Remember when Solo at 400m box office was such a disaster they completely changed their plans for movies? What would a Marvels level flop do, because they should be expecting that.
kek and checked. Considering we know even have mainstream media clowns, southpark & elon, mocking them it'll hurt their pockets more. But seeing they are still moving forward with Rey, shows they are still brain dead fricking moronic and will cannibalize themselves.
>take the absolute worst character from the worst Star Wars movies and give her ANOTHER movie
Absolutely genius move by Iger and Kennedy.
Oh....
How's that Taika Watiti movie?
Or that Patty Jenkins movie?
Or that Rian Johnson trilogy?
Or that Peter Feige movie?
Or that James Mangold movie?
Those are stil being made? Right? Right?
Ponytail with glasses is my thing tbh so she should do that.
The funniest thing is that SOLO was their one chance to sell people on the idea that recasting > de-aging actors, and it didn't even do terrible at the box office. It was just mismarketed from what I remember. Now every show or movie has to desperately recast anyone who's ever had a role before and slap 10 pounds of CGI over their faces. Or they just don't even try anymore and have the Thrawn VA show up looking like a middle aged dad with a beer bod. It doesn't seem like there's any future for the franchise when they are completely unable to get anyone excited about any character that wasn't already in the previous movies or shows.
I agree, the casting decision and idea were pretty universally panned. I guess they felt they could do no wrong back then. My point is not that SOLO was a good movie or even a good idea, but that it was their one shot to successfully sell the idea that characters can be recast post-prequels, and it was so poorly received that they've never even tried it again.
Boba Fett. Lando. Wedge. Tarkin. There were a bunch of minor characters from the OT they could've recast and wrapped a generic Star Wars movie around, and fans would've eaten it up. Or bring back Obi-Wan. Hell, even a Luke or Leia recasting wouldn't have been as big a sell as Han Solo, simply because you can't recast Harrison Ford.
>The funniest thing is that SOLO was their one chance to sell people on the idea that recasting > de-aging actors, and it didn't even do terrible at the box office. It was just mismarketed from what I remember.
Solo spent $272-330 million and only got a box office of $393 million worldwide
>we're losing millions, our projects are crap and the fans are abandoning us in record droves >should we make products the fans actually want? >no! >let's reuse the character everyone hates instead
A bold plan. Let's see how it works out for ~~*disney*~~
The definition of them having an agenda to push. 15 years ago if a Disney movie flopped there would never be a sequel. Princess and the Frog for example. But now with woke Disney we're seeing them revisiting a failed movie like Princess in the Frog and shoving it into their parks and they're making a live action adaption simply because it has black people in it
It’s also a confidence ploy. They want to imply that they’re not bothered in the slightest by recent failures.
The problem is that they already blinked by not capitalising on this supposed opportunity earlier. Everyone knows that the ST era is radioactive, and they’re only dipping their toes in it now because they’ve burned every other bridge. The mere fact they’re not even announcing it as a trilogy, just episode 10, is even more telling.
A love interest would help but the bigger issue is that Rey is a Mary Sue. Even with a decent love interest no one will like her as a character. She is shit.
It’s even worse than that. She was a Mary Sue that stole everyone else’s achievements and legacy to make herself look better.
They can’t back down now, or people will throw the fact that she’s getting the same treatment the OT characters did back in disney’s face, but doubling down will cement the fact she’s stealing Luke’s post ROTJ arc. Even just making her a normal but flawed character will be seen as weakness after they refused to back down earlier.
A love interest would help but the bigger issue is that Rey is a Mary Sue. Even with a decent love interest no one will like her as a character. She is shit.
It’s even worse than that. She was a Mary Sue that stole everyone else’s achievements and legacy to make herself look better.
They can’t back down now, or people will throw the fact that she’s getting the same treatment the OT characters did back in disney’s face, but doubling down will cement the fact she’s stealing Luke’s post ROTJ arc. Even just making her a normal but flawed character will be seen as weakness after they refused to back down earlier.
