The ancient samples resemble Berbers. But the place was full of Europeans or with people mixed with Europeans. Most of the samples from some Punic city resemble a mix of Sicilians (probably ancient Greeks) and Berbers
2 years ago
Anonymous
>The place was filled with Europeans because they had European colonies. >But Rome had no black people despite them having tons of African colonies
Double standard, much?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Out of thousands samples from Iron Age and Roman Era there's one African. He looks like early Christian samples from Nubia (Sudan). It's a sample from Viminacium (modern day Serbia) and genetically resemble modern Horners.
Plenty of North Africans and people mixed with them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
africa doesn't mean africa
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>But Rome had no black people despite them having tons of African colonies
Africa is not a synonymous with Blacks. Africa is not the Black continent. North Africans are not blacks, they are Caucasians.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Muh race theory nonsense
Learn real science.
africa doesn't mean africa
No, it literally meant Africa. Also, Sudan.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Learn real science.
Telling the difference between a Berber and a sub-Saharan Black does not require science. You just need eyes. I'm using the term Black because you are disingenuously twisting "African" to be a synonym for big lipped, coffee skinned, wooly haired Blacks from fricking Benin. There will be no ambiguity of language. North Africa is not Black country.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Telling the difference between a Berber and a sub-Saharan Black does not require science. >Muh visual
People used to think whale dicks were sea monsters based on their eyes. Much like you believe in races based on your eyes.
>'m using the term Black because you are disingenuously twisting "African" to be a synonym for big lipped, coffee skinned, wooly haired Blacks from fricking Benin
That would be you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Categorizing a species based on observable phenotypes is like when people used to think sea monsters were real
Just how fricking stupid are you, kid?
2 years ago
Anonymous
he is trolling you, anon. At least I hope, no one should be that moronic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Explain to me how you are any different from the people in Austria Hungary who assumed there was a vampire infestation because they thought they saw signs of them being around.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's literally the exact same. It's creating a fantasy not supported by science based on questionable and easily misunderstood visual stimuli. There is no difference between you talking about race and a mother burning their child alive because they assume she's a changeling.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're an intellectual subhuman. Eat shit and die.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The left has gone so woke it wraps around to thinking a continent can only have one skin color.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Most of the samples from some Punic city resemble a mix of Sicilians (probably ancient Greeks)
Western Sicily was dominated by phoenician colonies, it stands to reason that Punics in north africa would resemble their cousins on Sicily.
>Phoenicians were Greek
My brother in Christ what the frick are you talking about?
Post dark age greek civilization originates in Phoenician traders showing up on the shores of greece to trade.
I doubt the person you are replying to comprehends the proximity of the phoenicians to the greeks
2 years ago
Anonymous
where do you think the phoenicians came from? they came from greece. where did those people in greece come from? that's right, they came from scandinavia. the greeks and phoenicians and yes hannibal were all blonde haired blue eyed aryans.
Carthaginians were haplogroup U, which is a unique and ancient haplogroup to Europe and Western Asia. not saying they were aryans but they were European in origin.
Carthage was founded by Vikangs, but Romans were black dark gorrila Black folk that came from the lost continent of Bantu. Carthage lost the war but destroyed Rome's welfare system by migrating and fricking all the black women with their BWCs and creating italians
>Sub-Saharan >Meaning literally 'Under/below the Sahara' >Incel term
Have you ever opened a single fricking book, ever? Do you look at what you post before you post it?
Do people legitimately think a geographical separator like the largest desert on the planet doesn't result in differences in the species that inhabit it? Look at the numerous differences of the people of Europe. Africa is so much ridiculously larger than Europe and people think that it's inhabited by 1 type of people?
The West Africans or Blacks, what we consider black, largely killed the other races of sub Saharan Africa. The Capiods, Bushmen, are one of the most ancient humans and they were killed by Blacks. the Pygmy people the same. they still cannibalizing Pygmies in the Congo and nobody cares.
They unironically wanted to keep their socii under arms(italians) as far away as possible (completely understandable, italians stink), hence conquering half the fricking oecumene .
