the movie portrays anyone remotely moral as a secular humanist (in the middle ages) because the director is a binary minded moron that thinks agreeing with me (atheism) = good person. it has nothing to do with the muslims or christians in particular, but the anachronistic imposition of secularism and the equating of that with moral virtue. you basically cannot be pious and also a good person in the movie. it’s childish
>fell for the cool leper king movie meme >shows up halfway to the movie >sister is a prostitute >barely any screen time >stops watching after he stops showing to do some cool leper king shit
>movies HAVE to be historically accurate >movies HAVE to have perfect plot >movies will NOT adhere to suspension of disbelief
peak midwit. This movie spouts moral relativism but its acting and aesthetics is phenomenal and thats why you watch it. If you cant find value in aesthetics then your opinion on films mean absolutely nothing when it comes to film
It's not the same thing. One is done for politics and doesn't fit the setting. The other is done so a movie isn't just a 5 hour reading of Wikipedia. If a black character is done well and fits the setting then it's fine.
You really are a midwit. Go back to r*ddit and pretending you're anything more than a dull farm animal, lmao
how do i become a christian bros?
christianity nowadays seems cool as frick with all the art and buildings and religious artifacts
i thought it was all hymns and homosexual prayers and shit
the poetry, music and literature is what is more likely to make you christian. if you only care about the material aesthetics of christianity that means you appreciate the religion rather than want to adhere to its ethos
You don’t need to keep replying to yourself bro, just put your opinion in one post.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>more moron babble
That's obviously not me because the posting styles are nothing alike. You're not even the smart kind of autistic. Just the useless kind.
7 months ago
Anonymous
you know you could just post a screencap instead of appealing to imaginary prose distinctions and then regurgitating a canned line redditors use as an insult? this post hasn’t helped your case lmao
7 months ago
Anonymous
Inb4 his inevitable cope
7 months ago
Anonymous
Why so you can say I edited it? C'mon moron. We both know you'd done that.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>won’t do it
as expected kek. >you’d done that
holá ESL!
7 months ago
Anonymous
That's proper southern slang, moron. Cope more. Again, don't be a Black person and act like you wouldn't have pull the >le edit
Shit. It's just insulting.
Every time I rewatch it, I'm more and more annoyed by Bloom's crappy performance. He's completely out of sync with his co-stars and just fumbles through his scenes. It's like you're in the opera watching Ave Verum Corpus and there's some stiff computer engineering student screwing around on the stage and he's supposed to be the hero. Kingdom of Cringe.
>In the aftermath of a clash in Turkistan in 1221, a woman held captive by Mongol soldiers admitted she had swallowed her pearls to safeguard them. She was immediately executed and eviscerated. When pearls were indeed recovered, Genghis Khan “ordered that they open the bellies of the slain” on the battlefield to look for more. Such was the consequence of pearls for the Mongol Empire.
Ridley Scott should've gave up after Alien, his magnum opus. He sucks now.
Alien and Blade Runner were his only good films, the rest range from poor to mediocre
Blatantly false.
When you stand before God, you cannot say "But I was told by others to do thus." or that virtue was not convenient at the time.
This will not suffice.
a simple "no" would suffice
You know what. Maybe I will
no
its mediocre, no matter how hard Cinemaphile shills it
shadowed by gladiator but still christkino in its own right
The last "Epic" movie to be made. I will never forgive the studio meddling that butchered the theatrical version of it.
This movie is the biggest waste of 4 hours you'll ever experience.
Great film. Only bother watching the "director's cut" though.
reminder muslims hate this movie because they think the christians were portrayed as evil enough
the movie portrays anyone remotely moral as a secular humanist (in the middle ages) because the director is a binary minded moron that thinks agreeing with me (atheism) = good person. it has nothing to do with the muslims or christians in particular, but the anachronistic imposition of secularism and the equating of that with moral virtue. you basically cannot be pious and also a good person in the movie. it’s childish
The christian king was pretty moral
>it’s childish
Americans wouldn't watch it otherwise.
>the movie portrays anyone remotely moral as a secular humanist
you've just described every other notable "historical" film made by hollywood
How exactly was Baldwin portrayed as a secular humanist?
Besides the literal angel hospitaller starting fires and saying faith is all that matters.
high iq post
Christcucks wanna be oppressed so bad
Ok Shlomo
I've never watched it. I wish I could.
