>nothing like the comics version
Nah he's right but the Holland version takes a lot from different sources like from the Spectacular cartoon, Ultimate, some of the Ditko era stuff, etc. Especially the villains feel classic Spider-Man.
>frick off, casual
Ironic since MCUtards are the biggest casuals and posers around.
>nothing like the comics version
Nah he's right but the Holland version takes a lot from different sources like from the Spectacular cartoon, Ultimate, some of the Ditko era stuff, etc. Especially the villains feel classic Spider-Man.
He takes a lot of shit from ultimate and some things from Miles. Keaton was good but the villains are all too connected to iron man. Easily the worst live action Spider-Man/Peter.
>He takes a lot of shit from ultimate and some things from Miles
The only thing he takes from Miles is his fat friend being asian but that's really it. >Easily the worst live action Spider-Man/Peter.
Not really. The Amazing Spider-Man movies suck balls for a multitude of reasons like having dogshit villains and making Spider-Man the chosen one who is destinied to fight a villain cast he doesn't even know yet.
3 months ago
Anonymous
What's the matter, not a fan of The Rhino?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Miles is his fat friend being asian but that's really it.
And being in a school for geniuses >Amazing Spider-Man movies suck balls for a multitude of reasons like having dogshit villains
Even with all the issues TASM 2 had, it still is streets ahead of anything Holland put out. Garfield acted circles around Holland in the TASM flicks and in NWH. The OST, the CGI, the supporting characters, the web swinging, the Peter xGwen relation were all so much better than anything from the MCU garbage.
And speaking of dogshit villains, mysterio was garbage and the nwh villains were all recycled from the previous movies.
The fact that Holland required the previous 2 Spider-Men and nostalgia bait to bail his ass out showed how useless he really is. Plus Holland can't act if his life depended on it. >Spider-Man the chosen one who is destinied to fight a villain cast he doesn't even know yet
I don't remember this happening. Are you talking about the sinister 6 equipment in the end credits? When did they say he was the chosen one?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>And being in a school for geniuses
He's in a normal tech highschool. >The OST, the CGI
The OST is shit. Pure garbage. Doesn't sound like Spider-Man, just like generic capeshit. The second one is especially heinous. Who cares about CGI? Raimi-Man 1 CG sucks balls but it's still a fun movie. >supporting characters
Like who? Harry who wants to inject himself with 20 milliliters of Spider-Blood or the moron girlfriend who begs the script to kill her off? That's the only two "supporting" characters. >The fact that Holland required the previous 2 Spider-Men
Bro. TASM1 is a worse remake of the first Raimi-Man movie. They even have Uncle Ben having a fallout with Peter directly before he offs himself. The movie didn't REQUIRE anything. They made plenty of cash without these guys before. If you got an issue with some fanservice then boy do you have to hate the Raimi movies because they got plenty of comicbook fanservice copying imagery from it as well.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>He's in a normal tech highschool.
They are all geeks/gifted. Even Flash is one. >Doesn't sound like Spider-Man, just like generic capeshit.
Ironic since MCU is the very definition of genetic capeslop. The opening theme in TASM 2 is more memorable than anything from the Holland flicks. Does this clown even have a theme? Lmao >Who cares about CGI? Raimi-Man 1 CG sucks balls but it's still a fun movie.
Bruh. It's a movie about a guy shooting ropes from his hands. CGI is very important. Else we end up with floating balloon Spider-Man in the ferry scene from homecoming and the awful effects from nwh. And why are you bringing the raimi movies into this? Stick to the point. And since you brought it up, the raimi flicks still look miles better than any of the Holland ones despite coming out almost 15 years earlier. >Harry who wants to inject himself with 20 milliliters of Spider-Blood or the moron girlfriend who begs the script to kill her off? That's the only two "supporting" characters.
Flash is an actual bully. Ben is physically present. Gwen is good.
And do you really want to talk about shitty supporting characters when you have Microsoft scammer flash, chink Ned and whatever the frick Zendaya's goblina mystery meat character is supposed to be. I'd be very careful about poking fun at them. >They made plenty of cash without these guys before. If you got an issue with some fanservice then boy do you have to hate the Raimi movies because they got plenty of comicbook fanservice copying imagery from it as well.
Yeah cause Holland was carried hard by iron man, le MCU shared universe and nostalgia bait respectively. His own performance was utter dogshit.