>It’s even worse than that. She was a Mary Sue that stole everyone else’s achievements and legacy
she brings him back but has to give him half of her power
and since she need the force healing to perform this ritual, he gets all the dmg spells
At this point? Honestly I'm out of ideas. After TLJ I thought the best course for her character was to make her go full Darkside and redeem Kylo as the underdog that has to fight her.
Now? What the frick are you even doing with the character. She is the perfect Mary Sue. What can you even write that would make her character compelling. What hero arc can she even have? What error in believe does she have she needs to learn from that's not cookie cutter shit?
At this point make her fricking Goku or Superman and write the entire universe around her about what it means to have a walking fricking goddess among you
Oh....
How's that Taika Watiti movie?
Or that Patty Jenkins movie?
Or that Rian Johnson trilogy?
Or that Peter Feige movie?
Or that James Mangold movie?
the age pill got her. the movie will probably feature less ESG shit because they tend to not associate shit they want to push with not physically desirable actors
actually scratch that daisy is probably a MTF troony due to shoulders and overall face skin - bones. many such cases i guess. the movie will include a frick ton of propaganda
they think indians spamming lewd AI gens will translate to money at the box office. similar to when Sony execs rereleased Morbius because of ironic memeing.
she does sometimes, but then other shots in the sequels she looks horrible.
Personally i think its the hair, its very unflattering, she looked great when its not pulled in that stupid ponytails.
Alright Cinemaphile, Disney has put you in charge, your goal is to revitalize the Star Wars franchise. However, you have the following restrictions: >you cannot hit the reset button >you must continue Rey's story >you cannot have the vengeful ghosts of the Force drag Rey to Force-Hell, with detailed and graphic extended shots of her flesh sloughing off (test audiences reacted suboptimally)
What's your plan?
I'd sooner watch a 3 part trilogy movie about the guy who owns and runs the canteena on tatoeen from episode 4 were he just does everyday shit rather than watch anything with Rey, monkey boy, fat chink and slightly unsure gay man
Let's fantasize what Rey character arc in a new trilogy would be? She claimed she is Skywalker after 3 movies of not being Skywalker.
What would be her conflict?
Women who do this are moronic. Not only does it look fricking awful, but it makes them lose their hair.
She already has a forehead the size of a Death Star, pulling her hair back will make it worse.
Star Wars is dead and even worse a confusing mess.
They fricked it up royally with the ST. None of it was interesting or had staying power.
Completely botched on any conceivable level. They had Luke, Leia and Han return and NEVER share a scene together.
They had Ben/Kylo's turn be confusing and happen OFFSCREEN.
The logistics of the New Republic/First Order/Resistance were never really defined in any way that mattered.
They made ANOTHER Death Star.
Total nonsense.
Mandalorian and everything adjacent to it managed to reinvigorate the franchise but ultimately just exposed how shallow it all is.
Any new viewer simply doesn't know what the frick is going on and these shows became a vehicle for trite cameos and establishing even more shows, like some anemic low energy disease slowly spreading with diminishing returns.
But by all means, inject more diversity and "break new ground" by pandering to an audience that was never interested in the franchise to begin with.
>They made ANOTHER Death Star.
kek if you thought Starkiller Base was bad don't watch TRoS >Any new viewer simply doesn't know what the frick is going on
Same thing happened to the comics, same thing happened to the mcu, you'd think at some point these morons would learn that splitting the story across multiple kinds of media means that long term you get zero new viewers and the ones you do have slowly trickle out
My favorite thing is that they got Max von Sydow to appear and he played a bit role that made no sense of some guy that was talked about like he was important but it was never elaborated upon. Literally shows up for less than a minute.
Where do you even go with Rey's dumb story? Is SHE going to rebuild the Jedi order, only now that it's a woman it can't fail? This is going to be Korra levels of bad LMAO. I can't wait for the memes, shitposts, and flop coverage.
The story that has been released so far is that Rey is training a brother and sister and the brother gets salty that the sister is so much stronger in the force and goes to the dark side, because god forbid we have a decently written male character from Disney.
