Why? What kind of moron logic is that? People are gonna be MAD that it's good? What? have a nice day. The only thing worth seething about is you smugfrick miles fans. You're whiny, entitled, you have no humility nor respect for anything that's come before you, and worst of all, none of you know how to communicate like human beings.
This one's already seething.
You gonna swallow those tears tomorrow, lil guy, or are you gonna throw an even bigger fit that normal people don't reflect your opinions?
>normal people don't reflect your opinions
I'm a normal guy. I'd curb stomp you in the streets if you were talking this type of stupid shit to me in person.
A well deserved bat straight to the face is what you'd get, kid.
11 months ago
Anonymous
You're only making this more fun for the Miles camp. Go on, seethe harder.
11 months ago
Anonymous
No. I'm done. No more attention and fodder for (You). Smarten up.
>"I'm a normal guy" says the man slamming his fists on the ground over a Spider-Man cartoon movie
Lmao
This isn't about a cartoon. It's the disrespect. Try thinking for once in your worthless life.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>No. I'm done. No more attention and fodder for (You). Smarten up. >Still includes the post number anyways
Then be done, or seethe harder. We both know which option you'll take homosexual.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>i feel disrespected because people made fun of me for crying over a cartoon movie
Uh.....ok. Little b***h.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not crying over a cartoon movie. You're intentionally not getting what's going on to make me look bad. Find the nearest rope and put it around your scrawny little neck as tight as you can after your 15 minutes of feeling superior are up. Worthless little homosexual. I genuinely despise your existence. You disrespectful little b***h. How dare you and all these other cucks think you have any right to treat me this way?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Weren't you done? People who are done don't keep crying like little b***hes.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>No. I'm done. No more attention and fodder for (You). Smarten up. >Still includes the post number anyways
Then be done, or seethe harder. We both know which option you'll take homosexual.
Weren't you done? People who are done don't keep crying like little b***hes.
Not that anon, but aww, Sweet! A Schizo Thread! Into the inclusiverse was the gayest animated movie of the 2010s. Why would the sequel that admits it supports trans ""'rights""' be any better?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Trans people exist and deserve rights
11 months ago
Anonymous
Trans is a mental illness.
They should be getting support to accept the body they have. Instead of chopping off their bits and being slaves to Big Pharma.
11 months ago
Anonymous
"Slaves to big pharma" is a facile argument designed to redirect legitimate anticapitalist fervor into transphobia. Dismantling capitalist power structures and eliminating big pharma would enable trans people to get the medical care they need, which may or may not include hormones and/or surgery. Piggybacking transphobia onto anticapitalism is never going to work no matter how much you try to force it.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>ignores that chemical castration is bad
Not even that anon and you lost the argument by trying to redirect it yourself. Stop supporting genital mutilation as a cure for people's depression.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Either way, once you have surgery, you'll need to be on drugs for the rest of your life. Doesn't matter if you pay for it yourself or get it from the government, it's all the same.
If anything, it's "people" like you who're stopping socialized medicine from being a thing. By wanting to waste it on frivolous, unnecessary surgery and drugs when you should just learn to accept the body you're in.
>People are gonna be MAD that it's good? What?
Have you missed how people act now? People hope for things to fail and get upset when their fears come true and it's something people love. Look at Cinemaphile and the Spider-man game for example.
The Insomniac games are fricking terrible though. Give me a game I can actually control again for frick's sake, I'll even put up with your ugly strong independent women in burkas and your black charisma black hole, just stop putting everything on fricking rails.
fpbp
The film will score very highly with both critics and audience, 90+ on each, and Cinemaphile will seethe once more that something involving Miles is well received and loved.
It will have No Way Home syndrome. It will be loved blindly until people start paying more attention to how cluttered the story will be and realize that the movie is actually a 5 or 6/10 with good animation.
>Will make 650 mil
With a bunch of gay shit?
Word of mouth will kill this movie
>People are gonna be MAD that it's good? What?
Have you missed how people act now? People hope for things to fail and get upset when their fears come true and it's something people love. Look at Cinemaphile and the Spider-man game for example.
People hope that bad things fail because if they succeed more will come, look at how everyone regardless of political affiliation wished failure upon The Emoji Movie.
And Cinemaphile is not a good examples because fanboys are competing against each other
It's pathetic and has way more to do with politics. People just hear there is a Spiderman movie and the main character isn't white and bam, instant seethe. Their judgement is clouded by hate and even if the movie is good they fool themselves into thinking the movie was bad.
I think people are just tired of selling popular characters as “the right color” rather than just coming up with good original stories or characters. Spiderverse let Hollywood know about the multiverse an entire concept devoid of creativity and soul there to let empty suits realize that homies like you don’t NEED good stories or modality, you just need to be fed the same shit with a different coat of paint.
People hate miles because they s read miles, that’s it the writer was an butthole and his concept was both destructive to the brand AND hilariously racist, but you eat it up because “it owns the chuds”. gays like you are why we DESERVE this horrific sightless world we live in
11 months ago
Anonymous
>you just need to be fed the same shit with a different coat of paint.
It's really hard to accept arguments like this when everyone bashing Miles seems to want more Peter, which is just the same shit with the exact same coat of paint.
11 months ago
Anonymous
There’s more you can do with peter than miles you mong. But why do you gays get so sated with corporations race bending to create empty problems between different raced autists? Why not push for them to make new or simpler yet, USE existing black characters? Frick half of this movie is shitting in empty iconography of a white character so a black characte mr can “look good” by teaching shitty morals in this empty story just like the first movie
11 months ago
Anonymous
>Why not push for them to make new characters
They did make a new character.
His name's Miles Morales.
>Frick half of this movie is shitting in empty iconography of a white character so a black character can “look good” just like the first movie
You are blinded by rage if that's what you think the first movie was like.
11 months ago
Anonymous
How wasn’t it anon? Spider-man was unique in his genre by being a character based on growth of story, how does trivializing that story by reducing him to being nothing but a PART of some green lantern corp bullshit respect that? And how does shitting on a massive part of his story by focusing on gwen being paired with miles and how he’s better than peter because he saves her respecting that story? Face it anon you’re just a b***h who enjoys bendis to suc so could you just do that on Reddit or Twitter or anywhere else? Because you will NEVER be welcome HERE, the only place we can openly speak about how shit these “stories” are
11 months ago
Anonymous
Exactly, Miles is just worse Peter, he has no purpose.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Why the hell should the audience of a popular character accept that he gets replaced with supposedly another character that is in reality the same one except with a different skin tone? People watch Dragon Ball for Goku, not my OC Joeku who is like Goku in every way except the interesting ones, and also he is white. There is literally no situation in which they should accept seeing Joeku instead of Goku in DB media, let alone pay for it and give me recognition, what an insane approach to art.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Amazing how it only took one post for you to take your mask off.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I own my “mask” and I own my perspective, you just latch onto the propaganda of the day and collapse when someone points that out. I’ve tried for a DECADE to accept a character whose creator NEEDS me to hate to satisfy his (and your) world view. It’s not MY fault that this movie codified EVERYTHING wrong with him and Hollywood at the moment. Why are you so gleeful at these multinational conglomerates pushing your view and this petty divide for “profit”? And do you really have no capability in questioning WHY your views so thoroughly line up with there’s?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>hy are you so gleeful at these multinational conglomerates pushing your view and this petty divide for “profit”?
NTA but you homosexuals seething so hard about it just made it fun for them. You really only have yourselves to blame for this one. Cope.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It’s actually been pushed to this point, and this isn’t just trolls anymore. I think this is the effort disney is making to tank the franchise in the same way they tanked x-men and FF to hurt fox. They don’t like sharing with Sony and will push as great a divide they can. Sony shitting on peter in spiderverse is just a part of the propaganda though.
Though I would hope that you’d get at least SOME people to just hate all the clout this shit gave bendis to ruin what he ruined at DC. But I don’t think people can have honest conversations about this since the bulk of this is just bait and “lol didn’t read”
I think people are just tired of selling popular characters as “the right color” rather than just coming up with good original stories or characters. Spiderverse let Hollywood know about the multiverse an entire concept devoid of creativity and soul there to let empty suits realize that homies like you don’t NEED good stories or modality, you just need to be fed the same shit with a different coat of paint.
People hate miles because they s read miles, that’s it the writer was an butthole and his concept was both destructive to the brand AND hilariously racist, but you eat it up because “it owns the chuds”. gays like you are why we DESERVE this horrific sightless world we live in
Frick off. Miles Morales only exists as Bendis' symbolic middle finger to the original white Spider-Man. He only exists to replace Ultimate Spider-Man after they killed him off. He's never been popular. No one bought the shitty movie game & the Spiderverse movie was nowhere near as successful as the media claimed. The sequel's already pushing interracial propaganda + pedophilia. We'll never accept your communist agitprop disguised as "moral values."
It doesn’t need to succeed anon, it just needs to have the message the powers that be want. It’s the same reason why none of you care about the story. You just enjoy a shit fight
The sequel implies every single Spider-Man across the multiverse indirectly kills their Gwen and that Miles is the only one that will save Spider-Gwen, Amy Pascal called the movie a romance between the two of them and said there will be a love triangle with Spider-Punk.
>The sequel implies every single Spider-Man across the multiverse indirectly kills their Gwen and that Miles is the only one that will save Spider-Gwen,
She isn't his Gwen. Where is Mile's Gwen Stacy anyway?
>The sequel implies every single Spider-Man across the multiverse indirectly kills their Gwen and that Miles is the only one that will save Spider-Gwen,
She isn't his Gwen. Where is Mile's Gwen Stacy anyway?
>Where is Mile's Gwen Stacy anyway?
Sony and Disney disagree about Miles being a guy like Stan Lee's Peter who dated the girl next door and even had a Black Cat who seduced him, Sony and Disney want to sell a product made for men to gays and women, it doesn't work. So Miles will never get his MJ or his Black Cat, at least not while they are in the hands of Sony and Disney. Who knows, maybe someone like Elon Musk will buy Marvel in the future?
This is the second post and it practically has it down to a tea. It will be rated as a indisputed masterpiece for that alone -- the plot, animation, ect be damned.
Will get 90+ in critic and audience reviews
Will make 650 mil
Will probably be just okay but I’m hoping it’s good
Regardless the first is still my fav super hero movie
Kek this genre is filled with shit anon sorry to say
But thinking about it again I might like the first GOTG and Iron Man more. It’s still one of my favs
It's not just that. There's so much shit that will kill this movie. >bloated run time of over 2 and a half hours >No Peni Parker >No Spider Noir >No Spider Ham >BLM propaganda >Trans propaganda >A pregnant woman endangering her unborn child >Miles taking more of that stage from Peter B. Who carried the first film >The Villian is an alternate universe spiderman >rick and morty style council of Spidermen
Take your pick There's an easy reason to hate this movie. Sure defenders will blame it all on racism or transphobia but the reality is this film is flawed from top to bottom and I say this as someone that loved the first movie.
It's not just that. There's so much shit that will kill this movie. >bloated run time of over 2 and a half hours >No Peni Parker >No Spider Noir >No Spider Ham >BLM propaganda >Trans propaganda >A pregnant woman endangering her unborn child >Miles taking more of that stage from Peter B. Who carried the first film >The Villian is an alternate universe spiderman >rick and morty style council of Spidermen
Take your pick There's an easy reason to hate this movie. Sure defenders will blame it all on racism or transphobia but the reality is this film is flawed from top to bottom and I say this as someone that loved the first movie.
This movie will suffer because the replacements aren't as interesting as Peni, Noir, or Ham
Both Black Panthers still have a certified fresh rating, and according to critics Black Widow is a masterpiece and Mario is unwatchable, they've long lost any credibility they pretended they had
People expected it to go full girlboss but at the end of the movie Mario and Luigi save the day and Peach isnt portrayed as infallible, just competent
I assume Nintendo stepped in and told them to tone down the girlboss
Might as well go deeper on this. Mario also was clearly made for fans. Anyone not familiar would be questioning why are they driving on a rainbow. The MCU movies at least explain who and what shit is.
Mario Kart 8 alone sold 63 million copies and it's the sixth best selling game of all time
11 months ago
Anonymous
Does that change the fact that the movie doesn't explain anything? 63 million kids and man children are not regular adults who would know about those things.
11 months ago
Anonymous
There's plenty of movies that don't explain anything that are well received by critics, Spider-Verse itself would be bewildering to anyone lacking previous Spider-Man context, and Mario is a much bigger IP than Spider-Man.
Because no one seems to mention the universal cope that will come when makes as little at the box office as its predecessor an pretends what some critic says is important.
And what about the cope when it does well? What about the cope of "well it needs 3 billion to break even anyway"? What about the cope that even among the most packed 3 months in the last three years, it still manages to succeed?
I'm to this day still reading cope about the first spiderverse doing well. The sequel will be no different and when Beyond is canceled I'm sure I'll hear yet more cope about that too.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>beyond getting cancelled
Anon even if Across the Spider-Verse bombs financially then Beyond will still be released since it’s coming out next year, most of the work is likely done on that film
11 months ago
Anonymous
Just like the scoob christmas special huh?
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's facts. Spiderverse could go on to get a theme park, show, and be called a focus on financial statements and you would still insist it failed.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It couldn't because Sony only has movie rights to Spider-Man. Any movie that makes less money than Chicken Little is a failure in my eyes.
Financially suicide squad did way better than many movies with good reviews. In the end, suicide squad is remembered for being shit while good movies continue to be fondly remembered.
The movie is going to be okay but all the reviews will be glowing, the audience reviews will be ~80% and half the people on here will call it new world order great replacement propaganda made by the israelites
>new world order great replacement propaganda made by the israelites
I mean that's technically true in this case, Bendis is a israelite and made Miles to replace Peter
Movie will be fine but the critics will be like "this is the greatest superhero movie ever!!1!" and Cinemaphile will work itself into knots over it for a month or 2
>Make your predictions!
The film has everything that woke critics like
>Propaganda of child mutilation >Female protagonists are unattractive >Female protagonists don't wear sexy costumes >Black Cat can never appear in this franchise >The white hero will be portrayed as an idiot >Miles will not have the masculinity of traditional heroes >The female protagonist is actually a boy
literally every film made in either of our lifetimes wanted to win awards.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Wanted to win =/= construed itself entirely around what baits award judges
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's not 'constructed entirely around what baits award judges', it's literally just a flag that says 'hey trans people exist and deserve not to be second-class citizens'. You're looking at a speck on the edge of your plate and constructing elaborate conspiracies in your mind to explain why the shadow government wants to poison you.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Anon the directors of the first one refused to work on it unless they can make it about Miles, the literal colorswap with zero stories, and then gave him one of Peter's stories, what possible reason would they have to want to put the focus on a character with absolutely no narrative merit other than the fact black-led movies are a shoe-in for awards ceremonies
11 months ago
Anonymous
>what possible reason
because more mainstream movies should have black protagonists whose entire lives don't revolve around a prison/gang narrative
11 months ago
Anonymous
Movies shouldn't be propaganda
11 months ago
Anonymous
that is literally the opposite of propaganda. It's just diversity, and diversity is not propaganda unless you believe the existence of nonwhite people to be inherently propaganda.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not sure you understand the definition of either of those terms
11 months ago
Anonymous
Do you?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Define them
11 months ago
Anonymous
"Diversity" refers to when media accurately depicts a broad swath of people instead of focusing on a specific kind of person.
"Propaganda" refers to media designed to subtly advertise a specific ideological messaging.
While it is true propaganda can obviously be diverse, and that diversity can potentially be in the service of propaganda, such as the CIA producing recruitment videos containing people of color and promoting the CIA as 'inclusive', that doesn't mean making content diverse is inherently propaganda, unless your perspective is that that media should only contain one specific kind of person, and that is a deeply immoral belief tied into conservative, supremacist values.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Diversity is political, promoting political causes in media is propaganda. You can have diversity without believing it absolutely needs to be in everything and forcing it where it doesn't belong, but that's not what Spider-Verse did.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>forcing it where it doesn't belong
Again, you are telling on yourself. You believe that superhero movies should only contain white men and the occasional hourglass bimbo in skintight latex. Your opinion is meaningless.
11 months ago
Anonymous
No, that's just a strawman your ego produced to protect you from dealing with the fact you're wrong. Having a Peter and Prowler adventure would've been an organic way to have diversity in a Spider-Man movie, what Spider-Verse did instead was focus the movie on the character invented to celebrate Obama's election i.e. an inherently political issue.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Peter Parker is so played out. Why are you so obsessed with him, and so hateful of the one who you claim is exactly the same but black? Why does it bother you so much? What a fricking conundrum.
11 months ago
Anonymous
You're either highlighting your stupidity is being intentionally dishonest when you try the "played out card", when the very existence of Miles himself is to ride the coat tails of that played out character except be a race swap. That's the very reason Bendis created the character and I use the term create in the loosest sense.
11 months ago
Anonymous
we NEED moar SpiderDad
11 months ago
Anonymous
he so sexy
-female
11 months ago
Anonymous
We traded this for some guy named Miles.
11 months ago
Anonymous
we NEED moar SpiderDad
Has Peter’s face ever looked anything like Peter B. Or blonde Peter’s face in the the comics? Whenever I look at either of them I don’t see Peter Parker, just some random blonde/middle aged guy with the same name
11 months ago
Anonymous
Frenz maybe, I think he's supposed to be an Andrew Garfield knockoff
11 months ago
Anonymous
I can see it being based off of Frenz’s art, but it’d be weird if they chose his interpretation of the character’s appearance over someone like Romita Sr.
11 months ago
Anonymous
he was initially supposed to be voiced by Tobey Maguire (thankfully hasn't) and many of his and the blonde's flashbacks are scenes from the Maguire/Raimi trilogy
11 months ago
Anonymous
Frenz maybe, I think he's supposed to be an Andrew Garfield knockoff
Fun fact: your nose and ears don't stop growing, the growth just slows down over time. It's possible that over time, Pete would look like that.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>(male)
11 months ago
Anonymous
Miles Morales is always going to be just another character but black. How is it not racist that the only thing that matters about him is his skin color?
11 months ago
Anonymous
the mental gymnastics in your thought process are fascinating
11 months ago
Anonymous
You need to go back to Twitter, troony.
11 months ago
Anonymous
This anons right, the other poster could be a bot given that their argument is simply "no your wrong"
11 months ago
Anonymous
Okay let's have Miles in the movie but make him white, you wouldn't be so hateful to complain about that would you
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, I am, because there are too many white people.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Whoa, racist much? White people are a worldwide minority
11 months ago
Anonymous
And if we work together we can take that pollution down to zero
11 months ago
Anonymous
No we can't, that's ESG shit.
11 months ago
Anonymous
The first one sure, but the second one absolutely is doing that.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>"Diversity" refers to when media accurately depicts a broad swath of people instead of focusing on a specific kind of person.
NTA but when do you ever run into that many diverse minorities all at once? Don't deny that it's an overcorrection anon, c'mon.
11 months ago
Anonymous
"Diversity" refers to when media accurately depicts a broad swath of people instead of focusing on a specific kind of person.
"Propaganda" refers to media designed to subtly advertise a specific ideological messaging.
While it is true propaganda can obviously be diverse, and that diversity can potentially be in the service of propaganda, such as the CIA producing recruitment videos containing people of color and promoting the CIA as 'inclusive', that doesn't mean making content diverse is inherently propaganda, unless your perspective is that that media should only contain one specific kind of person, and that is a deeply immoral belief tied into conservative, supremacist values.
>your perspective is that that media should only contain one specific kind of person,
Like all the constant blackwashing in this upcoming shitfest? Not all of them were white yet they got changed regardless.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Just because you agree with something, doesn't mean it isn't propaganda. Diversity and propaganda are not mutually exclusive terms.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's too late, anon. Hood culture ruined most modern perception of black man.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>more mainstream movies should have black protagonists whose entire lives don't revolve around a prison/gang narrative
So we'll never get a good Luke Cage adaptation?
11 months ago
Anonymous
I said 'more' not 'all'.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>what possible reason would they have to want to put the focus on a character with absolutely no narrative merit
You do realise they did give a reason for picking miles over Peter right? It was because of Miles’ family dynamic. You know something Peter doesn’t have?
