Spider-Man: Reign

Why is this getting a sequel?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tfw Miguel will never accidentally kill you by repeatedly coming inside you with his radioactive sperm.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      We needed one good book with how trash ASM is. Really because andrews was doing stuff for spider-office so he took his chances and pitched this. I like reign so looking forward to this. Seems better than the dogshit that was dkr2.

      Miguel doesnt have radioactivity tho?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        But I WISH he did.

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Editorial knows that controversy sells and that a sequel to the "radioactive cum" story will get attention
    and Reign is honestly not a bad story

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    What? Where? When?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      This weeks' ASM 31 last couple of pages is teasing a Reign sequel

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        is it set in the 616 or in the original reign timeline?was it just a separate story/teaser in asm 31?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          it appears to be set in the original's timeline. It's a separate teaser from the main story, along with Superior and Spider-Boy teases

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        By Karee?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      This weeks' ASM 31 last couple of pages is teasing a Reign sequel

      is it set in the 616 or in the original reign timeline?was it just a separate story/teaser in asm 31?

      >This weeks' ASM 31 last couple of pages is teasing a Reign sequel
      Nice, was the last storytime of pain guerilla marketing?

      By Karee?

      here's the pages

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Fact, this Spider in question Is Mary Jane Watson. reborn as a spider woman

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            nah, it's the MJ hallucination from the og story. you can see she's actually behind Peter, acting like his conscience

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not really, check the spider man thread.
              Peter died after reign, This is Mary Jane reborn as spider woman, as no one knows how did this happen, though is possible that the radioactive cum let her go through the same cocoon metamorphosis peter had after his fight with morlun.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I wouldn't have kissed you after the blowjobs Tiger if I knew it'd lead to that! I'm sorry I didn't swallow!

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Its funny how Marvel is trying gaslighting us into thinking Reign is the most infamous Spidey story when anyone who has a brain would say OMD is.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Especially when reign is being seen in a better light lol.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          Kek I thought you were just reaching, it's blatantly saying it's coming. Wonder if he'll be in the next Spider-Verse

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    house of ideas

  5. 9 months ago
    The "Happy is Gert's Daughter" Anon

    >This weeks' ASM 31 last couple of pages is teasing a Reign sequel
    Nice, was the last storytime of pain guerilla marketing?

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >getting a sequel?
    Kaare. Andrews wants to do it, and Marvel gives him money to do random projects. he did that random Amazing Fantasy mini couple years ago so i'm pretty sure. Marvel will just let him do anything i've not idea why though

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >lets give every comic character ever multiple dour edgy angsty Dark Knight Returns ripoffs regardless of whether it makes sense or has any meaning or reason to exist

    Why are cape writers so fricking lazy and uncreative

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    We gonna get a reprint of Reign soon?

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because making sequels to stories that never needed sequels is all the rage these days. I'm actually in the very small camp of people who enjoyed this book for what it was, and I think this is moronic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *