Remember to copyright your work so you don't look like a loser who gets walked over by everyone.
>Pic unrelated
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Remember to copyright your work so you don't look like a loser who gets walked over by everyone. >Pic unrelated
???
>Gooseworx
INFLATION?!
Drills, actually. But I can sort of see it in a stylized way.
You're thinking of the dingo indie cartoonist. The digital clown indie cartoonist is into vore and drills.
How does a drill vore?
>the dingo indie cartoonist
You made me want to check on him.
This is gonna be so fricking good.
(me)
Oh and I found out how much he wants to produce the BD pilot. $15k.
He changed the protag's design from being based on a literal DeviantArt inflation rape OC, right? RIGHT?
No.
Jesus. Christ. He has actually fallen for the sunken cost fallacy. Kinda makes me sick to see this raw talent going to waste on a radioactive cartoon because he has 0 critical thinking skills. I would laugh and enjoy the ride but I feel so fricking bad for him. I'll keep him in my prayers in the hopes he snaps out of it one day.
i looked up this shit in the archive and ffs you guys were too mean to him like literally no one is going to know the character is based on some deviantart inflation artist.
They were mean *precisely* to try to get him to change it before he committed. Everyone will know now because he dug his heels in.
I think this post was the fairest one in that thread
>All you had to do was change the design up and tell a tactful white lie about what really inspired you and no-one would have cared
It's not pearl-clutching over the use of adult inspiration like the others, but it's still giving him practical advice.
I follow goose's stupid fetish account because I'm a gross freak and I've yet to see a single image of a drill, what the frick even is this meme
Is there any boobies or peepees on there?
its mostly just spheres but theres a couple hyper tit pics. I only really followed for the vore but they barely draw it just the same fricking blob inflation shape every other inflation artist draws. maybe I'm just too far desensitized but theres not really anything that 'crazy' in there its like run of the mill fetish shit
Yep, typical hypergay. Thanks for the deets
Did goose drew that big booba lizard
How the frick did you get in
its inflation, vore, inanimate tf and humiliation you dummy
just a joke about how goose drew alot of art of characters getting their head drilled in, and the knowledge of goose's fetish alt and with not knowing whats in it leading to that being the end thought process i guess
for the record i think im kinda glad i dont see her fetish art, it feels like one of those cases where ignorance is bliss in regards to the fetishes being done as well as the characters involved in it
sucks i get the chemical run-off from her nerd friends like m23 or badluckfate though
Copyright is automotic, you don't have to do anything extra to get the copyright for what you make
I don’t think that’s true
google is free btw
You can't think the copyright laws out of existence.
It is. As soon as something exists in a fixed format, you own the copyright. This isn’t the 1800’s. You don’t need to file shit with a clerk at an office. You just show evidence that you made the thing first and that it’s reasonable the person infringing on your copyright had reasonable access to your work and that’s it.
t. creator who has actually dealt with this before
No. Not it does not super work like that at all you fricking moron. By all means you have zero comprehension of how this shit really works.
If what you're saying was the case Michael Jackson would have been able to belt out ALL HIS GREATEST hits on the Simpsons when he cameod. He couldn't because while he is the owner of the songs the company holding the rights to the songs refused to allow him to use them.
You are honestly one of those fricking idiots who clicks "agree to all" and thinks there is no underlying shit going on to ensure you won't get fricked over when you hit it big at creating something people want to put money down on.
That's because MJ had some sort of agreement that gives his rights (that's the "right" on "copyright") for some kind of compensation (e,g. distribution, production, etc). By default if you create something it by yourself, all rights are reserved, unless you state that they can use it someway (e.g. giving a CC BY/MIT license, being in a contract, selling it, etc).
I saw companies that avoids shit that doesn't have any license (e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing/en, but also software companies), just so they can avoid being sued.
you don't understand licensing agreements.
Are you confusing copyright with trademark? Those are not the same thing.
It's mostly true. Copyright is automatic in America upon the work being made, but you have to register it with the Copyright Office at some point if you actually want to get it enforced. That's more of a formality than anything, assuming you're competent and go to a notary (or at least do a poor man's copyright and mail the work to yourself to get the postmark's cheap government-approved date stamped on it) so you have proof of when you made it.
>but you have to register it with the Copyright Office at some point if you actually want to get it enforced
No you don't.
I've enforced copyright without registering shit. This is the sort of information that circulates around creative circles when people don't really know what they're talking about.