11 months ago
Anonymous
>ignores uncle ben >ignores aunt may >ignores friendship relationships like Harry and MJ
Frick off you gaslighting homosexual
11 months ago
Anonymous
not he same man, come on
11 months ago
Anonymous
Source
11 months ago
Anonymous
>"Well, to me, it sort of all circles around to his family. He has a very different family than Peter Parker did," Lord confessed. "First of all, both of his parents are alive, so that's a huge difference right there. And being able to portray a very grounded family with a mother and father who both want the best for their son, but go about it in different ways. Also an uncle that loves him, but is encouraging him to go down a different path. That whole dynamic is really the center of what the whole movie's about, and it was really important to us to get right. And it really speaks to Miles trying to figure out who he is and who he's gonna be, what kind of a person he's going to become."
https://comicbook.com/marvel/amp/news/spider-man-into-the-spider-verse-miles-morales-peter-parker/
11 months ago
Anonymous
So shit that was completely unutilized, no one cared about, barely present in the comics, and that minimizes the tragedy and relatability of Spider-Man? Why not make it about Miles and his family then instead of the multiverse.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Trans children don't exist, it's a delusional ploy to get literally underdeveloped brains into sexual-themed fetish concepts before they get a chance to develop natural sense of identity
Boys shouldn't crossdress and call themselves girls because it will impair their social development. Same with girls. (Puberty literally affects them differently)
Kids shouldn't be able to consent to medication (which we don't know the long-term effects of) or life-changing surgeries
Kids are literally incapable of understanding what a woman or a man is. It takes life experience to understand these concepts beyond a surface level.
11 months ago
Anonymous
They sorta do exist but true gender dysphoria is 1. Incredibly rare and 2. Most kids grow out of it by the time they reach adolescence. This current “Trans kids” push is literally just gaslighting children into thinking they’re trans because they’re naive and are easily malleable
11 months ago
Anonymous
For what possible purpose
11 months ago
Anonymous
Because they have a chip on their shoulder about the fact that their transition is them indulging a mental condition. Gotta get kids on it to prove to the world that "actualy, it's natural"
11 months ago
Anonymous
Someone wanted to trick the gays into sterilizing themselves
11 months ago
Anonymous
>They sorta do
No, they do not. Children cannot be born thinking they're another gender.
11 months ago
Anonymous
This is just what I’ve heard and read from different accounts of people who were diagnosed with gender dysphoria before the big trans push, including conservative trans e-celebs like Buck Angel and Blaire White who are vehemently against current trans narratives. But regardless I don’t want kids and teens to undergo medical transitioning whether they actually have gender dysphoria or not. I believe that the treatment should revolve more around mental care rather than physical care since changing your body to be the opposite sex is and always will be a physical impossibility so learning to accept who you were born as seems to be a healthier approach mentally, emotionally, physically, socially, and economically.
Spider-Gwen has a “Protect Trans Kids” banner hung above her room’s doorway. This has led people to predict/shitpost that Gwen will be revealed to be trans in ATSV
i'm too nervous to pick a side, i'm not an outrage gay but i also don't care for Morales all that much, it's probably gonna get like a 95% even if it was bad
i liked the first movie quite a lot, i've watched it two times and i really liked that Peter B got back with his version MJ and stopped being a gay and put a baby in her, but if i'm being 100% honest they went way too far with the low frame rate animation, that spider verse headquarters in the trailers looks fricking absurd, the idea of all the spider men having diffrent artstyles sounds cool on paper but it looks extremely ugly, like having the PS4 spider man be an actual 3D PS4 render just looks moronic imo, and also the trans flag thingy and raceswapped 7 month pregnant Jessica Drew is cringe but i don't really care about that
i think the story is gonna be sorta obvious, The Spot is gonna be some secret multiversal threat but appear as a harmless c tier villan and all the spider men trying to capture Miles are gonna be proven wrong some how after chasing him the whole movie and join forces to beat the big bad, but hey idk it could be good like the first one i just think the animation looks like shit at certain points
I just want to see the spot. I think the trailers imply he becomes a multiverse tier threat because miles was texting while fighting him which is pretty funny
They are gonna get together because it’s kind of inevitable and the ‘platonic friendship erm…THEY'RE SIBLINGS can’t a guy and a girl just be friends :/ homosexuals will seethe all over Twitter ignoring the fact that Miles was clearly into her in the first movie.
Isn't it kind of toxic to imply the male character is entitled to the girl just because he's into her? Wouldn't the "respect other people's boundaries" message be more progressive? She even tells him she doesn't want to do it in the sequel because she's scared for her life and he keeps pushing her into it anyway, that's not very progressive, what sort of message does that send.
That's a very cringe statement because black men are probably the worst husbands out all of the races >it's all about that bee bee cee baby
Anon, do you realize how racist, child-grooming, pants-on-fire moronic you sound?
I'm not even saying you couldn't make a story with Miles and Gwen as a couple, hell, they might even do it properly. It's the propagandizing what bothers me.
I fricking deleted it but I wanted to post this European juice commercial that had a white woman give birth to a black baby, only to reveal the baby was for an interracial gay couple. Like that had anything to do with the juice.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>stonetoss
End your suffering. Embrace the void.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Uh-oh! Looks like I committed a wrongthink! Go get your paper bags if you get a panic attack, everyone!
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, yes, you're the only sane person on earth. You can go to sleep forever now.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>
11 months ago
Anonymous
Wasn't this thread about based black spiderman at one point? Why the schizoposting?
11 months ago
Anonymous
You're the one hell-bent on getting the last word. Shut up.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Getting called a homosexual on Cinemaphile for posting pictures from shitty webcomics is a long time tradition. You have to go back.
11 months ago
Anonymous
The example you gave seems like explicit propaganda, miles and gwen dosen't feel that way. Especially if its done naturally like from what i've seen in some of the clips.
11 months ago
Anonymous
To some people it's going to be propaganda just because it has a black person in it.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I don't think it's "forced" but I didn't think it was necessary either. I do feel like the progressive angle was a factor as to why it's happening, though. In the first movie their relationship as friends was so refreshing, why reverse that?
11 months ago
Anonymous
Hollywood/Exec meddling.
eitherway I don't mind how their relationship shakes up.
what I would personally have preferred is that they split up by the third movie and miles got a girlfriend from his universe like tiana toomes or barbra rodriguez. I don't know how gwen and mile's relationship would even function long term since they literally don't live in the same universe.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>zero chemistry >Miles dating a version of his mentor's dead ex soulmate and doesn't care >gets told Gwen dates Spider-Man in every universe and thinks nothing of it >gets told it always ends badly for Gwen and he persists anyway >movie implies he'll be the only one that can make the relationship work making it so that they're the only destined pairing of Gwen and Spider-Man in the multiverse >Miles desperately needs his own characters yet gets Peter's hand-me-downs again >they're dating across the multiverse even though it should kill them according to the movies >she friendzoned him in the first movie which is not something girls just back out of >she's cold, mature, older, and more experienced and he's an immature rookie boy >Gwen not recoiling at the name "Miles" >Gwen not caring about two different living Peters >Peter not caring about the living Gwen >illegal age gap in the original comic pairing >Spider-Gwen's whole thing is the "hero's girlfriend" character being the hero herself and not defined as the leading man's girlfriend and they shit on that idea immediately
Yeah completely natural and not forced at all lmao
11 months ago
Anonymous
They sort of had chemistry in the first, but definitely not in a romantic sense, that is true, and most of your other points are valid.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>False >Meta nonsene which is basically what all Anti-Gwiles are based around >What? >Yes, He likes her and she likes him. They believe they can make it work. >Things that have never happened. >He does. Cope. >Already solved >Didn't happen >You didn't watch the movie >What? >Meta nonsense >Meta Nonsense >Not true >Untrue meta nonsense
You have a single legitimate point? Why is it always just walls of text of schizod rambling?
You never heard that
" ‘platonic friendship erm…THEY'RE SIBLINGS can’t a guy and a girl just be friends" crowd speaking up about ships like kylo and rey, an infintely worse couple than anything spiderverse 2 could cook up, why is that?
My only hope is that the cool Mexican Spiderman from the future doesn't job to the black Spiderman they're trying to sell me as the next coolest guy. I would've preferred a Spiderverse with Miguel as the protagonist
Not really the same as a big budget film, the films and big budget ps4 games are gateway entries for villains to get some spotlight like spot and mr homietive
I was hoping Spot would end up being the blonde Peter from the first film but the recent bodega clip revealed him to be just some random alchemax worker, sadge
Unfortunately, yes, I like the first movie, but I like it in spite of Miles not really having much of a personality. But I chalk that up in-universe to him being young and not particularly well-defined yet, and metacontextually as the studio trying to make him as inoffensive and broadly appealing as possible.
i remember watching the first one. i never really talked about it online. i thought it was ok, but apparently it's like the greatest cbm ever on twitter.
The term diversity is incredibly dishonest, when it comes to shows and movies, the term demographic marketing should be used instead. A tv show or movie has a finite amount of characters,the question should be what demographics does it market too? The term diverse is an attempt to trick people who want to be seen as virtuous.
I imagine most of the reviews are going to be 'it's good but worse than the first" with them criticizing the new directors and new characters (Spider-Punk, Spider-India, and Jessica Drew).
It's gonna be shit. The first one being good was a fluke. This one is heavily prompting miles "tails" molé for brownie points. They really want to bury og parker just so miles molé is the only spiderman on people's minds. >T. long time fan since the raimi movies
It becomes meaningless when there isn’t anything special about being spider-man in the movie. It becomes just another toy to sell and another example of bad artists over designing a character to make up for the fact that there is no character in the movie. It’s just another reference soulless focus testers threw at a wall anon, it has no meaning or reverence.
99% RT, 90 or so MC, one of the greatest animated films of all time like that one guy said. You don't see reviews calling something revolutionary unless it's something pretty good. Cinemaphile will call it shit regardless and Twitter will masterbate over the diversity like they do everything else. I personally will probably enjoy it and most normal people will too.
>You don't see reviews calling something revolutionary unless it's something pretty good
Unless the lead is black, like Black Panther and Jordan Peele movies
I don't remember anybody praising Black Panther like they do Spider-Verse. And critics have always been mixed on Peele except for Get Out which was pretty good.
>I don't remember anybody praising Black Panther like they do Spider-Verse.
I do >And critics have always been mixed on Peele except for Get Out which was pretty good.
Nope
I don't remember anybody praising Black Panther like they do Spider-Verse. And critics have always been mixed on Peele except for Get Out which was pretty good.
Bruh if critics are to be believed Everything Everywhere All at Once is the best movie of all time, they're just easily impressed monkeys
These posters aren't showcasing the mask out of a racist motivation to hide Miles's blackness, they're showing off the mask because its cool and make for a better poster.
There's just as much domestic promotional material that show off the mask.
The infinite cope to justify a movie with black lead doing well sure is a sight. It should be a good thing that a good movie will be succeed regardless of race but so many of you would rather be consumed by irrational hatred and refuse reality. This isn't a bait post. Your life is worth more than this.
