing that bothers me about AI art, is that I wasn't the one who invented it.
Making millions seethe. Get rid of these gays and my creation changes the world.
The israelites pay them to not shit on mainstream slop anymore. At worst they'll say something was just okay, but they don't rip apart movies like they used to because they want those shekels to keep coming in.
Or they just actively avoid bothering with movies they know they're not going to like because it's boring for them to repeat the same complaints over and over after a decade of doing this.
Except that isn't it. They don't want to lose what nebulous connection they have to the entertainment industry now AND they're terrified of being cancelled or losing their israelitetube revenue for wrongthink. They still shit on bad movies, but they're either old or indie-slop. They refuse to shit on NEW mainstream movies for the reasons I gave.
>"Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It's Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don't grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn't conscious of it. And, superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call minorities."
- Joseph Sobran
Buy an ad Mike
Where were you homosexuals during fishtank?
frick off homosexual
It's tv full of boomers? Who the hell likes red letter media? The drinker, nerdotic or mauler are far better than these guys who look like they gave up on life
redditor
I've fallen off Drinker and Nerd because I feel like politics and emotion influence their judgements a little too much, but I do still like Mauler. If he says something has a solid narrative I've found it's usually worth my time, though it's not a guarantee I'll watch.
>media illiterate chud grifters
The threads have existed long, long before your newbie ass came around.
QRD?
RLM finally got around to reviewing some R*ddit shit that everybody lost interest in three weeks ago.
Mike > Jack > Rich > Culkin > Colin > rotting dogshit > Jay > pozzed dysentery > Bald Fattie
>AIDSmoby that high
Get fricked, Mr. Peepee Poopoo. Nobody likes you.
Jack is the most based guy in the group besides Mike.
I would argue that he's better than Mike, to be honest.
>jack
He's literally wrong about everything.
a few months ago jack was playing elden ring on a second wind stream and he absolutely tore into kevin smith. it was the most based shit i’ve ever seen in my life.
imagine not liking jay
>jay struggling to understand why predator 2 takes place in the mid 90s
lol lmao
My ranks are: Mike > Jim > Colin > Rich > Culkin > Tim drunk > Jack drunk > Tim > Jay > Fat Bald > Jack > Mike's GF > Comic Book Guy > Random Guest > Specifically Patton Oswald was the worst one ever
Truthfully most are funny on their own but I think the rankings are more by who has more comedic chemistry with more people and willingness to push the comedic boundaries. Patton Oswalt was not at all funny when he went on.
Didn't even mention the GOAT: Tim
Trash list and you're gay.
I refuse to see this movie on principle because of the AI title cards
THEY ARE WEARING THE WRONG COLOR SHIRRRRRRRRRTS NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MY FRICKING AUTISMMMMMMMMMMMMM AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGH
>he doesn't know the lore
Do they mention this movie is AI generated or do they ignore it for the implications it gives towards Space Cop?
They don't criticise things anymore because it messes with their ad revenue.
Are the rumors about Mike true bros?
Yes. He's got 6 more months, tops.
Yes, Michelle is much happier now
Yes. Mike Stoklasa is transitioning to Michelle Stoklasa.
I'll check it out in a few months, and I'll download it so it gets no views.
Problem? You're not a marketer or something?
how old are you gays?
If you're on 4chins and you're not roughly the same age as moot(+/- 5years) then you are a newbie and should either return to reddit or become an hero.
Imagine being an old frick and proud of wasting decades here lmao
kys
You got big plans for the future Mr. Superstar??
>moot
Who? That guy who owned the site for less than half the time it's been around?
>6 years difference
Frick, ngtmi boys. Also, who?
bros... mike isn't looking good
at this point it's months until he dies of his alcoholism
Jesus.
When did he get so fat?
he gains 5 pounds every video
do people in the midwest not learn that beer is liquid bread like us big city folk? you have dinner or beer, not dinner and beer
DA JABBA WANGA
Consuming beer and Cheetos while watching TNG for the 8000th time.
how long does he have before he gets a Trump-vegana in his neck?
