>Paramount execs are kicking the tires on the next Star Trek movie
>currently untitled installment (referred to internally as simply Star Trek 14) is set to release in 2026 to celebrate the franchise’s 60th anniversary
>the movie will bring theatrical Star Trek back to the Prime Timeline in the late 24th century
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
I used to love Star Trek but STD was the disease that ruined the Star Trek franchise. I'm not interested in it anymore.
It was the J.J. Abraham's movies which did it. It turned Star Trek into big loud dumb popcorn action flicks.
To be fair, most Trek movies have been that since the end of the TOS films. While the nu-trek movies weren't good, they aren't insultingly bad and woke-cringe like STD.
>not insultingly bad
>Kirk racing to the Beastie Boys as the only thing J.J. knows about star Trek is the old clip of Shatner arguing with the director about the pronunciation of the word sabotage
>I call him Bones because his wife fleeced him in a divorce not because doctors are called sawbones
>It's the Enterprise but biggerer!
>transporting across solar systems into moving ships
>No we promise Cumberbatch isn't Khan we swear
>My name is.. Khan
>Fooled you! trollface.jpg thanks for the money suckers!
>not insultingly bad
It saddens me that JJ has been tapped to direct a remake of 'Krull'. Yes, I know I can just refuse to see the new movie but it sucks that the old one will be overwritten in the public consciousness by the new one.
No one gives a shit about Krull. All people remember is it's that weird movie with that cool boomerang.
It's better to be forgotten than defamed.
The old one was pretty TV movie tier.... I feel bad for Tia Carrere though. She was a great actress that never got her due.
Krull, not Kull. I can't believe anyone else even remembers Kull
it is connected to the Conan franchise
Oh I know people would be aware of tie books, maybe still remember the comics but the movie, I saw it in theatres & barely remember it exists.
My main in Ultima Online was Dreadlord Kull Grandmaster Scholar. Legendary time for kino, both tv and online.
Krull without a British director and an all-British cast (Ken Marshall notwithstanding) isn't Krull
Who gives a shit about the public consciousness? Most of you homosexuals don't even leave your mom's house
ARE YOU FRICKING SERIOUS
>pedantry and bitterness
Sorry if you expected TNG to last forever. The people who give a shit about TOS are quickly dying off and TNG already had its theatrical run. They needed to expand the fanbase and you should consider yourself lucky that the nu-trek movies had any amount of fan service at all when you weren't the primary target audience. And as I've said earlier in the thread, the movies haven't been real trek since Wrath of Khan. Deal or bail, it's not getting better for you.
TOS is unironically the kinoest kino ever to grace a portable kinonator
I don't know the key to success but I do know that the key to failure is trying to appeal to everyone. Also they could try not straight up lying to fans. They did it again with Discovery
>No we promise these aren't Klingons we swear
>Fooled you trollface.jpg thanks for the money suckers!
But your definition of failure is purely based on what you want when I've told you you're not the primary target audience. The nu-trek movies were profitable as far as I know, and another TOS or TNG canon movie wouldn't have been. Sorry if you felt lied to, but literally no one cares.
>profitable
No they weren't the 2nd & 3rd flopped which is why they haven't made more. I guess alienating their decades long customers to chasr the normalgay demographic didn't work out the way they hoped
And there was no way they could justify the expense of a movie when the core fanbase didn't show up for any of the previous movies. Better to keep the franchise alive somehow than let it completely die off or relegated to the garbage shows we get now. But there's no realistic way of pleasing you, so whatever.
I just said they eschewed their original audience. Why would we show up to pay for their dumbed down for mass appeal product when we were told we weren't needed or even welcome because we're "toxic" for pointing out how they're not giving the series the respect it deserves. You know what would make me happy? Professional space examining both sides of philosophical problems. You know, Star Trek. Not sexed up 20 somethings sprinting down hallways to rap music.
You sound like a mega monster homosexual.
>No we promise Cumberbatch isn't Khan we swear
I'll never be mad at this. Of course he lied. I would have done the same. Then again, I wouldn't have done a retread of TWOK with a shitty twist, nor would I have cast Cumberbatch as Khan, but you know what I mean.
Kahn is canonically Indian. Cast him
Do I look like a pajeet? I don't know a single Indian actor who could pull it off (because I only know a couple.)
Abitabh Bachchan if old
Kumail Nanjiani if young
90% of this post is autistic meta though? I only saw the 2007 one. I thought it was decent as a film at the time. Not really Trek but ENT felt that way too.
all of that happened in either the 3rd or 2nd one.
Only the Khan part, the rest is all from the 1st
Yup where McCoy is like "My wife took everything & only left me my bones" it's so duuuuuuuumb!!! He's called Bones because a colloquial nickname for doctors are Sawbones. Is that too complicated for the average retail ded American moviegoer in 2009?
>a colloquial nickname for doctors are Sawbones.
i didnt know that. must be an out of use term. in the german dub he is called "pille" (=pill), i never knew why they translated bones into pille. kind of makes sense now. its a nickname for his profession.
