I actually felt shocked at her death and took a few days off from binging after that episode
My friend couldn't understand why, he just called her a dumb bawd
Why do people give so much importance to her?
Walter kills a bunch of characters and is responsible for a bunch more by proxy, are you going to tell me gale is not on Walter? Or the kid the gangsters shot? Or the dirty bike kid? It's all caused by a ripple effect caused by Walter. Why is she so fricking special? He didn't chocked her to death, it was a effect of his actions.
Blackmail is "in the game". Jane's more moronic than the rest of you, if she thought she could just blackmail someone who produced ~$1.5 million in meth money, and have nothing happen to her.
There was a court case where a guy watched someone drown and did nothing and was punished as being culpable for the death. If you're the only person who see somebody dying in America and dont tell anybody, you are held partially responsible.
Why do people give so much importance to her?
Walter kills a bunch of characters and is responsible for a bunch more by proxy, are you going to tell me gale is not on Walter? Or the kid the gangsters shot? Or the dirty bike kid? It's all caused by a ripple effect caused by Walter. Why is she so fricking special? He didn't chocked her to death, it was a effect of his actions.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I literally just explained to you why he's culpable based on US law, why are you being obtuse?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Read
Why do people give so much importance to her?
Walter kills a bunch of characters and is responsible for a bunch more by proxy, are you going to tell me gale is not on Walter? Or the kid the gangsters shot? Or the dirty bike kid? It's all caused by a ripple effect caused by Walter. Why is she so fricking special? He didn't chocked her to death, it was a effect of his actions.
Again and again until you understand that autistic moron isn't talking about legality you autistic moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
He misspoke, but he literally meant to say that Walter wasnt responsible, and I am literally telling you that he was, and that there is no distinction between her death and the others, which is the whole point of his post, you fricking collosal moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
No I didn't misspoke, I asked >WHY PEOPLE GIVE SO MUCH IMPORTANCE TO HER DEATH?
And then I gave examples of people that Walter either killed by proxy, or that were killed by Walters actions.
Why is this girl so talked about it, but no the other characters that he killed or are killed because of his actions? Why is she so special?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Why is she so special?
#1 >She's hot.
A very distant #2 >anons have sympathy for Jesse's suffering
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>Why is she so special? >#1 >>She's hot.
Agreed.
2 years ago
Anonymous
parasocial relationships
2 years ago
Anonymous
Until then Walt only attacked people who attacked him first. You can say that he maybe responsible for overdoses or street violence, but that's beside the point. He killed Jane for trying to steal Jesse from him and that's it. He trasitioned to evil criminal instead of just someone doing business with them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They are all equally wrong, but her death is particularly egregious because unlike the other ones, he didnt actually have to do it to maintain his freedom. He did it for pure convenience, which, unlike murder for necessity, is particularly evil. Somebody literally already explained that to you moron
This was the first time Walt "killed" someone not to save his life, but for convenience, so it was significant. It was different watching it as the show aired. If you watched it after airing then you already know Walt becomes le bad guy so it doesn't have the same impact.
>Only in the sense that the crime of murder requires killing a human being
Wrong.
The question is not if the officer is wrong, the officer is wrong; but to what degree?
What killed him? And did it killed him? Was he drugged?
more just unnecessary her death could have been outside a vacuum of walt's own interests, he stopped dead in his tracks knowing this outcome would be of benefit to him
Walter just stood there and watched her die. It was even his fault she rolled onto her back in her sleep, and he stood over while she helplessly choked to death. To make it worse he walked off knowing Jessie would wake up later feeling the full blame. And there’s always the possibility she wouldn’t have relapsed if it hadn’t been for Walter in the first place. She was also a character viewers got “to know” (albeit toxic, controlling, and irritating) rather than some random dealer or something that would have killed Walter over money or something.
Why do people give so much importance to her?
Walter kills a bunch of characters and is responsible for a bunch more by proxy, are you going to tell me gale is not on Walter? Or the kid the gangsters shot? Or the dirty bike kid? It's all caused by a ripple effect caused by Walter. Why is she so fricking special? He didn't chocked her to death, it was a effect of his actions.
Because she was hot and because it was a shameful way to go and because Walt made the choice to let it happen against his better nature. It was a powerful moment.
