It's a fetish, but it isn't sex. I wager they'd just rather let degenerates have their fun rather than court the idea of having to learn about every weird fetish out there.
Yeah, this is obviously some creeps female muscle growth channel....are you going to start taking down every instance of muscle growth even on channels where it doesn't matter? For that matter are you going to take down all the women's olympics channels? Everything is someone's fetish, there's no point in fighting it unless it's explicit.
I don't know, man. There's a pretty big line between doing something once or twice to troll and spending literally tens of thousands of dollars on wonder bread fetish commissions.
Its funny, I looked at this and everything about it reminded me if Bartleby Montclair of Dresdin, but that's juxtaposed with the fact that Bartleby is so masculine and so gay that there is no reason for him to ever associate with a woman on his own volition.
This.
Honestly though it's surprising whenever it's so hyper-specific and yet has a huge community. The other day I found a fetish community obsessed with shots in cartoons where women are pressing their foot on the gas pedal of a car. Not nude feet or detailed feet, mind you, just screenshots from cartoons that show a character pressing the gad pedal. Fricking stupid fetish.
This, as far as normal people are concern it's the equivalent of this
https://youtu.be/FAZrYGkDI1k
This subsect also fascinates me. Not inflation OF characters, but just people who get a sexual thrill out of ACTUAL balloons.
I'm reminded of seeing a furry crying about how his suit inflation videos got deleted off YouTube and he didn't bother to make back ups. The situation was mildly amusing.
I mean they probably did catch on but it's not sex so they wont care. Same with feet stuff, tickling, farting, etc.
Basically it works like this: porn is technically okay. Sex and nudity is bad (unless you have some clearance to brand it as educational content). Then in pretty much all cases traditional foreplay like tongue kissing, fondling, and grinding is explicitly bad, but not bad enough for removal unless it turns into sex or nudity. Just validate your age to watch.
Now the real question lies in what they'd do with traditional foreplay that feeds into feet, inflation, etc. but doesnt veer into full blown sex or nudity.
Youtube, and all of these other websites, do not give a shit about "protecting the children". They are corporations, they exist to make money and titillating stuff makes money. All of these sites only ban porn and nudity because they'll get in trouble if they don't, either because Apple's walled garden app store will kick them out or because they'll get sued and targeted by the fundamentalists in the "National Center on Sexual Exploitation"
It's a fetish, but it isn't sex. I wager they'd just rather let degenerates have their fun rather than court the idea of having to learn about every weird fetish out there.
Yeah, this is obviously some creeps female muscle growth channel....are you going to start taking down every instance of muscle growth even on channels where it doesn't matter? For that matter are you going to take down all the women's olympics channels? Everything is someone's fetish, there's no point in fighting it unless it's explicit.
You guys must sure love comics and cartoons if the most exciting thing you have to talk about is youtube policy.
And wonderbread
once you start banning fetishes it's a slippery slope
Well, it's not like it's sexy.
This, as far as normal people are concern it's the equivalent of this
https://youtu.be/FAZrYGkDI1k
The recommended vids with this one tell me the fetishists also see it in the same category.
True
Literally anything can be a fetish to someone
jc be careful what you post on a blue board man that should be rated AO!
>Made for the 1%
That is definitely not what wonderbread is.
Who else buys $500 wonderbread?
Honestly i think murrlogic is trolling all of us with the wonderbread and deforestation fetish.
I don't know, man. There's a pretty big line between doing something once or twice to troll and spending literally tens of thousands of dollars on wonder bread fetish commissions.
He printed all the money with all the paper he made from fallen trees
This sucks
Its funny, I looked at this and everything about it reminded me if Bartleby Montclair of Dresdin, but that's juxtaposed with the fact that Bartleby is so masculine and so gay that there is no reason for him to ever associate with a woman on his own volition.
>$500
Damn Bidenomics!
This.
Honestly though it's surprising whenever it's so hyper-specific and yet has a huge community. The other day I found a fetish community obsessed with shots in cartoons where women are pressing their foot on the gas pedal of a car. Not nude feet or detailed feet, mind you, just screenshots from cartoons that show a character pressing the gad pedal. Fricking stupid fetish.
This subsect also fascinates me. Not inflation OF characters, but just people who get a sexual thrill out of ACTUAL balloons.
>community
Is deviantart a community anymore?
You wind up with things like those hilariously conceited ethots who censor their own feet in photos.
>every cartoon has a warning in front of it that says cartoons may cause fetishes because some kid grew up with a flattening fetish caused by cartoons
Newgrounds does it right. If people think your work is too fetishy the rating gets bumped up.
I'm reminded of seeing a furry crying about how his suit inflation videos got deleted off YouTube and he didn't bother to make back ups. The situation was mildly amusing.
Sauce of picrel?
Oh Joy Sex Toy
Is that thing in her hand supposed to be a rose toy?
Reference to Oglaf's first comic
kek
People upload clips like this for fetishes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A-3OvyHKuc
How the frick did he do that with the nunchuk?
Obligatory mention https://www.youtube.com/c/TheNomchive
This wasn't how I was expecting to see The Great Warrior Wall again
>my man got a boner for Michael Bay's balls out Devastator
You cannot make this up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69L6D4Mnfh0
I mean they probably did catch on but it's not sex so they wont care. Same with feet stuff, tickling, farting, etc.
Basically it works like this: porn is technically okay. Sex and nudity is bad (unless you have some clearance to brand it as educational content). Then in pretty much all cases traditional foreplay like tongue kissing, fondling, and grinding is explicitly bad, but not bad enough for removal unless it turns into sex or nudity. Just validate your age to watch.
Now the real question lies in what they'd do with traditional foreplay that feeds into feet, inflation, etc. but doesnt veer into full blown sex or nudity.
nude yoga, for example, though it seems the bulk of it may have moved onto trends I haven't caught up with.
Youtube, and all of these other websites, do not give a shit about "protecting the children". They are corporations, they exist to make money and titillating stuff makes money. All of these sites only ban porn and nudity because they'll get in trouble if they don't, either because Apple's walled garden app store will kick them out or because they'll get sued and targeted by the fundamentalists in the "National Center on Sexual Exploitation"
Dobson?