It's like poetry, it rhymes.
mike is terrified of going outside
>jay mentions how you get the dumbest people on twitter if you mention AI
>within 2 minutes he says the most stereotypical dumbest thing about AI, ie. that it steals stuff from other sources
Allllllllrighty!
What did you expect from a humanities-brained xoomer?
I expect people with no technical knowledge (and a wide audience, like having a youtube channel with 1.5million subscribers) to have some self-preservation and shut their damn mouth.
You expect wrong
2 minutes he says the most stereotypical dumbest thing about AI, ie. that it steals stuff from other sources
that's...literally what AI does. That is objectively what it does.
If you don't know what you're talking about
then dont talk about it with the pretense of confidence
So it's Digital Quentin Tarantino and should be celebrated, right?
INB4 "But QT is sentient!"
No.
>INB4 "But QT is sentient!"
>No.
It's hard to have a debate with someone like you that's being willfully moronic
Congrats moron you made me laugh.
there's no stealing, it's literally just math
Literally every artist ever is a "thief" going by your moron logic. You learn from seeing.
That's not how human brains work. They're not directly inputting pixels directly from specific sources in specific quantities.
good thing thats not how ai works either...
have a nice day ai Black person, stop derailing the thread
youre the dumb Black person that doesnt know how ai works, and is getting mad about it
lmao, i'm not the anon you were responding to, you stupid Black person
take your fricking moronic ai spam and post on twitter with the rest of the shitjeets no one cares
AI was used in the movie. RLM talked about that for like 10 minutes.
What else do you expect people to discuss relating to the video?
They talked about it for barely a minute
6:00
>(escape from New York poster being compared with AI) It's a beautiful painting and is made to provoke emotions.
They're comparing the Civil War AI posters with the Escape From New York poster. Their discussion on the AI art in Late Night With the Devil boiled down to "it's not ideal but it's a low-budget movie and it's such a small part of the film so whatever."
wrong.
>art students use their eyes to look at existing works
>"wow that one is cool, nice textures"
>"that one is cool too, i like the colors"
>goes off and makes their own thing, using some of those textures and colors
We don't call this stealing, friend. There's creative input, there's transformative processes.
It scares you that AI can be so human-like, but that doesn't mean you should shut your brain down and transform yourself into something even less than an AI!
No one is celebrating that kind of copying either.
>heh, get ready to get replaced by ai and robots republicans
>NOOOO NOT THOSE JOBS NOOOOOOOO
Drove me nuts when he opened every other video saying zoomers don't want sex in movies.
Buy an ad homosexual
>unrelated brainlet AI takes
uhhhhhh
>animated episode never broke 275k views
LOL
Mike seriously never learns.
someone could easily edit this to be about mike and jay with JC being replaced Chris Stuckmann who is actually breaking out of the youtube cirtic niche and making a real movie while Mikes attempt all fail.
hi chris.
>18 seconds ago
Thanks Mike!
>MFW it's up!
LET'S FRICKING GO!
Watched LNWTD last night and liked it, but seemed like the screenwriter ran out of ideas at the end and shit his pants.
>30 minutes of ranting that it was not a "real" found footage movie
>zero interesting thoughts
holy frick they fell off
People who dislike AI are unironically Narcisistic and delusional.
So disappointing to see Jay thinking "it steals" and "it's bad because is not a real artist taking artistic libery"
Where does AI get it's source material to draw from?
The same way a real artist does. By using "Inspiration and references" nobody creates from nothing
Please dtop replying
Except a human is capable of creating from nothing. Even being inspired by other things. But a machine is literally incapable of creating anything that isn't directly taken from an existing source.
I promise you, people will look back in history and laugh at you I PROMISE YOU
>You're on the wrong side of history!
OK, libtard.
No one has ever had an original creative thought. Every creation is just stealing two things and smashing them together. Creativity doesn't exist, its a trick, conjured by stealing from enough things to muddy the source that it seems original. AI is no different.
Every last story or artwork has a lineage of theft going back to pre-history.
What did cavemen steal to make their cave paintings? The light reflected from the buffalo?