I think most smart people would've let her die, she showed that she had no bond in her word when she blackmailed walt. She wouldn't never known he saved her because he wasn't supposed to be there
i just wantd to say that i went to school with a dominican chick that looked the same as jane but sans pale skin. had a hairy lower back, and big saggy breasts
>accidentally cause someone to begin dying >deliberately don't save them so that they would die
You should read that dictionary instead of just parroting its title.
Allowing her to die doesn't constitute malice, thus he can't be charged with 2nd degree murder, you could say it is, but he didn't forced her to do the drugs. You see? The same logic can be applied to her as well, (reckless conduct lacking concern for human life or having a high risk of death), obviously she wouldn't be charged as it is her own life, but then he can't as well.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It would be involuntary manslaughter, if she puked after he left. Because he was there, it's second degree.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It would be involuntary manslaughter, if she puked after he left.
Where is it written that you have to save an addict from themselves?
2 years ago
Anonymous
When your actions cause them to die. If he hadn't have shaken Jesse as he did, she wouldn't have rolled onto her back, and instead would have puked on Jesse.
Her being high or sober changes nothing.
His actions resulted in her being on her back, and then he did nothing to help her.
We're not talking about Walt needing to lift a car, all he had to do was turn her head.
Go back to making Saw shitposting threads.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>If he hadn't have shaken Jesse as he did, she wouldn't have rolled onto her back, and instead would have puked on Jesse.
You can know that. She could have rolled on her back. Or not. >Her being high or sober changes nothing.
It changes everything, if she was sober that situation would not have happened. >We're not talking about Walt needing to lift a car, all he had to do was turn her head.
Is it in the law that he have to? >Go back to making Saw shitposting threads.
?
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
You dare to insult me with a small board like that?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Its in the law that he at least had to tell somebody in a timely manner
2 years ago
Anonymous
What law is that?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You can know that. She could have rolled on her back. Or not.
If she would have rolled onto her back on her own, then it would be involuntary manslaughter, he was still there while she was dying. >It changes everything, if she was sober that situation would not have happened.
It changes nothing. Sober people puke too. We know she's high, but Walt doesn't. For all he knows, it's food poisoning from supper. >Is it in the law that he have to?
Literally, we've been saying that for dozens of posts. >?
You're moronic way of dodging responsibility is the same thing that Saw shitposters do. You'd fit right in with them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Clearly you have the Jesus complex and we won't get anywhere, we will have to agree to disagree on the morality, so morality aside.
Is it the law? If so, what laws did he break? >Saw shitposters do
I've never seen a post about the movies in this entire board.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Clearly you have the Jesus complex and we won't get anywhere
Clearly you're moronic, if you think that. >we will have to agree to disagree on the morality, so morality aside.
No, you're moronic, and that's all there is too it.
Walt.
Literally.
Admits.
To.
It. >I could have saved her, but I didn't.
You seen to think that if this went to court this would come to light. What actually happens means shit if there's no way to prove it
>there's no way to prove it
Walt literally admitted to it. What more proof do you want?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Again, I'm not talking about the morality. I'm talking about law, if I'm moronic as you say, then just tell us the laws he broke. Simple. Can you do that? Wait... what's that? No... ok then.
I'll accept that apology now.
2 years ago
Anonymous
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law#Common_features
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_peril
Now please frick off.
I'm saying there's no way to prove it in court. There was no witness and you think walt would admit in court that he could save her?
>I'm saying there's no way to prove it in court
The jury would have the information we have. We saw the scene where Walt admits it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the jury would have the information we have. We saw the scene where Walt admits it.
Lol you're moronic, why would the jury be an omnipotent presence, that makes no sense
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Lol you're moronic, why would the jury be an omnipotent presence, that makes no sense
Because we're dealing with fiction, not reality.
Walt's guilt is undeniable. You're trying to split hairs and talk about if he'd go to jail. We already saw that he gets away with it, in the show.
We're talking about if he's guilty or not.
Walt's morally and legally guilty. Even though he'll never see the inside of a jail cell for it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>legally guilty.