It will have No Way Home syndrome. It will be loved blindly until people start paying more attention to how cluttered the story will be and realize that the movie is actually a 5 or 6/10 with good animation.
The movie is going to be very well animated, acted, produced, etc. it will have ridiculous reviews and ratings.
The story itself will probably be trash. If the leaks are true its story is complete nonsense and moronic. But I think the production value and goodwill of the animation + first spider verse + everyone’s worship of miles will make people ignore this
It'll be well rated.
My hope for it is that it'll be a 'can't save everyone' ending, with the ultimate moral lesson that you still have to try. I think it'd be a good step to take it, and based on the trailers the conflict will be based around that.
What I fear is it'll be where every other spider man is just playing it safe with deciding who to save, and Miles is the best spider man that he can save everybody.
What was great about the first one was that Miles wasn't a better spider man, he was just another spider man belonging to his own world.
He was more like someone living up to the mantle of a spiderman by doing it his own way.
Which is a great subversion of how he was portrayed up to that point. As in a spiderman meant to fill in the role left by peter rather than being his own hero.
Doing things his own way is something that every spider man needs to do, which is why that 'training' doesn't work. It's why so much emphasis is put on 'The one and only Spider man', because each spider man is different, and each is the one and only spider man. In being his own hero, he becomes Spider man, but not a better Spider man, just his own.
I don't want the movie to throw that out the window and make it "Miles is such a good spider man he was able to do what no other spider man could! He's the best!"
It'd be better as a "Because he's one of the newest Spider Man, he still tries because he doesn't know it can't happen." Let him be remind The spider men that you still have to try, even if you don't succeed.
>Gwen and Miles will be explicitly interested in each other, but they won’t end up together. (Maybe Miles would be betrayed shes apart of the mob chasing him in the trailer) >Peter B has a reduced role >Peni, Noir, and Ham have voiceless cameos. >Ben Reily looks like the Peter from Miles’ universe >The Spot is a Spider-Man variant >Miguel fricks OP uninterrupted with a webfluid condom for 30 straight minutes.
Why’s Miguel so big in this movie? He was pretty much Peter’s side in the last one.
Whys he so large? Whys he so big and strong? Whys he so hunky and masculine? Why are his muscles so big??? Is his wiener big too? Does he have a big PENIS?
They literally ran out of budget and reused the Peter model. They actually reused the Peter model again for Gwen's dead friend even though he was supposed to be a teen.
The sheer number of you Discord trannies and Redditoids constantly shilling this film for free is frankly sad.
This film will probably do well, it won't beat out the first one, but it will be profitable. Beyond that, like Miles himself, it will be viewed as a mediocre piece of media that will be forgotten in a year.
Of course, I'm sure you cum guzzling homosexuals will eat the cherry picked stats and corporate hype like it was your own shit. You'll spend a few weeks after release spamming countless bait threads to try and desperately generate some minor interest in hate watching this film. You'll all but jerk off in our faces and demand we treat this nothing film like a master piece just so you can get your rocks off to a few dozen views. You'll probably succeed, but it won't last.
Eventually, no amount of bait will entice enough posts to keep your low effort threads alive. You'll either have to move on to the next outrage du jour, or finally admit that we were right and the film was not worth the effort you put into it. I'm sure there will be many in the former category, you all love corporate wiener more than anything in the world, but I hope that at least a few of you in the later will have the courtesy to make yourselves more useful on our side.
Of course you did homosexual, you read every word of it and it made you mad enough to reply. How hard was it to keep your post that short? How many drafts did you type up, thinking it a perfect put down only to realize it was cringe trash? I'll bet it was quite a few.
What I say will come to pass, and you'll still be here, trying desperately to squeeze just a few more (You)s out of this to feed you massive homosexual addiction. Tongue my anus Black person.
I would like it to be at least as good as the first but I'm far too jaded to allow myself to believe they haven't somehow fricked it up and made a massive pile of shit.
Will we one day have animated capeshit with great animation where the women are hot with comic book costumes and the men are straight with that heroic aura?
At a certain point a few years ago. The board got overrun by culture war outragegays that merely care about the movie starring a black man and Gwen having a trans flag in her room for a split second, and that fact proceeding to DOMINATE the thread cause apparently in a SPIDER-MAN movie there’s nothing else to discuss.
Why are you pretending Cinemaphile didn't hate Miles from the first second he was announced in USM over 10 years ago, the "we Spider-Man now" image was a banner here for years. You're not some Twitter tourist trying to muddy the waters and rewrite history are you.
As a fan, I can tell you Miles isn't hated enough for how shit he is. I can't even give you a comparison to another series' character because he's THAT unique in being an inflammatory non-entity that intentionally fails to set himself apart, but also can't achieve any Spider-Man qualities.
I was excited for the fist one, but it turned out meh, the best part was miles and peter interactions, and the ending was bad with that whole powerup thanks to believing in himself, i have seen some trailers and this time the main guys are miles and gwen, peter is just an extra, so they already took the best part of the first one away, gwen and miles chemistry doesn't compare at all to mentor/student, it doesn't help that she was almost at the same level as noir or penny, so i don't really care to go and watch it, and also conceptually the whole gwen/miles stuff is weird, giving him the ex gf of peter from another dimension? And is not a case like white nick fury and black nick fury, as we still get stories involving peter/gwen, is not something of the past, but then again, the whole gwenverse was stupid
it'll be good, Cinemaphile will seethe
Why? What kind of moron logic is that? People are gonna be MAD that it's good? What? have a nice day. The only thing worth seething about is you smugfrick miles fans. You're whiny, entitled, you have no humility nor respect for anything that's come before you, and worst of all, none of you know how to communicate like human beings.
This one's already seething.
You gonna swallow those tears tomorrow, lil guy, or are you gonna throw an even bigger fit that normal people don't reflect your opinions?
>this stupid shit is proving me right
>normal people don't reflect your opinions
I'm a normal guy. I'd curb stomp you in the streets if you were talking this type of stupid shit to me in person.
Seethe harder.
A well deserved bat straight to the face is what you'd get, kid.
You're only making this more fun for the Miles camp. Go on, seethe harder.
No. I'm done. No more attention and fodder for (You). Smarten up.
This isn't about a cartoon. It's the disrespect. Try thinking for once in your worthless life.
>No. I'm done. No more attention and fodder for (You). Smarten up.
>Still includes the post number anyways
Then be done, or seethe harder. We both know which option you'll take homosexual.
>i feel disrespected because people made fun of me for crying over a cartoon movie
Uh.....ok. Little b***h.
I'm not crying over a cartoon movie. You're intentionally not getting what's going on to make me look bad. Find the nearest rope and put it around your scrawny little neck as tight as you can after your 15 minutes of feeling superior are up. Worthless little homosexual. I genuinely despise your existence. You disrespectful little b***h. How dare you and all these other cucks think you have any right to treat me this way?
Weren't you done? People who are done don't keep crying like little b***hes.
Not that anon, but aww, Sweet! A Schizo Thread! Into the inclusiverse was the gayest animated movie of the 2010s. Why would the sequel that admits it supports trans ""'rights""' be any better?
Trans people exist and deserve rights
Trans is a mental illness.
They should be getting support to accept the body they have. Instead of chopping off their bits and being slaves to Big Pharma.
"Slaves to big pharma" is a facile argument designed to redirect legitimate anticapitalist fervor into transphobia. Dismantling capitalist power structures and eliminating big pharma would enable trans people to get the medical care they need, which may or may not include hormones and/or surgery. Piggybacking transphobia onto anticapitalism is never going to work no matter how much you try to force it.
>ignores that chemical castration is bad
Not even that anon and you lost the argument by trying to redirect it yourself. Stop supporting genital mutilation as a cure for people's depression.
Either way, once you have surgery, you'll need to be on drugs for the rest of your life. Doesn't matter if you pay for it yourself or get it from the government, it's all the same.
If anything, it's "people" like you who're stopping socialized medicine from being a thing. By wanting to waste it on frivolous, unnecessary surgery and drugs when you should just learn to accept the body you're in.
>I'm a normal guy.
Kek.
>I'd curb stomp you in the streets if you were talking this type of stupid shit to me in person.
KEK.
>WHY WOULD I BE MAD OR ABNORMAL? I WILL KILL YOU FOR SAYING THAT
God dang, dude.
>"I'm a normal guy" says the man slamming his fists on the ground over a Spider-Man cartoon movie
Lmao
Holy frick dude, don't scare me like that tough guy.
>People are gonna be MAD that it's good? What?
Have you missed how people act now? People hope for things to fail and get upset when their fears come true and it's something people love. Look at Cinemaphile and the Spider-man game for example.
Cinemaphile "seethes" toward everything
The Insomniac games are fricking terrible though. Give me a game I can actually control again for frick's sake, I'll even put up with your ugly strong independent women in burkas and your black charisma black hole, just stop putting everything on fricking rails.
Cinemaphile won't seethe because it's good, Cinemaphile will seethe because they hate blacks
Wrong way around, it'll get praised by reviewers because they love blacks
this post only grows more correct as the thread progresses
but when has Cinemaphile not seethe?
fpbp
The film will score very highly with both critics and audience, 90+ on each, and Cinemaphile will seethe once more that something involving Miles is well received and loved.
How about you go back where you came from
Seething as usual, I see.
>good
you mean it will have black people are stronk women
Obssesed
People hope that bad things fail because if they succeed more will come, look at how everyone regardless of political affiliation wished failure upon The Emoji Movie.
And Cinemaphile is not a good examples because fanboys are competing against each other
It's pathetic and has way more to do with politics. People just hear there is a Spiderman movie and the main character isn't white and bam, instant seethe. Their judgement is clouded by hate and even if the movie is good they fool themselves into thinking the movie was bad.
>People just hear there is a Spiderman movie and the main character isn't white and bam, instant seethe.
Strawman
You know its true, and I don't give a shit if you admit it or not. We just got off an entire month of meraid seethe, too.
I think people are just tired of selling popular characters as “the right color” rather than just coming up with good original stories or characters. Spiderverse let Hollywood know about the multiverse an entire concept devoid of creativity and soul there to let empty suits realize that homies like you don’t NEED good stories or modality, you just need to be fed the same shit with a different coat of paint.
People hate miles because they s read miles, that’s it the writer was an butthole and his concept was both destructive to the brand AND hilariously racist, but you eat it up because “it owns the chuds”. gays like you are why we DESERVE this horrific sightless world we live in
>you just need to be fed the same shit with a different coat of paint.