And what fan service did Raimi have? He wasn't so desperate he had to resort to hey guise remember dat memes from anywhere else.
And at least TASM acknowledged Ben instead of acting as if he never existed and giving his most iconic lines to aunt May. Absolutely disgusting!
3 months ago
Anonymous
>They are all geeks/gifted.
Watch the movies, moron. He's in a club where geeks gather. Peter Parker is a geek. Always has been. First issue starts with him going to a science exhibition >Ironic since MCU is the very definition of genetic capeslop.
Something tells me you don't know what irony means > Does this clown even have a theme?
Yes by the composer who worked on The Batman, The Incredibles and countless other movies. Unlike with The Amazing Spider-Man they also didn't switch between movies so the OST is very consistent and has a leitfaden
>And why are you bringing the raimi movies into this
Because you brought up CGI and these movies are important to mention if you wanna equate CG to quality. Amazing Spider-Man 1 looks like drab shit only shot at night to cover CG costs. Raimi movies improve over the trilogy but it's ALWAYS obvious when there is CG especially in the final fights. >Flash is an actual bully
He's also gone 1/3 of the first movie in because it needs to build a cape universe where characters do shit. >Gwen is good
LMAO. What about her is good exactly? That she has a death wish for no reason being girlboss towards Spider-Man when a fricking electric guy shoots a billion volts at her? >Ben is physically present.
What does that even mean? He is physically there for about 5 minutes but Peter Parker acts irresponsible even after his death blatently shown by him letting his own girlfriend die because Peter and Gwen are morons who read the scripts. > I'd be very careful about poking fun at them.
Careful. You might be cutting yourself on that edge. The Amazing Spider-Man has shit supporting and main characters who are basically jokes in a soap. It's great you can enjoy slop by Alex Kurtzmann. >Yeah cause Holland was carried hard by iron man
Suuuure. Spider-Man was carried by Iron Man despite him only appearing in the first and not for very long at that. Again. Watch the movies before talking.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah and who else is part of that geek club, moron? Flash, Liz, Ned. Who were never ever geeks in any of the source material. So stfu. >by the composer who worked on The Batman
Wow. So he worked on 2 shit franchises. What a track record.
Go watch the opening scene of TASM 2. Maybe this time try getting Disney's dick out from your mouth before doing so.
That scene truly captured what it means to be Spider-Man. Being in nyc and saving civilians not some whiny twink in outer space. >Raimi movies improve over the trilogy but it's ALWAYS obvious when there is CG especially in the final fights.
Again, MCUtard. These movies were released in the early 2000s. Yet homecoming with it's balloon suit looks like total ass despite coming out in 2017. Watch the ferry scene again. >The Amazing Spider-Man has shit supporting and main characters who are basically jokes in a soap
Nice job ignoring muttdaya, 7/11 flash, chink Ned and gilf aunt May as some of the supporting characters. I'm waiting to hear what fantastic explanation you have for MJ being an ugly, black sarcastic gorilla. >Spider-Man was carried by Iron Man despite him only appearing in the first and not for very long at that. Again. Watch the movies before talking.
Lmaooo. Majority of homecoming was Peter slobbering over Tony's dick. Hell, even the first 2 villains are directly associated with Tony and stark tech. MCUtards are so delusional. Lmaooo
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Who were never ever geeks in any of the source material.
So you agree then that the school is just normal and they're in a geek squad, got it. >Wow. So he worked on 2 shit franchises
Yeah yeah everything is shit in your eyes. You're an edgy contrarian. We all understand. >Go watch the opening scene of TASM 2. M
Appeal to emotions to someone else. Your franchise is dead. Amazing Spider-Man is universally panned. The first time anyone liked the guy was in the MCU because he wasn't written and directed like shit >saving civilians
Perhaps you should be watching that scene again because he is actively risking the lives of people by quipping to the rhino instead of stopping him. >These movies were released in the early 2000s.
So? CG bad = Movie bad. That's on you. TASM also doesn't have that excuse. >Blabla buzzword salad
So you got nothing but racist remarks. Anything else? Did you enjoy Electro being blackwashed as well. He is your favourite supporting character after all >Majority of homecoming was Peter slobbering over Tony's dick.
He is actually going against what Tony tells him constantly and that's seen as a good thing. You would know that if you actually watched the movie you are talking about.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Yeah yeah everything is shit in your eyes. You're an edgy contrarian. We all understand.