This is a good metaphor for the public school system. >Establishment designed from the ground up to favor girls >Boys inevitably fall behind >Turn to crime and delinquency to cope
If you work in law or finance you'll eventually encounter this kind of behavior, I don't know if it has a name but the show Arrested Development portrayed it pretty well. Basically you get someone, or a family of someones, who had more money at one point, but now they don't, but it hasn't registered yet. They keep making plans for lavish things and writing checks for luxuries that they can't afford. Dropping half a billion dollars on a movie starring a universally disliked character in some grand political statement to own the chuds is a luxury that Disney can no longer afford.
Also seeing this thing introduced as the first part of a trilogy which has to get cancelled will be pretty fricking funny.
They can't accept that they fricked up and that they're on the back footing so they double down, thinking that the other party is in the wrong and they'll win because they're right.
Also at that level of decisionmaking and money-handling you can't show weakness. You have to pretend everything is fine right up to the very end when you're packing your shit in a box and getting escorted out of the building. And even they you already have a prepared statement deflecting blame or using sophistry to explain that something beyond your grasp didn't align up.
That's basically it. Does anyone really believe this movie will get made? The only reason this announcement happened is because someone freaked out when Daisy Ridley recently said there was no script yet, just a storyline.
All of these project they keep announcing and then cancelling is purely to gauge the potential audience reaction.
ALL of this, the entire colossal frickup that happened is because they're relying too much on their marketing division that is getting their metrics from social media, not actual normal people. So the metrics they're getting say "people online are vocal about representation!" then these execs are fed that info and think that's what they need to do to make profit. Except the data is bogus because the marketing division's data is heavily lopsided since only utter morons who DO NOT HAVE MONEY are screaming online about representation all day. It simply does not translate into money.
So anyway, the marketing division likely makes these very reliable looking presentations and pie charts and shit about what the "people" are thinking and they just slap together a placeholder project to gauge the reaction.
And then they realize that the metrics they based their marketing on were from months ago and since that time the vocal people online moved to the next outrage, so their data is useless, even in a fake sense.
So they slap another project together, then another, then another ... they keep chasing whatever utter braindead morons are getting outraged or championing any given day.
This is what you get when you hand over an entire franchise to a committee.
I'm honestly super fricking excited for this movie, not because I want to go see it, but because I want to see the media meltdown when it does poorly at the box office a la Indiana Jones.
Come to think of it that's like 90% of why I get excited about movie releases these days, watching a big IP fail is way more entertaining than the movies themselves.
People out themselves as morons when they say Rey is a Mary Sue. She’s not, the problem is the exact opposite, she constantly fricks things up but never has to suffer any real consequences for her actions. You killed Chewie by accident because you couldn’t control your powers? Oh just kidding haha we got you!
Just remembered that Disney turned force lightning into a heritable power rather than a dark side technique that had to be learned and practiced. Frick
So what, there will be second order, now with solar system size death star, and even lesser group of rebels will be the match that will light the spark that will start the fire that will burn second order down? And Rey will be a jaded hermit on Totesnotdagobar and she will train another Mary Sue mc, who will be secretly Ben Solo's nephew?
The work on TFA was started in 2012, probably even earlier, 7 years after last mainline movie. ROS came 4 years ago, i think it is safe to say by the time new one will be released it will be at least 5 or 6 years old. By Disney's logic, it is time to beat the "Not your dad's Star Wars!" drum again.
I guess the goal is to do so poorly as a company that Iger has no choice but to sell the company to be bought up by Apple. It makes sense, then he can take his money and retire.
An entry on a website, that's meaningful. I'm guessing they are not going to go forward with much until they name KK's replacement who will have a completely new vision.
/aco/ will be pleased
Remember when Solo at 400m box office was such a disaster they completely changed their plans for movies? What would a Marvels level flop do, because they should be expecting that.
kek and checked. Considering we know even have mainstream media clowns, southpark & elon, mocking them it'll hurt their pockets more. But seeing they are still moving forward with Rey, shows they are still brain dead fricking moronic and will cannibalize themselves.
