>Since the release of the film, Stone has alleged multiple times that a scene in which her vulva was exposed as she crossed her legs was filmed without her knowledge.[56] Stone later said she was told that her lack of underwear would only be alluded to and not shown.[57] She had been wearing white underwear until Verhoeven said they reflected light on the camera lens and asked her to remove them, assuring her that only a shadow would be visible. Stone stated that it was not until she saw the film in a screening room with a test audience that she became aware of the visible nudity, leading her to slap Verhoeven in the face and leave the screening.
Of all the obvious and complete nudity she agreed to and participated in over the course of the film, this is what she felt went over the line?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Why didn't she just wear underwear then, problem solved?
You didn't read it all, moron. It's explained.
she could have just put on some black panties
God, I wish I was her vulva.
You must love wiener.
She's bullshitting.
There's a difference between nudity you agree to and nudity you get tricked into.
I don't see why she wouldn't agree to it though. She shows off everything else. She's completely nude several times in the movie. One scene has full frontal with bush and all. Another scene has her whole ass and breasts. The movie is an erotic thriller, which basically means a porno. The least of her exposure is the leg scene.
If she's telling the truth about getting tricked into it, the difference isn't the nudity, it's the getting tricked into it part. Even if it was irrational for her to care about that scene, it's still messed up if she actually got tricked into it.
The rest of the film makes it impossible to believe she was tricked into it.
The prostitute is lying. She wasn't tricked into anything. She wanted to show Newman her cooch.
>Verhoeven has always denied the claims that Stone didn’t consent to her vegana being filmed as she crossed and uncrossed her legs: “Sharon is lying,” he told ICON in 2017. “Any actress knows what she’s going to see if you ask her to take off her underwear and point there with the camera.”
His directors com was so bad I had to stop, its just him going "wasnt it, didnt we, wasnt it" and some guy telling him what actually happened and him going "wasnt it" after every single word he just says wasnt it as if he has dementia and cant remember anything about making the movie so annoying as its a great movie and the other guy had some good stories but god damn pauls moronic wasnt it wasnt wasnt it we used a camera wasnt it and lights wasnt it then we went to set wasnt it and we then shot back on location wasnt it SHUT UPPP PAUL
So is there a 4K enhanced close up of this scene?
It looks like a split tennis ball
She paid the San Francisco Zoo a large sum to get her husband a close up look at the reptile pit and a gila monster ate his foot. That split tennis ball made it all possible.
I thought you were just being funny but looked it up and can't stop laughing. Reality is stranger than fiction.
>The damage was exacerbated by the fact that Bronstein was bare-foot at the time. The editor had removed his white tennis shoes before entering the cage after learning that the lizard was fed on a diet of white rats and might confuse Bronstein's feet for his next meal
She knew what she was doing
thats fricking hilarious
Proofs??
Possibly the most overrated scene of all time.
Can’t see shit.
Why does she lie about this? Does it generate more interest or something?
I'm not convinced she's lying. What would she possibly gain from lying? This movie made her reputation as a quality actress. And she gets nude in a lot of other ways in the movie so it's not like a brief shot of her vegana would add much to that. So why would she lie about it?
To keep talking about it. To get headlines with the kind of topics that get headlines these days.
Keep her name in the press to maintain a level of celebrity that can be used to leverage bigger roles/more money per role.
The story is ludicrous.
That's a plausible explanation, but why do you think her story is ludicrous?
>That's a plausible explanation, but why do you think her story is ludicrous?
Because a woman like Sharon Stone had great power back in her peak. She was A list in the 90s. If she doesn't want to take off her clothes then no one can make her. She wasn't some struggling actress trying to break into the industry.
>What would [person] possibly gain from [thing]?
Never ask this again. Humans are impulsive and irrational. You can't rationalize human behavior. Some people lie just because tricking others gets them excited. And if it's not enough to convince you, understand that this question can always be answered by "they get some form of gratification from it" whoever it may be.
>never ask this again
Who the frick are you to tell people what to do? Go the frick back to plebbit you little wienersucker. I can tell that's where you came from just by the way you type you fricking baby.
>here's how not to be a gullible moron
>frick you I'm profoundly moronic and I'll believe everything everyone tells me out of spite
ok man
its no more irrational than reflexively not believing her with no basis
That's what belief defaults to. You don't believe something until you do.
>Who the frick are you to tell people what to do?
Never say this again.
women lie about shit all the time for no other reason than to save face and get one over on someone else
Because it's decades later to milk it for more press coverage.
She gets what all women crave: attention.
You can't even see anything...
Try a 40ft screen instead of your phone, zoom zoom.
> zoom zoom
You are insecure about your age. Many such cases!
Why would I rather be young and ignorant?
