Whats there to prove? We already know its would get review bombed for certain reasons. >OMG look at this pozzed woke shit. Why would they make a movie about a black guy killing whites!!! One star for a black guy killing white people. >OMG look at this pozzed woke shit. Strong female survives alien that killed the crew with females, blacks and an android that represents gender neutrality because it has no penis or vegana. The alien is also black and killing white people. One star.
Stop shitposting troony. You know damn well that's not true. The only ones review bombing them would be "critics" and twitter users for not being woke. They'd review bomb it for blade not shouting blm and because ripley is fighting female xenomorphs instead of male ones.
Whenever we point out propaganda filled shit, blade and alien and terminator and so on are what we point to when we want to prove a point. Those movies don't have woke shit. They don't have identity or race politics. There's no sneaky israeli shit about race mixing.
They'd do extremely well today with the general audience and poorly with critics and mainstream media, like every fricking movie that's actually good instead of more fricking propaganda
Are you fricking moronic? The circumstances that these movies were made will never be the same. Different audience, different personalities, different production methods
Thats like saying if the founders were around now adays they would be considered schizo supremest
>If you make a movie aligning with the ideals of contemporary radical political movements, your movie will be associated with said radical political movements.
Kek, you're stupid.
And it would probably be justified because they would be vehicles for ideology first and foremost before telling actual good stories with compelling characters.
https://i.imgur.com/ja0mUWL.jpg
remember when you could make a movie with a black protagonist without having a political agenda
Blade was actually VERY redpilled by the late 90s standards. The ~~*vampires*~~ subsisted on blood, could only survive through parasitizing other people, ran the world from the shadows and owned the cops. I'm sure it was unintentional, but still based nonetheless.
>Blade was actually VERY redpilled by the late 90s standards. The ~~*vampires*~~ subsisted on blood, could only survive through parasitizing other people, ran the world from the shadows and owned the cops. I'm sure it was unintentional, but still based nonetheless.
But that's all standard for 90s vampires. V:tM was exactly that.
The character Blade was actually supposed to be a White British guy, the movies are literally some of the first big cases of Black washing
That being said I still loved them so I don't care lmao
Yeh but people didn’t care cause they weren’t brainwashed by politics back then seems like every smooth brained npc is a cuck homosexual that supports BLM these days
The problem isn't even the politics, it's that they can't write or make a movie for shit these days.
I blame the writer's strike.
Just look at the new Candyman. It didn't fail because it was woke, that part was the only good part of the movie outside the puppet show. It failed because it's a shit movie and an extra shitty horror one.
Frick, they didn't even have a clear protag to carry the movie and have an arc, they just had 2 semi-characters share the spotlight with unexplored backstories and personalities.
>I blame the writer's strike.
I blame the fact that writers are some of the most underrated people in the industry, and yet so critically important. it's just that most people can't really tell the difference between good and bad writing.
writer's strike showed soulless producers that most people, as you said, can't really tell the difference between good and bad writing and why writing matters at all.
> remember when we could just talk about moofies without homosexuals bringing in pol all the time
yes i get it the world sucks but that's why i watch fantasy kino
Blade was pure though, a refined capeshit for a more civilised age
Those examples are textbook crap /misc/ complains about, but "woke" for these guys also encompasses the mere presence of black people in anything but a slave role. There's no pleasing them.
>encompasses the mere presence of black people in anything but a slave role
I've never seen this complain, unless used by some woketard as strawman (like now) or when criticizing some historical setting where blacks wouldn't actually exist if not in the role of slaves
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I've never seen this complain, unless used by some woketard as strawman (like now)
Oh frick off, you could not post on here for more than five minutes and believe this
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are just here to feel the adrenaline rush derived from coming to this "dangerous" internet zone and calling people names.
All I've heard is woketards using that strawman to mock every single criticism of wokeshit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
"Criticisms" like "AHHHH A BLACK PERSON! OUT OF PLACE! SHOEHORNED! FORCED! POZZED!!!!"?