You just have shit taste. >dead. Amazing Spider-Man is universally panned. The first time anyone liked the guy was in the MCU because he wasn't written and directed like shit
Oh you're one of THOSE morons. Nevermind. Now all your stupidity makes a lot more sense. >you should be watching that scene again because he is actively risking the lives of people by quipping to the rhino instead of stopping him.
And how many people were killed? ZERO. because he stopped him. And quipping is a part of his strategy to distract villains. Now surprising a casual MCUtard wouldn't know this. >CG bad = Movie bad. That's on you.
In a movie about Spider-Man I'd expect the CGI to be great, especially since imbeciles like you say the MCU version is the greatest thing. Sadly we get floating balloon Spider-Man which is enough for your tiny peanut brain. >you got nothing but racist remarks. Anything else? Did you enjoy Electro being blackwashed as well. He is your favourite supporting character after all
HAHAHAHAHA. You literally CAN'T explain anything, can you? You dumb Disney drone. You chat shit about bad supporting characters yet can't explain any of those monstrosities in the Holland flicks. And muh racism won't work here, Black person. This ain't reddit. Cry moar. >e is actually going against what Tony tells him constantly
Yet 70% of the movie is him cozying up to Tony, using a suit built by Tony to stop a villain indirectly created by Tony. Funny how that works, huh? Plus he gets his homosexual suit back at the end of the movie so the entire thing was moot anyway.
3 months ago
Anonymous
[...]
And one more thing you stupid frick. Electro isn't a supporting character he's a villain. There's a big difference between the two. Unfortunately I doubt your 56 kb brain can comprehend it since it's a pile of mush from watching too much Disney slop
>You just have shit taste.
That's coming from a guy who calls The Incredibles shit while shilling Sony slop lmao >Oh you're one of THOSE morons
Just say you have no argument really instead of doing the pathetic nothing snipes to have the last word >And how many people were killed?
How would you know? Spider-Man wouldn't because he doesn't give a shit about casualties in this movie and he doesn't go saving people. He blatantely kills Electro and is responsible for the death of his girlfriend since he is a moron. >In a movie about Spider-Man I'd expect the CGI to be great
So no Spider-Man movie is good because the CG is bad in every film at some point >HAHAHAHAHA. You literally CAN'T explain anything, can you?
Could have just said the first time you had nothing but racist remarks. You really must have loved Black Electro. Is that a fetish for you? Just calling Zendeya a buzzword is nothing to argue against. Say something of sunstance or leave it. >Yet 70% of the movie is him cozying up to Tony >Yet
If you wanna argue against the movie, watch it first. You didn't but you should. Maybe then you don't make embarrassing mistakes like saying Peter goes in a school for super smarts or how people went for Iron Man in the second Spider-Man movie despite the guy not being in it. Homecoming is constantly about how Peter wants to prove himself as a hero, he disregards Tony's wishes because he thinks he is better than that. That's Spider-Man. >Electro isn't a supporting character he's a villain
Then Flash isn't a supporting character because he is the antagonist in TASM1. You really can't help contradicting yourself constantly. Now let's see what buzzwords you're gonna use this time to cope yourself out of this dilemma to shill your Kurtzmann masterpieces.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>That's coming from a guy who calls The Incredibles shit while shilling Sony slop lmao
When did I say this, dumbass? And anyway Hans Zimmer is greater than some literally who street musician. His entire catalogue mogs the frick of out gay, emo Batman >Just say you have no argument really instead of doing the pathetic nothing snipes to have the last word
Oh the irony! Try playing the racism card again you stupid ape. >How would you know?
I could ask you the same question, moron. How do you know people were killed? >Spider-Man movie is good because the CG is bad in every film at some point
I never said this.Stop putting words in my mouth. But the way you MCUtards keep hyping up these movies you would expect them to have great CGI. Even the so called "bad" TASM movies look incredible when compared to any of the MCU trilogy. >Just calling Zendeya a buzzword is nothing to argue against. Say something of sunstance or leave it.
She's black, ugly and serves no purpose. You could delete her and it wouldn't make any difference. I've not seen any convincing argument from your side either for these disgusting side characters either, Black person. Maybe try shouting muh racism again. I'm sure some predditors would love to help you. >or how people went for Iron Man in the second Spider-Man movie despite the guy not being in it. Homecoming is constantly about how Peter wants to prove himself as a hero, he disregards Tony's wishes because he thinks he is better than that.