Humans didn’t create buffalos, anon.
Well if all art is stolen then who did the first artist steal from?
Gods creation
No. An AI directly steals images. You can cope with semantics all you want
>human brain: "its okay to steal if you don't remember where you stole it from!"
>"Inspiration and references"
lol. lmao.
there is nothing new under the sun
AIDS ridden trans men breastfeeding is pretty new thoubeit
am i stealing your content right now by reading your post. am i stealing your fricking thoughts!?
>So disappointing
is it though? Jay always has the most basic b***h twitter takes
I don't care if AI steals from other artists, I care that it looks like garbage and lacks soul.
Just reminds me of this
>morons on a moron board
Oh no. Anyway.
All that's perpendicular to the real homosexualry, that is ai artists selling what the program made for real money when anyone with the same or similar prompt could do what they did.
that's how art always works, whether it's a paint brush or an ai prompt
You unironically think typing a prompt is the same as an actual painting?
AI gives you very little control. A person can give you exactly what you want while an AI prompt will just get you in the ballpark at best.
AI gives you tremendous control, you just have to know how to use it, also we've barely begun scratching the surface of what it can do
>AI gives you tremendous control,
kek
You actually believe this don't you.
You can't control the lighting, color schemes, props, costume designs, or a thousand other variables. You can only get so specific in a prompt and the models are only trained with so many images.
Like the SORA "airhead" video. They had to manually put the balloon onto people's bodies in most shots because their dataset didn't have any headless people in it. They also had a shit ton of problems getting any shots coherent enough to fit their extremely vague narrative. It's just random shots with a narrator to tie them together.
There's a reason you can spot an AI image with ease. They all look the fricking same.
>You can't control the lighting, color schemes, props, costume designs
You can literally control all of these things if you specify it in the prompt.
>There's a reason you can spot an Al image with ease. They all look the fricking same.
They're already reaching a point where they're becoming indistinguishable from real life and real "art".
>You can literally control all of these things if you specify it in the prompt.
No, you fricking can't. You can't change the degree of the lightsource at fricking all or how many lights there are. You're fricking full of shit.
And good luck getting the actual costume you want. You'll get something vague to what you're looking for but it won't be exact. Like changing a studded collar on a goth girl. There are a million designs out there and the AI can't tell the difference between them.
>indistinguishable from real life and real "art".
AI art sticks out like a sore thumb. I can instantly tell if something is AI or not.
>AI art sticks out like a sore thumb. I can instantly tell if something is Al or not.
Sureeee. Just like these people could
right?
>I can instantly tell if something is AI or not.
the moronic jeets can't, however
nowadays you can't even look up an actress on google to jack off anymore, 50% of the results is moronic ai art by these subhumans
sites like pixiv actively use this shit to dime you by having you PAY not to see ai art because they realize what obnoxious spam cancer it is
it's fricking killing the internet
I can agree with that.
If more people start embracing AI and stop this anti-AI, then less people will be tricked
ai is theft and people who make money from it should go to prison for breaking copyright, simple as
they would rather suspend copyright law than cripple ai progress
whoever is first to invent an AI capable of obsoleting human labor becomes permanent ruler of earth
theyre not going to let China have free reign over that
Lol they're already constantly crippling ai progress to make sure it gives you safe acceptable answers
thats just the one they let plebs use
internally they can turn off all the gay filters and censors
they are very well aware that the censorship hampers its effectiveness
theres are already papers to the effect
and the efficiency and competitiveness of open-source models also attests
yeah i'm sure all the rule34 frozen art is really gonna lead to world domination
call me when it can fix my pipes and put down tiles better than mexicans, you dumb Black person
>People who dislike AI are unironically Narcisistic and delusional.
AI can be used by anybody genius.
It's funny because "real artist" require money AI is basically free
Tech worshipping morons like you should jump off a bridge. AI doesn't benfit your life in any way whatsoever, why shill for it for free? It's gay and soulless.
It benefits everybody. Is it provides art, music, it can automate the job instantly for millions of people across the globe in any language for free.
