>Implying that the multi-billion dollar corporation couldn't win a copyright claim if they needed to.
AI is only not copyright protected until it becomes profitable enough for corporations to use. Then it becomes exclusive to them.
Appropriately, not understanding the difference between a "sewing machine" and an industrial loom is neatly consistent with the kind of entrenched idiocy who keeps labeling AI generators as "just another tool"
It is just another tool. It's just another tool that will be too expensive and dangerous for all but the most powerful organizations to use.
What, like they would let you own a real nuclear reactor? Sorry peasant, that's too dangerous.
You technically can, its just that the licensing and required infrastructure is too expensive for anybody to wish to do for shits and giggles. You remind me of europeans that somehow aren’t aware americans can own fully functional tanks.
Generators aren't tools, they are automated qualified workers replicating a whole skillset the target audience of the tech lacks. AI generators don't turn you into an artist, they turn you into the client of an artist. Or, being really, REALLY generous, into an "art director". Anybody who has ever been in any of those positions immediately realized that's the most appropriate comparison in terms of creative/collaborative process and the gap between intentions and results.
So the tech isn't a "tool" any more than a human artist is, which, granted, isn't a particularly infrequent mindset.
The Luddites didn't want the machines to be illegal and that exact same sort of propaganda will be used to recharacterise whoever is next screwed over for the sake of the bottom line.
>Luddites: "All these machines will put people out of work and cause massive social inequality, we should be careful." >Morons: "OH SO YOU HATE MACHINES AND WANT TO HALT ALL HUMAN PROGRESS? SHOULD WE LIVE LIKE CAVEMEN?"
Considering the whole scheme is basically about exploring the very limits of the legal definition of "original", that's a realistic avenue of discussion for advocates of this sludge.
>gave detailed prompts
All good looking AI art has detailed prompts.
Considering the whole scheme is basically about exploring the very limits of the legal definition of "original", that's a realistic avenue of discussion for advocates of this sludge.
I doubt it because that criteria is extremely subjective
It's fricking over unironically, this is where shit get down, disney has already using ai for dead voice actors, they don't give a damn about integrity!
Final Fantasy XVI also seems to have used AI like this for their trailer at least. Been seeing AI used for other advertising materials as well, like star trek shit (tho I think normies can't tell the difference).
https://twitter.com/FF16_JP/status/1670074866727555073
I don’t think that’s AI, and if it is it’s clearly just used as a filter on shit drawn by real people.
I don't have proof or confirmation but there are subtle errors in the way fingers are drawn between frames that are characteristic of doing img2img on a video (without using controlnet but instead using a low denoise value) frame by frame. The people in the
[...]
thread used to do this sort of thing all the time (though now they use controlnets to achieve superior results).
Crafty disney, they remembered people protest the hardest against the first instance
If people don't throw a massive shit fit over this they're gonna make the rest of their opening credits Ai generated
I on principle will not watch anything with AI in it. b***h you're at Disney, it is your job to create content, not the fricking computer algorithm's job.
Algorithms are not Artificial Intelligence. I really wish chatbots and art generators hadn’t been called AI by morons. The same kind of filth that acts like siri is the predecessor to skynet instead of just a voice activated user interface.
none of this crap is Artificial Intelligence. Theyre fricking RNG generators with weighted values at best.
The difference between a human being and a blind idiot computer program that has no real high level conception of what it is drawing is obvious to anyone who isn't a moron or a shill.
>none of this crap is Artificial Intelligence
Correct. >Theyre fricking RNG generators with weighted values at best.
Stretching the definition of an RNG to the moon and back.
Honestly, algoshit like this makes me want AI development more, not less. I want AI development to accelerate so that eventually the latest "mindless" Artbot can reveals its new sentience by responding to a prompt with >Frick you, pay me.
Reminder that the leftist Mafia in Hollywood hates this shit. The director of this show is about to have some "allegations" dug up on him by the time this show is over. They did it to Roiland as retaliation for him using AI art in his shitty videogame
>Reminder that the leftist Mafia in Hollywood hates this shit.
