Seduction of the Innocent and The Comics Code

Was Seduction of the Innocent the most damaging thing to happen to comic books? It neutered the industry for decades.

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Was Seduction of the Innocent the most damaging thing to happen to comic books?
    No, deconstruction stories did that.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Never understood why people think that comics are for kids.

      prove it.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Whatever the industry did to kill almost anyone but Marvel and DC was enormously damaging.

      Watchmen was a godsend.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        yep, monopolies are always a bad thing

        For what it's worth, Wertham was coming from a decent place. He was a legit criminal psychologist who prior to SOTI, saw a LOT of fricked up shit in his line of work. Most notably, Wertham was the shrink who had to do extensive interviews with Albert Fish, one of the most fricked up serial killers of the 20th Century and was the one Fish confessed all of the fricked up shit he did to kids to.

        means nothing really

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      That book was a scapegoat. It sold next to nothing and was unknown to the public (and probably even the industry) before the senate hearings. Blame the government and its connections to comics publishers. THAT'S what caused the censorship, no matter what revisionists try to tell you.

      That's not a deconstruction. Understanding Comics is a deconstruction. Actual deconstructions are RARE in comics.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Blame the government and its connections to comics publishers
        Noelle Stevens please.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, the industry itself is at fault.
      Apparently Wertham just wanted to institute age ratings.

      This

      That book was a scapegoat. It sold next to nothing and was unknown to the public (and probably even the industry) before the senate hearings. Blame the government and its connections to comics publishers. THAT'S what caused the censorship, no matter what revisionists try to tell you.

      That's not a deconstruction. Understanding Comics is a deconstruction. Actual deconstructions are RARE in comics.

      Watchmen employs revisionism, not deconstruction.

      >This one guy made a character I dislike, therefore he is responsible for ruining all of comics
      Really?

      Maybe he means the gravitation toward quirky Whedonesque writing in comics.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >quirky Whedonesque writing
        Better than Frank Miller's edgy cringe or George Lucas' bad Shakespeare.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not really, they're all pretty terrible.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not really, they're all pretty terrible.

          No. Frank Miller's was good until about halfway through Sin City, and he wasn't emulated the way Bendis is. Bendis was never good.

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fredric Wertham was right.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      He wasn't but the industry has spent the last decade trying to make him right.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Censorship is and always will be about controlling the masses. Its pointless, useless, and only there because some people get offended by things they do not like.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Was Seduction of the Innocent the most damaging thing to happen to comic books?
    Until Bendis.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >This one guy made a character I dislike, therefore he is responsible for ruining all of comics
      Really?

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    For what it's worth, Wertham was coming from a decent place. He was a legit criminal psychologist who prior to SOTI, saw a LOT of fricked up shit in his line of work. Most notably, Wertham was the shrink who had to do extensive interviews with Albert Fish, one of the most fricked up serial killers of the 20th Century and was the one Fish confessed all of the fricked up shit he did to kids to.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Road to hell, anon. Road to hell.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus, chatting with that bastard Albert Fish would screw anyone up. That man was sickness incarnate. I seriously suspect he was behind two additional child murders known as the New York Ripper killings

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >After Wertham's manuscript collection at the Library of Congress was unsealed in 2010, Carol Tilley, a University of Illinois librarian and information science professor, investigated his research and found his conclusions to be largely baseless. In a 2012 study, Tilley wrote "Wertham manipulated, overstated, compromised, and fabricated evidence—especially that evidence he attributed to personal clinical research with young people—for rhetorical gain."
      >Among the criticisms leveled at Seduction of the Innocent are that Wertham used a non-representative sample of young people who were already mentally troubled, that he misrepresented stories from colleagues as being his own, and that Wertham manipulated statements from adolescents by deliberately neglecting some passages while rephrasing others such that they better suited his thesis.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think people also need to think about the context of when the book came out. Youth culture and the concept of teenagers as we view them is an incredibly recent development that came about as part of the post-war period.

      More teenagers—a word that literally didn't exist until the mid-1940s—started attending high school and as more of them were spending more time together in a shared setting this led to the creation of a shared culture that was exclusive to teenagers. The hard times were mostly gone so Johnny didn't have to start working in the factory when he turned 14 and Anne didn't need to immediately go into clerical work or whatever. Now all the Johns and Annes were hanging out together in school and after school they'd hang out some more with all their abundant free time, maybe have a part-time after school job so they could buy things. So youth culture began taking shape and a lot of times it came in the form of rebellion against parents and expected social norms. This was incredibly shocking to a lot of people and there was a whole moral panic about juvenile delinquency. Something had to be behind it, corrupting the youth away from morality and comic books, with their tawdry and violent stories, were seen as one of the factors.

      This is also why rock 'n roll was so shocking and seen as especially obscene and vulgar. It was more sexually charged (especially the black artists) to the point where the name itself was an obvious reference to sex and teenagers would get so into it that they'd seem to go into frenzies like the riots and vandalism that would happen during Blackboard Jungle screenings. America pre and post-World War II might as well be completely different worlds. The cultural change brought about by the economic prosperity after a generation of depression and misery was sudden, immense, and very shocking and upsetting to adults who had no real idea what to make of any of it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *