Name a bigger piece of shit, I dare you.
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Skinamarink
Name a bigger piece of shit, I dare you.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Anyone figure out what this movie is actually about other than kids wake up and shit just randomly disappears.
Like what were the parents involvement in all of this?
I watched a israelitetuber breakdown of it and I knew it was going to be shit when he said 'and this is the scariest partt!!!!' and it's just some deep voice saying hello or some shit but whatever at least directors are TRYING to be original, even if it's not very entertaining, better than the constant superhero shite or coombait that fills our screens right? But don't listen to me, I'm just some guy on Cinemaphile, listen to the morons on twitter tell you which films are 'important' and 'says a lot about our society' and 'so progressive' naaaaah let's shit on the guy actually trying to do something right because if there is one thing I have learned from all the movies I have watched it's that originality gets you nowhere and if you want to be successful just churn out the same fricking film over and over again until the manchildren finally die and maybe, just maybe, you might be able to make an actual original fricking film.
I bet you’re the director lmao you fricking suck dont quit your day job
yes I am the director and I called my own film shit congratulations you got me, go watch the new marvel film and say :O at the screen every time your favourite children's character says a funny line that's true 'kino' right?
yeah that's usually the best, most subtle way to shill
okay well I am clearly not the director and why would he feel the need to shill a film you've already posted a thread about?
okay kyle
okay I'll larp as kyle for you to make you feel better about your shit thread
okay kyle
that applies to literally everything
Great bait man
the house/family had a god-like creature messing with them for fun. its basically a "horror" version of the cartoon they kept showing clips of, looping, etc
here's the cartoon the movie used, at the scene they looped the most
?t=177
Allegory for child abuse
A piece of grass can be an allegory to child abuse if you think hard enough. That word is a meme
There's no real deeper meaning to any of it (other than what you're projecting) other than a demon (or something) has trapped the kids in the house and is tormenting them forever, or at least until it feels like stopping. The monster has control over both time and space and can cause endless tormenting, or looping of your death over and over again, or endless days stuck in the house, etc.
This is all pretty explicit in the film that was the prototype for Skinamarink, Heck. where the conclusion is that they're in hell, after 50 years of being stuck in the house with some monster fricking with them.
Heck was honestly vastly superior in runtime, explanation, and aesthetic. The VHS filter was more period appropriate than the film grain in Skinamarink. I recommend Heck to anyone who asks about Rinkydink.
In the commentary the creator says something like "I know what's going generally with some of what happens, but I'm not sure what was going on when I wrote this bit." That was the scene in the parents' bedroom. There's no grand vision of a plot to unravel, so take whatever you happen to take from it. It's more about the mood it sets, which I get won't be enjoyable for everybody, but was for myself and others.
wot if your happy childhood wuz a ghost
Oppenheimer
This movie was beyond bad for multiple reasons but the biggest one was the use of the silence/blank noise followed by loud noises, it's so fricking cheap and not clever at all, you can literally use the same tactic for ANYTHING and it will get a reaction from anyone with a regular nervous system.
For me the worst part was the camera film used. The fuzzies burned my fricking eyes
Oh, OP, don't get me started. I've seen some CRAP in my day.
I didn't mind it. It's different but does what it's trying to do. It's like a 4 year old's nightmare.
A 4 year olds nightmare does not make for a feature film for adults.
Maybe if you have no imagination. It gave me some pretty weird dreams even if there wasn't anything obviously disturbing during the movie itself.
Boomers with no imagination or soul can't understand it
Get filtered
Bro it's the poltergeist except with jumpscares
You didn’t watch it did you
Yeah, really it's just Poltergeist except without
>cinematography
>acting
>a musical score
>direction
>talent
So it's basically like Poltergeist except it's not really a movie, and Poltergeist was actually good, which this is not
It's poltergeist minus the fricking SpielBERG
Sorry for not wanting a movie that applies to the ADHD riddled lowest common denominator
It's the first ever purely ambient horror film. Given that, I'm eager to see what kind of spin on the formula can be used by future imitators. There's a lot of room for experimentation and boundary pushing.
Watch Sleep Has Her House. Watch Leviathan.
>first
Nuh
?si=ArjEFrZ0SS33EAlF
I watched it with a friend and it was fun. Some good, some bad, way too long.
The funny part is how much furniture and bric a brac that I remembered from my own childhood home. Like the mantle clock with the spinny bits.
I can't
Out of movies that some certain people hyped up as good, this was the worst one i have seen in my entire life
At least with other blatantly garbage movies nobody will pretend they have any value
watched this movie high as frick and it put me in a trance. The distortion in the visuals really fricked with me (in a good way), made it a very interesting watch. Would rec
The most disapointing horror film I've seen in a long time. Pissed me off that it had a good idea and premise and just did nothing with it. So many scenes could have really lead to something interesting, but nothing. It's a two hour waste of time in every aspect.