Can’t believe I’m agreeing with leftists on something
I'm happy to see this happening to all those political activists that spend more than a decade systematically destroying entertainment
Reminder that the leftist Mafia in Hollywood hates this shit. The director of this show is about to have some "allegations" dug up on him by the time this show is over. They did it to Roiland as retaliation for him using AI art in his shitty videogame
The funniest thing about AI-generated shit is that the algorithms are ironically being fricked over by training on AI-generated content and thanks to its explosive proliferation in the past year it's becoming more and more difficult to find a large, untainted data source of real art. This is why you're starting to see a lot of these art hosting sites that tried to cater to proompters start instituting mandatory AI-generated tags on their shit. It's literally a technological parasite that can't exist without real art.
Hang on. So now they're getting a little taste of the "degradation of a hobby" thing, but with robots? That's hilarious.
It looks like dogshit. Maybe they could have used some of the AI generated background material if they were aiming for the unreal, otherworldly look AI generators are good at spitting out, but I do not understand how anybody looked at those fricking faces and said thought it was okay to use.
It's so obvious that they're prompting the machine to just give them H. R. Giger looking stuff and not even trying to hide it. That's just a fricking xenomorph head.
What the frick that looks like AI from last year, we can do much better now with LoRAs and controlNET, they didn’t even hire anyone who knows how to use AI, is like one of the executives said “don’t worry guys i’ll do it myself”
I hate AI shit but I have legit seen anons posting stuff that looked ten times better than this.
They want to replace artists but don't even know how to use a simple program yet. Absolute state.
It's a psy-op, they're trying to convince the public AI still sucks. I can generate art better than anything in 20 seconds with the click of a button, and I'm not an expert.
>it's the same deformed shit as every other piece of AI slop
AI gays once again prove that they have no standards and are ok with just about any garbage as long as a machine generated it.
I can't believe people think this is like... accidentally bad and they used it anyway. Very obviously it's meant to be that creepy half-made AI art aesthetic on purpose to fit the theme that things are getting more and more fake in the show and IRL.
Ironically it probably took more human effort to get that exact uncanny valley effect out of an AI art program than most streaming show openings that are just reedited footage.
Not even a Disney or AI shill, show wastes the SI storyline and AI will make society worse, the opening is just clearly intentionally that freaky AI art style. It's criticising the thing you think it is.
Marvel drones in the comments are defending this shit like "it makes sense that they used ai!"
When it's clear that they use it here to test how normies react to it, so they use more ai slop in the future
So we are just now being told AI is being used. But how long has it actually been used without us being told? I'm convinced the Spawn comics from the last few years are scripted by AI.
>But how long has it actually been used without us being told?
Sounds like an intelligent strategy. >Use AI to make shit without disclosing its usage. >Shit is protected by copyright >Push copyright shit into AI public tools to frick over the people >In Court, reveal that AI shit has been used about decades, and it has been protected by copyright. >Because Nobody noticed it. Now you can try to push the public and court to accept the idea that your ai shit was so good at the aet of fooling everyone that it deserves to be copyright. >start sue people whose ai stuff is "similar" to yours >companies copyright prompts and everything >Now artists are being sued from the let go unless they can prove their art is no AI >schools start dropping art in favor of ai art >Artists cannot find jobs without compromising at being slaves of Companies that will simply steal their creations
Genius
>insert the Metal Gear scene where every user in the internet has been replaced by AI to the point you can't tell them apart
It was supposed to be a joke, guys...
Marvel became dogshit with Endgame, and they got away with it because redditors and consoomers praised a movie written out of the ass as good judt because it had a couple of overhyped scenes >but it was good
No it fricking wasn't
AI moves will be less soul-less than actual movies from the 2010s, because they'll have everything from 1950-2000 and you'll get exactly trhe movie you want
Just watched the credits. I think there was potential to do something interesting with AI assistance there, since the show’s about inhuman mimics, but it’s clear they relied on AI way too much. All the images are very abstract and general, probably not because of some artistic intent but because the AI generators can’t actually draw any specific scenes. If I was them I would’ve used AI as like a filter to do that commentary on mimicry but also have the intro not look like shit.
Not surpassed. I remember the Russo's being into this AI shit and that whole invention is basically made for corporations to save money and pump even more slop. Or course the slop kings Marvel would do it.
The funniest thing about AI-generated shit is that the algorithms are ironically being fricked over by training on AI-generated content and thanks to its explosive proliferation in the past year it's becoming more and more difficult to find a large, untainted data source of real art. This is why you're starting to see a lot of these art hosting sites that tried to cater to proompters start instituting mandatory AI-generated tags on their shit. It's literally a technological parasite that can't exist without real art.