Will a real artist help a kid in somalia making his own movies for free?
Also, hoe fricking ironic to be talking shit about devices on your eletronic device
Also, imagine if a genius kid is born in a shithole country. The kid makes math breaktrhoughs but can't convey his ideas without visual aid. Or great games, buildings, etc.
AI will change the world
>AI will change the world
isn't there some street you need to shit in rajneesh?
I'm literally printing this to laugh at you later. Remember this
sure sure
just remember, feces and urine go in a toilet bowl, not the street
and after you're done, you flush, you don't eat it
lol
> It's gay and soulless
And modern art isn't? What's the last thing to come from Hollywood or any other American "artistic" industry that couldn't be described as gay and soulless?
>the 1% of nepo babies who get millions of free money to pretend to be artists and do drugs and frick b***hes in Parisian galleries are bad therefore actual people who have to work for a living (99% of artists who have produced literally everything you see around you) are also bad
You didn't even prove him wrong lol
Also the funniest shit is that movie posters have been using stock photos for at least the past decade with photoshopped faces onto one another sometimes an actors face may be shopped onto someone else's body which they've been doing for decades. AI is just the natural evolution and will continue even past that
>Also the funniest shit is that movie posters have been using stock photos for at least the past decade with photoshopped faces onto one another sometimes an actors face
Yeah and are they somehow good? Have the photos been stolen? Can you still sell stock photos? moron.
I didn't say they were good and do you honestly believe every single stock image is bought through proper legal channels, you're not some NFT guy are you
>do you honestly believe every single stock image is bought through proper legal channels
Yes, if you're working for a legitimate magazine you even get access to their libraries.
Which will just evolve naturally with AI that's why unions have already struck deals with it because they understand that it's the next evolution for art slop. Even A24 the horrorslop you dick sucking redditors like have started using AI in their script and movie posters
You're just moronic because you think you're in the age where you "notice" something when it's been happening for decades
?
Yes, those people are also bad. The vast majority of what those 99% pump out is just "what if existing IP was female/black/gay/transgender", not really too different from what you say AI does when you think about it. Go spend a couple of hours on twitter and see what most artists are actually like. They are insufferable. Artists with actual talent will still be able to thrive in a world with AI.
>Accelerationists ITT
Gross
>here's that hot movie twink i was telling you about
>they liked it
fricking hacks
how can they like such a blatantly sloppy lazy attempt at found footage/mockumentary
the film completely DROPS it at the end
the movies a fricking MESS
the ai pajeets are going to seethe at rlm forever now
Theres been that whole reveal of the AI masterpiece "airhead" being done mostly manually while having issues with the AI shitting out incoherent videos incapable of following the narrative.
AI gays are the worst.
anti-AI gays are even more insufferable.
>if a film has even 1 second of AI generated content in it WE WILL BOYCOTT!!!
Ah too bad way harder to just replace humanity than you thought 🙁
They all had to just accept that we are doing to humans what Quentin Tarantino was doing to movies and quit their jobs :~~*(
omg they are speaking truths but they don't maybe have the best vocabulary because only a loser gets an art history degree 🙁 IM mad
>it's a Jay thinks he's a better filmmaker episode
So what about this video is supposed to be fake? It's clearly an editing mistake where they were trying to mask something distracting out, but it's not fake. They're all there on the couch. They're all discussing the video they're watching. You keep posting this over and over again and it's just kind of sad that you seem to think you're making some sort of point.
What a hack.
>can't even honestly criticize and dislike the movie without getting lumped into butthurt losers that don't understand ai
>be me
>Make a movie about The creation of the automobile
>takes place in 1700 or something
>The mustache twirling villain says:
>"pff, this is ridiculous! Just use a horse!"
>the crowd starts to agree:
>"It needs to be manufactured and it needs gas to work!! It will never replace horses!"
>main character replies
>"...but guys, they said the same thing about the printing press!"
>villain replies:
>"history will prove me right!"
>audience laughs
> I go to Cinemaphile
>there's actual cartoon characters out there who don't realize how goofy they truly are.
