>sci-fi movie
>all planets have gravity identical to ours
>if it ever happens a planet has a different gravity it's always lower and never higher than ours
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>sci-fi movie
>all planets have gravity identical to ours
>if it ever happens a planet has a different gravity it's always lower and never higher than ours
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
shut up b***h
Hollyisraelite hacks are SEETHING.
i think there's a planet in futurama with higher gravity
shut up b***h
i think there's a futurama with higher planet
>sci-fi setting has inter-galactic currency
>its called "credits"
Jesus FRICKING christ how unoriginal can you possibly be. I would unironically rather hear something stupid like "space bucks" at this point than hear god damned "credits" for the millionth time.
What kind of woman fakes being mad about credits for attention? man up you fricking whiny b***h
I'm just confused as to how credits in Star Trek work. It's a post scarcity society where food is made for free in replicators, right? What's the difference between credits and old-fashioned currency?
Maybe it's only post scarcity on the scale of individuals or a crew of a few thousand, but when you get into planet-sized ecosystems and beyond, the energy requirements go up significantly. Credits might not just be for the sale of goods but access to the energy required for replicators.
It's mostly humans who abandoned currency a lot of the rest of the federation still has it and even a lot of human planets have it who are further from the core of the federation. Star fleet just never uses it cause they have all the best tech and morals and people
star trek is moronic and there's no such thing as post scarcity
>trillions of planets to choose from
>selectively colonize planets that can support life without major terraforming
it's not complicated
That's because they only make movies about visits to class M planets
That's like saying
>sea movie
>the boat is always on top of the water
>it is never higher than the water
>if it's not higher than the water it's under the water
Interstellar
>sci-fi movie
>talking frogs exist
>they have internet access
>sci-fy movie
>all planets have the same athmosphere as earth
>sci fi movie
>they focus on possible conflicts arising from technology instead of spending months of training and millions of dollars in CGI to make it look like the planet has 1.2x earth gravity
my parents and teachers told me i was smart but im lazy so i didnt do well in school btw
>my parents and teachers told me i was smart but im lazy
yeah, that's what they told all the midwits. were you also "special"?
yes. im 130 iq but i dont have a job. thats why i make threads picking apart sci fi films (im op, i was just making these posts to clarify)
>130 iq
which free online website do did you use?
>Sci-fi movie
>no exploration of different societal structures (miniaturization of societies, Mathrioshka brain etc.)
>no exploration of actual sci-fi concepts such as immortality, infinite universes, mirror universes, time-travel based wars and conflicts, etc
>people still need to work and earn money despite advanced AI existing and top scientists eradicating most diseases. Capitalistic societies and merchants instead of a barter-based or exchanging favors across space and time, etc
>all concepts of physics and gravity are based on Earth's atmosphere and the milky way (no giant suns threatening life, no planet bound black holes, no quantum mechanics, concept of time and space is largely Earth-based
>no optimistic outlook, cyberpunk and gritty because it looks cool
>no exploration of actual sci-fi concepts such as immortality, infinite universes, mirror universes, time-travel based wars and conflicts, etc
>time-travel based wars and conflicts
Does Terminator count?
>time-travel based wars
You just give everything you have to yourself in the past and now you have double the stuff
ENTER
>human media about humans focuses on places humans could theoretically live in
No way!
God forbid adventures take them to an unwelcoming world once in a while.
Once in a while? Once in a while? How many science fiction movies have you watched? I'll bet no more than three.
Feel free to name more than three with high gravity planets.
>Feel free to move the goalposts
Not a movie, you lose.
Thanks, I accept your concession.
You conceded when you chose to pretend you're more moronic than you really are.
Whereas you pretend to be less moronic than you actually are. Too bad it's not working.
>God forbid adventures take them to an unwelcoming world once in a while.
>Nooooo! They have to be high-gravity planets.
>Goalposts? What goalposts?
High gravity planets are mentioned in the OP, mongoloid.
>each planet only has one ecosystem
>It's an ice planet
>Is actually on Earth.
>each planet only has one race of people and they all have the same haircut and outfit
If carbon life is exceptionally rare, perhaps gravity being similar is a necessity else carbon based life could not develop membranes to sustain function.
Is it possible to emulate gravity in space through centrifugal force?
I'm asking because I've seen 'Moonraker'. It might have been in 'A Space Oddysey:2001' too, I forget.
As thusfar, I don't think any mentions of it have been made where this would be a plausible idea in reality.
The one that always gets me is robots
>Humans invent super powerful AI
>Give AI mechanical bodies
>AI slowly learns through interactions with the world
>Instead of becoming its own unique lifeform with fundamental differences in perception and experience characterized by its unique nature, it becomes human lite
>Robot societies either aren't shown or if they are shown, they're just a big computer or again human society lite
Even the fact that robots talk to each other audibly is moronic. The absolute fricking terror of an AI revolution would be that two robots could exchange gigabytes of information, which means billions of words, in seconds, between each other.
Ex Machina is the only kind of okay film I can think of, because you can make a strong argument the robots were nothing like people and only exploited human behavior for their own gain.
humans probably wouldn't settle on a planet where they would weigh as much as an average real world burger, would they
it's difficult to build movie sets on Earth that have different gravity than ours, or to find actors that aren't human, or that speak languages other than ones we already know about