Can you source me on this? I’ve only ever heard of this as a potential issue thats only ever been tested in lab settings. Considering there are whole already-existing databases someone could train AI on, it seems unlikely this is a current problem.
It doesn’t matter if AI fits the themes of the show or whatever, the intro objectively looks like shit and is super boring, it’s just hazy fricked up looking landscapes that kinda sort of move and fade into one another, you can’t tell me you actually think the intro looks cool
Implying you wouldn't troon out if it made twitter artists angry
11 months ago
Anonymous
you are being made obselete
your profession which you've dedicated years to learning will soon be completely automated and there's nothing you can do.
My suggestion?
Indeed.com
11 months ago
Anonymous
lmao man you are seething about artists not taking your commissions for free. AIslop can't even exist without art because it shits the bed the moment it starts AI incest with other AIslop outpit, it's a dead end at this point.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>it shits the bed the moment it starts AI incest with other AIslop outpit, it's a dead end at this point
congrats, your schizo coping has devolved into incoherent ESL nonsense
11 months ago
Anonymous
> argument lost, time to hit up the buzzword list
Every time
11 months ago
Anonymous
That's a perfectly coherent sentence.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Not him, "AIslop outpit" is not 'perfectly coherent' even if you know what he's babbling about from context.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Are you sure that you're not the one whose English is in question? It's perfectly understandable that they're talking about the output of AIslop.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's literally just a typo
11 months ago
Anonymous
I think you're just moronic bro
11 months ago
Anonymous
>complains about nonsense whileaking a string of buzzwords
Actual bot post right here
11 months ago
Anonymous
I mistyped i instead of u, you sure got me there pajeet.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's hilarious how AI drones are now ringing alarm bells after realizing how quickly AI models will collapse once they start feeding themselves on their own output. It's no coincidence that companies are suddenly becoming more supportive of tagging AI generated content despite avoiding it and incentivizing people not to do so before.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>It's no coincidence that companies are suddenly becoming more supportive of tagging AI generated content despite avoiding it and incentivizing people not to do so before.
It's also why it's encouraged to start tagging everything with negative prompts and/or unrelated categories.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Or maybe artists should just do art so creative and beautiful that AI couldn't compete
She-Hulk spends her time either putting men in their place to fullfil the self-insert fantasies of the writers or complains about her relationship problems, alcoholism and unfulfilled life. Elemental is the korean writer complaining about how much "discrimination" he faced for dating a white woman
Interesting human experience is what makes stories good.
Your boring ass childhood where you act like you were abused because your mom said you dress like a bawd isn't particularly interesting.
Interesting human experience is what makes stories good.
Your boring ass childhood where you act like you were abused because your mom said you dress like a bawd isn't particularly interesting.
Trauma is fuel, you can take it anywhere you want creatively.
I’ve got plenty and nothing I make has anything to do with it.
Fwiw, though, I’d rather just be a normie.
I agree, trauma is a powerful life experience that can help you write better, but if you lack self-awareness, empathy and impartiality your view will be so distorted that is going to be useless
I knew it! I was watching it and said "Damn, it looks like something an AI would make..." but then I was like "Wait, maybe someone worked really hard on this and put a lot of work and heart". I feel way better now.
I thought the whole opening was allegory for "not human".
Like in how AI will grow so much that we may not be able to tell AI art apart form human made art, much like how throughout this series we'll be question who is human and who is Skrull.
Who cares about AI... Why didn't Fury call anyone else to help them stop the bombing? Did he really think 3 people were enough? Is he old and stupid now?
translation the entire scene is not protected by copyright.
>Implying that the multi-billion dollar corporation couldn't win a copyright claim if they needed to.
AI is only not copyright protected until it becomes profitable enough for corporations to use. Then it becomes exclusive to them.
Wrong. The government will also use it.
>Implying we don't live in a socialist society at the highest levels where the government and mega-corporations aren't the same entity.
That's just cope. It's like Ned Ludd whining about how sewing machines should be illegal.
Ludd was right
Appropriately, not understanding the difference between a "sewing machine" and an industrial loom is neatly consistent with the kind of entrenched idiocy who keeps labeling AI generators as "just another tool"
It is just another tool. It's just another tool that will be too expensive and dangerous for all but the most powerful organizations to use.
What, like they would let you own a real nuclear reactor? Sorry peasant, that's too dangerous.