>Turns out the automobile was made from stolen horses.
Horse is better, they’re making cars illegal soon anyway
Nope. Horses fart too much (carbon dioxide) and remind nogs of the evil old times when most people where white.
>0.0001 ESG points have been contributed to your transition fund.
well reptillian CEOs can't mind control my horse to not work if I say something bad about BLM online so I think technology loses again glowie
i will still not watch the movie. buy an ad, both of youse
there's an entire genre called non-fiction that literally just steals shit from real life
Wow these chuds are fricking anti-AI now? What's next, unironical Drumpf support?
Photography is stealing
the AI discourse is so incredibly boring, it's just different flavors of nerds arguing about something they can't even stop, the genie is already out of the bottle, AI for better or for worse is here to stay and it's only going to get more and more prominent in our daily life's and anyone who rejects it will be left behind
Exactly, if you don't let AI replace you as an artist, you'll be replaced by AI as an artist.
>if you don't let AI replace you as an artist
>let
this implies you even have a choice in the matter
>is that the same thing you said about VR when peddling your latest tech scam fad? how about 3D televisions?
if it's just a novelty then why are so many people rallying against it? just let the fad pass and fall into obscurity, no?
>AI for better or for worse is here to stay and it's only going to get more and more prominent in our daily life's and anyone who rejects it will be left behind
is that the same thing you said about VR when peddling your latest tech scam fad? how about 3D televisions? lmao
I dunno if youre a troll or not.
But we're at most 10 years away from an AI that will be able replace most if not all white collar work.
And at the same time, probably integrated with robots to kill blue collar.
Nobody gives a FRICK about whether or not you worhtless gays make money on stupid fricking drawings.
sure thing, rajeesh.
>you're a pajeet if you disagree with me
Nope. I just have common sense.
What are you making money from then?
I work in ai
i am working myself out of a job
>i-it's just a fad, chud.
Now this is a true cope.
VR and 3D TVs had high points of entry that 99% of people couldn't afford and the content was limited. AI is something everyone has access to for free and has much wider application. It's already becoming incredibly common in every workplace as an assistant.
>the genie is already out of the bottle
if i had a dollar for every time some guy spews that shit i would be the next elon.
it isnt like you can regulate and/or put laws onto it, right?
>1983
>computers will never win against humans in chess
>2013
>computers are used to regulate humans
Like poetry, it rhymes
No one doubts that AI will replace tons of jobs. It's just going to take unethical methods to do it and decades of development.
Just wait until we have AGI and then everyone is fricked. It's going to be a long time because we know so little about the mind and consciousness.
No it won't. Cellphones to smartphones was 25 years basic smartphones- palm pilots and blackberry was less than 20. They are baby dripping disruptive technology
FAT
did he and ginger break up? or did she just get creeped out by internet pervs and step back?
I'm happy people can still enjoy RLM. Good for you all.
more like Late night with Reddit, in that it's the kind of meme movie that's taylor-made for reddit
>10 minutes spent seething about AI art
They're cooked
Is there RLM AI already?
Worst part about RLM is when the fat guy gives his take on how a movie should did something, like at 10:30 in this video and he start saying "the camera should done this..".
>how a movie should did something
>bad human art is good because it's impressionistic
>good ai art is bad because it's not impressionistic
is this what film school teaches you?
I agree with what they said, the AI was going for a realistic look and it failed.
If it was done in a expressionistic style that would work
Why do they bother to review movies after they’ve left theaters? I thought they’d want to show support for a low budget movie like this
>Why do they bother to review movies after they’ve left theaters?
You're not going to believe this, anon, but RLM got famous for reviewing a movie that came out 15 years earlier
Yeah but it seems odd to have a review show for new releases like this and not at least TRY to release the review when it could actually help the movie they seem to like
Mike Stoklasa has agoraphobia and doesn’t want to go to theaters.
Did anyone catch Jay briefly shitting on Skinamarink? Made me gain a bit more respect for him. That movie is absolute dog shit.
filtered
>artificially grainy shots of the corners of ceilings is true cinema
it feels authentic
more authentic than a girl's head splitting open and bad cgi popping up
you disagree? what did you think of frogman?