It's really hard to accept arguments like this when everyone bashing Miles seems to want more Peter, which is just the same shit with the exact same coat of paint.
There’s more you can do with peter than miles you mong. But why do you gays get so sated with corporations race bending to create empty problems between different raced autists? Why not push for them to make new or simpler yet, USE existing black characters? Frick half of this movie is shitting in empty iconography of a white character so a black characte mr can “look good” by teaching shitty morals in this empty story just like the first movie
>Why not push for them to make new characters
They did make a new character.
His name's Miles Morales.
>Frick half of this movie is shitting in empty iconography of a white character so a black character can “look good” just like the first movie
You are blinded by rage if that's what you think the first movie was like.
How wasn’t it anon? Spider-man was unique in his genre by being a character based on growth of story, how does trivializing that story by reducing him to being nothing but a PART of some green lantern corp bullshit respect that? And how does shitting on a massive part of his story by focusing on gwen being paired with miles and how he’s better than peter because he saves her respecting that story? Face it anon you’re just a b***h who enjoys bendis to suc so could you just do that on Reddit or Twitter or anywhere else? Because you will NEVER be welcome HERE, the only place we can openly speak about how shit these “stories” are
Exactly, Miles is just worse Peter, he has no purpose.
Why the hell should the audience of a popular character accept that he gets replaced with supposedly another character that is in reality the same one except with a different skin tone? People watch Dragon Ball for Goku, not my OC Joeku who is like Goku in every way except the interesting ones, and also he is white. There is literally no situation in which they should accept seeing Joeku instead of Goku in DB media, let alone pay for it and give me recognition, what an insane approach to art.
Amazing how it only took one post for you to take your mask off.
I own my “mask” and I own my perspective, you just latch onto the propaganda of the day and collapse when someone points that out. I’ve tried for a DECADE to accept a character whose creator NEEDS me to hate to satisfy his (and your) world view. It’s not MY fault that this movie codified EVERYTHING wrong with him and Hollywood at the moment. Why are you so gleeful at these multinational conglomerates pushing your view and this petty divide for “profit”? And do you really have no capability in questioning WHY your views so thoroughly line up with there’s?
>hy are you so gleeful at these multinational conglomerates pushing your view and this petty divide for “profit”?
NTA but you homosexuals seething so hard about it just made it fun for them. You really only have yourselves to blame for this one. Cope.
It’s actually been pushed to this point, and this isn’t just trolls anymore. I think this is the effort disney is making to tank the franchise in the same way they tanked x-men and FF to hurt fox. They don’t like sharing with Sony and will push as great a divide they can. Sony shitting on peter in spiderverse is just a part of the propaganda though.
Though I would hope that you’d get at least SOME people to just hate all the clout this shit gave bendis to ruin what he ruined at DC. But I don’t think people can have honest conversations about this since the bulk of this is just bait and “lol didn’t read”
But I’d be fine if it were Miguel as the lead instead of him being the antagonist
not an argument
Or, you know, it's a shit movie that might as well have been generated by AI.
Don't give me that bullshit
Frick off. Miles Morales only exists as Bendis' symbolic middle finger to the original white Spider-Man. He only exists to replace Ultimate Spider-Man after they killed him off. He's never been popular. No one bought the shitty movie game & the Spiderverse movie was nowhere near as successful as the media claimed. The sequel's already pushing interracial propaganda + pedophilia. We'll never accept your communist agitprop disguised as "moral values."
NTA, yet those outings are successful enough for him to keep on getting pushed. Funny how that turns out.
It doesn’t need to succeed anon, it just needs to have the message the powers that be want. It’s the same reason why none of you care about the story. You just enjoy a shit fight
You bendis gays are a plague on us all
First post best post.
>WFBM at the forefront
10/10 across the board regardless of quality
Relax, they're just friends.
>he doesn't know
Yeah, beneficial friends
The sequel implies every single Spider-Man across the multiverse indirectly kills their Gwen and that Miles is the only one that will save Spider-Gwen, Amy Pascal called the movie a romance between the two of them and said there will be a love triangle with Spider-Punk.
>love triangle with Spider-Punk.
Lmao what?
Yep
She is now
>She is now
I mean the Gwen of his earth?
The sequel implies the Gwen of his Earth fell in love with Peter A and died as a result
and if she didn't, she'd be way too old for him. she's around MJ's age
>The sequel implies every single Spider-Man across the multiverse indirectly kills their Gwen and that Miles is the only one that will save Spider-Gwen,
She isn't his Gwen. Where is Mile's Gwen Stacy anyway?
>Where is Mile's Gwen Stacy anyway?
Sony and Disney disagree about Miles being a guy like Stan Lee's Peter who dated the girl next door and even had a Black Cat who seduced him, Sony and Disney want to sell a product made for men to gays and women, it doesn't work. So Miles will never get his MJ or his Black Cat, at least not while they are in the hands of Sony and Disney. Who knows, maybe someone like Elon Musk will buy Marvel in the future?
I assume Gwen in Miles’s universe already died after aryan Peter didn’t save her
This is the second post and it practically has it down to a tea. It will be rated as a indisputed masterpiece for that alone -- the plot, animation, ect be damned.
KNEEL
Slott also worked on it and it's adapting his story, they won, Cinemaphile lost
>no Superior
>in fact no actual Otto as he's a chick in the film
how could he win if his pet character isn't included?
They're saving him for the sequel
100% going to be in Beyond.
Will get 90+ in critic and audience reviews
Will make 650 mil
Will probably be just okay but I’m hoping it’s good
Regardless the first is still my fav super hero movie
>Regardless the first is still my fav super hero movie
I hope it's also the only super hero movie you saw
Kek this genre is filled with shit anon sorry to say
But thinking about it again I might like the first GOTG and Iron Man more. It’s still one of my favs
the first one only made $384 million. i doubt this one will make more money.
I have a theory on why that is. When this new one comes out and dominates I am going to reveal why the first was so underrated and BTFO shitposters.
The opening weekend is already projected to make double and the first one started the miles push
It will make 500 mil at least
>"WAAAAAAAHHHHHHH IF THE MOVIE DOESN'T MAKE A 1 BILLION DOLLARS WORLDWIDE IT'S A FRICKING FAILURE BECAUSE I SAY SO WAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH"
Kys
its going to be a 500M-700M movie, pretty good for something that started as a flop maybe if the ending is really good part 2 can get 1 billion
>Is only a success if makes 1 billion dollars worldwide
Marvel has brainwashed your brains so hard, morons
I'm not saying that moron 500M is already a good success but It can do better
I mean it's a Marvel Spider-Man movie, the one that made $700M ($908M in today's money) was considered a catastrophic flop
>Will make 650 mil
With a bunch of gay shit?
Word of mouth will kill this movie
It's not just that. There's so much shit that will kill this movie.
>bloated run time of over 2 and a half hours
>No Peni Parker
>No Spider Noir
>No Spider Ham
>BLM propaganda
>Trans propaganda
>A pregnant woman endangering her unborn child
>Miles taking more of that stage from Peter B. Who carried the first film
>The Villian is an alternate universe spiderman
>rick and morty style council of Spidermen
Take your pick There's an easy reason to hate this movie. Sure defenders will blame it all on racism or transphobia but the reality is this film is flawed from top to bottom and I say this as someone that loved the first movie.
Peni Parker was pretty cringe tbh, though I am sad spider noir won’t be in it
This movie will suffer because the replacements aren't as interesting as Peni, Noir, or Ham
Literally none of this will backfire on the movie if it's actually good like the first.
>Regardless the first is still my fav super hero movie
The cope of "it has a non white lead so it gets fake positivity" will NOT work since Mermaid just came out to mixed.
Watching the culture war cope after this will prolly be the best part.
Both Black Panthers still have a certified fresh rating, and according to critics Black Widow is a masterpiece and Mario is unwatchable, they've long lost any credibility they pretended they had
But i thought the Mario movie was woke?
It lost its woke status after making a lot of money at the box office. That's how things work in the current climate.
GET WOKE
MAKE A BILLION
It wasn’t. It’s just bullshit spewed by grifters and mentally fricked dumbasses.
Yeah, so it was spread by culture warriors. Cool. They're homosexuals.
They're homosexuals about this movie too.
It is, but right-wingers have to do some mental malabarism to continue to like Nintendo.
People expected it to go full girlboss but at the end of the movie Mario and Luigi save the day and Peach isnt portrayed as infallible, just competent
I assume Nintendo stepped in and told them to tone down the girlboss
why does no one show the kamek troon scene
They said Mario is mediocre and it is. It was like a roller coaster ride. People had fun, then forgot about it right after.
Just like the two dozen MCU movies which are all 80+ certified somehow
Might as well go deeper on this. Mario also was clearly made for fans. Anyone not familiar would be questioning why are they driving on a rainbow. The MCU movies at least explain who and what shit is.
Mario Kart 8 alone sold 63 million copies and it's the sixth best selling game of all time
Does that change the fact that the movie doesn't explain anything? 63 million kids and man children are not regular adults who would know about those things.
There's plenty of movies that don't explain anything that are well received by critics, Spider-Verse itself would be bewildering to anyone lacking previous Spider-Man context, and Mario is a much bigger IP than Spider-Man.
Okay, whatever helps you cope at night.
When did MCU become a part of the culture war?
Is it because some capes are brown or women?
Not sure what you're talking about, I'm just saying critics' opinions are meaningless.
MCU movies are atleast plots
>Just like the two dozen MCU movies which are all 80+ certified somehow
They are competent movies, just aggressively mediocre
Weird you mentioned the Little Mermaid when it is underperforming at the box office.
How is it weird when the topic is about reviews and the cope that will come when it is rightfully universally loved.
Because no one seems to mention the universal cope that will come when makes as little at the box office as its predecessor an pretends what some critic says is important.
And what about the cope when it does well? What about the cope of "well it needs 3 billion to break even anyway"? What about the cope that even among the most packed 3 months in the last three years, it still manages to succeed?
I'm to this day still reading cope about the first spiderverse doing well. The sequel will be no different and when Beyond is canceled I'm sure I'll hear yet more cope about that too.
>beyond getting cancelled
Anon even if Across the Spider-Verse bombs financially then Beyond will still be released since it’s coming out next year, most of the work is likely done on that film
Just like the scoob christmas special huh?
It's facts. Spiderverse could go on to get a theme park, show, and be called a focus on financial statements and you would still insist it failed.
It couldn't because Sony only has movie rights to Spider-Man. Any movie that makes less money than Chicken Little is a failure in my eyes.
