>somehow convinced the MPAA to let a frontal scene in a pg-13 movie
I might have to apologise to Wes Anderson
>somehow convinced the MPAA to let a frontal scene in a pg-13 movie
>somehow convinced the MPAA to let a frontal scene in a pg-13 movie
I might have to apologise to Wes Anderson
Why should children be barred from watching sex scenes anyway? Because I'm pretty sure most of them have been exposed to porn by the time they're 13.
but enough about drag queen story hour
Different story. The act of reading to children itself isn't suspicious, what's suspicious is that these drag queens aren't ready to give up this act in order to vindicate themselves.
With theaters it's just children and the screen, no ulterior motives.
>priests are the biggest chomos
kek, not even close you dumb reddit homosexual
>2% of the population
>33%+ of child molestation
sure they aren't, homosexual
shut the hell up. those priests couldnt have been abusing any more kids than school teachers, cops, or politicians, but instead of acknowledging that the world is run by pedophiles, (You) all just go on and on about muh priests.
Priests abuse kids at a much higher rate than teachers. Religious people are mentally ill.
>Priests abuse kids at a much higher rate than teachers.
blatantly false, redditor
I almost want to laugh at this pic cause it's true but then i see the girls' expressions and I feel really bad ;_;
we must protect our anime grils from the biden family menace
Also this anon is right. Abuses within the church are minuscule compared to public schooling in general.
Oh wait that's the wrong graph (still eye-opening though!)
Let me find the public school one...
Those catholic priests aren't doing it because they're catholic, they're doing it because they're homosexuals.
>catholic molestation is 95% male on male
What's the message here again?
Statistically speaking the catholic church diddled at the same rate as any other organisation that involves kids like schools, sports, etc.
The difference is they fricked up massively by trying to cover it up and by not getting rid of the pedo-priests, just moving them on to different churches where they could re-offend.
Which it turns out is the same thing government schools do. School employees who are caught having sex interactions with students are moved three times on average before they're finally booted. Same thing happens with universities, where a professor who gets in trouble ends up transferred to a branch campus.
>US public school employees who sexually abuse children are typically moved to different schools three times before they are finally arrested, preying on as many as 73 victims before they are eventually punished, according to a new report by a conservative think tank.
>Published last week by the Defense of Freedom Institute, the report details hundreds of cases in which teachers in public school districts were accused of abuse, but had their records scrubbed before being moved to new positions, where the abuse continued.
>Citing earlier research by the Government Accountability Office, the report noted that firing teachers can be a costly process for school districts. As such, the districts often negotiate confidentiality agreements with unions whereby a teacher can resign or be demoted to avoid disciplinary action, before being transferred to another school with a clean slate.
>The average employee accused of abuse is passed to three different school districts before facing legal consequences, and can abuse up to 73 children in this time.
>This system has allowed sexual assault to proliferate, the report claimed. According to the most recent Department of Education data, 13,799 cases of sexual violence and 685 cases of rape or attempted rape were recorded in schools during the 2017-2018 school year, up from 9,649 and 394 in 2015-2016.
in uni the students are usually of age tho
Yes but that doesn't mean they wanted their professor whipping out his dick during a tutoring session.
You never know. Have you ever talked to these students? A lot of people can be into zany shit
They're all to blame, and there's also nuance to each side. Of course it's easier to advocate for extremes and cherry pick stats for either side because let's be honest, this thread would have died 5 posts in if it were an actual discussion concerning the movie itself
>according to a new report by a conservative think tank
>Defense of Freedom Institute
lol, lmao even
>Same thing happens with universities, where a professor who gets in trouble ends up transferred to a branch campus.
universities are all adults though. why is that an issue
They're in a position of authority. A girl may think that if she refuses the professor's advances he might give her a bad grade or fail her.
That's if they actually abuse that position to coerce them. If they aren't coercing and it's fully consensual than it's not wrong.