2 years ago
Anonymous
inb4 he claims this is a "strawman" to excuse away all the morons on his sports team
2 years ago
Anonymous
"Criticisms" like "AHHHH A BLACK PERSON! OUT OF PLACE! SHOEHORNED! FORCED! POZZED!!!!"?
Saying "inb4 strawman" and then using a strawman is not a valid argument.
Stop being woke, moron
? Proof? Obama said all black peoples problems were related to slavery and it was covering for the banks that led to this mainly. The moment occupy actually focused on banks it got hit with identity politics, not that you're old enough to remember.
why did politics have to be invented in 2016, bros?
was yahoo answers peak internet culture?
Occupy Wall Street is the reason why.
If Blade or Alien(s) was made today using the same script and actors it would get review bombed.
of course it would, it doesnt have any stupid pandering and critics do not care about the actual movie
Nice what if.
Prove it.
If they made them now they would be pozzed shit
Nice job proving his point
>leftard can't read and assumes he's right
Such many cases
Whats there to prove? We already know its would get review bombed for certain reasons.
>OMG look at this pozzed woke shit. Why would they make a movie about a black guy killing whites!!! One star for a black guy killing white people.
>OMG look at this pozzed woke shit. Strong female survives alien that killed the crew with females, blacks and an android that represents gender neutrality because it has no penis or vegana. The alien is also black and killing white people. One star.
>We already know
No we don't.
Have you tried putting out a movie that is as well made as Alien/s with nonpozzed cast and nonwoke marketing?
Stop shitposting troony. You know damn well that's not true. The only ones review bombing them would be "critics" and twitter users for not being woke. They'd review bomb it for blade not shouting blm and because ripley is fighting female xenomorphs instead of male ones.
Whenever we point out propaganda filled shit, blade and alien and terminator and so on are what we point to when we want to prove a point. Those movies don't have woke shit. They don't have identity or race politics. There's no sneaky israeli shit about race mixing.
They'd do extremely well today with the general audience and poorly with critics and mainstream media, like every fricking movie that's actually good instead of more fricking propaganda
Nice fantasy, just like your vegana, completely made up.
They would be shitting themselves and complaining about how blacks can't be vampires and some other moronic shit.
>WE WUZ DRACULA N SHIET
x 1000 times
Samegay
Are you fricking moronic? The circumstances that these movies were made will never be the same. Different audience, different personalities, different production methods
Thats like saying if the founders were around now adays they would be considered schizo supremest
>If you make a movie aligning with the ideals of contemporary radical political movements, your movie will be associated with said radical political movements.
Kek, you're stupid.
And it would probably be justified because they would be vehicles for ideology first and foremost before telling actual good stories with compelling characters.
Blade was actually VERY redpilled by the late 90s standards. The ~~*vampires*~~ subsisted on blood, could only survive through parasitizing other people, ran the world from the shadows and owned the cops. I'm sure it was unintentional, but still based nonetheless.
>Blade was actually VERY redpilled by the late 90s standards. The ~~*vampires*~~ subsisted on blood, could only survive through parasitizing other people, ran the world from the shadows and owned the cops. I'm sure it was unintentional, but still based nonetheless.
But that's all standard for 90s vampires. V:tM was exactly that.
no it wouldnt you moron.
what part of those movies are even close to being controversial?
The character Blade was actually supposed to be a White British guy, the movies are literally some of the first big cases of Black washing
That being said I still loved them so I don't care lmao
prime wesley snipes was great
>prime wesley snipes was great
Shut up, Wesley!
Yeh but people didn’t care cause they weren’t brainwashed by politics back then seems like every smooth brained npc is a cuck homosexual that supports BLM these days
Have an ounce of self-awareness
no
The original comic book character is black too, what are you talking about?
I think he is confusing it with Frost who in the original material was a old british dude from the Victorian era I think.
Wasn't Frost in the villain of the first movie?
That's what i hate about audiences now. They assume just because someone is black they are trying to push something.
gee how could they possibly assume something like that in this day in age? fricking moron
Because you've been trained to by Cinemaphile.