Legally he is not. If he is tell us the laws he broke.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law#Common_features >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_peril
Have you actually read it? This proves my point. Kek. He has no legal obligation to do anything at all. And even if he fell into one of the categories of guardian, or "responsible for the illness" which would be the vomiting, it is a misdemeanor (not murder) and the state of New Mexico is not covered. So it doesn't matter how you slide it, he's still innocent. Now, I can say that it's not that I think he is innocent, but he actually is innocent. You know if you're going to play a obscurantist law, you better read it first. Piece of advice.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Have you actually read it?
You didn't even make it one sentence into the Imminent peril part. >Good Samaritan provisions are not universal in application. >The legal principle of imminent peril may also apply.
Jane was in imminent peril, Walt admits to it.
?t=117
Walt fully understands what he did. He makes it so clear. >I was there. >And I watched her die. >I watched her overdose and choke to death. >I could have saved her. >But I didn't.
?t=111
Why are you so convinced by one tear?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>The legal principle of imminent peril may also apply.
Again, not covered in NM, but even IF it was, and even IF imminent peril applied, it is a misdemeanor NOT murder.
He confessing doesn't change anything, we know he could have saved her, feeling guilty doesn't change anything as well, we already know he watched her die. The question is is it against the law? If so, what law? And did he murder her? I think that your imminent peril is little think, we would need a little more literature to see if that constitutes imminent peril. But even if it did, again New Mexico is not covered. So he didn't do anything LEGALLY wrong.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>The legal principle of imminent peril may also apply.
Again, not covered in NM, but even IF it was, and even IF imminent peril applied, it is a misdemeanor NOT murder.
He confessing doesn't change anything, we know he could have saved her, feeling guilty doesn't change anything as well, we already know he watched her die. The question is is it against the law? If so, what law? And did he murder her? I think that your imminent peril is little think, we would need a little more literature to see if that constitutes imminent peril. But even if it did, again New Mexico is not covered. So he didn't do anything LEGALLY wrong.
Tally me up on the board anon. One more.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And more thing about the guilt thing, he's obviously admitting it, after the fact, he's guilty, so, again, how do we classify this imminent peril? How do we define that? She could have survived you know, you know, maybe if she wasn't zonked out of her mind... So again, how would we define this imminent peril?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm saying there's no way to prove it in court. There was no witness and you think walt would admit in court that he could save her?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You seen to think that if this went to court this would come to light. What actually happens means shit if there's no way to prove it
2 years ago
Anonymous
>What actually happens means shit if there's no way to prove it
Irrelevant. It's a fictional show, assume that the jury would be able to see everything that we saw.
The morality of it, I think we would all agree it's a big no no, but legally of it? I don't know, I just don't see it. Definitely not murder, not a million years.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yea, I don't get why that person would think that would result in a murder charge. Killing someone drunk driving tends to be manslaughter and that's not accidental since you're choosing to drive intoxicated
2 years ago
Anonymous
Exactly Vehicular manslaughter, in this case no one is even taking into account that she is actually committing a crime, and putting her life in danger by using the drugs. She could have easily rolled over on her own, he had no malice or premeditation. He just didn't act, that's not a crime.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>i dont actually know the law
He's literally culpable by US law
2 years ago
Anonymous
Are you to save everyone that is in danger? What law is that?
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, you have to at least tell other people what's happening, preferably the police. You cant just watch someone die and do nothing. It wasnt a law via legislature, it was based on a court case and judicial review
2 years ago
Anonymous
What does the law says? Do you have a law?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I learned about it in college, and again, its not a law, its a court case which, via judicial review, became the law of the land. I dont remember the name and i dont feel like looking it up for you, google it if you want
2 years ago
Anonymous
Convenient.
In private last year the president gifted me America, all the land, but I don't remember where is the document right now, and I don't feel like looking it up for you. Google it if you want.
have a nice day israeli swine
go jerk off on the talmud like always you trash
yeah yeah report me moron, you know i'm right
YOU. WILL. NEVER. BE. A. WOMAN.
She really did have to go. It was better for everyone. Including her dad. How many more times would she have fricked up and broken his heart again? She was gonna OD eventually. Better to rip the bandaid off now
Walt accidentally put her in danger but then deliberately chose to let her die when she started chocking even though he could have easily roll her on her side. It would be impossible to prove in court though, and you generally aren't obligated to save someone you didn't put in danger or not paid to save. But he confessed as much when he sold Jesse to the Nazis.