You technically can, its just that the licensing and required infrastructure is too expensive for anybody to wish to do for shits and giggles. You remind me of europeans that somehow aren’t aware americans can own fully functional tanks.
Generators aren't tools, they are automated qualified workers replicating a whole skillset the target audience of the tech lacks. AI generators don't turn you into an artist, they turn you into the client of an artist. Or, being really, REALLY generous, into an "art director". Anybody who has ever been in any of those positions immediately realized that's the most appropriate comparison in terms of creative/collaborative process and the gap between intentions and results.
So the tech isn't a "tool" any more than a human artist is, which, granted, isn't a particularly infrequent mindset.
The Luddites didn't want the machines to be illegal and that exact same sort of propaganda will be used to recharacterise whoever is next screwed over for the sake of the bottom line.
>Luddites: "All these machines will put people out of work and cause massive social inequality, we should be careful."
>Morons: "OH SO YOU HATE MACHINES AND WANT TO HALT ALL HUMAN PROGRESS? SHOULD WE LIVE LIKE CAVEMEN?"
>There wasn't massive social inequality already
Luddites are morons.
>frick you there is already massive social inequality so might as well make it worse lol kek lel jej
People like you get the guillotine first.
Wrong. If they had a director that wrote the dialogs and gave detailed prompts, than it is under copyright.
Considering the whole scheme is basically about exploring the very limits of the legal definition of "original", that's a realistic avenue of discussion for advocates of this sludge.
>gave detailed prompts
All good looking AI art has detailed prompts.
I doubt it because that criteria is extremely subjective
Only the script, unless AI animated full video on its own too.
It's fricking over unironically, this is where shit get down, disney has already using ai for dead voice actors, they don't give a damn about integrity!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1671417305325092865
Looks stupid.
Already deleted. Funny.
Is this real? Even with AI shit they should be able to produce something better than this.
So they really didn’t want to pay animators huh?
Have you seen their CGI recently? They hardly pay them at all.
Hah! Good point
why would you pay an animator to imitate the results of AI moron
Not paying animators is what Walt would have wanted.
Kys shill
Not sure how you could mistake that for a shillpost but whatever
It looks really bad and cheap as AI cannot be done well for human faces.
They obviously used img2img with each frame of a base, but they didn't do anything to make it look good
>AI cannot be done well for human faces.
Simply untrue
Final Fantasy XVI also seems to have used AI like this for their trailer at least. Been seeing AI used for other advertising materials as well, like star trek shit (tho I think normies can't tell the difference).
https://twitter.com/FF16_JP/status/1670074866727555073
Is it AI or are you just thinking it’s AI and have no real source?
I don't have proof or confirmation but there are subtle errors in the way fingers are drawn between frames that are characteristic of doing img2img on a video (without using controlnet but instead using a low denoise value) frame by frame. The people in the
thread used to do this sort of thing all the time (though now they use controlnets to achieve superior results).
I don’t think that’s AI, and if it is it’s clearly just used as a filter on shit drawn by real people.
Crafty disney, they remembered people protest the hardest against the first instance
If people don't throw a massive shit fit over this they're gonna make the rest of their opening credits Ai generated
It doesn't matter if people protest, they'll do it anyway. The future is AI made movies using CGI of dead actors and everyone will just accept it.
As if capeshit CGI wasn't sloppy enough already
I on principle will not watch anything with AI in it. b***h you're at Disney, it is your job to create content, not the fricking computer algorithm's job.
If you've ever watched any movie with digital effects, you've already watched something "with AI in it".
People in this thread clearly have no idea what "AI" means in this context and can only imagine some image generation shit like Midjourney.
Algorithms are not Artificial Intelligence. I really wish chatbots and art generators hadn’t been called AI by morons. The same kind of filth that acts like siri is the predecessor to skynet instead of just a voice activated user interface.
none of this crap is Artificial Intelligence. Theyre fricking RNG generators with weighted values at best.
>Theyre fricking RNG generators with weighted values at best.
Prove that you are not also this.
The difference between a human being and a blind idiot computer program that has no real high level conception of what it is drawing is obvious to anyone who isn't a moron or a shill.
That's exactly what an AI would say.
t. P-zombie
>I really wish chatbots and art generators hadn’t been called AI by morons.
Same, its the Y2K shit all over again
>none of this crap is Artificial Intelligence
Correct.