They barely discussed the film and spent 30 minutes saying “I would’ve filmed it like this and the way it was shot and edited took me out of it but I liked it” over and over again. What the frick happened to these hack frauds? They’re just phoning it in for that YouTube check?
To be fair there isn't much to talk about. It's a very simple film.
That has been the stand Half in the Bag routine since 2020.
>It was okay I guess, here's how I would've done the movie instead. I'm falling asleep Jay can we just wrap it up already
mike has gone from being the best part of RLM to being dreadful
he's so low energy
>yeah man i don't care about anything anymore, i can barely find the willpower to make this movie stream, frick going to the cinema, frick movies
wow thanks mike i'm so excited!
i hope against hope that god grants me a miracle and makes chris stuckmann's shitty movie half-decent because that would break these old gays
He is the weak link I've realized, he's always just out of it and admits to barely watching movies anymore. He's fine with other stuff like re:View and trivia videos because he actually cares about those movies but there's no point in watching Half in the Bag most of the time now
i feel maybe he stopped drinking because whenever he gets drunk as frick on botw it can still bring laughs
>i don't care about anything anymore, i can barely find the willpower to make this movie stream, frick going to the cinema, frick movies
BASED
Don’t forget when Mike Stoklasa pulls out a paper and starts rambling for thrifty minutes.
Mike Stoklasa only does RLM because the paypiggies give him 60K. Mike would rather be sucking off Nepo babies or doing VA work. He has completely checked out.
>they barely discussed the film and spent 30 minutes discussing the film
please elaborate
>785 days without reviewing The Batman
The silence is deafening.
EPIC! UPVOTE!
>spends half the "review" complaining about AI
>spends the other half complaining about how they would have made the movie
This was not a review.
it's not a review show
Welcome to your first RLM video.
the movie went to shit when the girl became super shock. And wtf was the ending?
the movie must suck ass because i only watched like 7 minutes of the video and all they did was talk about AI art
I just hope AI waifus will replace roasties so I don't have to deal with Tinder, paying for dates and roasts cheating with Chad
My friends are back
I have no friends
>he hasn’t upgraded to the $25/mo Friendship Tier on RLM’s Patreon yet
why should a big movie studio be banned from using A.I generated art but a small studio should be allowed to?
the big movie studio doesn't owe artists any handouts and if the art was very important to the movie they would hire a talented artists anyway.
The same reason we give small companies tax breaks and support that we don't give to major corporations.
Think it through
small businesses add value to the world
small artists do not
Why have you entirely changed the debate from small businesses to small artists? You are legit Indian aren't you?
>Why have you entirely changed the debate from small businesses to small artists?
Why did you change the "debate" from whether or not companies ought to use ai art? to a discussion of tax incentives for small businesses?
surely it's an ethical question
it's either ethical to use A.I art or unethical. You can't just say a film company gets a pass to use it because they're small that doesn't make sense.
>You can't just say a film company gets a pass to use it because they're small that doesn't make sense.
It makes complete sense.
I understand small, indy film makers cutting corners to save on expenses. But when a movie company spends $300m making and marketing a movie, and expects to gross $500m+, then I don't think they should be using the cheap AI option
No it doesn't. So it's only unethical if you can't afford it? Either it's wrong and shouldn't be done or it's fair game.
If you're fine with a small Indy studio acting unethically to save on expenses I would ask to what end. Would you risk your crews health by shooting extremely long hours? Or your actors safety?
You're struggling to understand because you have ridiculous black and white thinking and are unable to comprehend nuance and circumstance
what's the nuance? a small indy studio partakes in unethical practices because the require doing so to make their movie. It's part of the sausage making of creating a film.
A large studio uses A.I art because it's much faster easier and cheaper. It's part of the sausage making of being a large company making a film.
>why should a big movie studio be banned from using A.I generated art but a small studio should be allowed to?
They should both be banned, what are you on about?