Financially suicide squad did way better than many movies with good reviews. In the end, suicide squad is remembered for being shit while good movies continue to be fondly remembered.
The movie is going to be okay but all the reviews will be glowing, the audience reviews will be ~80% and half the people on here will call it new world order great replacement propaganda made by the israelites
>new world order great replacement propaganda made by the israelites
I mean that's technically true in this case, Bendis is a israelite and made Miles to replace Peter
him being israeli has no bearing on anything unless you are a schizoposter
I just said it's technically true, even the Peter in the movies was turned from white into a israelite
>10/10 because Black folk and trans rights
>Will actually be a 6/10 at best given the bloated plot
Movie will be fine but the critics will be like "this is the greatest superhero movie ever!!1!" and Cinemaphile will work itself into knots over it for a month or 2
It will get a 99% with armond white complaining about a non white lead for clicks.
Armond's criticism of the first one was completely valid though
>armond white
nothing that comes out of this mans mouth is valid
3 minute interracial sex scene between miles and Gwen. Also cut out the trans flag
>Make your predictions!
The film has everything that woke critics like
>Propaganda of child mutilation
>Female protagonists are unattractive
>Female protagonists don't wear sexy costumes
>Black Cat can never appear in this franchise
>The white hero will be portrayed as an idiot
>Miles will not have the masculinity of traditional heroes
>The female protagonist is actually a boy
Rotten tomatoes
96%
You described the little mermaid and that got a 70 though...
>The female protagonist is actually a boy
Did I miss something?
Shitpost fodder.
Imagine how many more messages like this will be in the movie
Gwyn Stacy
Award bait.
literally every film made in either of our lifetimes wanted to win awards.
Wanted to win =/= construed itself entirely around what baits award judges
It's not 'constructed entirely around what baits award judges', it's literally just a flag that says 'hey trans people exist and deserve not to be second-class citizens'. You're looking at a speck on the edge of your plate and constructing elaborate conspiracies in your mind to explain why the shadow government wants to poison you.
Anon the directors of the first one refused to work on it unless they can make it about Miles, the literal colorswap with zero stories, and then gave him one of Peter's stories, what possible reason would they have to want to put the focus on a character with absolutely no narrative merit other than the fact black-led movies are a shoe-in for awards ceremonies
>what possible reason
because more mainstream movies should have black protagonists whose entire lives don't revolve around a prison/gang narrative
Movies shouldn't be propaganda
that is literally the opposite of propaganda. It's just diversity, and diversity is not propaganda unless you believe the existence of nonwhite people to be inherently propaganda.
I'm not sure you understand the definition of either of those terms
Do you?
Define them
"Diversity" refers to when media accurately depicts a broad swath of people instead of focusing on a specific kind of person.
"Propaganda" refers to media designed to subtly advertise a specific ideological messaging.
While it is true propaganda can obviously be diverse, and that diversity can potentially be in the service of propaganda, such as the CIA producing recruitment videos containing people of color and promoting the CIA as 'inclusive', that doesn't mean making content diverse is inherently propaganda, unless your perspective is that that media should only contain one specific kind of person, and that is a deeply immoral belief tied into conservative, supremacist values.
Diversity is political, promoting political causes in media is propaganda. You can have diversity without believing it absolutely needs to be in everything and forcing it where it doesn't belong, but that's not what Spider-Verse did.
>forcing it where it doesn't belong
Again, you are telling on yourself. You believe that superhero movies should only contain white men and the occasional hourglass bimbo in skintight latex. Your opinion is meaningless.
No, that's just a strawman your ego produced to protect you from dealing with the fact you're wrong. Having a Peter and Prowler adventure would've been an organic way to have diversity in a Spider-Man movie, what Spider-Verse did instead was focus the movie on the character invented to celebrate Obama's election i.e. an inherently political issue.
Peter Parker is so played out. Why are you so obsessed with him, and so hateful of the one who you claim is exactly the same but black? Why does it bother you so much? What a fricking conundrum.
You're either highlighting your stupidity is being intentionally dishonest when you try the "played out card", when the very existence of Miles himself is to ride the coat tails of that played out character except be a race swap. That's the very reason Bendis created the character and I use the term create in the loosest sense.
we NEED moar SpiderDad
he so sexy
-female
We traded this for some guy named Miles.
Has Peter’s face ever looked anything like Peter B. Or blonde Peter’s face in the the comics? Whenever I look at either of them I don’t see Peter Parker, just some random blonde/middle aged guy with the same name
Frenz maybe, I think he's supposed to be an Andrew Garfield knockoff
I can see it being based off of Frenz’s art, but it’d be weird if they chose his interpretation of the character’s appearance over someone like Romita Sr.
he was initially supposed to be voiced by Tobey Maguire (thankfully hasn't) and many of his and the blonde's flashbacks are scenes from the Maguire/Raimi trilogy
Fun fact: your nose and ears don't stop growing, the growth just slows down over time. It's possible that over time, Pete would look like that.
>(male)
Miles Morales is always going to be just another character but black. How is it not racist that the only thing that matters about him is his skin color?
the mental gymnastics in your thought process are fascinating
You need to go back to Twitter, troony.
This anons right, the other poster could be a bot given that their argument is simply "no your wrong"
Okay let's have Miles in the movie but make him white, you wouldn't be so hateful to complain about that would you
Yes, I am, because there are too many white people.
Whoa, racist much? White people are a worldwide minority
And if we work together we can take that pollution down to zero
No we can't, that's ESG shit.
The first one sure, but the second one absolutely is doing that.
>"Diversity" refers to when media accurately depicts a broad swath of people instead of focusing on a specific kind of person.
NTA but when do you ever run into that many diverse minorities all at once? Don't deny that it's an overcorrection anon, c'mon.
>your perspective is that that media should only contain one specific kind of person,
Like all the constant blackwashing in this upcoming shitfest? Not all of them were white yet they got changed regardless.
Just because you agree with something, doesn't mean it isn't propaganda. Diversity and propaganda are not mutually exclusive terms.
It's too late, anon. Hood culture ruined most modern perception of black man.
>more mainstream movies should have black protagonists whose entire lives don't revolve around a prison/gang narrative
So we'll never get a good Luke Cage adaptation?
I said 'more' not 'all'.
>what possible reason would they have to want to put the focus on a character with absolutely no narrative merit
You do realise they did give a reason for picking miles over Peter right? It was because of Miles’ family dynamic. You know something Peter doesn’t have?
>ignores uncle ben
>ignores aunt may
>ignores friendship relationships like Harry and MJ
Frick off you gaslighting homosexual
not he same man, come on
Source
>"Well, to me, it sort of all circles around to his family. He has a very different family than Peter Parker did," Lord confessed. "First of all, both of his parents are alive, so that's a huge difference right there. And being able to portray a very grounded family with a mother and father who both want the best for their son, but go about it in different ways. Also an uncle that loves him, but is encouraging him to go down a different path. That whole dynamic is really the center of what the whole movie's about, and it was really important to us to get right. And it really speaks to Miles trying to figure out who he is and who he's gonna be, what kind of a person he's going to become."
https://comicbook.com/marvel/amp/news/spider-man-into-the-spider-verse-miles-morales-peter-parker/
So shit that was completely unutilized, no one cared about, barely present in the comics, and that minimizes the tragedy and relatability of Spider-Man? Why not make it about Miles and his family then instead of the multiverse.
Trans children don't exist, it's a delusional ploy to get literally underdeveloped brains into sexual-themed fetish concepts before they get a chance to develop natural sense of identity
Boys shouldn't crossdress and call themselves girls because it will impair their social development. Same with girls. (Puberty literally affects them differently)
Kids shouldn't be able to consent to medication (which we don't know the long-term effects of) or life-changing surgeries
Kids are literally incapable of understanding what a woman or a man is. It takes life experience to understand these concepts beyond a surface level.
They sorta do exist but true gender dysphoria is 1. Incredibly rare and 2. Most kids grow out of it by the time they reach adolescence. This current “Trans kids” push is literally just gaslighting children into thinking they’re trans because they’re naive and are easily malleable
For what possible purpose
Because they have a chip on their shoulder about the fact that their transition is them indulging a mental condition. Gotta get kids on it to prove to the world that "actualy, it's natural"
Someone wanted to trick the gays into sterilizing themselves
>They sorta do
No, they do not. Children cannot be born thinking they're another gender.
This is just what I’ve heard and read from different accounts of people who were diagnosed with gender dysphoria before the big trans push, including conservative trans e-celebs like Buck Angel and Blaire White who are vehemently against current trans narratives. But regardless I don’t want kids and teens to undergo medical transitioning whether they actually have gender dysphoria or not. I believe that the treatment should revolve more around mental care rather than physical care since changing your body to be the opposite sex is and always will be a physical impossibility so learning to accept who you were born as seems to be a healthier approach mentally, emotionally, physically, socially, and economically.
Spider-Gwen has a “Protect Trans Kids” banner hung above her room’s doorway. This has led people to predict/shitpost that Gwen will be revealed to be trans in ATSV
cool, she's hot and it would be neat if she was trans
It sets up a false expectation and will just make more kids want to 41 themselves.
i don't think that's true, i think just seeing a character who is trans be cool and liked is good enough.
>a character who is trans be cool and liked
Right, false expectations.
needlessly cruel
That was the perfect set-up for an easy dunk. I'm not throwing away my shot.
you know what, fair. I, too, often cannot resist an easy dunk regardless of my personal feelings on the matter.
Thank you Wesley. I'm glad you understand.
They don't have the balls
I'll say, the black community's reaction would be absolutely hilarious, though. I'd love to see it happen
And there were people who complained about the organic webs and had no idea what was still to come
will not have the masculinity of traditional heroes
Is this really a bad thing? Miles being a beta is part of his charm.
>Miles
>charm
>it will get a 99% on the strength of Spider-Man's multiverse
>everyone will pretend it was because of Miles and use it as an excuse to push him more
Its actually astounding the lengths this board will go to convince you “NO EVERYONE HATES MILES, REALLY!”
yeah, its kinda weird. most people are just indifferent to him and don't really care about him.