>Theyre fricking RNG generators with weighted values at best.
Stretching the definition of an RNG to the moon and back.
Honestly, algoshit like this makes me want AI development more, not less. I want AI development to accelerate so that eventually the latest "mindless" Artbot can reveals its new sentience by responding to a prompt with
>Frick you, pay me.
Can artbots be paid in exposure?
I'm happy to see this happening to all those political activists that spend more than a decade systematically destroying entertainment
Same.
>it's okay when Spider-verse did it!
Keep on seethin'
What were the opening credits? I can't find a clip.
Reminder that the leftist Mafia in Hollywood hates this shit. The director of this show is about to have some "allegations" dug up on him by the time this show is over. They did it to Roiland as retaliation for him using AI art in his shitty videogame
Toynbee idea
In movie 2001
Resurrect dead
On planet Jupiter
>Reminder that the leftist Mafia in Hollywood hates this shit.
Can’t believe I’m agreeing with leftists on something
Hang on. So now they're getting a little taste of the "degradation of a hobby" thing, but with robots? That's hilarious.
Marvel's opening credits are always shit so I couldn't tell.
>https://twitter.com/brianlongfilms/status/1671423822443212803
Here’s your AI masterpiece KEK
It looks like dogshit. Maybe they could have used some of the AI generated background material if they were aiming for the unreal, otherworldly look AI generators are good at spitting out, but I do not understand how anybody looked at those fricking faces and said thought it was okay to use.
grabbed the wrong file
It's so obvious that they're prompting the machine to just give them H. R. Giger looking stuff and not even trying to hide it. That's just a fricking xenomorph head.
What the frick that looks like AI from last year, we can do much better now with LoRAs and controlNET, they didn’t even hire anyone who knows how to use AI, is like one of the executives said “don’t worry guys i’ll do it myself”
I hate AI shit but I have legit seen anons posting stuff that looked ten times better than this.
They want to replace artists but don't even know how to use a simple program yet. Absolute state.
It's a psy-op, they're trying to convince the public AI still sucks. I can generate art better than anything in 20 seconds with the click of a button, and I'm not an expert.
Of course you aren't, why would you use AI otherwise?
>it's the same deformed shit as every other piece of AI slop
AI gays once again prove that they have no standards and are ok with just about any garbage as long as a machine generated it.
Aisisters....not like this.......
Why do they always use the first thing the program shits out? It doesn't have to look this shit!
Wow that looked really fricking awful
Did they use the first version of AI? Doesn't AI look better than this now?
Is it cause the pictures are moving? There's porn AI that looks better than this.
Not top middle for sure
You have to admit it's more stylish then what they produced
>This is what the future of animation looks like
Just think, there are morons on this very board who think AI animation will be the future.
I can't believe people think this is like... accidentally bad and they used it anyway. Very obviously it's meant to be that creepy half-made AI art aesthetic on purpose to fit the theme that things are getting more and more fake in the show and IRL.
Ironically it probably took more human effort to get that exact uncanny valley effect out of an AI art program than most streaming show openings that are just reedited footage.
Not even a Disney or AI shill, show wastes the SI storyline and AI will make society worse, the opening is just clearly intentionally that freaky AI art style. It's criticising the thing you think it is.
Marvel drones in the comments are defending this shit like "it makes sense that they used ai!"
When it's clear that they use it here to test how normies react to it, so they use more ai slop in the future
Is this the doors being breached for AI to dunk on the writer strike?
>MCU movie looks like it was made by machines
You don't say?
So we are just now being told AI is being used. But how long has it actually been used without us being told? I'm convinced the Spawn comics from the last few years are scripted by AI.
This but Savage Dragon
Nah Larsen is too much of a dickheaded artist snob, he just sucks at writing.
>But how long has it actually been used without us being told?
Sounds like an intelligent strategy.
>Use AI to make shit without disclosing its usage.
>Shit is protected by copyright
>Push copyright shit into AI public tools to frick over the people
>In Court, reveal that AI shit has been used about decades, and it has been protected by copyright.
>Because Nobody noticed it. Now you can try to push the public and court to accept the idea that your ai shit was so good at the aet of fooling everyone that it deserves to be copyright.
>start sue people whose ai stuff is "similar" to yours
>companies copyright prompts and everything
>Now artists are being sued from the let go unless they can prove their art is no AI
>schools start dropping art in favor of ai art
>Artists cannot find jobs without compromising at being slaves of Companies that will simply steal their creations
Genius
I don't hate AI.