Digits of truth in this thread
The funniest thing is that SOLO was their one chance to sell people on the idea that recasting > de-aging actors, and it didn't even do terrible at the box office. It was just mismarketed from what I remember. Now every show or movie has to desperately recast anyone who's ever had a role before and slap 10 pounds of CGI over their faces. Or they just don't even try anymore and have the Thrawn VA show up looking like a middle aged dad with a beer bod. It doesn't seem like there's any future for the franchise when they are completely unable to get anyone excited about any character that wasn't already in the previous movies or shows.
I can't stress how much people actively didn't want a Han Solo movie. They had headwind from day 1 and should have done the Boba Fett movie instead.
I agree, the casting decision and idea were pretty universally panned. I guess they felt they could do no wrong back then. My point is not that SOLO was a good movie or even a good idea, but that it was their one shot to successfully sell the idea that characters can be recast post-prequels, and it was so poorly received that they've never even tried it again.
True. They treated Star Wars like they could turn it into a 2nd MCU.
They absolutely could have with better planning and execution.
Boba Fett. Lando. Wedge. Tarkin. There were a bunch of minor characters from the OT they could've recast and wrapped a generic Star Wars movie around, and fans would've eaten it up. Or bring back Obi-Wan. Hell, even a Luke or Leia recasting wouldn't have been as big a sell as Han Solo, simply because you can't recast Harrison Ford.
>The funniest thing is that SOLO was their one chance to sell people on the idea that recasting > de-aging actors, and it didn't even do terrible at the box office. It was just mismarketed from what I remember.
Solo spent $272-330 million and only got a box office of $393 million worldwide
Relative to budget that is terrible
>and it didn't even do terrible at the box office.
It lost Disney about $100 million.
it's gonna be a disney plus movie
>we're losing millions, our projects are crap and the fans are abandoning us in record droves
>should we make products the fans actually want?
>no!
>let's reuse the character everyone hates instead
A bold plan. Let's see how it works out for ~~*disney*~~
The definition of them having an agenda to push. 15 years ago if a Disney movie flopped there would never be a sequel. Princess and the Frog for example. But now with woke Disney we're seeing them revisiting a failed movie like Princess in the Frog and shoving it into their parks and they're making a live action adaption simply because it has black people in it
It’s also a confidence ploy. They want to imply that they’re not bothered in the slightest by recent failures.
The problem is that they already blinked by not capitalising on this supposed opportunity earlier. Everyone knows that the ST era is radioactive, and they’re only dipping their toes in it now because they’ve burned every other bridge. The mere fact they’re not even announcing it as a trilogy, just episode 10, is even more telling.
By casting a woman, Disney will receive Blackrock funding. This may even be more than enough to offset the costs of producing the slop.
>They still think it's about the money
The likely chances of the Rey movie getting released is the same as the chances of Kathleen Kennedy getting fired.
>he thinks the scraps of paper in his pocket are "money" because the TV told him so
This anon hasn't been paying attention lmao
The golem protects his masters from harm guarding outside.
This
moronic Cinemaphileiggers think the audience is the customer
>muh blackrock
dumb disney shills still aren't paying attention to anything
not watching
No one is. This is a Daisy Ridley humiliation ritual.
they just don't fricking learn do they?
The only thing they learn is that all the bigots who didn't watch the last one need to be taught even more of a lesson with the sequel.
Oh because you're so fricking smart. have a nice day, incel piece of trash.
>take the absolute worst character from the worst Star Wars movies and give her ANOTHER movie
Absolutely genius move by Iger and Kennedy.
Just imagine the unsold merchandise this will generate.
Magnificent aren't they
Ohnonono
me in the back
>WHOO!
>WH-
>WHOO!
>REEEEEEY
>WH-
>REEE-
>THEY FLY N-
>WH-
>WHO-
>-EEEEEEEEY
>please disney plus me
>WHOO!
>WHO-REEEE-FLYNAO-WHOO-WHOO!