Go read my original point again you mouth breathing imbecile. I said he was carried by iron man, shared universe and nostalgia bait respectively. That means he was carried by iron man for homecoming, le MCU for ffh and nostalgia for nwh. Can't believe I have to explain this to you. Fricking marveltards,I swear. >Flash isn't a supporting character because he is the antagonist in TASM1
Green Goblin was the villain, dummy. Take your own advice and watch the flicks you dumb homosexual.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Yeah yeah everything is shit in your eyes. You're an edgy contrarian. We all understand.
You just have shit taste. >dead. Amazing Spider-Man is universally panned. The first time anyone liked the guy was in the MCU because he wasn't written and directed like shit
Oh you're one of THOSE morons. Nevermind. Now all your stupidity makes a lot more sense. >you should be watching that scene again because he is actively risking the lives of people by quipping to the rhino instead of stopping him.
And how many people were killed? ZERO. because he stopped him. And quipping is a part of his strategy to distract villains. Now surprising a casual MCUtard wouldn't know this. >CG bad = Movie bad. That's on you.
In a movie about Spider-Man I'd expect the CGI to be great, especially since imbeciles like you say the MCU version is the greatest thing. Sadly we get floating balloon Spider-Man which is enough for your tiny peanut brain. >you got nothing but racist remarks. Anything else? Did you enjoy Electro being blackwashed as well. He is your favourite supporting character after all
HAHAHAHAHA. You literally CAN'T explain anything, can you? You dumb Disney drone. You chat shit about bad supporting characters yet can't explain any of those monstrosities in the Holland flicks. And muh racism won't work here, Black person. This ain't reddit. Cry moar. >e is actually going against what Tony tells him constantly
Yet 70% of the movie is him cozying up to Tony, using a suit built by Tony to stop a villain indirectly created by Tony. Funny how that works, huh? Plus he gets his homosexual suit back at the end of the movie so the entire thing was moot anyway.
And one more thing you stupid frick. Electro isn't a supporting character he's a villain. There's a big difference between the two. Unfortunately I doubt your 56 kb brain can comprehend it since it's a pile of mush from watching too much Disney slop
to what anon?
...TO THIS?
frick kill marry
man man man
Imagine the smell
i can only get so hard
>how do you go from three dudes in costumes to three dudes in costumes
What do you mean
This was underwhelming
name a better one
frick frick marry
Well, it all started in Arkansas at an airport in a town called Mena....
Daisy Taylor is my wife
frick marry kill
All right does is get triple stuffed by black guys and shoves metal rods down her wiener.
>and shoves metal rods down her wiener.
w t f
how is that in any way pleasurable.
Daisy taylor is my waif
Natalie's butthole is so blown out its gross to look at
hot
three queers in zentai fetish costumes
to THIS????
who are these characters?
>my name is spidernigress and I'm a whooooole lotta woman!
I like the MCU Spider-Man films. Literally the only movies I enjoy from the MCU. Bravo, Watts.
first one is fine and holland is actually very much how i imagine the comics spider-man to be, but the other two are really not that good.
Honestly can't relate to this. Far From Home is my favourite Spider-Man movie.
Holland fricking sucks and is absolutely nothing like the comics version. Wtf is wrong with you?
For me it's the opposite. I despise the Holland flicks. Loads of problems are overlooked in his shitty movies. Yes, including NWH.
>nothing like the comics version
Nah he's right but the Holland version takes a lot from different sources like from the Spectacular cartoon, Ultimate, some of the Ditko era stuff, etc. Especially the villains feel classic Spider-Man.
>Holland fricking sucks and is absolutely nothing like the comics version. Wtf is wrong with you?
>implying
frick off, casual
They're not bad movies, i just think the first one is more cohesive and works better as a Spider-Man movie (too much Iron Man in it though).
>frick off, casual
Ironic since MCUtards are the biggest casuals and posers around.
He takes a lot of shit from ultimate and some things from Miles. Keaton was good but the villains are all too connected to iron man. Easily the worst live action Spider-Man/Peter.
>He takes a lot of shit from ultimate and some things from Miles
The only thing he takes from Miles is his fat friend being asian but that's really it.
>Easily the worst live action Spider-Man/Peter.
Not really. The Amazing Spider-Man movies suck balls for a multitude of reasons like having dogshit villains and making Spider-Man the chosen one who is destinied to fight a villain cast he doesn't even know yet.