83% on RT
i'm too nervous to pick a side, i'm not an outrage gay but i also don't care for Morales all that much, it's probably gonna get like a 95% even if it was bad
i liked the first movie quite a lot, i've watched it two times and i really liked that Peter B got back with his version MJ and stopped being a gay and put a baby in her, but if i'm being 100% honest they went way too far with the low frame rate animation, that spider verse headquarters in the trailers looks fricking absurd, the idea of all the spider men having diffrent artstyles sounds cool on paper but it looks extremely ugly, like having the PS4 spider man be an actual 3D PS4 render just looks moronic imo, and also the trans flag thingy and raceswapped 7 month pregnant Jessica Drew is cringe but i don't really care about that
i think the story is gonna be sorta obvious, The Spot is gonna be some secret multiversal threat but appear as a harmless c tier villan and all the spider men trying to capture Miles are gonna be proven wrong some how after chasing him the whole movie and join forces to beat the big bad, but hey idk it could be good like the first one i just think the animation looks like shit at certain points
do they acknowledge that PS4 spiderman and PS5 spiderman look completely fricking different?
Higher 80s to 94.
I just want to see the spot. I think the trailers imply he becomes a multiverse tier threat because miles was texting while fighting him which is pretty funny
They are gonna get together because it’s kind of inevitable and the ‘platonic friendship erm…THEY'RE SIBLINGS can’t a guy and a girl just be friends :/ homosexuals will seethe all over Twitter ignoring the fact that Miles was clearly into her in the first movie.
Isn't it kind of toxic to imply the male character is entitled to the girl just because he's into her? Wouldn't the "respect other people's boundaries" message be more progressive? She even tells him she doesn't want to do it in the sequel because she's scared for her life and he keeps pushing her into it anyway, that's not very progressive, what sort of message does that send.
>he keeps pushing her into it anyway, that's not very progressive
It's okay because he's black
lel what kinda logic is this? They're going to get together because Hollywood loves interracial romance, especially white girls and black guys
They're just fulfilling white women's fantasy is all
Statistically they're doing the opposite
Only stats you agree with.
That's a very cringe statement because black men are probably the worst husbands out all of the races
>it's all about that bee bee cee baby
Anon, do you realize how racist, child-grooming, pants-on-fire moronic you sound?
I'm not even saying you couldn't make a story with Miles and Gwen as a couple, hell, they might even do it properly. It's the propagandizing what bothers me.
Women also have a fetish for being struggling artists, do you think they ever interviewed homeless to ask what that experience is like?
I think you're trying to tell me something
Better figure it out, then.
LMAO no thank you, your point was probably stupid anyways
Okay, dumb butt.
What "propagandizing"?
I fricking deleted it but I wanted to post this European juice commercial that had a white woman give birth to a black baby, only to reveal the baby was for an interracial gay couple. Like that had anything to do with the juice.
>stonetoss
End your suffering. Embrace the void.
Uh-oh! Looks like I committed a wrongthink! Go get your paper bags if you get a panic attack, everyone!
Yes, yes, you're the only sane person on earth. You can go to sleep forever now.
>
Wasn't this thread about based black spiderman at one point? Why the schizoposting?
You're the one hell-bent on getting the last word. Shut up.
Getting called a homosexual on Cinemaphile for posting pictures from shitty webcomics is a long time tradition. You have to go back.
The example you gave seems like explicit propaganda, miles and gwen dosen't feel that way. Especially if its done naturally like from what i've seen in some of the clips.
To some people it's going to be propaganda just because it has a black person in it.
I don't think it's "forced" but I didn't think it was necessary either. I do feel like the progressive angle was a factor as to why it's happening, though. In the first movie their relationship as friends was so refreshing, why reverse that?
Hollywood/Exec meddling.
eitherway I don't mind how their relationship shakes up.
what I would personally have preferred is that they split up by the third movie and miles got a girlfriend from his universe like tiana toomes or barbra rodriguez. I don't know how gwen and mile's relationship would even function long term since they literally don't live in the same universe.
>zero chemistry
>Miles dating a version of his mentor's dead ex soulmate and doesn't care
>gets told Gwen dates Spider-Man in every universe and thinks nothing of it
>gets told it always ends badly for Gwen and he persists anyway
>movie implies he'll be the only one that can make the relationship work making it so that they're the only destined pairing of Gwen and Spider-Man in the multiverse
>Miles desperately needs his own characters yet gets Peter's hand-me-downs again
>they're dating across the multiverse even though it should kill them according to the movies
>she friendzoned him in the first movie which is not something girls just back out of
>she's cold, mature, older, and more experienced and he's an immature rookie boy
>Gwen not recoiling at the name "Miles"
>Gwen not caring about two different living Peters
>Peter not caring about the living Gwen
>illegal age gap in the original comic pairing
>Spider-Gwen's whole thing is the "hero's girlfriend" character being the hero herself and not defined as the leading man's girlfriend and they shit on that idea immediately
Yeah completely natural and not forced at all lmao
They sort of had chemistry in the first, but definitely not in a romantic sense, that is true, and most of your other points are valid.
>False
>Meta nonsene which is basically what all Anti-Gwiles are based around
>What?
>Yes, He likes her and she likes him. They believe they can make it work.
>Things that have never happened.
>He does. Cope.
>Already solved
>Didn't happen
>You didn't watch the movie
>What?
>Meta nonsense
>Meta Nonsense
>Not true
>Untrue meta nonsense
You have a single legitimate point? Why is it always just walls of text of schizod rambling?
>false
>not true
>incorrect
>wrong
>inaccurate
>misleading
>erroneous
>fallacious
>untrue
>mistaken
>fabricated
>bogus
>deceptive
>fictitious
Try again
>ITT self inserting Black person who will end up dating a 250lb wh*te woman to get back at the white man
You never heard that
" ‘platonic friendship erm…THEY'RE SIBLINGS can’t a guy and a girl just be friends" crowd speaking up about ships like kylo and rey, an infintely worse couple than anything spiderverse 2 could cook up, why is that?
Also them being any kind of siblings, even only conceptually, only makes me want to see them frick more.
Whoa Bendis, too far
I'm an incest shipper in every show or movie. Especially twincest. 'found family' isn't as good, but it'll do in a pinch.
My only hope is that the cool Mexican Spiderman from the future doesn't job to the black Spiderman they're trying to sell me as the next coolest guy. I would've preferred a Spiderverse with Miguel as the protagonist
I hope the movie backfires and not miles prefer Miguel over Miles
*audiences prefer Miguel over Miles
I doubt that won't be the case. Miguel is so cool.
The only way it won’t be the case is if they butcher Miguel’s character to make Miles look better
Good reviews, but reviews only matter when they agree with what you already thought of the movie before seeing it.
Will 90's animated series Spider-man appear?
>10/10 just like the first
>Reddit and twitter will be happy
>The most autistic posters on this site will be assblasted for months
Why don't you go back there
Sorry mate, I've always been here.
I'm just not a fricking sperg
take that 10/10 to like an 8/10 and I agree
>No one cares about the fact spot is finally getting an Mainstream appearance
Spot bros…
He was in the cartoon
Not really the same as a big budget film, the films and big budget ps4 games are gateway entries for villains to get some spotlight like spot and mr homietive
I was hoping Spot would end up being the blonde Peter from the first film but the recent bodega clip revealed him to be just some random alchemax worker, sadge
I'm glad it's his comic origin essentially. A scientist who did work for Kingpin and wound up getting these powers.
Why did they give him a dad bod?
Designed by Anka
i want to cum in his holes
Because he’s just some guy that got super powers and has to live with it now
Because he's just an average joe that suddenly got superpowers, bro was probably chugging beers when he got those powers out of nowhere
Why is this villain threated as a joke anyways? dude is a living portal gun
>they're ruining Miguel's character REEEEEE
But wasn't he always a huge butthole?
Is it me or is Miles kind of a bland and boring homie?
Unfortunately, yes, I like the first movie, but I like it in spite of Miles not really having much of a personality. But I chalk that up in-universe to him being young and not particularly well-defined yet, and metacontextually as the studio trying to make him as inoffensive and broadly appealing as possible.
Yeah, miles was the worst part of the first film from what I remember. He isn't interesting or unique really.
Miles has always been boring and bland. He literally needs an entire multiverse of more interesting spider people to make people watch his movie
i remember watching the first one. i never really talked about it online. i thought it was ok, but apparently it's like the greatest cbm ever on twitter.
It'll have rave reviews from critics and middling reviews from regular people.
Does it have Peni Parker?
The term diversity is incredibly dishonest, when it comes to shows and movies, the term demographic marketing should be used instead. A tv show or movie has a finite amount of characters,the question should be what demographics does it market too? The term diverse is an attempt to trick people who want to be seen as virtuous.
Black person lovers will like it.
The tomatometer will give it 6,840,942% and the highest it will get from actual people is 3%.
>Miles steal Peter's ex girlfriend, some of his rogue gallery and stories.
Wow, this is great!
>MCU Peter steal Ganke
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Both legitimate feelings. Peter has too much, redistributing some of that wealth is only healthy.
I imagine most of the reviews are going to be 'it's good but worse than the first" with them criticizing the new directors and new characters (Spider-Punk, Spider-India, and Jessica Drew).
Parents get outraged by Miguel using the S word so much
Do baity people like clownfish or whoever talk about spiderverse, or do even they admit it is great?
critical darling
modest profit
It's gonna be shit. The first one being good was a fluke. This one is heavily prompting miles "tails" molé for brownie points. They really want to bury og parker just so miles molé is the only spiderman on people's minds.
>T. long time fan since the raimi movies
Cope, seethe, mald
L, swagless, ratio, broke
They hate Peter so much they gave him a loving marriage with a child, something the COMICS refuse to do.
You’re a massive moron, Anon. You being a Raimigay only strengthens that point.
It becomes meaningless when there isn’t anything special about being spider-man in the movie. It becomes just another toy to sell and another example of bad artists over designing a character to make up for the fact that there is no character in the movie. It’s just another reference soulless focus testers threw at a wall anon, it has no meaning or reverence.
If they loved him as much as you claim they'd make that the plot of the movie
99% RT, 90 or so MC, one of the greatest animated films of all time like that one guy said. You don't see reviews calling something revolutionary unless it's something pretty good. Cinemaphile will call it shit regardless and Twitter will masterbate over the diversity like they do everything else. I personally will probably enjoy it and most normal people will too.
>You don't see reviews calling something revolutionary unless it's something pretty good
Unless the lead is black, like Black Panther and Jordan Peele movies
I don't remember anybody praising Black Panther like they do Spider-Verse. And critics have always been mixed on Peele except for Get Out which was pretty good.
>I don't remember anybody praising Black Panther like they do Spider-Verse.
I do
>And critics have always been mixed on Peele except for Get Out which was pretty good.
Nope
Did he direct Nope?
Okay homosexual. Who cares.