What would you have rather happened in the movie
Get a better cameraman.
Ok
I didn't get it, but I was dozing off
Dragon Ball Evolution.
?si=KE8xK-u28Yl5--Cy
It's rare to see a filter this refined. You could have replaced every hallway and television watching scene in this film with children being picked up from school, a mother buying groceries or any other kind of banal chore and NO ONE would have complained the way they do about SKinnamamamarink.
These lame, dull, moronic homosexuals got bored because pointless thing (with movement!!!!!!!1111!) wasn't happening. This movie was fricking incredible and the exact direction horror needs to take. Frick appealing to the audience and their shit zero attention span and bullshit complaints. They don't know shit and are shit.
Fricking loved this movie. Mind you, not without it's flaws. The jump scares were all bad (and unneeded). The breaking of the fourth wall was bizarre (and should never have been in the film). And finally the budget did hinder some aspects of the full scope the film was going for. But that last issue may also be a lack of skill on the directors part. But either way, they shot for the stars with this fricking thing and it was glorious.
Highly recommended if you aren't a goldfish person.
>broke the fourth wall
What part of the movie was that?
The on screen text explaining the passage of time. They could have incorporated a clock to explain the time change, even using an electronic clock that shows the dates. But for some reason a movie that spends so much time getting the audience immersed decided to do on-screen text.
Again, really bizarre choice. It's a stretch but I really wonder if it was snagged from Aniara. That movie does on-screen text to a similar effect but it is established early on so it doesn't take you out of the movie.
Another thing that Heck did better: it measured time in "sleeps," which is how a child would keep track without access to daylight. I agree that showing would have been better than telling, but a clock would have taken away from the disorientation. Maybe cutting to tally marks labeled "sleeps" on a chalk board or etch-a-sketch would do it.
I'm not pressed on how. I was thinking one of those old digitals that tallied days months and years along with time of day, over in a corner somewhere gathering dust next to a pile of toys or something. But again, it doesn't matter. It just would have been better if it was in the film, not labeled onto it.
>oh my god, is that the top half of a wall? HOLY SHIT THATS SO SCARY!
Movie was a 0/10, took no skill to make, zoomies are easily grifted.
Horror wise? or overall Cinema wise? cause I can give the answer to both
>it's Poltergeist
Ahh, I see. These are the people we're dealing with.
All the inscrutability of Skinamarink, but viewed through a pinhole.
I haven't seen this but have seen skinamarink and thought it sucked (although not as bad as people are saying) I also heard this movie was trash. Which one is better?
It's honestly not complete garbage. Better than Skinamarink; more happens, that's for goddamn sure. It's found footage with a bit of space-time frickery. It just has frustrating elements, one of which is the often-obscured visuals. And a moment at the end tried to be so edgy I rolled my eyes. But I wouldn't say it's worthless, I could see how others might like it.
That ending bit, to me, was both really funny and kind of gratifying. It's almost like they wanted to make sure the audience knew they would do it. They didn't want to be called pussy. I dunno, by that point I was just along for the ride.
Checked
I appreciate them wanting to go for it, but overshooting the mark so hard that it elicits a laugh took me out of it. And maybe I'm outing myself as filtered, but making just a tad more sense would have gone a long way for me. Like the opening when you can hear him say this has already happened, I appreciated the payoff with that. But you're kind of bringing me back around, maybe I need to rewatch it.
I wouldn't say wanting to know more is being filtered. You were engaged which is the best thing any piece of art can do. It seems like the kind of movie with plenty of hidden stuff in it, no clue. I watched it once and that was enough for me. Maybe a group watch-along would get me to re-visit.
>don't go so hard on yourself
What a stupid thing to tell a person. Is there a word for love of stupidity? Idiotphilia? Are a moronphile? Maybe that's why you're here. Some people jerk off in their own shit, you jerk off in your own stupidity and want others covered in it as well. Dumb.
It was really raw. Lot of charm in how little sense any of it made or was interested in making. I enjoyed that but you really need to steal yourself for the first 40 minutes of it. Felt like the goal was to make an "scp" type movie and they succeeded in that. Just some people that stumbled into some shit they shouldn't have.
I liked both and preferred skininamarinkinknink. But they have very different vibes. Outwaters had way more energy. Lots of shit going on and none of it made any sense. Clearly intentional though.
An interdimentional Spider demon traps the souls of the children and uses their memories to create a fake version of their house to torture them eternally so that it can feed on their fear or some shit. Kinda pretentious the way the director won't just tell you the concrete plot that is happening, he does the whole "I know what the plot is but I'm not gonna tell you tee hee" pretentious gay
>made up bullshit I made up
>proceeds to b***h like a deranged moron
The quality posts I come to Cinemaphile for, if I am being honest.
I'm just smarter than you and most of the people in this board. It's ok to be dumb don't go so hard on yourself
The one I'm taking right now
Clean it up jannies
This is the best horror movie ever made, so any other horror movie?