What's the matter, not a fan of The Rhino?
>Miles is his fat friend being asian but that's really it.
And being in a school for geniuses
>Amazing Spider-Man movies suck balls for a multitude of reasons like having dogshit villains
Even with all the issues TASM 2 had, it still is streets ahead of anything Holland put out. Garfield acted circles around Holland in the TASM flicks and in NWH. The OST, the CGI, the supporting characters, the web swinging, the Peter xGwen relation were all so much better than anything from the MCU garbage.
And speaking of dogshit villains, mysterio was garbage and the nwh villains were all recycled from the previous movies.
The fact that Holland required the previous 2 Spider-Men and nostalgia bait to bail his ass out showed how useless he really is. Plus Holland can't act if his life depended on it.
>Spider-Man the chosen one who is destinied to fight a villain cast he doesn't even know yet
I don't remember this happening. Are you talking about the sinister 6 equipment in the end credits? When did they say he was the chosen one?
>And being in a school for geniuses
He's in a normal tech highschool.
>The OST, the CGI
The OST is shit. Pure garbage. Doesn't sound like Spider-Man, just like generic capeshit. The second one is especially heinous. Who cares about CGI? Raimi-Man 1 CG sucks balls but it's still a fun movie.
>supporting characters
Like who? Harry who wants to inject himself with 20 milliliters of Spider-Blood or the moron girlfriend who begs the script to kill her off? That's the only two "supporting" characters.
>The fact that Holland required the previous 2 Spider-Men
Bro. TASM1 is a worse remake of the first Raimi-Man movie. They even have Uncle Ben having a fallout with Peter directly before he offs himself. The movie didn't REQUIRE anything. They made plenty of cash without these guys before. If you got an issue with some fanservice then boy do you have to hate the Raimi movies because they got plenty of comicbook fanservice copying imagery from it as well.
>He's in a normal tech highschool.
They are all geeks/gifted. Even Flash is one.
>Doesn't sound like Spider-Man, just like generic capeshit.
Ironic since MCU is the very definition of genetic capeslop. The opening theme in TASM 2 is more memorable than anything from the Holland flicks. Does this clown even have a theme? Lmao
>Who cares about CGI? Raimi-Man 1 CG sucks balls but it's still a fun movie.
Bruh. It's a movie about a guy shooting ropes from his hands. CGI is very important. Else we end up with floating balloon Spider-Man in the ferry scene from homecoming and the awful effects from nwh. And why are you bringing the raimi movies into this? Stick to the point. And since you brought it up, the raimi flicks still look miles better than any of the Holland ones despite coming out almost 15 years earlier.
>Harry who wants to inject himself with 20 milliliters of Spider-Blood or the moron girlfriend who begs the script to kill her off? That's the only two "supporting" characters.
Flash is an actual bully. Ben is physically present. Gwen is good.
And do you really want to talk about shitty supporting characters when you have Microsoft scammer flash, chink Ned and whatever the frick Zendaya's goblina mystery meat character is supposed to be. I'd be very careful about poking fun at them.
>They made plenty of cash without these guys before. If you got an issue with some fanservice then boy do you have to hate the Raimi movies because they got plenty of comicbook fanservice copying imagery from it as well.
Yeah cause Holland was carried hard by iron man, le MCU shared universe and nostalgia bait respectively. His own performance was utter dogshit.
And what fan service did Raimi have? He wasn't so desperate he had to resort to hey guise remember dat memes from anywhere else.
And at least TASM acknowledged Ben instead of acting as if he never existed and giving his most iconic lines to aunt May. Absolutely disgusting!
>They are all geeks/gifted.
Watch the movies, moron. He's in a club where geeks gather. Peter Parker is a geek. Always has been. First issue starts with him going to a science exhibition
>Ironic since MCU is the very definition of genetic capeslop.
Something tells me you don't know what irony means
> Does this clown even have a theme?
Yes by the composer who worked on The Batman, The Incredibles and countless other movies. Unlike with The Amazing Spider-Man they also didn't switch between movies so the OST is very consistent and has a leitfaden
>And why are you bringing the raimi movies into this
Because you brought up CGI and these movies are important to mention if you wanna equate CG to quality. Amazing Spider-Man 1 looks like drab shit only shot at night to cover CG costs. Raimi movies improve over the trilogy but it's ALWAYS obvious when there is CG especially in the final fights.