Some stupid fricking rock, that was really Rome, didn't get pushed over by some wind which translated over to once Rome has taken some land, it is now as important as any other piece of land in their empire. They were going for all of the Earth or non of it.
i am north african, when i see Black folk, i make sure to make them feel how they should, lesser, i always give them a disgusted angry look, and they cant do nothing, because in here if they try to hurt me all of my pals and i will kill them, i love being berber, i hate Black folk, and israelites are the sons of the devil himself
Rome got downright autistic about destroying Carthage. They were the only check on their regional power. Once Rome took most of Italy it was a matter of time.
Rome was still fairly new during the Punic Wars and not the machine it would later come. Had Hannibal not traveled in the mountains where he lost a lot of men/soldiers. Rome probably would've been fricked. They changed their military strategies completely because of Carthage.
They lost like three major battles on Italian soil but Hannibal never directly attacked Rome itself. Hannibal was also hampered by factions back in Carthage that didn’t want to see him succeed.
Carthage could have beaten Rome if Hannibal had just marched on Rome after Cannae. Hannibal didn't though, and instead just fricked around in the Italian peninsula for a while, and Fabius also delayed him further. The Carthaginians were moronic and refused to send supplies and support to Hannibal, and because of this, he didn't have the strength necessary to march on Rome once Rome recovered from the defeat at Cannae. Eventually, Rome launched a counterattack on Carthage, which forced Hannibal to stop his offensive in order to protect Carthage because Carthage kept a tiny standing army, and relied mostly on mercenary forces. Basically, Hannibal had a very good chance but the Carthaginian merchants' greed ruined it.
he didnt have the strength to siege rome after cannae thats why he didnt. the point was to convince romes allies to switch sides, their troops were vital to romes was effort, thats why he fricked around in southern italy. it was a valid strategy
carthage refused to send supplies because they were sending everything to spain, a much more valuable province to them, they needed to defend it. it also became clear that dissolving the roman alliance in italy didnt work after a few years so they didnt bother supporting hannibals pointless exercise:
greedy ~~*merchants*~~ is a lazy explanation, carthage made the right choices with the information available at the time
Trying to siege Rome would end badly, he should have taken a southern stronghold with ship routes back to carthage to establish a supply line, raided the lands and courted the Greeks for an alliance.
Probably not, sadly. Rome might as well have unlimited manpower compared to carthage. It didn't help that their tribal alliances basically refused to yield.
>Rome mentions the Carthagian practice of child sacrifice >Historians begin to say it was just Roman lies in the late 20th century >Now confirmed that Carthagians sacrificed their children
Why are they like this
>people from the middle east/africa are le black >NO NO NO NO THIS IS FAKE NEWS >jesus - some working poor from the middle east - is the whitest dude alive >YES THIS IS TRUE! IT SAYS HERE IN MY MAGICAL SKYFAIRY BOOK!
the Roman province of Africa was basically modern Tunisia.
Rome also had a province named Asia in Western Turkey but literally nobody tries to pretend they were East Asians.
Hannibal wasn't black. Carthaginians weren't black. I have no idea why this fallacy is even taken seriously. It's beyond ridiculous.
>nobody tries to pretend they were East Asians.