>fell for the cool leper king movie meme
>shows up halfway to the movie
>sister is a prostitute
>barely any screen time
>stops watching after he stops showing to do some cool leper king shit
Baldwin should have been a bigger character. Norton was locked in despite being covered up the whole time.
i did and its not very good. i cant beleive boomers ate up this Hollywood slop.
Watch Real Crusades History's takedown of this movie instead. (no, I'm not a Christian, but this movie is horrible history)
>movies HAVE to be historically accurate
>movies HAVE to have perfect plot
>movies will NOT adhere to suspension of disbelief
peak midwit. This movie spouts moral relativism but its acting and aesthetics is phenomenal and thats why you watch it. If you cant find value in aesthetics then your opinion on films mean absolutely nothing when it comes to film
You hold use those same three points you just listed to defend the recent trend of blackwashing in historical movies lmao
It's not the same thing. One is done for politics and doesn't fit the setting. The other is done so a movie isn't just a 5 hour reading of Wikipedia. If a black character is done well and fits the setting then it's fine.
You really are a midwit. Go back to r*ddit and pretending you're anything more than a dull farm animal, lmao
Sounds like I struck a nerve lmao
>gets absolutely destroyed and have no response
>"dude you are just uhh mad or something"
Lol.
ooh, you big mad
I rewatch it with my mom every easter
how do i become a christian bros?
christianity nowadays seems cool as frick with all the art and buildings and religious artifacts
i thought it was all hymns and homosexual prayers and shit
the poetry, music and literature is what is more likely to make you christian. if you only care about the material aesthetics of christianity that means you appreciate the religion rather than want to adhere to its ethos
Here we go, this is what every Cinemaphile homosexual claiming to be Christian is actually thinking.
>how do I trick myself into believing all the fake stories?
You're already a moron so you're already half way to being religious
Sorry your mommy lied to you about santa and now you're a nihilistic moron but keep it to yourself. More insufferable than the Christian posters.
I'm not nihilistic at all I just call out morons where its due
must be tiring insulting yourself all day
>More insufferable than the Christian posters.
I'm a Christian and I have to say that Christ posters are way worse than based fedora posters
If they actually had something good to say. Instead it's smugposting by underages and actual morons. So in the end they're always much much worse.
You don’t need to keep replying to yourself bro, just put your opinion in one post.
>more moron babble
That's obviously not me because the posting styles are nothing alike. You're not even the smart kind of autistic. Just the useless kind.
you know you could just post a screencap instead of appealing to imaginary prose distinctions and then regurgitating a canned line redditors use as an insult? this post hasn’t helped your case lmao
Inb4 his inevitable cope
Why so you can say I edited it? C'mon moron. We both know you'd done that.
>won’t do it
as expected kek.
>you’d done that
holá ESL!
That's proper southern slang, moron. Cope more. Again, don't be a Black person and act like you wouldn't have pull the
>le edit
Shit. It's just insulting.
you sound like a moron
Zoomers found the one based frame in a 4 hour movie for Muslims.
NOOOOOO! DON'T MAKE ME MARRY EVA GREEEEEN NOOOOOOOO! I'D RATHER SEE JERUSALEM FALL TO THE SARACENS BEFORE I PUT A RING ON HER!
Directors cut is great but the ending is still awful and Orlando Bloom casting was a terrible decision
Every time I rewatch it, I'm more and more annoyed by Bloom's crappy performance. He's completely out of sync with his co-stars and just fumbles through his scenes. It's like you're in the opera watching Ave Verum Corpus and there's some stiff computer engineering student screwing around on the stage and he's supposed to be the hero. Kingdom of Cringe.
I watch for her.
How different are the versions that you people shit on theatrical version so much? It can't be that different from each other, can it?
It's a huge difference.
my gf said it was like comparing me to her ex
its known for being one of the best directors' cuts of all time. It adds back in an entire plotline essential to the story.
>In the aftermath of a clash in Turkistan in 1221, a woman held captive by Mongol soldiers admitted she had swallowed her pearls to safeguard them. She was immediately executed and eviscerated. When pearls were indeed recovered, Genghis Khan “ordered that they open the bellies of the slain” on the battlefield to look for more. Such was the consequence of pearls for the Mongol Empire.
Why were they like this?
I got a pearl necklace for some turk prostitute to swallow a-hyuk hyuk
>What is Gaza worth...
>"Everything"
>... and Nothing.
Pottery. Scott is a genius.
Liam Neeson got an arrow to the testicle and survived.
okay