>Flash is an actual bully
He's also gone 1/3 of the first movie in because it needs to build a cape universe where characters do shit.
>Gwen is good
LMAO. What about her is good exactly? That she has a death wish for no reason being girlboss towards Spider-Man when a fricking electric guy shoots a billion volts at her?
>Ben is physically present.
What does that even mean? He is physically there for about 5 minutes but Peter Parker acts irresponsible even after his death blatently shown by him letting his own girlfriend die because Peter and Gwen are morons who read the scripts.
> I'd be very careful about poking fun at them.
Careful. You might be cutting yourself on that edge. The Amazing Spider-Man has shit supporting and main characters who are basically jokes in a soap. It's great you can enjoy slop by Alex Kurtzmann.
>Yeah cause Holland was carried hard by iron man
Suuuure. Spider-Man was carried by Iron Man despite him only appearing in the first and not for very long at that. Again. Watch the movies before talking.
Yeah and who else is part of that geek club, moron? Flash, Liz, Ned. Who were never ever geeks in any of the source material. So stfu.
>by the composer who worked on The Batman
Wow. So he worked on 2 shit franchises. What a track record.
Go watch the opening scene of TASM 2. Maybe this time try getting Disney's dick out from your mouth before doing so.
That scene truly captured what it means to be Spider-Man. Being in nyc and saving civilians not some whiny twink in outer space.
>Raimi movies improve over the trilogy but it's ALWAYS obvious when there is CG especially in the final fights.
Again, MCUtard. These movies were released in the early 2000s. Yet homecoming with it's balloon suit looks like total ass despite coming out in 2017. Watch the ferry scene again.
>The Amazing Spider-Man has shit supporting and main characters who are basically jokes in a soap
Nice job ignoring muttdaya, 7/11 flash, chink Ned and gilf aunt May as some of the supporting characters. I'm waiting to hear what fantastic explanation you have for MJ being an ugly, black sarcastic gorilla.
>Spider-Man was carried by Iron Man despite him only appearing in the first and not for very long at that. Again. Watch the movies before talking.
Lmaooo. Majority of homecoming was Peter slobbering over Tony's dick. Hell, even the first 2 villains are directly associated with Tony and stark tech. MCUtards are so delusional. Lmaooo
>Who were never ever geeks in any of the source material.
So you agree then that the school is just normal and they're in a geek squad, got it.
>Wow. So he worked on 2 shit franchises
Yeah yeah everything is shit in your eyes. You're an edgy contrarian. We all understand.
>Go watch the opening scene of TASM 2. M
Appeal to emotions to someone else. Your franchise is dead. Amazing Spider-Man is universally panned. The first time anyone liked the guy was in the MCU because he wasn't written and directed like shit
>saving civilians
Perhaps you should be watching that scene again because he is actively risking the lives of people by quipping to the rhino instead of stopping him.
>These movies were released in the early 2000s.
So? CG bad = Movie bad. That's on you. TASM also doesn't have that excuse.
>Blabla buzzword salad
So you got nothing but racist remarks. Anything else? Did you enjoy Electro being blackwashed as well. He is your favourite supporting character after all
>Majority of homecoming was Peter slobbering over Tony's dick.
He is actually going against what Tony tells him constantly and that's seen as a good thing. You would know that if you actually watched the movie you are talking about.
>Yeah yeah everything is shit in your eyes. You're an edgy contrarian. We all understand.
You just have shit taste.
>dead. Amazing Spider-Man is universally panned. The first time anyone liked the guy was in the MCU because he wasn't written and directed like shit
Oh you're one of THOSE morons. Nevermind. Now all your stupidity makes a lot more sense.
>you should be watching that scene again because he is actively risking the lives of people by quipping to the rhino instead of stopping him.
And how many people were killed? ZERO. because he stopped him. And quipping is a part of his strategy to distract villains. Now surprising a casual MCUtard wouldn't know this.
>CG bad = Movie bad. That's on you.
In a movie about Spider-Man I'd expect the CGI to be great, especially since imbeciles like you say the MCU version is the greatest thing. Sadly we get floating balloon Spider-Man which is enough for your tiny peanut brain.
