anon
the show is LITERALLY just ragebait
you watching this show and complaining about it is literally giving mindy kaling a huge boner right now and you have absolutely no one to blame.
and if you think the producers look on Cinemaphile for critique you need to give me whatever weed you're smoking because you're not on planet earth.
if you really had an issue with a show you would simply damn it out of your memory.
when stalin had an adversary, he didn't just keep talking about him over and over again. he turned that person into an unperson. that's what you should do with this show
for what purpose? I am not watching this trash. Nor am I paying for Hbomax. You can always pirate if you want to eat shit for free.
So I repeat my question: audience is mad, what's the endgame? No one is going to buy Velma t-shirts or whatever as well as no one's watching season 2. Stop acting like they have any plan or understand marketing- they DON'T.
Porn is vicarious scopophilic entertainment. If you have issues projecting yourself onto the guy you’re either a cuck or have issues with your masculinity.
When two women kiss, who exactly is being "cucked"? Do you people know what the word means, or do you just change its definition to mean whatever you want it to at any given time?
There's nothing homosexual about two close female friends smashing thier veganal areas together repeatedly until orgasm is achieved, anon. It's quite literally the straitest thing that can occur between women
Christ, what're they teaching in the schools these days?
Better question is what's up with black people everywhere?
Like this shot from Harley Quinn Valentine's Day special, depicts many background characters fricking, and half of them are black.
I don't even think middle of New York is that black.
Regardless, isn't Gothanm based on Chicago? Chicago only has 28% black people and same amount of Latinos, but beyond Joker's family, there are no Latinos in the show.
>why did you censor it out?
Janitors say nay-nay, I was once banned from this board from posting screen cap of Starbarbarians (Harry Patrick youtube short) fricking. And that short isn't even R-rated on youtube.
>but beyond Joker's family, there are no Latinos in the show.
It's pretty funny how forgotten latinos are when it comes to diversity.
Writers will include random background muslims before they even remember latinos exist, despite latinos quickly rising in numbers in America
>Regardless, isn't Gothanm based on Chicago? Chicago only has 28% black people and same amount of Latinos,
Based on the politically correct, that's wrong and all of Chicago is nigs now. Not normal black people, all of them are gangbangers apparently.
lgbt women make up a large portion of the industry now so as a result, and since they only seek to project their own desires/fantasies into their projects, this is what you’re going to get.
Yeah, as fanservice like drawn together did in the 2000s. Even then it was foxy being a massive bawd. Want to compare that to Velma who looks like a walking turd?
There are exactly 0 lesbian scenes like this today.
If two women kiss in modern media it was done to spite a man not get him hard.
There are almost 0 exceptions to that in western media.
Tamest homosexual depiction possible.
Studios can say they're pro LGBT (and swallow more money) and normal people are less digusted by lesbian than men.
If you like girls, it's multiple girls doing sexual stuff. The problem is that lesbians don't like guys, so men liking it is cucked. With bisexual women this cuckoldry is removed as the girl-girl stuff can be a prelude to a threesome.
Hot lesbians always boost ratings.
Even during the 90ies despite the rabid moral watchdogs, they sneaked a lesbian scene here and there during sweeps week or even used to boost new shows for them to never ever do this again.
Nowadays they are used to boost the ratings of shitty shows, so much so, that they became a sign of bad quality.
Your pic is a bad example, because Daphne ends up with Norville, so not technically lesbian, just bait and switch
Ask this question again, another character you like will become a lesbo.
Im gonna ask this just so i can see Johanna and Kaisa making out.
>complaining about a show that's supposed to make you mad
you guys never learn do you
>not complaining about a show you don't like giving producers the assumption that you like it
you guys never learn do you
anon
the show is LITERALLY just ragebait
you watching this show and complaining about it is literally giving mindy kaling a huge boner right now and you have absolutely no one to blame.
and if you think the producers look on Cinemaphile for critique you need to give me whatever weed you're smoking because you're not on planet earth.
if you really had an issue with a show you would simply damn it out of your memory.
when stalin had an adversary, he didn't just keep talking about him over and over again. he turned that person into an unperson. that's what you should do with this show
Okay, let me try another approach:
>complaining about a comment that's suppose to make you mad
you guys never learn do you
yeah the fundamental difference is i know you'll reply because you have nothing better to do
Whatever points you think you're scoring, it's in a game only you are playing
>you watching this show
That was your first mistake.
for what purpose? I am not watching this trash. Nor am I paying for Hbomax. You can always pirate if you want to eat shit for free.
So I repeat my question: audience is mad, what's the endgame? No one is going to buy Velma t-shirts or whatever as well as no one's watching season 2. Stop acting like they have any plan or understand marketing- they DON'T.
The endgame is that weird liberals watch these cartoons.
joke's on you, I love lesbians and I enjoy the Velma show
Easier to market than gay men.
>Lesbians are hot
>easy rep as it a twofer
>bonus if one is trans
Easy
>Lesbians are hot
>one is a squat abusive troll of a woman.
Why is that always true too
millenial men are obsessed with lesbians for some reason
>he doesn't like two ladies kissing
You some kinda gay or somethin'?