I'm referring to what Jay said in the review. He said he understands if small companies do it. You can't regulate A.I art. As another anon said the genie is out of the bottle.
I don't care about what some moron said?
technology can't be regulated
Yeah that's why Coke still has coke in it right?
can you go and buy cocaine?
No, can you? Are you in some third world shithole?
1.Then why are you in the RLM thread?
2. Then why are you still speaking
Who said "banned"?
good point. why should they be criticized
Considering how many posters on Cinemaphile went full moron with the ending I wonder if Hack Fraud Media got it right
Jay can only cum when he chokes a woman within an inch of her life. He accidentally killed a prostitute in 2020 this way, but he got away with it because the police was too busy with the coofdemic and the BLM chaos and failed to gather the necessary evidences to prosecute.
it drives me nuts when Mike starts talking about story and narrative especially when he starts creating or fixing one. I think he has a very basic understanding of narrative and it comes across as very clumsy.
he's terrible at it too
i watch some boomer on youtube who claims he was once a tv executive and his feedback on stuff is far more concise and reasonable than anything mike's ever said
not to mention, he's like 60-70 and fivefold more lucid than Mr. Mike over here
WAKE UP MIKE
WAKE UUUUUUUUUUP
>Literally 3 minutes talkin about the actual movie
>The rest is their ""Hilarious"" ongoing storyline, AI autism or boring shit about the technical aspect of recording found footage stuff
They need an editor
bimmy won
rlm lost
Wait what? He was in AVGN movie?
>30 minutes of umm achshually it wouldn't look like this if filmed in the 70s
What a waste of my time. Don't think they even discuss the acting or characters
No. Mike is too sleepy for that.
Reminder that anti-AI gays are all about supporting small artists. But according to them if you're a broke artist trying to make do with tools that are available, you don't deserve to get any work.
Typing "make a picture of a swan and a boat on a lake" isn't art
Yet the product of typing that into AI is. How interesting.
Not arguing if it is or isn't. But there are absolutely ways that you can use AI as a tool within someone's art.
Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI voices is what the anti gays do. Same with them going after LNWTD (a low budget indie film) using 5 seconds of AI imagery. They don't actually care about small artists.
>Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI
What the frick talent are they showing? If I go and buy a box of chocolates and tell people I designed the cover am I showing my talent? LMFAO moron?
>came up with the idea of selling chocolates in a box
>I paid a cook to do the chocolates
>I pay a handyman to box them
>I pay designer to come with with the brand
>I shouldn't make any money because others made all the work
Communism
Who said anything about that?
What did you said then?
What I'm referencing is a Scooby Doo stop motion fan film that got a ton of shit from anti AI gays for using AI voices. The guy was just trying to show off his talents and gather enough Patreon money so he could hire actual voice actors and work on more projects. But they all attacked him and even got voice actress Grey DeLisle involved who tried to get him blacklisted.
Seeing how they reacted to that and LNWTD has made me hate these homosexuals with a passion.
Why is this problematic to you? What if it was voice actors showcasing their talents and the animation was AI? How much would you seethe then loser?
I wouldn't be seething at all if it's meant to get their names out there. Weak attempt at a "gotcha" moment.
>Why is this problematic to you? What if it was voice actors showcasing their talents and the animation was AI? How much would you seethe then loser?
I don't like AI, but amateur voice actors are the biggest gays when it comes to opposing AI. If anyone deserves to be replaced it's them. They have literally nothing outside doing impressions and they want to treated like gods because of it.
They're not just gays in the AI sphere as well.
>not starving to death
>treated like gods
Frick off Sanjeeshmaputra
They WANT to be treated like gods.
And voice actors have been stealing art longer than AI, and I don't mean the gay "inspiration is stealing" logic. I mean they'll take someone's comic without permission, read out the speech bubbles and monetize it for themselves.
>And voice actors have been stealing art longer than AI, and I don't mean the gay "inspiration is stealing" logic. I mean they'll take someone's comic without permission, read out the speech bubbles and monetize it for themselves.