Bear in mind the original Star Trek was made only 100 years after the American Civil Warm Doctors probably do fewer amputations nowadays.
sabotage is from the third
No it isn't. it's what Kirk is blasting from the stereo of the car he stole from his step dad and drives into that canyon in like the first 15 minutes of thr 2009 movie. Honestly if you can't be autistic with details then what business do you have posting about Star Trek on the internet?
?t=47
?si=X9UJ4N0m_2BchDyC
Them using it twice doesn't make me wrong, it just makes them hacks.
No.
see
They reused the song in Beyond, moron. That's why anon way above is blaming JJ. Because it was in HIS movie than it was first used.
For me, it's the shot of Kirk rolling up on the Enterprise under construction. The Enterprise can't even land on planets, its design was obviously never meant to even enter an atmosphere, and it's well established in the series that starfleet ships are built at the utopia planitia shipyards in orbit around Mars. JJ Abrams put that shot in the film because he's a fricking hack with no imagination so of course he felt a need to put in that kind of obvious hero looking at his future shot for the sake of putting it in a trailer, and gave it no more thought than that because he's physically incapable of doing so. THAT'S insultingly stupid, without even factoring in the convenient coincidence of it being built in a fricking small town in Iowa.
Also the Romulan mining ship looking like an indescribable mass of blades and being loaded with enough weapons to take on a fleet.
oh and I almost forgot the Enterprise engineering section just being filmed in a brewery or something, something that is really obviously a modern industrial factory barely dressed up to look like a sci-fi set. I wasn't expecting the high budget new Trek movie to remind me of fricking space mutiny
I’m a sentimental old bastard and as much as I hate to admit this now, the very first teaser hooked me.
?si=Fgn189PbEuCY1A4A
Atone by watching this non-goyslop gratuitous Enterprise porn https://youtu.be/GMQTzYp756o
Beautiful, made me pickup a 2160p copy of the movie
agreed
t. someone who actually lived in Iowa for 20 years
studied NASA as a kid (and even knew as a kid future spaceships etc would be assembled in space because it makes sense logically and zero-grav construction)
and the mining ship design still boggles my mind, its so fricking stupid its like prequel-era Lucas tier ideas
I never hated the JJ movies because it was obviously a different timeline, so not part of the main canon.
But STD and the other new shows tried to rewrite the canon and that rubbed me the wrong way.
At least those were good movies. I mean the first one, haven't seen the others. They weren't Star Trek proper, but good action flicks. I mean they are about as good as First Contact. Generations and Insurrection were worse.
At my most charitable I will say the 1st JJ movie was a serviceable action blockbuster but it most certainly was not Star Trek
Trek 09 is smarter and better written than any of the TOS movies.
Bait
Correct. Paramount basically told the fans that generated revenues to go frick themselves so they could attract the mouthbreathers who may see a film once and not engage beyond that.
I blame Mike Stoklasa of Red Letter Media shilling JJ Abram’s awful movie and spreading propaganda that Abrams was the best director ever born.
Mike Stoklasa ruined Star Trek and Cinema.
Normies rightfully have no idea what you're talking about.
star trek movies have been that since the 80s
Nah, the current shows are significantly worse.
Anyone who says anything other than JJ killed Trek is totally wrong and probably too young to have watched it happen in real time.
Accurate. The JJ trash was no where near as fatal as filling the bridge with histrionic, emotionally incontinent Black folk and redditors.
I was really hoping that they were gonna start running the trek movies like the mission impossible movies and just got different screen writers and directors each time to do their own thing but JJ killed the good will they made with into darkness and for some reason paramount COMPLETELY dropped the ball on beyond by not pumping it as their “50th anniversary celebration” until the last second on an awkward second release date that should’ve been the first
If they hired you to run the IP based in this concept, they’d make billions. These people are totally incompetent and detached from reality.
They seemed so obbsessed with remakes, it’s why khan was in the second one, it’s why the enterprise was wrecked in beyond and it’s why they were hyping a time travel movie as the potential fourth movie. It’s weird how Hollywood people think, it’s like they understand what they liked and can only imitate it poorly. JJ and his ilk are the worst things that could’ve happened to Hollywood in general, no creativity between these three israelites worth billions
100%. Couldn’t agree more. It’s incredible considering the amount of money they’re investing into these projects. Zero awareness or foresight.
At this point, I want to see what Quinton would do with the IP just out of curiosity. He can’t frick it up more than they have in the last two decades.
Quinten straight up said he would’ve been fine with just remaking an episode into a feature, I don’t know HOW paramount spooked him away when he handed them at LEAST three dozen solid movie ideas that could’ve been farmed from TOS alone. Hell even if they had to sell the movie as a “Star Trek event” in order for him to not have to qualify it as one of his “ten movies” they should’ve done that
I’m really curious about this script they have. Morbid curiosity mostly but I really can’t imagine it being worse than the recent shows.
He directed CSI episodes so he knows how to mesh his style within the confines of a franchise. I just wanted Brad bird to get a shot at a trek movie, I think he would’ve been a perfect director for one
>Brad Bird
That’s a very good choice. Would love to see what he would do with it.