tons of people don't even consider the middle-east to even be Asia geographically because of how heavily "Asian" is with "anyone who looks sort of like the Chinese"
Since leaving Carthage, Hamilcar had treated rebels he had captured well and offered them a choice of joining his army or free passage home. He made the same offer to the 4,000 captives from the recent battle.[64] The rebel leaders perceived this generous treatment as the motivation behind Naravas's defection and feared the disintegration of their army; they were aware that such generous terms would not be extended to them personally. To remove the possibility of any goodwill between the sides, Spendius, encouraged by his fellow leader the Gaul Autaritus,[65] had 700 Carthaginian prisoners, including Gisco, tortured to death: they had their hands cut off, were castrated, their legs broken and were thrown into a pit and buried alive.[62][66] The mercenary leader and skilled polyglot orator Autaritus is cited by Polybius as a chief instigator of this massacre. Hamilcar, in turn, killed his prisoners. From this point, neither side showed any mercy, and the unusual ferocity of the fighting caused Polybius to term it the "Truceless War".[62][66] Any further prisoners taken by the Carthaginians were trampled to death by elephants.[67][68]
At some point between March and September 239 BC the previously loyal cities of Utica and Hippo slew their Carthaginian garrisons and joined the rebels.[69] The people of Utica offered their city to the Romans, who, consistent with their response to the mutineers on Sardinia, declined.[56][70] The rebels previously operating in the area moved south and laid siege to Carthage.[69]
Having a clear superiority in cavalry, Hamilcar raided the supply lines of the rebels around Carthage.[66] In mid-239 BC, he was joined by Hanno and his army, but the two men disagreed as to the best strategy and operations were paralysed. Unusually, the choice of supreme commander was put to a vote of the army – possibly only the officers[71] – and Hamilcar was elected; Hanno left the army.[69][72] In early 238 BC the lack of supplies forced the rebels to lift the siege of Carthage. They fell back to Tunis, from where they maintained a more distant blockade.[54][66] While Matho maintained the blockade, Spendius led 40,000 men against Hamilcar. As in the previous year, they stayed to the higher and rougher terrain and harassed the Carthaginian army. After a period of campaigning, the details of which are not clear in the sources, Hamilcar trapped the rebels in a pass or mountain range known as the Saw. Pinned against mountains and with their food exhausted, the rebels ate their horses, their prisoners and then their slaves, hoping that Matho would sortie from Tunis to rescue them. Eventually, the surrounded troops forced their leaders to parley with Hamilcar, but on a thin pretext, he took Spendius and his lieutenants prisoner. The rebels then attempted to fight their way out in the Battle of the Saw and were massacred to a man.[73][74]
Average numidian auxiliaries.
This is the REAL reason most of Rome's allies and client states wouldn't go over to Hannibal historians don't WANT YOU to KNOW about, his army was full of Black folk and fricking reeked.
Kangibal
Half of rome was literally africa
phoenicians and berbers weren't black Tariq DeShawn
Except they were. Sorry if it hurts your feelings
jamal deshawn, stop
they look like brown iberians
north africans had fair hair and blue eyes before the arab invasion, even then they are still not black
They looked pretty much like modern day North Africans.
uh-oh, the guy on the left is about to get cancelled in the grave
Wtf I look like a scandi version of the guy on the right.
My ancestor.
The ancient samples resemble Berbers. But the place was full of Europeans or with people mixed with Europeans. Most of the samples from some Punic city resemble a mix of Sicilians (probably ancient Greeks) and Berbers
>The place was filled with Europeans because they had European colonies.
>But Rome had no black people despite them having tons of African colonies
Double standard, much?
Out of thousands samples from Iron Age and Roman Era there's one African. He looks like early Christian samples from Nubia (Sudan). It's a sample from Viminacium (modern day Serbia) and genetically resemble modern Horners.
Plenty of North Africans and people mixed with them.
africa doesn't mean africa
>>But Rome had no black people despite them having tons of African colonies
Africa is not a synonymous with Blacks. Africa is not the Black continent. North Africans are not blacks, they are Caucasians.
>Muh race theory nonsense
Learn real science.
No, it literally meant Africa. Also, Sudan.
>Learn real science.
Telling the difference between a Berber and a sub-Saharan Black does not require science. You just need eyes. I'm using the term Black because you are disingenuously twisting "African" to be a synonym for big lipped, coffee skinned, wooly haired Blacks from fricking Benin. There will be no ambiguity of language. North Africa is not Black country.
>Telling the difference between a Berber and a sub-Saharan Black does not require science.
>Muh visual
People used to think whale dicks were sea monsters based on their eyes. Much like you believe in races based on your eyes.
>'m using the term Black because you are disingenuously twisting "African" to be a synonym for big lipped, coffee skinned, wooly haired Blacks from fricking Benin
That would be you.
>Categorizing a species based on observable phenotypes is like when people used to think sea monsters were real
Just how fricking stupid are you, kid?
he is trolling you, anon. At least I hope, no one should be that moronic.
Explain to me how you are any different from the people in Austria Hungary who assumed there was a vampire infestation because they thought they saw signs of them being around.
It's literally the exact same. It's creating a fantasy not supported by science based on questionable and easily misunderstood visual stimuli. There is no difference between you talking about race and a mother burning their child alive because they assume she's a changeling.
You're an intellectual subhuman. Eat shit and die.
The left has gone so woke it wraps around to thinking a continent can only have one skin color.