The catholic church is also viewed as essentially a conservative political institution making it a favorite punching bag of the left. Catholic priests being pedos has been memed into popular culture by Hollywood as well.
Two sides of the same coin. Literally
>4/5 of gays got molested as kids
>the rest are men that got so unlucky with women that they turned gay.
it's like if it was a mental illness created by sexual traumas and rejection or something.
Just because you say it in a meme doesn't make it true.
Why is it so vital that kids are indoctrained by homosexualry?
I've never stepped foot in a Catholic church in my entire life. I don't listen to idolatrous heathen Mary worshipers.
Reread what you just posted there again, carefully this time
i first found porn at 8 years old through fricking yahoo. this was like 2001, there were no drag queens or trannies indoctrinating me. get fricking real, mongo.
I looked up porn on my parents dial-up connection when I was 12, you are oblivious if you think 95% of kids with access to a phone or tablet haven't seeked it out
it's virtually impossible to even google for cartoon or video game characters without seeing rule34 of them
Because Medieval Christianity said so and modern democrats strangely hold too much respect for it
This idea that the US is some kind of bastion of puritanism is a total meme. Sex is everywhere and Christianity is only held in contempt in popular American culture. If anything, ethics in film regarding nudity or sex is more influenced by unfrickable feminists who complain about the "sexualization and objectification of women" than it is by some sort of crypto-Christian force behind the scenes pulling the strings.
Americans clutch their pearls in faux modesty at R movie ratings all the time- other countries don’t do this. The likes of the U.K. have ratings such as 15 and 18 that are both routinely used, carrying no social stigma whatsoever.
>doesn't realise one begets another
ngmi
It's not about feminism because male nudity is also rejected. It's american puritan values that make the rating system favoring violence to sexuality, and it's been like that for decades.
There are other countries with even stronger feminist ideologies in the mainstream that aren't that freaked out by nudity, both male or female.
>y-you’re a puritan
Go watch dicks on naked attraction you dumb foreigner
how are you so proud of being ruled by puritan feminists? there is a better world out there than what you know
Not proud, just tired of the same limp criticisms about the most moronic things
>you don’t have enough nudity being shown to kids!
>but also you’re like so degenerate showing sexuality to kids!
>there is a better world out there than what you know
Lol where?
Penises are way more common than vags.
>B-but
Merkins don't count
>christian cereal maker follows israeli dickcutting ritual
>atheist child dickcutters follow christian moral code
goes to show that being baby mutilating prudes is genetic
>he never downloaded porn to his flip phone to show his friends
does your wife know you're a gay?
>most people have done it therefore it’s good
no, because watching pornography that young is a form of sexual abuse
you're an actual moron
That's not how that works.
oh look, a pedophile
what movie was this so i can google image search this scene? asking for a friend
Asteroid City, hasn't released yet
She already did full frontal in Under The Skin. I wasn't impressed tbh
too dimly lit. needed to see more.
Why was her one tit noticeably bigger than the other? I realize there’s usually some variation, but that you’d expect SOME symmetry from someone of that renown.
She was turned to the side. Not that difficult
>blink and you'll miss it
I'll believe it when I see screencaps
>In the United States, the Motion Picture Association (MPA) initially gave the film an R-rating "for brief graphic nudity".[37] Focus Features successfully appealed the decision, and the film was re-rated PG-13 "for brief graphic nudity, smoking, and some suggestive material".[38]
wtf
The mpaa equvalent of haggling
>this? this is definitely gonna be at least an R
*pester them again*
>mmm alright PG 13, but that's as low as I can go
its just an organisation created by the industry to prevent the actual government from regulating them. they control it and can give themselves whatever rating they want
Which is why its ratings are completely arbitrary and worthless. Try watching The Force Awakens and telling me why it needs to be PG-13. You could show it to kindergarteners.
You haven't seen 'This Film Is Not Yet Rated'? It explains how the MPAA rates movies and what a incestuous clusterfrick the whole process is.