>LE MUH WHATABOUTISM
Frick off Rabbisraeli Trandragore, go mass report every single one of their videos on Youtube or wherever and post results if you're really bothered by that.
yea that shit was unwarranted. even me being extremely anti AI. this guy let everyone know it was AI and would eventually get proper VA once he had the money. I dont understand why he got so much backlash. you dont get people on your side if you attack them. that just makes it worse for your cause.
Yeah when people who want to kill you start death camps you just want to go along with it and be nice to them maybe they'll kill you last?
This is like a twitter brain rot comment.
Remember shit on the street not on your feet.
>Harassing and getting the industry to blacklist a broke college student showing off their talents because they used some AI voices is what the anti gays do.
when did this happen? I'm not trying to be cheeky, genuinely wondering as to avoid it myself with my own projects. I'm not going to hire a fricking VA for some generic battle grunts and yelps for characters, and SFX voice packs cost too much and sound gay
What kind of projects?
In Cinemaphile some comics are accused of using AI
And some videogame was accused of using AI voice actors
They all listen to music made with samples but are too young to remember that being almost equally controversial. But what else would you expect from people who draw furry porn for a living?
ngl she could be going deeper, this isn't especially impressive
>haha the goys keep burning themselves
what the frick is mikes problem
Mike Stoklasa desperately wants to be israeli and be accepted by the israelites in Hollywood. He thinks being a self-hating White liberal will make the israelites accept him as one of them.
They should have reviewed Hundreds of beavers instead.
The only thing that bothers me about AI art, is that I wasn't the one who invented it.
Making millions seethe. Get rid of these gays and my creation changes the world.
I miss when RLM would review the most recent big dumb movie I'll be honest. especially terrible ones.
The israelites pay them to not shit on mainstream slop anymore. At worst they'll say something was just okay, but they don't rip apart movies like they used to because they want those shekels to keep coming in.
Or they just actively avoid bothering with movies they know they're not going to like because it's boring for them to repeat the same complaints over and over after a decade of doing this.
Except that isn't it. They don't want to lose what nebulous connection they have to the entertainment industry now AND they're terrified of being cancelled or losing their israelitetube revenue for wrongthink. They still shit on bad movies, but they're either old or indie-slop. They refuse to shit on NEW mainstream movies for the reasons I gave.
kys
>pay a fricking artist
what did we think of movie
I really liked it. The ending was ehh but all in all good.
remember the time they claimed that they inspired slander man?
It's another
>Jay non stop b***hes about a movie that's right up his alley just because it's popular
And
>Mike spends 20 minutes suggesting reworks that would make the movie ""better""
Episode
Aka every modern episode of Half in the Bag.
When are they gonna review Rebel moon?!?!
jay's criticism are always so hollow when i remember he made space cop
anon's criticism are always so hollow when i remember he made nothing
making nothing is better than space cop
I made your mother pregnant
Just finished watching. Loved every minute of it, the movie i mean
>the movie sucked because I would have put a vhs filter on it
insightful criticism
>Mike is using counterfeit heroin again
It's over
>"AI, create Kino"
>AI creates film with David Dastmalchian as the protagonist
Grim
Only way to save this channel is to livestream a wrestling tournament between all the RLM members, including some of the guest stars
i cant read an entire thread of you guys friend simulating so what did they actually say? did they like it?
holy shit i got through like 20 posts tops you guys are insufferable
now answer me. i'll pretend to be your friend
they liked it and thought it could be better. mike thinks they should've toned down the tropey horror stuff and increase the analogue aesthetic.
Tldr good idea but a liitle too much normalgay appeal. Recommended
The ironing is if it had been made more like those VHS movies it wouldn't have gotten the acclaim that it has and RLM would have never reviewed it.
*carries the movie*
spinoff when?
>they don't understand why an arrogant professional showman would behave so extravagantly
>they didn't realize the character is based on a real person who acted that way in real life
>"Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It's Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don't grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn't conscious of it. And, superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call minorities."
- Joseph Sobran
all of you are fricking moronic
Your mom is moronic. You are what you eat.
>over a decade later
>Cinemaphile still sucking off these homosexual ecelebs
test