>Most of the samples from some Punic city resemble a mix of Sicilians (probably ancient Greeks)
Western Sicily was dominated by phoenician colonies, it stands to reason that Punics in north africa would resemble their cousins on Sicily.
>Muh inane understanding of history
I wish you people had a time machine just because most of you would have a psychic break if you went to the past.
We were kings!
Hannibal looked like this, Amerigo MaxiBlack.
Phoenicians were Greek colonists moron.
Also North Africans still exist and they don't resemble sub-saharan Black folks in the slightest.
>Phoenicians were Greek
My brother in Christ what the frick are you talking about?
Post dark age greek civilization originates in Phoenician traders showing up on the shores of greece to trade.
I doubt the person you are replying to comprehends the proximity of the phoenicians to the greeks
where do you think the phoenicians came from? they came from greece. where did those people in greece come from? that's right, they came from scandinavia. the greeks and phoenicians and yes hannibal were all blonde haired blue eyed aryans.
Is anybody disputing this?
They were from Canaan (Israel) friend
were Semitic colonists moron.
ftfy
Carthaginians were Semites. As in related to Arabs and israelites.
Carthaginians were Aryan. So were the Romans.
WE
Carthaginians were haplogroup U, which is a unique and ancient haplogroup to Europe and Western Asia. not saying they were aryans but they were European in origin.
DNA doesn't lie
*smacks razor-thin lips*
Persians are the only Aryans. It's literally in the name of their country.
Persians of today and not the original Aryans of the past. They are as fallen as the current angloid or germcuck.
Found the ameriburger.
Carthage was founded by Vikangs, but Romans were black dark gorrila Black folk that came from the lost continent of Bantu. Carthage lost the war but destroyed Rome's welfare system by migrating and fricking all the black women with their BWCs and creating italians
Your ancestors lived in shit covered mudhuts while the Egyptians build an enduring civilization.
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_known_surviving_buildings
cope
>american education
moron alert oh wait youre just a dumb Black person
Not sub-Saharan Africa, though.
>sub-Saharan Africa
incel term
>incel
reddit term
It's a geographic term. You should really work on improving your adult vocabulary.
It….it’s a region anon…did you make out of fourth grade yet?
>Sub-Saharan
>Meaning literally 'Under/below the Sahara'
>Incel term
Have you ever opened a single fricking book, ever? Do you look at what you post before you post it?
Do people legitimately think a geographical separator like the largest desert on the planet doesn't result in differences in the species that inhabit it? Look at the numerous differences of the people of Europe. Africa is so much ridiculously larger than Europe and people think that it's inhabited by 1 type of people?
The West Africans or Blacks, what we consider black, largely killed the other races of sub Saharan Africa. The Capiods, Bushmen, are one of the most ancient humans and they were killed by Blacks. the Pygmy people the same. they still cannibalizing Pygmies in the Congo and nobody cares.
>people think that it's inhabited by 1 type of people
Just afrocentrists.
He has a gallic look about him, clearly not as true a Roman as any
Rome didn't control any African lands during the 2nd Punic War.
WE
WUZ
ROMANZ N' SHIET homie
>Half of rome was literally africa
No it wasn't. Most of the Empire was Europe and the Levant.
what did they need all that land for?
They unironically wanted to keep their socii under arms(italians) as far away as possible (completely understandable, italians stink), hence conquering half the fricking oecumene .
When you are an emperor it's like playing a grand strategy games in real life. Got to paint that map homie. Also, grain.
Some stupid fricking rock, that was really Rome, didn't get pushed over by some wind which translated over to once Rome has taken some land, it is now as important as any other piece of land in their empire. They were going for all of the Earth or non of it.
Africa was named after a white roman general
Scipio gained the title Africanus as a result of pacifying Africa, not the other way around.
[headcanon]
it has several origins, the tribe ifri, the word ''aprica'' etc
i am north african, when i see Black folk, i make sure to make them feel how they should, lesser, i always give them a disgusted angry look, and they cant do nothing, because in here if they try to hurt me all of my pals and i will kill them, i love being berber, i hate Black folk, and israelites are the sons of the devil himself
Based berberchad
i am just doing my job for my people
They were not Black folk though. Mostly Berbers and Phoenicians
Yeah the good half of Africa i.e the half with no Black folk in it
Nig cope
did carthage have a chance against rome or were they always fricked?