No, I’m not into cuckoldry, no.
>No, I’m not into cuckoldry, no.
You only watch masturbation porn?
Porn is vicarious scopophilic entertainment. If you have issues projecting yourself onto the guy you’re either a cuck or have issues with your masculinity.
Sorry, we don't have personality disorder or other related mental illnesses, coomcoom
When two women kiss, who exactly is being "cucked"? Do you people know what the word means, or do you just change its definition to mean whatever you want it to at any given time?
You're not in the show so you were always cucked by some other person moron.
>supporting homosexuality is straight
There's nothing homosexual about two close female friends smashing thier veganal areas together repeatedly until orgasm is achieved, anon. It's quite literally the straitest thing that can occur between women
Christ, what're they teaching in the schools these days?
I know too many lesbians to be into it. Fricking exhausting people.
It's an easy way to be "progressive" and "groundbreaking" without needing to put in any actual effort or originally.
Try read a X-men comic....everyone is gay...the mutants will end because no one can empreganet XD
Better question is what's up with black people everywhere?
Like this shot from Harley Quinn Valentine's Day special, depicts many background characters fricking, and half of them are black.
>is major urban center in america
that should answer your question. also, why did you censor it out? think we cant handle a bit of puss?
I don't even think middle of New York is that black.
Regardless, isn't Gothanm based on Chicago? Chicago only has 28% black people and same amount of Latinos, but beyond Joker's family, there are no Latinos in the show.
>why did you censor it out?
Janitors say nay-nay, I was once banned from this board from posting screen cap of Starbarbarians (Harry Patrick youtube short) fricking. And that short isn't even R-rated on youtube.
>but beyond Joker's family, there are no Latinos in the show.
It's pretty funny how forgotten latinos are when it comes to diversity.
Writers will include random background muslims before they even remember latinos exist, despite latinos quickly rising in numbers in America
Because Latinos will actually call you out for being a moron and misrepresenting their culture for your burger king's kids club tier shows.
do you see all the dicky threads on this site? post that shit. if you get a three day vacation i'll take a vacation with you
it's this one:
?t=110
I guess it's age restricted after all?
Oh well, it wasn't 8 years ago.
>Regardless, isn't Gothanm based on Chicago? Chicago only has 28% black people and same amount of Latinos,
Based on the politically correct, that's wrong and all of Chicago is nigs now. Not normal black people, all of them are gangbangers apparently.
It's a city. Guess what people you encounter in a city?
Now if it was a small town that would be strange
Pussy is in bottom right tho
lgbt women make up a large portion of the industry now so as a result, and since they only seek to project their own desires/fantasies into their projects, this is what you’re going to get.
Why didn't we get bisexual Shaggy?
Gay people are more excepted and nowadays, so now it's more normal to see them in media, because there's more of a push for that kind of thing
You mean lesbians. Gay and bisexuals are put on the back burner since they don't make as much money to cash in on
Lesbians are hot, you nerd
Yeah, as fanservice like drawn together did in the 2000s. Even then it was foxy being a massive bawd. Want to compare that to Velma who looks like a walking turd?
I'm glad I'm not a coprophiliac like you.
There are exactly 0 lesbian scenes like this today.
If two women kiss in modern media it was done to spite a man not get him hard.
There are almost 0 exceptions to that in western media.
Correction: Lesbians are hot in the movies.
Fact: Lesbians don't exist, & the pretty ones are almost always bisexual. Hot women only lez out for male attention.
I say this both figuratively and literally, lesbians are easy
I say this objectively, but
>creative types tend to push this stuff
>a lot of companies have gayness quotas and/or diversity quotas
Pendulum effect
>corporate wants gay people in product
>can we add gay men sex?
>no
>gay men kissing?
>no
>gay men holding hands?
>no
>hmm
>two girls kissing?
>yes
>18-21 year old gay men?
>no
>35+ year old gay men?
>yes
>two 14 year old lesbians?
>yes
>two 8 year old lesbians?
>yes
>Nooo! Stop adding totally hot lesbian kissing into this show!
Well most of them are supposed to be bisexual, but you'll be forgiven for not noticing because they never end up in relationships with men.
Because Tumblr dykes are making the executive decisions with these cartoons. It's the same reason why shows like The Owl House exist.
>Nowadays
People have been saying this for a decade now.
Tamest homosexual depiction possible.
Studios can say they're pro LGBT (and swallow more money) and normal people are less digusted by lesbian than men.
I don't get the fetish for lesbians.
It's so stupid.
If you like girls, it's multiple girls doing sexual stuff. The problem is that lesbians don't like guys, so men liking it is cucked. With bisexual women this cuckoldry is removed as the girl-girl stuff can be a prelude to a threesome.
Hot lesbians always boost ratings.
Even during the 90ies despite the rabid moral watchdogs, they sneaked a lesbian scene here and there during sweeps week or even used to boost new shows for them to never ever do this again.
Nowadays they are used to boost the ratings of shitty shows, so much so, that they became a sign of bad quality.
Your pic is a bad example, because Daphne ends up with Norville, so not technically lesbian, just bait and switch
Kinda wish Drawn Together had more girl on girl