She puts herself in danger by breaking the law and using a controlled substance. She is reckless with her own life, knowing it is dangerous and can cause her death.
Did yah even watch the show. Her death lead to her father being depressed thus fricking up on the job making two planes collide and then he later offed himself. Walt's decision to let her die, was yes helping Jessie but more so himself. She was going to manipulate Jessie with her holes to get over on Walt so she can leech like the parasite she is.
She needed to die just like dirtbike kid. Some junkie prostitute knowing Walter's identity, he would've been blackmailed to the end of days if she was allowed to live
>watched BrBa at 19, thought Jane was ugly >watched it again at 24 after dating an art hoe, suddenly find her attractive
Though she hit the wall hard in El Camino.
Bussy is just a euphemism to make it sound like fricking a nasty dirty shit chute is good when in reality the butthole is full of parasites and diseases and literally has smelly shit particles in it. So stop using it okay?
He should have gotten his junkie meth partner and Jesse's junkie heroin girlfriend to not do drugs.
He should have talked to Saul and hired Mike's guys.
All I remember from the series was when the white woman started necking bad guys, then the black junkie said she had to be stopped.
I pretty much lost interest at that point.
She did.
>junkie
>gold digger
She was no good for him.
I actually felt shocked at her death and took a few days off from binging after that episode
My friend couldn't understand why, he just called her a dumb bawd
Why do people give so much importance to her?
Walter kills a bunch of characters and is responsible for a bunch more by proxy, are you going to tell me gale is not on Walter? Or the kid the gangsters shot? Or the dirty bike kid? It's all caused by a ripple effect caused by Walter. Why is she so fricking special? He didn't chocked her to death, it was a effect of his actions.
Other than the dirt bike kid, which was equally as shocking, all those others are 'in the game'
What defines someone being "in the game"? Because I remember her recouping Jessie money by threatening Walter.
Blackmail is "in the game". Jane's more moronic than the rest of you, if she thought she could just blackmail someone who produced ~$1.5 million in meth money, and have nothing happen to her.
I hadn't actually thought of that, this is a good point
Because it was the actress and model known as KRitter, and she mad cute, dumb fricking Black person.
She had a presumably pretty nice cooter
That is what I believe as well, she is attractive. I seriously doubt that if she was a guy anyone would give two shits about it.
There was a court case where a guy watched someone drown and did nothing and was punished as being culpable for the death. If you're the only person who see somebody dying in America and dont tell anybody, you are held partially responsible.
Interesting to know, thank you. But it doesn't answer the question.
Walter was partially responsible for her death, that answers your question
No it doesn't, as stated here
I literally just explained to you why he's culpable based on US law, why are you being obtuse?
Read
Again and again until you understand that autistic moron isn't talking about legality you autistic moron
He misspoke, but he literally meant to say that Walter wasnt responsible, and I am literally telling you that he was, and that there is no distinction between her death and the others, which is the whole point of his post, you fricking collosal moron
No I didn't misspoke, I asked
>WHY PEOPLE GIVE SO MUCH IMPORTANCE TO HER DEATH?
And then I gave examples of people that Walter either killed by proxy, or that were killed by Walters actions.
Why is this girl so talked about it, but no the other characters that he killed or are killed because of his actions? Why is she so special?
>Why is she so special?
#1
>She's hot.
A very distant #2
>anons have sympathy for Jesse's suffering
>>Why is she so special?
>#1
>>She's hot.
Agreed.
parasocial relationships
Until then Walt only attacked people who attacked him first. You can say that he maybe responsible for overdoses or street violence, but that's beside the point. He killed Jane for trying to steal Jesse from him and that's it. He trasitioned to evil criminal instead of just someone doing business with them.
They are all equally wrong, but her death is particularly egregious because unlike the other ones, he didnt actually have to do it to maintain his freedom. He did it for pure convenience, which, unlike murder for necessity, is particularly evil. Somebody literally already explained that to you moron
This was the first time Walt "killed" someone not to save his life, but for convenience, so it was significant. It was different watching it as the show aired. If you watched it after airing then you already know Walt becomes le bad guy so it doesn't have the same impact.
I bet you think Chauvin was innocent too.
I think those are two very different situations.
I do think Walter is more innocent then guilt.
Wasn't George Floyd also drugged?
Only in the sense that the crime of murder requires killing a human being
>Only in the sense that the crime of murder requires killing a human being
Wrong.
The question is not if the officer is wrong, the officer is wrong; but to what degree?
What killed him? And did it killed him? Was he drugged?
>And did it killed him?
And why what killed him, killed him?
He was
more just unnecessary her death could have been outside a vacuum of walt's own interests, he stopped dead in his tracks knowing this outcome would be of benefit to him
she had a really nice ass
proof?
Walter just stood there and watched her die. It was even his fault she rolled onto her back in her sleep, and he stood over while she helplessly choked to death. To make it worse he walked off knowing Jessie would wake up later feeling the full blame. And there’s always the possibility she wouldn’t have relapsed if it hadn’t been for Walter in the first place. She was also a character viewers got “to know” (albeit toxic, controlling, and irritating) rather than some random dealer or something that would have killed Walter over money or something.
People that think with their dick and people that relate to scumbags like Jessie, so people that think with their dick.
Bazed friend
Same tbh
Because she was hot and because it was a shameful way to go and because Walt made the choice to let it happen against his better nature. It was a powerful moment.
I think most smart people would've let her die, she showed that she had no bond in her word when she blackmailed walt. She wouldn't never known he saved her because he wasn't supposed to be there
What if Walter leaked her nudes instead of letting her choke?
Heroin addict
>almost a millie on cash
Yeah she deserved
>t. Opiod fan
But what do her feet look like???
do you really think this is a controversial opinion?
She was a literal crack prostitute.
It was only sad because she was white with a great ass. But it also wasn't that sad because her character sucked and she can't act.
Goodnight sweet prince
For the longest time I thought Krysten Ritter was Spanish.
She deserves my wiener.
You don't have to love her, but if rumors are true, she'll be in the MCU... so you gotta respect her.
>She deserves my wiener.
You find this attractive?
You never heard of a hate frick?
No never.
Have you come out to your parents yet?
I find sex repulsive. Man or woman, but I can still appreciate beauty. Do you find her attractive?
she's already in the mcu, shes jessica jones
What a weird ass thread. I'm the only one that posted a Ritter and that was like 2 hrs ago. I figured if I planted one, more would sprout 🙁
Female lateMichael Jackson
i just wantd to say that i went to school with a dominican chick that looked the same as jane but sans pale skin. had a hairy lower back, and big saggy breasts
>hey guys I'm an incel and I hate women, BTW wasn't it awesome when this woman was murdered?
We get it. STFU already
>murdered
B1
the crime of intentionally killing a person
Cambridge dictionary
>accidentally cause someone to begin dying
>deliberately don't save them so that they would die
You should read that dictionary instead of just parroting its title.
Involuntary manslaughter
2nd degree murder
Allowing her to die doesn't constitute malice, thus he can't be charged with 2nd degree murder, you could say it is, but he didn't forced her to do the drugs. You see? The same logic can be applied to her as well, (reckless conduct lacking concern for human life or having a high risk of death), obviously she wouldn't be charged as it is her own life, but then he can't as well.
It would be involuntary manslaughter, if she puked after he left. Because he was there, it's second degree.
>It would be involuntary manslaughter, if she puked after he left.
Where is it written that you have to save an addict from themselves?
When your actions cause them to die. If he hadn't have shaken Jesse as he did, she wouldn't have rolled onto her back, and instead would have puked on Jesse.
Her being high or sober changes nothing.
His actions resulted in her being on her back, and then he did nothing to help her.
We're not talking about Walt needing to lift a car, all he had to do was turn her head.
Go back to making Saw shitposting threads.
>If he hadn't have shaken Jesse as he did, she wouldn't have rolled onto her back, and instead would have puked on Jesse.
You can know that. She could have rolled on her back. Or not.
>Her being high or sober changes nothing.
It changes everything, if she was sober that situation would not have happened.
>We're not talking about Walt needing to lift a car, all he had to do was turn her head.
Is it in the law that he have to?
>Go back to making Saw shitposting threads.
?
You dare to insult me with a small board like that?
Its in the law that he at least had to tell somebody in a timely manner
What law is that?