WE WUZ ACSHUN FIGUZ
SHIEET
Attack of Dey Clonz
How would you save Rey's character and redeem the Sequels?
>bring Ben Solo back
>he impregnates Rey
For me that's all it takes.
A love interest would help but the bigger issue is that Rey is a Mary Sue. Even with a decent love interest no one will like her as a character. She is shit.
It’s even worse than that. She was a Mary Sue that stole everyone else’s achievements and legacy to make herself look better.
They can’t back down now, or people will throw the fact that she’s getting the same treatment the OT characters did back in disney’s face, but doubling down will cement the fact she’s stealing Luke’s post ROTJ arc. Even just making her a normal but flawed character will be seen as weakness after they refused to back down earlier.
>Where's Ben????
>WHERE THE FRICK IS BEN!?!?!?!?!
>It’s even worse than that. She was a Mary Sue that stole everyone else’s achievements and legacy
she brings him back but has to give him half of her power
and since she need the force healing to perform this ritual, he gets all the dmg spells
the sequels aren't redeemable.
At this point? Honestly I'm out of ideas. After TLJ I thought the best course for her character was to make her go full Darkside and redeem Kylo as the underdog that has to fight her.
Now? What the frick are you even doing with the character. She is the perfect Mary Sue. What can you even write that would make her character compelling. What hero arc can she even have? What error in believe does she have she needs to learn from that's not cookie cutter shit?
At this point make her fricking Goku or Superman and write the entire universe around her about what it means to have a walking fricking goddess among you
Shes stealing Luke's story of creating the new jedi order, Luke clone, lizard sith dude and other stolen ideas
yes, then a time skip to their son as a teen
father and son adventure kino with him and Kyle
Rey never heard from again, who cares why
Oh....
How's that Taika Watiti movie?
Or that Patty Jenkins movie?
Or that Rian Johnson trilogy?
Or that Peter Feige movie?
Or that James Mangold movie?
Those are stil being made? Right? Right?
Don't forget the Benioff and Weiss trilogy!
and the Damon Lindelof one
I will literally watch anything with my wife Daisy in it
This hideous dyke has no interest in you. Stop simp posting.
Rey will have a redemption. a Reydemption
>my name is Rey…Rey Star Wars
I just want to see more daisy pits
they should show her in the shower (ass visible)
star wars never showed a butt before
>Rey who?
>Rey Dist!
Star Wars: New Dist Order, only in cinemas
>daisy is 31 years old
the age pill got her. the movie will probably feature less ESG shit because they tend to not associate shit they want to push with not physically desirable actors
actually scratch that daisy is probably a MTF troony due to shoulders and overall face skin - bones. many such cases i guess. the movie will include a frick ton of propaganda
they think indians spamming lewd AI gens will translate to money at the box office. similar to when Sony execs rereleased Morbius because of ironic memeing.
as i read that tweet i'm wondering why it's being announced years early
then i realize that's in like 4 fricking months
For what purpose? Just to prove to the Shareholders that Star Wars is dead?
I won't watch this even if it gets a 100% of RT, which it probably will.
Disney doesn't have the backing of RT anymore. Not even journalists are defending them. It's over.
who is the target audience for this?
I think Daisy looks attractive.
she does sometimes, but then other shots in the sequels she looks horrible.
Personally i think its the hair, its very unflattering, she looked great when its not pulled in that stupid ponytails.
Ponytail with glasses is my thing tbh so she should do that.
But chuds said it would never happen???
You're thinking of Rian Johnson's trilogy. It's still never happening, btw.
nobody cares about the trio from the sequel trilogy
why not take the opportunity to start over?
Because it is not about the money.