Bruh if critics are to be believed Everything Everywhere All at Once is the best movie of all time, they're just easily impressed monkeys
I wouldn't know, I've never seen that movie. A lot of people said it was great though.
It's really funny if this does well in china. The meme is china is immune to black propaganda. What cope will come out if its a hit in china?
They put out a lot of posters with a tiny Miles with the mask on to mislead people into thinking it's a Spider-Man movie
>superhero wears a mask
Whoa whoa whoa, hold on!
I agree, what a concept
Post your face when you got BTFO
Why are
only in China
Countries get exclusive posters, duh.
And China's exclusive posters all minimize and mask Miles because...
see
That's not an exclusive poster
Exclusive posters are not the only or the widely used ones. Miles black face will be on a lot of chinese theaters.
>minimize and mask
Kek, he is the focus and they are ALL masked.
>Kek, he is the focus
And tiny
>and they are ALL masked.
As they should be
Once again the us gets shafted with shit posters. Meanwhile the Asian countries get the cools ones..... 🙁
A real struggle to keep this narrative straight.
It just falls apart at the slightest amount of pressure.
see
Oh? need another my dude?
Nice Taiwanese poster
Now let's see the Chinese one.
These posters aren't showcasing the mask out of a racist motivation to hide Miles's blackness, they're showing off the mask because its cool and make for a better poster.
There's just as much domestic promotional material that show off the mask.
Why aren't the American ones doing that
Look at the OP image for this thread dumbass
YouTube critics dare each other to make nitpicking complaints as close to "the protagonist is a mulatto" as possible without breaking TOS
>Heh, sorry cucks! But based China doesn't want to see any Ni- ACK!!!
>posts another global poster
That's a china one.
Global one translated to Chinese, all the China-only ones deemphasize Miles
Miles is literally the focal point of this image. What are you smoking my homie?
No, the Monkey King is
1 out of 4 is not notable
I honestly don't know what you're trying to say anymore.
If only China were part of the globe!
What next? Are you gonna pretend that the chinese trailer is using AI to make Miles look white?
Great visuals but with a weak story, same as the first film.
The infinite cope to justify a movie with black lead doing well sure is a sight. It should be a good thing that a good movie will be succeed regardless of race but so many of you would rather be consumed by irrational hatred and refuse reality. This isn't a bait post. Your life is worth more than this.
My only worry is that it's already kinda long for these types of movies, and it's just the first part.
It will have No Way Home syndrome. It will be loved blindly until people start paying more attention to how cluttered the story will be and realize that the movie is actually a 5 or 6/10 with good animation.
It will recieve amazing ratings but probably just be okay like the first one
Gwen and Miles marry at the end
Reviews won’t come out for another 40 hours or so IIRC
The movie is going to be very well animated, acted, produced, etc. it will have ridiculous reviews and ratings.
The story itself will probably be trash. If the leaks are true its story is complete nonsense and moronic. But I think the production value and goodwill of the animation + first spider verse + everyone’s worship of miles will make people ignore this
The story of the first movie wasn’t amazing anyways
It'll be good
Yo Where da white reviews at?
It'll be well rated.
My hope for it is that it'll be a 'can't save everyone' ending, with the ultimate moral lesson that you still have to try. I think it'd be a good step to take it, and based on the trailers the conflict will be based around that.
What I fear is it'll be where every other spider man is just playing it safe with deciding who to save, and Miles is the best spider man that he can save everybody.
What was great about the first one was that Miles wasn't a better spider man, he was just another spider man belonging to his own world.
He was more like someone living up to the mantle of a spiderman by doing it his own way.
Which is a great subversion of how he was portrayed up to that point. As in a spiderman meant to fill in the role left by peter rather than being his own hero.
>doing it his own way
>does everything exactly like Peter did
Superior and Fake Red are examples of what you claim Miles does (but doesn't)
Doing things his own way is something that every spider man needs to do, which is why that 'training' doesn't work. It's why so much emphasis is put on 'The one and only Spider man', because each spider man is different, and each is the one and only spider man. In being his own hero, he becomes Spider man, but not a better Spider man, just his own.
I don't want the movie to throw that out the window and make it "Miles is such a good spider man he was able to do what no other spider man could! He's the best!"
It'd be better as a "Because he's one of the newest Spider Man, he still tries because he doesn't know it can't happen." Let him be remind The spider men that you still have to try, even if you don't succeed.
I want you to look at how many times you typed spider-man then I want you to realize that there is nothing of value in anything you think or say
>Make your predictions!
>Gwen and Miles will be explicitly interested in each other, but they won’t end up together. (Maybe Miles would be betrayed shes apart of the mob chasing him in the trailer)
>Peter B has a reduced role
>Peni, Noir, and Ham have voiceless cameos.
>Ben Reily looks like the Peter from Miles’ universe
>The Spot is a Spider-Man variant
>Miguel fricks OP uninterrupted with a webfluid condom for 30 straight minutes.
It will be cringe yet based. Not to be confused with based cringe.
Why’s Miguel so big in this movie? He was pretty much Peter’s side in the last one.
Whys he so large? Whys he so big and strong? Whys he so hunky and masculine? Why are his muscles so big??? Is his wiener big too? Does he have a big PENIS?
They literally ran out of budget and reused the Peter model. They actually reused the Peter model again for Gwen's dead friend even though he was supposed to be a teen.
He's going to stretch and remodel Gwen's pussy with his gigantic future wiener
They wanted to cuck miles and make porn of gwen being fricked by his future wiener
They wanted to cuck Gwen and make porn of Miles getting fricked by his Big Future wiener.
It's gonna be mid, but because it has spiggerman on it, morons are going to call it the best thing since sliced bread.
7/10, concept was novel for the first one so this one may not hit as well.
The sheer number of you Discord trannies and Redditoids constantly shilling this film for free is frankly sad.
This film will probably do well, it won't beat out the first one, but it will be profitable. Beyond that, like Miles himself, it will be viewed as a mediocre piece of media that will be forgotten in a year.
Of course, I'm sure you cum guzzling homosexuals will eat the cherry picked stats and corporate hype like it was your own shit. You'll spend a few weeks after release spamming countless bait threads to try and desperately generate some minor interest in hate watching this film. You'll all but jerk off in our faces and demand we treat this nothing film like a master piece just so you can get your rocks off to a few dozen views. You'll probably succeed, but it won't last.
Eventually, no amount of bait will entice enough posts to keep your low effort threads alive. You'll either have to move on to the next outrage du jour, or finally admit that we were right and the film was not worth the effort you put into it. I'm sure there will be many in the former category, you all love corporate wiener more than anything in the world, but I hope that at least a few of you in the later will have the courtesy to make yourselves more useful on our side.
I didn't read any of that
Cry more, little baby b***h
Of course you did homosexual, you read every word of it and it made you mad enough to reply. How hard was it to keep your post that short? How many drafts did you type up, thinking it a perfect put down only to realize it was cringe trash? I'll bet it was quite a few.
What I say will come to pass, and you'll still be here, trying desperately to squeeze just a few more (You)s out of this to feed you massive homosexual addiction. Tongue my anus Black person.
Didn't read this one either. Stay mad, little b***h boy.
>I'M NOT ANGRY!!! I DIDNT READ ANY IF YOUR POST CHU-ACK
Shut your Black person homosexual mouth and go back to getting AIDS.
Mad at the Internet
Mayday dies.
>>007
Checks out
Where are they
Embargo stops 30 hours from now. Dunno why OP said it comes out sooner.
No Miles/Gwen sex scene so 9/10
More like 9/11
Lots of praising, but it being "reviews" the credibility is as always nonexistant.
I thought they were already out
I would like it to be at least as good as the first but I'm far too jaded to allow myself to believe they haven't somehow fricked it up and made a massive pile of shit.
I warn you: the critics and reviews of this film are gonna be flawless
Will we one day have animated capeshit with great animation where the women are hot with comic book costumes and the men are straight with that heroic aura?
Wow people are really, REALLY mad about the existence of Miles. I didn’t pay much attention to the Spiderman related threads so I had no idea
The existence of Miles is really, REALLY offensive
At a certain point a few years ago. The board got overrun by culture war outragegays that merely care about the movie starring a black man and Gwen having a trans flag in her room for a split second, and that fact proceeding to DOMINATE the thread cause apparently in a SPIDER-MAN movie there’s nothing else to discuss.
>Replies:373
>Posters:117
You’re all such megahomosexuals.
Why are you pretending Cinemaphile didn't hate Miles from the first second he was announced in USM over 10 years ago, the "we Spider-Man now" image was a banner here for years. You're not some Twitter tourist trying to muddy the waters and rewrite history are you.
As a fan, I can tell you Miles isn't hated enough for how shit he is. I can't even give you a comparison to another series' character because he's THAT unique in being an inflammatory non-entity that intentionally fails to set himself apart, but also can't achieve any Spider-Man qualities.
100% on Rotten Tomatoes
>propagandists shill propaganda
Imagine my shock
Spotted the /misc/tard
I'm so glad I'm not this boring
Enjoying politics is what old boring people do anon
>It's politics when it's an ideology I don't like
>It's not politics when it's an ideology I like
Just keep all propaganda out of my entertainment thank you very much
I really don't give a shit about this multiverse BS. It's just a more lazy way of introducing new characters or doing crossovers.
Looks cool
Very good, but it might not be as good as the first. But if it is better than the first it will go down as one of the best comic films of all time
It'll be better in terms of antagonists but not quite sure about the rest yet.
Where are the reviews, Tom?
Well, where?
There’s too little chicks in this film. We need some more sexy white b***hes in here and preferably ones that don’t support trannies
Looser
Nah. She looks good in tights
This is the one where miles mother gets fricked by gwen
Yes
I just want to see the Spot in action, I care more about him than this whole multiple spiderman shenanigans
I was excited for the fist one, but it turned out meh, the best part was miles and peter interactions, and the ending was bad with that whole powerup thanks to believing in himself, i have seen some trailers and this time the main guys are miles and gwen, peter is just an extra, so they already took the best part of the first one away, gwen and miles chemistry doesn't compare at all to mentor/student, it doesn't help that she was almost at the same level as noir or penny, so i don't really care to go and watch it, and also conceptually the whole gwen/miles stuff is weird, giving him the ex gf of peter from another dimension? And is not a case like white nick fury and black nick fury, as we still get stories involving peter/gwen, is not something of the past, but then again, the whole gwenverse was stupid
Jake has spoken
Why am I supposed to care about who the frick Jake is?
The marketing team needed SOMEONE to say something positive about the movie.