The Romans refused to quit for over ten years of getting butt fricked by Hannibal on their own peninsula, they weren't going to give Hannibal shit.
Yes they were the leading power in the Western Mediterranean
Rome got downright autistic about destroying Carthage. They were the only check on their regional power. Once Rome took most of Italy it was a matter of time.
Rome was still fairly new during the Punic Wars and not the machine it would later come. Had Hannibal not traveled in the mountains where he lost a lot of men/soldiers. Rome probably would've been fricked. They changed their military strategies completely because of Carthage.
They lost like three major battles on Italian soil but Hannibal never directly attacked Rome itself. Hannibal was also hampered by factions back in Carthage that didn’t want to see him succeed.
Carthage could have beaten Rome if Hannibal had just marched on Rome after Cannae. Hannibal didn't though, and instead just fricked around in the Italian peninsula for a while, and Fabius also delayed him further. The Carthaginians were moronic and refused to send supplies and support to Hannibal, and because of this, he didn't have the strength necessary to march on Rome once Rome recovered from the defeat at Cannae. Eventually, Rome launched a counterattack on Carthage, which forced Hannibal to stop his offensive in order to protect Carthage because Carthage kept a tiny standing army, and relied mostly on mercenary forces. Basically, Hannibal had a very good chance but the Carthaginian merchants' greed ruined it.
he didnt have the strength to siege rome after cannae thats why he didnt. the point was to convince romes allies to switch sides, their troops were vital to romes was effort, thats why he fricked around in southern italy. it was a valid strategy
carthage refused to send supplies because they were sending everything to spain, a much more valuable province to them, they needed to defend it. it also became clear that dissolving the roman alliance in italy didnt work after a few years so they didnt bother supporting hannibals pointless exercise:
greedy ~~*merchants*~~ is a lazy explanation, carthage made the right choices with the information available at the time
Trying to siege Rome would end badly, he should have taken a southern stronghold with ship routes back to carthage to establish a supply line, raided the lands and courted the Greeks for an alliance.
Carthage would have won if it wasn't for political infighting. The fricked over Hannibal and then the Roman's fricked them to extinction
Yes, what truly buttfricked them is when Carthage lost Iberia
Probably not, sadly. Rome might as well have unlimited manpower compared to carthage. It didn't help that their tribal alliances basically refused to yield.
Black personius
WE
U
Z
>Phoenicians
>Black folk
burgers think in the binary of black and white plus world history to them only goes back to 1700
We have the worst leftoids and israelites in the world.
Americans should be genocided
>Rome's worst nightmare.
Historical revisionism?
Hannibal wasn't black.
but was he constipated
because that homie punchin a grumpy
Diversity is too black.
>Rome mentions the Carthagian practice of child sacrifice
>Historians begin to say it was just Roman lies in the late 20th century
>Now confirmed that Carthagians sacrificed their children
Why are they like this
just some late stage abortions bro just a clump of cells
We are still living the punic wars, it's Rome (MAGA) vs Carthage (Jews) to this very day
Carthage was the good guy though, idiot
no cap though?
fr
frfr?
Carthage was literally a nation of greedy shekel rubbing merchants.
>Carthage
>Jews
Cope. Carthage was based.
We literally don't know how he looked. Chuds, you keep seething tho
on my momma tho anyone under the equator stright up black tho and any genetic testing is straight up racist tho
Calm down.
does this look like a Black person to you?
in fact not even the arab mutts who live there today are black.
Kang Hannibal
HE WAS A COON SON OF ROME!
>people from the middle east/africa are le black
>NO NO NO NO THIS IS FAKE NEWS
>jesus - some working poor from the middle east - is the whitest dude alive
>YES THIS IS TRUE! IT SAYS HERE IN MY MAGICAL SKYFAIRY BOOK!
Why are schizos like this?
>fake news
>skyfairy book
go back
imagine being american
Israelites (the real ones) where aryan, sadly they all got wiped out by semite israelites.
JC was descendant of the aryans.
>Israelites (the real ones) where aryan
moron. Hebrew isn't even a indo european language.
Speedreader
Even before the israelites came the area was semetic.
Even the Phoenician language was semetic.