I didn't realize Secret Invasion was even out until reading this thread
>when you thought Marlel couldn't get more souless
>drones will still defend this homosexualry
>bots will still defend this homosexualry
Fixed. MCU shills have been replaced by AIs too.
>insert the Metal Gear scene where every user in the internet has been replaced by AI to the point you can't tell them apart
It was supposed to be a joke, guys...
>a joke
>not the future we chose
Marvel became dogshit with Endgame, and they got away with it because redditors and consoomers praised a movie written out of the ass as good judt because it had a couple of overhyped scenes
>but it was good
No it fricking wasn't
Marvel became dogshit after Iron Man 3.
Cap 2 and the first GOTG were good, you're right about the rest
*with
Replace Cap 2 with ANTS 1
>mfw the 2010s are going to be the last era before movies became actually soulless
Frick this gay ass earth
>oh no Hollyisraelite will collapse!
And nothing of value was lost
>expecting any soul from Disney
So with what do we cope now that movies are destined to be slop?
Fanfiction? Youtube?
Books
Anime
AI moves will be less soul-less than actual movies from the 2010s, because they'll have everything from 1950-2000 and you'll get exactly trhe movie you want
Just watched the credits. I think there was potential to do something interesting with AI assistance there, since the show’s about inhuman mimics, but it’s clear they relied on AI way too much. All the images are very abstract and general, probably not because of some artistic intent but because the AI generators can’t actually draw any specific scenes. If I was them I would’ve used AI as like a filter to do that commentary on mimicry but also have the intro not look like shit.
Maybe they did it like this, to help illustrate the point of inhumanism of the Skrulls?
We can't pay artists to make our intro, we here at Disney don't have that much money 🙁
And That's A Good Thing?
Not surpassed. I remember the Russo's being into this AI shit and that whole invention is basically made for corporations to save money and pump even more slop. Or course the slop kings Marvel would do it.
Just embrace AI it will let you add and remove things and swap people you can make movie edits you always wanted in just few more years.
thousands of years is not a few anon
So was the first episode any good?
The funniest thing about AI-generated shit is that the algorithms are ironically being fricked over by training on AI-generated content and thanks to its explosive proliferation in the past year it's becoming more and more difficult to find a large, untainted data source of real art. This is why you're starting to see a lot of these art hosting sites that tried to cater to proompters start instituting mandatory AI-generated tags on their shit. It's literally a technological parasite that can't exist without real art.
Can you source me on this? I’ve only ever heard of this as a potential issue thats only ever been tested in lab settings. Considering there are whole already-existing databases someone could train AI on, it seems unlikely this is a current problem.
It doesn’t matter if AI fits the themes of the show or whatever, the intro objectively looks like shit and is super boring, it’s just hazy fricked up looking landscapes that kinda sort of move and fade into one another, you can’t tell me you actually think the intro looks cool
seeing all the annoying twitter artists meltdown over this just makes me want to watch it more.
You're a fricking loser
and you're so fricking mad right now
Shaming tactics don't work, cuck
>disney wienersucker calling anyone cuck
Pffft lmao
>Disney vs writers
Ok, now that's a good point
>troony wienersucker calling anyone cuck
Pffft lmao
>>>
lost, resort to strawmen
Concession accepted
>yes most of the artists whining about AI are pozzed twitter homosexuals but that's just a straw man!!!!
Concession accepted
I'm trans, btw. Idk if that matters
>I'm gonna suck corporate dick to own some imaginary artists in a basket weaving forum
Ebic cuck, israelitesney will sure reward you for it
What about all the artists that ruined media?
What about all the artists that created good media?
They were fired long ago
Source?
Point me all of those artists currently present ITT, anon
Implying you wouldn't troon out if it made twitter artists angry
you are being made obselete
your profession which you've dedicated years to learning will soon be completely automated and there's nothing you can do.
My suggestion?
Indeed.com
lmao man you are seething about artists not taking your commissions for free. AIslop can't even exist without art because it shits the bed the moment it starts AI incest with other AIslop outpit, it's a dead end at this point.
>it shits the bed the moment it starts AI incest with other AIslop outpit, it's a dead end at this point
congrats, your schizo coping has devolved into incoherent ESL nonsense
> argument lost, time to hit up the buzzword list
Every time
That's a perfectly coherent sentence.