>you got nothing but racist remarks. Anything else? Did you enjoy Electro being blackwashed as well. He is your favourite supporting character after all
HAHAHAHAHA. You literally CAN'T explain anything, can you? You dumb Disney drone. You chat shit about bad supporting characters yet can't explain any of those monstrosities in the Holland flicks. And muh racism won't work here, Black person. This ain't reddit. Cry moar.
>e is actually going against what Tony tells him constantly
Yet 70% of the movie is him cozying up to Tony, using a suit built by Tony to stop a villain indirectly created by Tony. Funny how that works, huh? Plus he gets his homosexual suit back at the end of the movie so the entire thing was moot anyway.
>You just have shit taste.
That's coming from a guy who calls The Incredibles shit while shilling Sony slop lmao
>Oh you're one of THOSE morons
Just say you have no argument really instead of doing the pathetic nothing snipes to have the last word
>And how many people were killed?
How would you know? Spider-Man wouldn't because he doesn't give a shit about casualties in this movie and he doesn't go saving people. He blatantely kills Electro and is responsible for the death of his girlfriend since he is a moron.
>In a movie about Spider-Man I'd expect the CGI to be great
So no Spider-Man movie is good because the CG is bad in every film at some point
>HAHAHAHAHA. You literally CAN'T explain anything, can you?
Could have just said the first time you had nothing but racist remarks. You really must have loved Black Electro. Is that a fetish for you? Just calling Zendeya a buzzword is nothing to argue against. Say something of sunstance or leave it.
>Yet 70% of the movie is him cozying up to Tony
>Yet
If you wanna argue against the movie, watch it first. You didn't but you should. Maybe then you don't make embarrassing mistakes like saying Peter goes in a school for super smarts or how people went for Iron Man in the second Spider-Man movie despite the guy not being in it. Homecoming is constantly about how Peter wants to prove himself as a hero, he disregards Tony's wishes because he thinks he is better than that. That's Spider-Man.
>Electro isn't a supporting character he's a villain
Then Flash isn't a supporting character because he is the antagonist in TASM1. You really can't help contradicting yourself constantly. Now let's see what buzzwords you're gonna use this time to cope yourself out of this dilemma to shill your Kurtzmann masterpieces.
>That's coming from a guy who calls The Incredibles shit while shilling Sony slop lmao
When did I say this, dumbass? And anyway Hans Zimmer is greater than some literally who street musician. His entire catalogue mogs the frick of out gay, emo Batman
>Just say you have no argument really instead of doing the pathetic nothing snipes to have the last word
Oh the irony! Try playing the racism card again you stupid ape.
>How would you know?
I could ask you the same question, moron. How do you know people were killed?
>Spider-Man movie is good because the CG is bad in every film at some point
I never said this.Stop putting words in my mouth. But the way you MCUtards keep hyping up these movies you would expect them to have great CGI. Even the so called "bad" TASM movies look incredible when compared to any of the MCU trilogy.
>Just calling Zendeya a buzzword is nothing to argue against. Say something of sunstance or leave it.
She's black, ugly and serves no purpose. You could delete her and it wouldn't make any difference. I've not seen any convincing argument from your side either for these disgusting side characters either, Black person. Maybe try shouting muh racism again. I'm sure some predditors would love to help you.
>or how people went for Iron Man in the second Spider-Man movie despite the guy not being in it. Homecoming is constantly about how Peter wants to prove himself as a hero, he disregards Tony's wishes because he thinks he is better than that.
Go read my original point again you mouth breathing imbecile. I said he was carried by iron man, shared universe and nostalgia bait respectively. That means he was carried by iron man for homecoming, le MCU for ffh and nostalgia for nwh. Can't believe I have to explain this to you. Fricking marveltards,I swear.
>Flash isn't a supporting character because he is the antagonist in TASM1
Green Goblin was the villain, dummy. Take your own advice and watch the flicks you dumb homosexual.
And one more thing you stupid frick. Electro isn't a supporting character he's a villain. There's a big difference between the two. Unfortunately I doubt your 56 kb brain can comprehend it since it's a pile of mush from watching too much Disney slop
What's the point of having spiderman in an iron man suit?
He had to learn that the suit doesn't make the hero.
But real answer? To sell toys.
That's not a high point. That's the lowest point actually
Why did Tobey's suit look like total shit in this film?
Because Ted Raimi wasn't there to tell them how to light and shoot the suit properly. Same with Keaton's bat suit in The Flash.
>2 dorks arguing: The Thread
>itt:
No Way Home is a horrible movie.