I think it's a fair assumption, taking into consideration corporate remarks.
If this exact same unaltered movie came out today, you would call it political and screech about it.
The problem isn't even the politics, it's that they can't write or make a movie for shit these days.
I blame the writer's strike.
Just look at the new Candyman. It didn't fail because it was woke, that part was the only good part of the movie outside the puppet show. It failed because it's a shit movie and an extra shitty horror one.
Frick, they didn't even have a clear protag to carry the movie and have an arc, they just had 2 semi-characters share the spotlight with unexplored backstories and personalities.
>I blame the writer's strike.
I blame the fact that writers are some of the most underrated people in the industry, and yet so critically important. it's just that most people can't really tell the difference between good and bad writing.
writer's strike showed soulless producers that most people, as you said, can't really tell the difference between good and bad writing and why writing matters at all.
> remember when we could just talk about moofies without homosexuals bringing in pol all the time
yes i get it the world sucks but that's why i watch fantasy kino
Blade was pure though, a refined capeshit for a more civilised age
Or maybe you either weren't old enough to watch it, or you weren't being indoctrinated by /misc/tards when it came out.
>indoctrinated by /misc/tards
Was it poltards who put muhversity quitas requirements for awards?
You saw this movie when you were a child who hadn't been brainwashed by /misc/ yet.
Nah. The movie was good and nonwoke
If made today it would be bad and woke
Why, because Blade would be mean to the dindu nothin cops? Or he would have a, heaven forbid, WHITE love interest??
Snowflake alert.
Meds, take them.
A simple reply from a simple mind.
What?
>playing dumb
Oh please, we all know what """woke""" is code for, you racist sack of shit.
We all seem to except for you.
doesn't the fact that you drew those as examples and implied they would included prove our exact fricking point you midwit?
Those examples are textbook crap /misc/ complains about, but "woke" for these guys also encompasses the mere presence of black people in anything but a slave role. There's no pleasing them.
>encompasses the mere presence of black people in anything but a slave role
I've never seen this complain, unless used by some woketard as strawman (like now) or when criticizing some historical setting where blacks wouldn't actually exist if not in the role of slaves
>I've never seen this complain, unless used by some woketard as strawman (like now)
Oh frick off, you could not post on here for more than five minutes and believe this
You are just here to feel the adrenaline rush derived from coming to this "dangerous" internet zone and calling people names.
All I've heard is woketards using that strawman to mock every single criticism of wokeshit.
"Criticisms" like "AHHHH A BLACK PERSON! OUT OF PLACE! SHOEHORNED! FORCED! POZZED!!!!"?
inb4 he claims this is a "strawman" to excuse away all the morons on his sports team
Saying "inb4 strawman" and then using a strawman is not a valid argument.
Stop being woke, moron
Why would Blade *need* a love interest at all wokey?
Blade killed his own mother and his father figure lmao, let’s see if anyone has half the balls to do something like that in current year +7
It was protowoke. When progressives were much more subtle
>make a movie with a black protagonist without having a political agenda
Beverly Hills Cop came out almost 40 years ago.
Contender for the comfiest movie of all time.
No doubt. Still holds up today.
Crimson Tide with Denzel Washington was almost 30 years ago.
40?
50 years since the original, and 22 since Samuel L. Jackson did the remake of Shaft.
aww shit, I'm hearing it
Imagine growing up in 2016+, though. I pity the people for whom all this shit will be the new normal.
Imagine how older generations feel about stuff you don't even think about
It started when Obama ran for office and Palin + Fox said he was shucking and jiving his way into the White House.
>inb4 based
Your camp started this.
? Proof? Obama said all black peoples problems were related to slavery and it was covering for the banks that led to this mainly. The moment occupy actually focused on banks it got hit with identity politics, not that you're old enough to remember.
Remember when you could have black characters without incels automatically complaining about politics?
Blade was not a good movie
The remeaster is gonna be good
>ouch my neck