Nuke america.
me, or my family. here's my cousin's wedding was last week
>history channel
A homie with a spear.
the Roman province of Africa was basically modern Tunisia.
Rome also had a province named Asia in Western Turkey but literally nobody tries to pretend they were East Asians.
Hannibal wasn't black. Carthaginians weren't black. I have no idea why this fallacy is even taken seriously. It's beyond ridiculous.
Maybe so, but I still hate Phoen*cians due to their child sacrifices and weird religion.
I don't disagree, human sacrifice or worse child sacrifice is barbaric and doesn't deserve to exist
Well Carthaginians threw their newborns into fires.
>nobody tries to pretend they were East Asians.
tons of people don't even consider the middle-east to even be Asia geographically because of how heavily "Asian" is with "anyone who looks sort of like the Chinese"
East Asians have a pretty rich history and don't have to We Wuz anything even remotely near them.
you are right about ME and Asia though.
Let me guess, Africa = black?
Nothing good ever comes out of Africa
WWK
Is this a parable for America?
Since leaving Carthage, Hamilcar had treated rebels he had captured well and offered them a choice of joining his army or free passage home. He made the same offer to the 4,000 captives from the recent battle.[64] The rebel leaders perceived this generous treatment as the motivation behind Naravas's defection and feared the disintegration of their army; they were aware that such generous terms would not be extended to them personally. To remove the possibility of any goodwill between the sides, Spendius, encouraged by his fellow leader the Gaul Autaritus,[65] had 700 Carthaginian prisoners, including Gisco, tortured to death: they had their hands cut off, were castrated, their legs broken and were thrown into a pit and buried alive.[62][66] The mercenary leader and skilled polyglot orator Autaritus is cited by Polybius as a chief instigator of this massacre. Hamilcar, in turn, killed his prisoners. From this point, neither side showed any mercy, and the unusual ferocity of the fighting caused Polybius to term it the "Truceless War".[62][66] Any further prisoners taken by the Carthaginians were trampled to death by elephants.[67][68]
At some point between March and September 239 BC the previously loyal cities of Utica and Hippo slew their Carthaginian garrisons and joined the rebels.[69] The people of Utica offered their city to the Romans, who, consistent with their response to the mutineers on Sardinia, declined.[56][70] The rebels previously operating in the area moved south and laid siege to Carthage.[69]
Having a clear superiority in cavalry, Hamilcar raided the supply lines of the rebels around Carthage.[66] In mid-239 BC, he was joined by Hanno and his army, but the two men disagreed as to the best strategy and operations were paralysed. Unusually, the choice of supreme commander was put to a vote of the army – possibly only the officers[71] – and Hamilcar was elected; Hanno left the army.[69][72] In early 238 BC the lack of supplies forced the rebels to lift the siege of Carthage. They fell back to Tunis, from where they maintained a more distant blockade.[54][66] While Matho maintained the blockade, Spendius led 40,000 men against Hamilcar. As in the previous year, they stayed to the higher and rougher terrain and harassed the Carthaginian army. After a period of campaigning, the details of which are not clear in the sources, Hamilcar trapped the rebels in a pass or mountain range known as the Saw. Pinned against mountains and with their food exhausted, the rebels ate their horses, their prisoners and then their slaves, hoping that Matho would sortie from Tunis to rescue them. Eventually, the surrounded troops forced their leaders to parley with Hamilcar, but on a thin pretext, he took Spendius and his lieutenants prisoner. The rebels then attempted to fight their way out in the Battle of the Saw and were massacred to a man.[73][74]
Hannibal is the greatest Black and LGBTQIA+ hero to have ever lived and he would have marched for Pride
nice
I remember fighting Lake Trasimeno battle on the Roma Surrectum mod and holy shit it was beautiful
Actually, turns out Rome's worst nightmare was israelites, since they collapsed the empire.
This is how Black folk lived for a million years before whitey came
Average numidian auxiliaries.
This is the REAL reason most of Rome's allies and client states wouldn't go over to Hannibal historians don't WANT YOU to KNOW about, his army was full of Black folk and fricking reeked.
Back when writing was developed in China, the real Chinese? Aryan.
Well, they do ruin everything
Kerkouaune was a Punic settlement.
>They made Hannibal black
Why , to make him seem more savage? The Carthaginians weren't black