>rewatch the 2nd pirates of the caribbean
>still has the most kino CGI ever made
how'd they do it?
 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
|
>rewatch the 2nd pirates of the caribbean. >still has the most kino CGI ever made
>rewatch the 2nd pirates of the caribbean
>still has the most kino CGI ever made
how'd they do it?
|
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
|
very carefully
also wet n' shiny is one of the looks CGI is really good at so they made a smart choice there
really? i thought water was the hardest and thats why james cameron made avatar 2 mainly in the water cuz of the challenge, i remember that practicl effects look best when wet or goey like in movies like the thing so u cant tell its a rubber texture
Actual volumes of water sloshing around are complex and hard, but shiny wet surfaces look pretty good almost by default because of all the specular highlights. People aren't looking at the physics of individual droplets (although I bet Davy Jones had advanced tech for that stuff too), they're seeing a bunch of glinting spots that looks high-detail and pretty.
>how'd they do it?
225M budget
yeah...because money is the reason...
You realize half the screen time is spent on a fricking boat, right? Budget could be heavily allocated to specific focuses like tentacle face when you don't need to CGI to depict half of New York being obliterated for 30 minutes
holy fricking copium
>There are redditors on this board right now who thinks movie budget allocation is done by clicking a plus and a minus button next to a generic "CGI" label on a spreadsheet
I am going to hazard a guess and assume that they spent more money making a character look good that was going to be seen throughout the entire movie, as opposed to a stupid fricking 3rd eye that has a total screen time of about 5 seconds. Are you dumb?
>there's redditors using reddit spacing ITT to defend marvel movies
>NOOO YOU USED A SPACE IN YOUR POST I'M NOT DUMB I'M NOT DUMB I'M NOT DUMB
go back
>"Hey, you know how we've got that 3rd eye scene at the end of the movie that lasts for a few seconds? What if we made it like SUPER good quality..You know, like davey jones from pirates!"
>Why would we do that? There's a whole process with budgeting and dead lines. It's already been decided and there's not really a lot we can do at this point without wasting a lot of time and money
>"Sir, you don't understand...A brain dead fricking moron on Cinemaphile saw that someone else had a space in their post. This needs to be resolved."
>Say no more
but it's not going to be seen for 5 seconds. it's going to be seen for 5 seconds x a billion audience members + millions of shared images for us to laugh at
obviously they have to prioritise, but it's also studios demanding last minute changes and vfx houses taking on more than they can handle
Marvel is shit, israelites are demons, people dont have souls anymore, money has nothing to do with it. Nothing these people make will ever be good. Cope chud
There are newer marvel movies with a bigger budget that look like shit
The Flash had a higher budget and looked like a fricking video game.
Check them.
I still don't get this game
Play Red Dead Redemption, that’s how I learned it.
these 4 fours
They gave enough time for the vfx team to work on the project without announcing another five movies in a span of only 11 months
Transformers 2007 has the best CGI effects ever put to film
Nope, it’s Alita Battle Angel.
Bullshit. The cgi is decent, but the film is shot in a way that makes it look far better than it actually is. Explosions Man earned his paycheck tbqh.
The film is specifically shot and cut to hide the fact that there is no CGI and you are actually just watching a rolled up ball of tinfoil being microwaved
THREE SEVENS
Black person
fricking moron
close tho
They didn’t use ray tracing for the lighting. The lighting is fake and exaggerated for artistic reasons and because of this it somehow looks more real. This is also why video games should think twice about using ray tracing and “realistic” lighting… it often falls flat and looks artistically worse than the fake stuff (not to mention with video game hardware it has a massive performance hit). The artist has to do more work with fake lighting too
two threes
Three twos
three threes
Good artists and art directors and probably ample time.
Why must it always devolve into larping fish anons throwing digits like Black folk in the ghetto. What do you even get if you win?
Part of the board
Part of the shit
call me a liar then, homosexual
or up the bid
your call
Anon you are a liar and will spend an eternity on this board.
More like sea GI
THREE FIVES
Four fours
Four sevens