Shahron in dis shat yu vil shou uz ze pusy bat we vil NOT be it on kahmera. Juszt shou uz ze pusy wizout shouin ze pusy, ja? Okey, rohl kamera nao ROHL KAMERA NAO
anyone got the vulva 4K remaster webm?
open matte vulva version color gradet for finest vulva experience
You have to understand the psychology of women. They yearn to be the most public prostitutes you can imagine, but only if it benefits them to society. If that changes, if CHAD wants nothing to do with them anymore. Suddenly it's "I was tricked" "I was raped" "I was not fully aware of my actions when I did that gangbang"
The woman recoils as you show her pussy footage.
How she shrinks. "I've been found out!"
>I understand the psychology of women
>that is why I’m still a virgin and always will be
Lmao
Have sex
I would but all the women are busy having sex with men who defend them tirelessly on Cinemaphile
I've rewatched that scene a hundred times, you can't see shit.
I need to get laid
just wait a couple of years until they slap a ChatGPT onto an onahole
How long has it been?
twelve days
its never even happened
29 years and counting.
2 weeks but I got a blowjob from a different girl 3 days ago
Seven years
Go to /gif/. That place is packed with guys who are totally not gay but just enjoy sucking dick.
she got extra famous and...it's just not enough. she has to milk it for more.
don't get into dating. 30 years ago can get you in trouble in current day because one c**t decides she's ready for a third payout
She has all the right to complain about it if she was lied to, clearly her trust in Verhoeven was broken here and it's totally legitimate for her to have misgivings with it.
>you can show my pussy 5 times but SIX?! OI WAS RAPED!
you can't even see shit, besides some blonde pubes which are basically invisible
regardless of the nudity in the rest of the film, how do anons not see its understandable how she would be pissed at being tricked into a scene she didnt want
she's a prostitute, she's done worse for less
my mistake forgot i shared this board with incels
i had sex last night btw going on another date with her tomorrow and then probably gonna go away with her for the weekend
also done all kinds of sex with more than 90 females
knowing that i have had more pussy than you and still can understand sharon stones plight makes me a better person and a better man
>knowing that i have had more pussy than you and still can understand sharon stones plight makes me a better person and a better man
NTA, and I agree in principle, but you're setting a very low bar by comparing yourself to incels that inhabit this shithole.
i could've sworn the part was controversial because it called for this very shot from the get go and plenty actresses turned it down until a C list one (Stone) accepted it and became big from it. And having said that, no I haven't had a date ever and I last had sex in Nov 2020. Reading, I can kinda understand, but it still stinks to me
Because she wasn't tricked, it's an entirely bullshit claim for sympathy points.
Lies. She knew exactly what she was doing.
Why did Newman say he smelled tuna?
This sounds like such a fake retelling of events to sound like some kind of girl boss.
it is exactly that
>I'M STILL RELEVANT LOOK AT ME LISTEN TO ME
you may be jesting, but this will happen to you as well, faster than you might think.
>you're a troony trust me
her name isn't hag!
WHAT THE FRICK HAPPENED!?
Entropy
It was literally in the script that she doesn’t wear underwear to the interrogation
What a moronic prostitute
pure sexo
she was hotter in total recall
this
she didn't have the atrocious hairstyles she has in basic instinct
>woman had no part in, and even argues against, anything that ever made a movie kino
No surprises here. Any time a women appears to do anything competent, they were probably tricked into doing it by a man.
>prostitute yourself for popularity
>later retract consent to maintain decency
that's all this is
he made the best schlock and the best manvsbug movie ever so i dont care?
Pics?
what happens if an actor cums during a sex scene?
>Stone later said she was told that her lack of underwear would only be alluded to and not shown.
So she was only worried about her vaj being shown to the audience, and not a studio full of cameramen and shit?
Gotta love a woman of such obvious unwavering modesty. It's like Verhoeven is the Devil and somehow with his complex web of subtle lies tricked the Virgin Mary herself, so he should be burned at the stake.
Do these prostitutes really expect anyone to buy this bullshit? Notice these women don't have any problem trying to sell you on the fact they're total morons, as if any woman worth her salt would actually unknowingly fall for some bullshit like that. She's either a knowing prostitute, or too dumb to maintain her virtue in the first place. Take your pick c**t.
The pity of Hollywood degeneracy is we will never see or even know the names of the better actresses who told casting couch creeps to get bent and just walked out. The kind smart enough to just suggest they wear black underwear to solve the supposed light reflection problem instead. We just wind up with the second-rate prostitutes willing to suck Harvey Weinstein's tiny dick instead.
In a truly merit-based system you'd never have to tolerate Jennifer Lawrence and other talentless c**ts.
>all these posts
>no one willing to take a few days vacation to post a webm
this place is so shit now
>he lets bans last the whole duration
you people don't seriously...?
>be me
>see this film once
>thought it was shit
>must've blinked and missed the big deal shot
>literally don't care
>still overrated shit
You can't see shit anyway.