>According to the report, the movie will be based on Shūsaku Endō's book of the same name; Endō also wrote the book that "Silence" was based on. It was co-written by Kent Jones, a critic, filmmaker and former staple of the New York Film Festival, and will be set mostly in modern day (although don't hold Scorsese to that). Scorsese expects the film to run 80 minutes and, according to the report, will mostly be "focusing on Jesus' core teachings in a way that explores the principles but doesn't proselytize." It will shoot later this year.
https://www.thewrap.com/martin-scorsese-new-jesus-movie-later-2024/
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
>will be set mostly in modern day
The most interesting part.
>>will be set mostly in modern day
>The most interesting part.
"Love thy Black folk like thy love thyself. Cast not ballots for tyrants."
>Passion 2
>Scorese making movie about Jesus
>PASSION 2
Christian Kino incoming
Malick also has a Jesus film coming out.
Scorcese is one of those people that says he's Catholic but does not live his faith at all and in fact preaches heresy.
>Scorsese to direct ‘A Life of Jesus’ this year
Didn't he do that already?
>The book deals with the "maternal" aspects of God revealed through Jesus.
what is this wop smoking
People need to cool it with the Jesus films. It's getting a little ridiculous. I mean, how many more ways can you tell Christ's story?
It would be great to see more faith-based films that aren't ham-fisted garbage, but making films that are directly based on the Gospels is just silly at this point.
The modern day setting implies this is actually about Jesus' second coming instead of the gospel narrative.
Oh, I guess I should have read the greentext
Cringe
Is Malick releasing his Jesus movie this year too?
I'm hyped but also very cautious. Marty apparently always wanted to make a Jesus film set in the modern time, even before the Last Temptation. That being said, Last Temptation is a blasphemous film that's one of the loosest adaption of the Gospels next to Superstar. I heard Silence actually is a better Christian film than Last Temptation. Anyway, this is probably going to Marty's last film since he apparently wanted to make a modern Jesus film since the beggining of his career.
Dogma robots
last temptation is just a shit film, sorry bro
watch silence, zoomie
An NWO-puppet fake pope told him to make a distraction episode to convince the public spiritual warfare is still text-driven, not a war on their own doorsteps? Cool
Scorsese has made so many movies about monstrous behavior that he no longer can properly gauge any moral conflict.
If you actually think his films promote monstrous behavior, I'm surprised you even know how to use a computer.
Btw you're trans?
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
So, you don't even know what you were implying? Lol ok
His films are often about unscrupulous people doing terrible things, sure, but the moral messages are ultimately always anti-sin.
>So, you don't even know what you were implying?
You're simply an ESL.
Go ahead, enlighten me. What exactly were you saying?
Scorsese’s attempts at redemption are too guilt-ridden to succeed. Killers of the Flower Moon was just another instance of fatuous white guilt. Scorsese of all people should know the sensitivity that distinguished innumerable American movies that dealt with the tragic mistreatment of Native Americans, but Killers only promises there will be Blood/Oil/Genocide. It is Scorsese’s first truly political movie, and, unfortunately, he has been radicalized against America. His stab at another film about Jesus will indubitably be a knife stabbing the religion he claims to profess.
Ok, so a lot of empty, /misc/-tier kvetching. That's pretty much what I expected.
First of all, that's one film that was about a specific thing that you're ultra-sensitive about - and you misinterpreted it.
Secondly, IT WAS BASED ON A TRUE STORY (something /misc/weenies always conveniently ignore). Also, it wasn't a "white man bad/brown man good" film. It's about how money and materialism corrupts. You'll notice there were one or two unscrupulous Indians as well.
But anyway, you failed to back up your implication that Scorsese has no moral compass because he makes films that feature monstrous behavior
>Secondly, IT WAS BASED ON A TRUE STORY
The classic idiot signifier; taking "based on a true story" as gospel. Not realizing the corrupting and twisting effect of the screenwriter who manipulates "real" events to support a chosen agenda. Scorsese’s true-crime narrative never repents. There’s no “Lord, forgive us;” only another wallow in sin. The transgressions of Killers cannot do justice to this awful history because Scorsese’s regular gangster template is hackneyed.
>taking "based on a true story" as gospel
If I took it as gospel, I would have said "it's a true story".
Maybe just read about what actually happened. You'll find the white folks actually did some pretty heinous shit. Was it because they were white? Of course not - and I don't think that was the message of the film.
You guys are like feminists who cry misogyny when a film features a vulnerable woman or a damsel in distress.
The racial subject matter of Killers satisfies the guilt stoked by social problems of the Xwitter generation. Ethnic naïveté makes Killers, with its stick-figure victims and villains, an unmitigated failure. It’s not the movie we need right now, especially given the tribal strife being manipulated by Hollywood and media today. But it does successfully exemplify a creeping masochism that has entered the culture.
Just because the film, to some degree, falls in line with a certain trend in Hollywood doesn't make it anti-white. And again, it doesn't back up your notion that Scorsese is morally unqualified to make a film about Christ.
I'll extend an olive branch: I do think it wasn't the best film to make in today's sociopolitical climate. When I first saw the trailer, I had to roll my eyes a bit.
>Just because the film, to some degree, falls in line with a certain trend in Hollywood doesn't make it anti-white.
I agree that it's not anti-white, but rather irresponsible and politically exploitative.
>I do think it wasn't the best film to make in today's sociopolitical climate.
Yes, we really should think more about the feelings of triggered /misc/ users
In Killers of the Flowers Moon it was Freemasons and israelites who were the bad guys. DeNiro was a 32nd degree mason and DiCaprio was israeli.
Scorsese succumbed to America’s current self-loathing in Killers of the Flower Moon. A bland epic superficially preoccupied with white supremacy. It shows Scorsese learned nothing from John Ford.
Last temptation of christ is my favorite scorsese kino so i expect this to be good too
>boomer makes his 67th film
who cares, his last film was a piece of shit!!!
Marvin ScorSHITe
Can't wait to Jesus depicted as an Italian gangster
Three big jesus movies incoming then
>scorsese
>malick
>gibson
Gonna be a lot of redditors kvetching in that year
All three of those have the potential to be shit.
I do hope Jesus will be black. It'll make it more real
Will he shove the word 'Black person' in it?
Michael B Jordan is playing Jesus
>A scene where Jesus leaves his brunette wife for a hot blonde
Sounds like a good idea if it's was directed by Sorrentino. Scorcese lacks of vitality these days
posted in the other thread
>80 min
it's a flop
>posted in the other thread
So? This one was made first.
I hope a better director make a Jesus movie based on this book: https://youtube.com/shorts/7kBfLGBbScw
If it's produced by a streaming service like his last 2, i'm avoiding it.