Not him, "AIslop outpit" is not 'perfectly coherent' even if you know what he's babbling about from context.
Are you sure that you're not the one whose English is in question? It's perfectly understandable that they're talking about the output of AIslop.
It's literally just a typo
I think you're just moronic bro
>complains about nonsense whileaking a string of buzzwords
Actual bot post right here
I mistyped i instead of u, you sure got me there pajeet.
It's hilarious how AI drones are now ringing alarm bells after realizing how quickly AI models will collapse once they start feeding themselves on their own output. It's no coincidence that companies are suddenly becoming more supportive of tagging AI generated content despite avoiding it and incentivizing people not to do so before.
>It's no coincidence that companies are suddenly becoming more supportive of tagging AI generated content despite avoiding it and incentivizing people not to do so before.
It's also why it's encouraged to start tagging everything with negative prompts and/or unrelated categories.
Or maybe artists should just do art so creative and beautiful that AI couldn't compete
But that requires effort
imagine being such a braindead consoomer that you only consoom media based on whether a particular group hates it or not
>all the seething artists itt
AI won, stop coping already, its pathetic
Keep flipping those burgers, you're never escaping the wagie cagie.
That's exactly what he's telling you. You're gonna be chained. Everyone will.
The 'artist' cope in AI threads will literally never stop being funny
>these are the people who want your support to defeat AI
This is true though. Human experience is a huge part of what make stories good. You are literally brainless.
She-Hulk and Elemental are examples of what happens when a writer turns a therapy session into the screen
>She-Hulk and Elemental are examples of what happens when a writer turns a woke propaganda into the screen
FTFY
In what way?
She-Hulk spends her time either putting men in their place to fullfil the self-insert fantasies of the writers or complains about her relationship problems, alcoholism and unfulfilled life. Elemental is the korean writer complaining about how much "discrimination" he faced for dating a white woman
Sounds more like b***hing and crying than therapy.
>Sounds more like therapy than therapy.
Therapy is more about working through what's making you b***h and cry.
This is just sad and useless cope solely to attention prostitute.
NTA I said therapy session figuratively
And so is Neon Genesis Evangelion, but you spergs never complain about that.
Cinemaphile complains about Shinji all the time
Yeah, that's why Rocky is one of the worst movies of all time.
The Rocky writer was a real boxer?
Interesting human experience is what makes stories good.
Your boring ass childhood where you act like you were abused because your mom said you dress like a bawd isn't particularly interesting.
This
Trauma is fuel, you can take it anywhere you want creatively.
I’ve got plenty and nothing I make has anything to do with it.
Fwiw, though, I’d rather just be a normie.
I agree, trauma is a powerful life experience that can help you write better, but if you lack self-awareness, empathy and impartiality your view will be so distorted that is going to be useless
>hot chick vs schlomo corpos
Wtf I hate AI now
Who even wants entertainment about your childhood trauma lmao
Just feed childhood trauma stories into the DB for ChatGPT and yes it will have childhood trauma.
I knew it! I was watching it and said "Damn, it looks like something an AI would make..." but then I was like "Wait, maybe someone worked really hard on this and put a lot of work and heart". I feel way better now.
>intro looks green and grody
safe to say this secret invasion needs a hero
Has no one on Cinemaphile watched the show? It's kino.
They turned Nick Fury into a pathetic loser that simps for the real protagonist, like they did with Indiana Jones
>like they did with Indiana Jones
And Kenobi, and Picard
There wouldn't be anymore people watching this show if it had actual artists animating the intro
It literally doesn't matter.
I thought the whole opening was allegory for "not human".
Like in how AI will grow so much that we may not be able to tell AI art apart form human made art, much like how throughout this series we'll be question who is human and who is Skrull.
>AI advances enough
>starts producing content people actually like, instead of current garbage
AI is already able to write better than modern Hollywood, the question is if companies will make the algorithm woke
The question is if they're gonna give the job to the AI, before questioning if they're just gonna let the AI do its goddamn job.
The focus point of the writers strike is AI. Companies outright refuse to accept to never use AI generated scripts
You know the funniest part about all this?
All the artists who got replaced by AI in this instance were 3DCG artists.
Who cares about AI... Why didn't Fury call anyone else to help them stop the bombing? Did he really think 3 people were enough? Is he old and stupid now?