>You can know that. She could have rolled on her back. Or not.
If she would have rolled onto her back on her own, then it would be involuntary manslaughter, he was still there while she was dying.
>It changes everything, if she was sober that situation would not have happened.
It changes nothing. Sober people puke too. We know she's high, but Walt doesn't. For all he knows, it's food poisoning from supper.
>Is it in the law that he have to?
Literally, we've been saying that for dozens of posts.
>?
You're moronic way of dodging responsibility is the same thing that Saw shitposters do. You'd fit right in with them.
Clearly you have the Jesus complex and we won't get anywhere, we will have to agree to disagree on the morality, so morality aside.
Is it the law? If so, what laws did he break?
>Saw shitposters do
I've never seen a post about the movies in this entire board.
>Clearly you have the Jesus complex and we won't get anywhere
Clearly you're moronic, if you think that.
>we will have to agree to disagree on the morality, so morality aside.
No, you're moronic, and that's all there is too it.
Walt.
Literally.
Admits.
To.
It.
>I could have saved her, but I didn't.
>there's no way to prove it
Walt literally admitted to it. What more proof do you want?
Again, I'm not talking about the morality. I'm talking about law, if I'm moronic as you say, then just tell us the laws he broke. Simple. Can you do that? Wait... what's that? No... ok then.
I'll accept that apology now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law#Common_features
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_peril
Now please frick off.
>I'm saying there's no way to prove it in court
The jury would have the information we have. We saw the scene where Walt admits it.
>the jury would have the information we have. We saw the scene where Walt admits it.
Lol you're moronic, why would the jury be an omnipotent presence, that makes no sense
>Lol you're moronic, why would the jury be an omnipotent presence, that makes no sense
Because we're dealing with fiction, not reality.
Walt's guilt is undeniable. You're trying to split hairs and talk about if he'd go to jail. We already saw that he gets away with it, in the show.
We're talking about if he's guilty or not.
Walt's morally and legally guilty. Even though he'll never see the inside of a jail cell for it.
>legally guilty.
Legally he is not. If he is tell us the laws he broke.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law#Common_features
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_peril
Have you actually read it? This proves my point. Kek. He has no legal obligation to do anything at all. And even if he fell into one of the categories of guardian, or "responsible for the illness" which would be the vomiting, it is a misdemeanor (not murder) and the state of New Mexico is not covered. So it doesn't matter how you slide it, he's still innocent. Now, I can say that it's not that I think he is innocent, but he actually is innocent. You know if you're going to play a obscurantist law, you better read it first. Piece of advice.
>Have you actually read it?
You didn't even make it one sentence into the Imminent peril part.
>Good Samaritan provisions are not universal in application.
>The legal principle of imminent peril may also apply.
Jane was in imminent peril, Walt admits to it.
?t=117
Walt fully understands what he did. He makes it so clear.
>I was there.
>And I watched her die.
>I watched her overdose and choke to death.
>I could have saved her.
>But I didn't.
?t=111
Why are you so convinced by one tear?
>>The legal principle of imminent peril may also apply.
Again, not covered in NM, but even IF it was, and even IF imminent peril applied, it is a misdemeanor NOT murder.
He confessing doesn't change anything, we know he could have saved her, feeling guilty doesn't change anything as well, we already know he watched her die. The question is is it against the law? If so, what law? And did he murder her? I think that your imminent peril is little think, we would need a little more literature to see if that constitutes imminent peril. But even if it did, again New Mexico is not covered. So he didn't do anything LEGALLY wrong.
Tally me up on the board anon. One more.
And more thing about the guilt thing, he's obviously admitting it, after the fact, he's guilty, so, again, how do we classify this imminent peril? How do we define that? She could have survived you know, you know, maybe if she wasn't zonked out of her mind... So again, how would we define this imminent peril?
I'm saying there's no way to prove it in court. There was no witness and you think walt would admit in court that he could save her?
You seen to think that if this went to court this would come to light. What actually happens means shit if there's no way to prove it
>What actually happens means shit if there's no way to prove it
Irrelevant. It's a fictional show, assume that the jury would be able to see everything that we saw.
The morality of it, I think we would all agree it's a big no no, but legally of it? I don't know, I just don't see it. Definitely not murder, not a million years.