Alright Cinemaphile, Disney has put you in charge, your goal is to revitalize the Star Wars franchise. However, you have the following restrictions:
>you cannot hit the reset button
>you must continue Rey's story
>you cannot have the vengeful ghosts of the Force drag Rey to Force-Hell, with detailed and graphic extended shots of her flesh sloughing off (test audiences reacted suboptimally)
What's your plan?
i immediately release all disney-owned brands and properties into public domain and then leave
rey get ipad
I'd sooner watch a 3 part trilogy movie about the guy who owns and runs the canteena on tatoeen from episode 4 were he just does everyday shit rather than watch anything with Rey, monkey boy, fat chink and slightly unsure gay man
Rose is dead. Although knowing Disney, they will probably give Rey resurrection powers and bring Rose back. Yay.
Really?
Why couldnt the rest of the awful new cast die off then.
If they gave Rey resurrection powers, they would definitely bring back Mark Hammil just to humiliate Luke some more.
And mark being a hypocrite would take the money and allow luke to be fricked over some more.
Mark ready to kill a homie
>'my legacy... ruined'
>turns and sees Rian's unstrangled neck
>'...I could have a new legacy'
Lads, what if they're all Marvels level bombs?
I give zero shits about spaceshit but I will be honest with you lads I always go into these threads for Daisy pictures
Boyegabros… there is hope yet
wait, is there still an audience for it ? Not shitting on rey, but don't tell me they'll keep going with this timeline after what they did...
Disney should get Harry Winston to design the next metal bikini.
Rey Skywalker WILL rebuild the Jedi Order and there's nothing chuds can do about it!
>Why didn't chuds watch the new Star wars movie?
>are you excited about new Rey movie? Tweet
>80% of Twitter comments are various forms of no/nope
It's doa Disney!
Show some of the comments I don’t use that shit
Not a single female looks up to Rey as a role model. A complete failure on Disney's part to create a generational icon.
Let's fantasize what Rey character arc in a new trilogy would be? She claimed she is Skywalker after 3 movies of not being Skywalker.
What would be her conflict?
Man baby's not accepting her as the true Jedi master.
Absolutely nothing
Is this the Daisy thread?
Women who do this are moronic. Not only does it look fricking awful, but it makes them lose their hair.
She already has a forehead the size of a Death Star, pulling her hair back will make it worse.
kino except the shitty marker smush on the lid
What’s wrong with their face?
Star Wars is dead and even worse a confusing mess.
They fricked it up royally with the ST. None of it was interesting or had staying power.
Completely botched on any conceivable level. They had Luke, Leia and Han return and NEVER share a scene together.
They had Ben/Kylo's turn be confusing and happen OFFSCREEN.
The logistics of the New Republic/First Order/Resistance were never really defined in any way that mattered.
They made ANOTHER Death Star.
Total nonsense.
Mandalorian and everything adjacent to it managed to reinvigorate the franchise but ultimately just exposed how shallow it all is.
Any new viewer simply doesn't know what the frick is going on and these shows became a vehicle for trite cameos and establishing even more shows, like some anemic low energy disease slowly spreading with diminishing returns.
But by all means, inject more diversity and "break new ground" by pandering to an audience that was never interested in the franchise to begin with.
>They made ANOTHER Death Star.
kek if you thought Starkiller Base was bad don't watch TRoS
>Any new viewer simply doesn't know what the frick is going on
Same thing happened to the comics, same thing happened to the mcu, you'd think at some point these morons would learn that splitting the story across multiple kinds of media means that long term you get zero new viewers and the ones you do have slowly trickle out
My favorite thing is that they got Max von Sydow to appear and he played a bit role that made no sense of some guy that was talked about like he was important but it was never elaborated upon. Literally shows up for less than a minute.
>these movies are gonna be her legacy
as opposed to what else?
being the worst ridley sister?
They'll sex her up this time, right?
If they don't I will be upset.
Where do you even go with Rey's dumb story? Is SHE going to rebuild the Jedi order, only now that it's a woman it can't fail? This is going to be Korra levels of bad LMAO. I can't wait for the memes, shitposts, and flop coverage.
The story that has been released so far is that Rey is training a brother and sister and the brother gets salty that the sister is so much stronger in the force and goes to the dark side, because god forbid we have a decently written male character from Disney.
This is a good metaphor for the public school system.