I wrote a paper on MPAA guidelines in college and it got censored, lol.
Why wouldn't he want it to be R, like other serious movies for adults? PG-13 is for capeshit.
if PG-13 was alloted one (1) nude scene just like with the f-bomb, ticket sales would skyrocket
Titanic had breasts and it was rated 12, at least in Europe.
Maybe if it meant breasts in Marvel movies, but why is PG-13 a target for this movie? It's not like teenagers are an important demo for Wes Anderson films, anyway. It wouldn't be missing out on potential sales by being R. If anything, the opposite is true: adults looking for relief from the dramatic and artistic mediocrity of generic Hollywood blockbusters will dismiss it out of hand for being PG-13.
Brief breasts fit PG-13. Titanic had PG-13.
and vagine?
So where is it?
Why did they need to show breasts in a movie about children gathering to watch stars?
Why are you gay?
based scarlett
So did she end up getting her boobs filled again? Remember the shitstorm when she cut them off in 2014
Why does kids+sex= bad?
t. ESL subhuman
nonce
Cultural norm of many places says so. If you have an issue then go look for a different culture
>rating a movie R just because someone is naked
Please tell me you don't really support Quaker shit like this?
I feel like these people don't remember what PG used to be like in the decades before the early 2000's.
there's this whole wave of zoomer puritans
what's funny is that theyre themselves often of progressive values and this causes frequent twitter shitstorms between different types of progressives
>men fricking men in the ass is okay, but showing a naked woman isn't
usually it's about showing teens any type of pornography plus the bullshit about SHE WAS ONLY SEVENTINO AND A HALF
Usually the way to go about these things is trying to imagine saying this shit to a group of friends in public and if you visualize them giving you a wtf or ick look then maybe the problem is with you
do you only have female friends? guys will pretend to virtue signal in front of women and soi males but will give their honest opinion with their close friends
I used the term "friends" but really meant coworkers or colleagues. People talk shit here about any topic because they hide behind "Anonymous", but it doesn't translate to IRL, and if you think it does then again you are the problem for being that socially moronic
who cares what your coworkers or colleagues think. They don't matter and they aren't going to be honest with their beliefs. The only thing that matters is what your close friends and family thinks. Most people aren't going to care about an age gap if the person is legal. Which is 16-18 depending on the state. People who don't care about you will pretend to be outraged because they can use it aaginst you and virtue signal to other people
Logan's Run was PG and had a rape orgy scene, along with several instances of full frontal nudity. My step-mother joked that PG stood for "Pretty Good".
Siri, when did films quit using the Hayes code and switch to the MPAA standard? Also tell me when the PG13 rating was added and when Logan's Run came out
why is this a controversy in america?
Because he was too pussy to make the trailer park boy and his siblings father and daughters
What kind of parent is going to take the kids to a fricking wes anderson movie anyway
Who cares. You are neither party and this doesn't affect you (unless you're a parent)
So is Cinemaphile just gonna b***h and moan or will someone here at least post the webm?
it's not out yet
I hate women
I feel mildly annoyed at women and then forget about it after watching copious amounts of porn. Funny enough this is also a ScarJo movie plot
>showing kids naked bodies is bad because... They'll become trannies!!!
>showing kids extreme violence, guts and war footage is good because...
why are circumcised mutts like this
moronic puritanical beliefs combined with a deep sense of righteousness deeply ingrained in the mutt soul
once you understand this type of thinking you understand americans and why they love pornography but cover up greek statues or why they have no problem sending a region back to the stone age to give it democracy
Why are they pushing old women so much nowadays? Scarlett is like 50
Nudity is normal.
I didn't like her Hot Ones episode aside from looking at her. She even refused to answer one of the questions.
In "Airplane!" a nude woman with DD breasts runs in front of the screen and shakes for like 5 seconds. It got a PG rating.