Yea, I don't get why that person would think that would result in a murder charge. Killing someone drunk driving tends to be manslaughter and that's not accidental since you're choosing to drive intoxicated
Exactly Vehicular manslaughter, in this case no one is even taking into account that she is actually committing a crime, and putting her life in danger by using the drugs. She could have easily rolled over on her own, he had no malice or premeditation. He just didn't act, that's not a crime.
>i dont actually know the law
He's literally culpable by US law
Are you to save everyone that is in danger? What law is that?
No, you have to at least tell other people what's happening, preferably the police. You cant just watch someone die and do nothing. It wasnt a law via legislature, it was based on a court case and judicial review
What does the law says? Do you have a law?
I learned about it in college, and again, its not a law, its a court case which, via judicial review, became the law of the land. I dont remember the name and i dont feel like looking it up for you, google it if you want
Convenient.
In private last year the president gifted me America, all the land, but I don't remember where is the document right now, and I don't feel like looking it up for you. Google it if you want.
>coal burner
Agreed.
Looks like Charlotte.
Deserved is subjective. She earned it 100%
Letting Jane die was unironically one of the more admirable things Walt did. Probably saved Jesse's life.
>im a misogynistic sociopath
thanks for posting pls dont shoot up a school
Black folk sneed my anus
have a nice day israeli swine
go jerk off on the talmud like always you trash
yeah yeah report me moron, you know i'm right
YOU. WILL. NEVER. BE. A. WOMAN.
Im 100% english actually, you deserve to be alone.
She really did have to go. It was better for everyone. Including her dad. How many more times would she have fricked up and broken his heart again? She was gonna OD eventually. Better to rip the bandaid off now
Posts like these are why the rest of the world thinks we're the riddler from batman
I was being facetious, bro. I would never wish the loss of a child on someone. Luckily this is a fictional character we're talking about
We are not? Look at /LULZ/ post there is crazy
So were those fappening pics of her fake or real?
>loved to porky pig it up
my kinda gal
Walt accidentally put her in danger but then deliberately chose to let her die when she started chocking even though he could have easily roll her on her side. It would be impossible to prove in court though, and you generally aren't obligated to save someone you didn't put in danger or not paid to save. But he confessed as much when he sold Jesse to the Nazis.
She puts herself in danger by breaking the law and using a controlled substance. She is reckless with her own life, knowing it is dangerous and can cause her death.
>Don't trust the bee in apartment 23
I don't get it
imagine her lips around your wiener haha
>smoking
>tattoos
yep, glad shes dead
I could have fixed her.
post it
is there such thing as feetoplasty to fix her
Maybe she did, maybe she didn't.
But the real question is, did Walt kill her?
He admitted he did.
>ugly feet
Kill it
does she have any nude?
asking for fren
Did yah even watch the show. Her death lead to her father being depressed thus fricking up on the job making two planes collide and then he later offed himself. Walt's decision to let her die, was yes helping Jessie but more so himself. She was going to manipulate Jessie with her holes to get over on Walt so she can leech like the parasite she is.
She needed to die just like dirtbike kid. Some junkie prostitute knowing Walter's identity, he would've been blackmailed to the end of days if she was allowed to live
Isn't the point of the show that everyone of the characters fricking deserves their shit?
>watched BrBa at 19, thought Jane was ugly
>watched it again at 24 after dating an art hoe, suddenly find her attractive
Though she hit the wall hard in El Camino.
Jesse went from banging her to serving up his bussy to todd. That's what good decisions gets ya.
Bussy is just a euphemism to make it sound like fricking a nasty dirty shit chute is good when in reality the butthole is full of parasites and diseases and literally has smelly shit particles in it. So stop using it okay?
Should Walt have just humiliated her instead of letting her die?
He should have gotten his junkie meth partner and Jesse's junkie heroin girlfriend to not do drugs.
He should have talked to Saul and hired Mike's guys.
junkies don't feel humiliation
You can tell by her shift in demeanor she was going to scam Jessie out of the cash
No you can't. You can't know that.
did they frick her corpse before getting rid of it?
All I remember from the series was when the white woman started necking bad guys, then the black junkie said she had to be stopped.
I pretty much lost interest at that point.