>do a poor man's copyright and mail the work to yourself to get the postmark's cheap government-approved date stamped on it
Also not true. That's the stuff they used to tell creators in the 90's. Once you make the thing, it's yours. Publishing it will establish an official time stamp and is much more airtight than a mailed package which could be tampered with (steam open the package, put whatever you want in there...fake poor man's copyright!). Just make the thing and pop it up on youtube or something. Even if it's private, it will be logged officially on a server and can be referenced if necessary.
>I've enforced copyright without registering shit
The feds literally will not accept an infringement claim without it. Threatening some moron criminal and/or filing a DMCA complaint does not count.
That's what I've heard. I believe trademarks aren't automatic. Or something. Every artist automatically has the copyright to their work, but I'm not a lawyer so what do I know.
>Every artist automatically has the copyright to their work
the existence of the copyright is automatic, however it still needs to be registered if you intend to bring suit against somebody else for infringement (see the case of "Night of the Living Dead", whose studio accidentally released it into the public domain by mistakenly registering it under the wrong title and just never noticing for like a decade).
>That's more of a formality than anything
It's more than a formality. If you should have to go to court, you would have to prove actual damages if you do not have a registered copyright. It would also be the maximum amount you would be awarded.
Registered copyright allows for unrealized losses and punitive damages.
This is why a fan artist will never win against a company like Disney if they were to use their fan art. The fan artist could only win "fair" rate for illustration work. Disney could conjure up millions in theoretical damages.
Yeah, I can see how I worded that poorly. What I meant by it being a formality is that the forms are so simple that anyone keeping even the most minor notes about their work could sit down and knock it out in 5 minutes. It's a truly trivial process and one that absolutely anyone making a creative work should do.
>unrealized damages
I've always found it messed up that this is permitted, it's absolutely ripe for abuse.
So is tort, civil, criminal, all law is ripe for abuse. You just need a dumb judge and an activist jury.
>This is why a fan artist will never win against a company like Disney if they were to use their fan art.
Most big companies are aware that stealing fanart is a MASSIVE PR risk that would make them look bad, while cutting off the biggest source of free advertising in the modern age. They'd might win in court, but the damage that would cause to their rep would be more than enough to avoid the possibility of getting to that point to begin with.
Didn't Nickelodeon steal a Spongebob remix by Pogo? I never found out what happened with that
Are you referring to all of the YouTube kids garbage? If fricking DISNEY can’t do anything about it…
WILL DO! THANKS ADVISAL AND NOT homosexual OP!
Real. Bump in the Night chads rise up against the troony iconoclasts.
Parody law
Cope TADC gays
what is this fricking image
completely incompressible
Your clown show admit defeat
It's a product of the Hispanic infestation on this site
Good morning sir!
You mean trademark?
Nobody likes copyright hounds.
You have an unhealthy obsession
What happened?
Mexican stage troupes are already debuting their knock-off TADC stage shows to packed houses and Gooseworx is basically getting cucked out of all the pesos.
Copyrighting isn't gonna stop anyone south of the border from doing what they feel like doing
You know that, and I know that, but OP doesn't.
Copyright is automatic as soon as you create the work. But as some said, you'll want to register it if you expect the feds to do anything about infringement, and as others have said, you can't do much about people in countries that won't enforce it.
Are you talking about the Mexican Amazing Digital Circus Circus?
>tfw try to look up what the standards are for an intellectual property asset to be legally distinct
>literally none of the links give a good answer
Copyright is automatic. At least in USA, not sure how some other countries handle it.
You need to register the copyright in order to enforce it in any meaningful way, including in court. You'd better be sure that you can prove you made the thing when you said you did, such as a publication date on a physical object or a reliable online source.
Trademark needs to be registered and maintained. This is the one that can get killed by "genericide" so companies are fairly strict with their trademarks. I'll also note that trademarks are generally country-specific, meaning you need to file and maintain a trademark in every country you want to enforce it in.
Patents are inventions and behave similar to copyright, although you do need to file them and don't get them automatically just for making something. They also expire ~40 years, because Disney never spent billions extending the timeline. Although with drug companies holding onto the patent for diabetes medication, that might change.
Cinemaphile - Copyright Officiants
cringe
I don’t care if Goose is a trans, voice erotic
Any clips to prove?
Picrel reminds me of Illuminaughti's pfp
SEXY. TRIANGLE. WOMEN.