>Establishment designed from the ground up to favor girls
>Boys inevitably fall behind
>Turn to crime and delinquency to cope
If you work in law or finance you'll eventually encounter this kind of behavior, I don't know if it has a name but the show Arrested Development portrayed it pretty well. Basically you get someone, or a family of someones, who had more money at one point, but now they don't, but it hasn't registered yet. They keep making plans for lavish things and writing checks for luxuries that they can't afford. Dropping half a billion dollars on a movie starring a universally disliked character in some grand political statement to own the chuds is a luxury that Disney can no longer afford.
Also seeing this thing introduced as the first part of a trilogy which has to get cancelled will be pretty fricking funny.
It's just regular doubling down.
They can't accept that they fricked up and that they're on the back footing so they double down, thinking that the other party is in the wrong and they'll win because they're right.
Also at that level of decisionmaking and money-handling you can't show weakness. You have to pretend everything is fine right up to the very end when you're packing your shit in a box and getting escorted out of the building. And even they you already have a prepared statement deflecting blame or using sophistry to explain that something beyond your grasp didn't align up.
That's basically it. Does anyone really believe this movie will get made? The only reason this announcement happened is because someone freaked out when Daisy Ridley recently said there was no script yet, just a storyline.
All of these project they keep announcing and then cancelling is purely to gauge the potential audience reaction.
ALL of this, the entire colossal frickup that happened is because they're relying too much on their marketing division that is getting their metrics from social media, not actual normal people. So the metrics they're getting say "people online are vocal about representation!" then these execs are fed that info and think that's what they need to do to make profit. Except the data is bogus because the marketing division's data is heavily lopsided since only utter morons who DO NOT HAVE MONEY are screaming online about representation all day. It simply does not translate into money.
So anyway, the marketing division likely makes these very reliable looking presentations and pie charts and shit about what the "people" are thinking and they just slap together a placeholder project to gauge the reaction.
And then they realize that the metrics they based their marketing on were from months ago and since that time the vocal people online moved to the next outrage, so their data is useless, even in a fake sense.
So they slap another project together, then another, then another ... they keep chasing whatever utter braindead morons are getting outraged or championing any given day.
This is what you get when you hand over an entire franchise to a committee.
>the last trilogy was a fricking disaster BUT I have a GREAT feeling about this one!
they never learn
I'm honestly super fricking excited for this movie, not because I want to go see it, but because I want to see the media meltdown when it does poorly at the box office a la Indiana Jones.
Come to think of it that's like 90% of why I get excited about movie releases these days, watching a big IP fail is way more entertaining than the movies themselves.
People out themselves as morons when they say Rey is a Mary Sue. She’s not, the problem is the exact opposite, she constantly fricks things up but never has to suffer any real consequences for her actions. You killed Chewie by accident because you couldn’t control your powers? Oh just kidding haha we got you!
Just remembered that Disney turned force lightning into a heritable power rather than a dark side technique that had to be learned and practiced. Frick
So what, there will be second order, now with solar system size death star, and even lesser group of rebels will be the match that will light the spark that will start the fire that will burn second order down? And Rey will be a jaded hermit on Totesnotdagobar and she will train another Mary Sue mc, who will be secretly Ben Solo's nephew?
The work on TFA was started in 2012, probably even earlier, 7 years after last mainline movie. ROS came 4 years ago, i think it is safe to say by the time new one will be released it will be at least 5 or 6 years old. By Disney's logic, it is time to beat the "Not your dad's Star Wars!" drum again.
you are all moronic gullible morons
So she stayed as a hermit on Tatooine for a whole 4 years?
she took the podracing scene by storm. the name Skywalker puts asses in seats.
Franchise is dead
This look cool but the character is so unredeemably dumb and representative of Disney it's going to automatically flop
I guess the goal is to do so poorly as a company that Iger has no choice but to sell the company to be bought up by Apple. It makes sense, then he can take his money and retire.
An entry on a website, that's meaningful. I'm guessing they are not going to go forward with much until they name KK's replacement who will have a completely new vision.