Gangster Star Trek sounds stupid. It was an episode written to utilize sets, costumes and props. It's a dumb episode and would make a dumber movie.
A solid movie about the ramifications of breaking the prime directive using gangsters could be just what the world needs right now. Make it about LA gangs in the 90s rather than Chicago in the 30s and you’d have something different enough to call it its own thing
Yeah, this. I enjoyed the Abrams movies, but I dropped that show after the first season and haven't watched a single Star Trek thing since. It just wasn't good and killed the franchise in the same ways that Disney did with Star Wars.
Sure, a project greenlit just before a merger. Not much of a future for this one.
From what I’m hearing, the movie was a topic of discussion between David Zaslav and Bob Bakish. Warner is positioning itself as the distributor.
The execs want an exciting but cerebral story. People involved in the creative side of things describe it as a movie version of ‘All Good Things’.
Just saying that after a big corporate shakeup, the projects from the last guy are the first to go.
I assure you that Warner is very much on board with the idea.
What really got the ball rolling was the positive (and viral) reaction to the SNW-LDS crossover.
Warner wants Matalas in the director’s chair. A major point of contention right now is the main lead. Paramount is pushing for Sonequa (joined by Anson Mount, Jack Quaid, Quvenzhané Wallis, and various legacy Trek actors like Jonathan Frakes). Matalas wants more focus on old actors, particularly Frakes and Riker’s USS Titan. Paramount wants Sonequa as the lead because that’s why they ended Discovery.
Matalas is eager to direct so I’m sure they’ll figure things out.
>What really got the ball rolling was the positive (and viral) reaction to the SNW-LDS crossover.
Dead silence?
I’ll just leave this here
Well, it´s Combs, so cheating a bit. But powerful evidence none the less.
gotta feel a little bad for the discovery actors. its not their fault, theyre just workers. its the writers and producers that need to feel the pain for this absolute trash they willed into existence.
Oh no. Anyway......
look at all those brown arms
It's Combs, mate. Most people aren't here for his Trek work. Still, nice to see no one showed up for these homosexuals.
it'd be perfect if the reverse shot was STD
No, because the Bride wasn't a steaming pile of shite.
but it would hammer home how mad west was
>West
>"mad"
I see.
You are correct, that would be funny.
anthony rapp deserves to die homeless and without a job
the dude cant act and is a perpetual fricking victim, the poster child of modern white leftists
how mathematically perfect
>Sonequa
I had to look up who "Sonequa" was. You mean "Space Jesus."
I can only say that I hope she has retires from acting and has a very pleasant, healthy, long life... away from anything even vaguely related to Trek (which describes STD fairly well).
shut the frick up, moron
shut the frick up, moron
>Sure, a project greenlit just before a merger. Not much of a future for this one.
This is common to give yourself more perceived value. The reason Disney got a deal on Star Wars was because nothing was in production.
this would be moronic. glad its doa
what we need is a voyager enterprise crossover movie trilogy to erase nutrek from the timeline.
Can tell where to get your VOY fix, but you won´t like it.
hit me
youre right i dont like it
>handsome guy and shota boy
i wish they still make kino like this. now it's all girls.
Partially because the guy was a himbo and accidentally Baldwined himself by playing with a gun on set.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon-Erik_Hexum
You were warned.
Prodigy.
How'd that lady walk through that lady?
Holodeck. She was being reminiscential of the lst time she saw TattoMan.
This looks like a video game cut scene wtf
True. First thing that came my mind was Star Trek Online.
Even if it were good, you'd have to like VOY to enjoy this shit, and nobody genuinely likes VOY. What were they thinking?
I liked VOY. But I saw it first when I was a child, so I didn't get it was a lot of worse TNG episodes. But the Doctor and Seven and even the Kim/Tom dynamic at times made up for it. Oh and Janeway was a much more "real" person than Picard.
VOY > DSN
oh god it's Generations but with infinitely more soi and cringe
>soi and cringe
I don't understand. Why would Special Outstanding Individuals be cringe? They're special and outstanding.
multiverse story with all the characters is fricking great idea and you know it
like what patrick stewart does these days? or that russian broad? or that black guy?
you give them a couple of bucks, and you're guaranteed to make a lot of money. even scott bakula. what he's doing? nothing.
>that russian broad?
?
Katarina Janewinski maybe?
Sirtis, my guess. Or maybe the lady that played Neyachev?
If you don´t know about Picard, you cannot imagine how much I envy you.
>If you don´t know about Picard
but what does patrick stewart do outside of that my homie?
x-men is over. it's done.
he's an old man. he doesn't get any roles.
>what does patrick stewart do outside of that my homie?
What does he have to do? He could have retired, or - if there were really no decent roles for him and he still wanted to work - returned to the stage to play King Lear or whatever. Instead he chose to participate in the desecration of the character with which he's most associated.
>What does he have to do? He could have retired
have you seen his interviews?
he has a huge ego
he complained about not getting cast anymore due to his age.
Still wondering what the frick you meant by "russian broad", pajeet.
Dr Pulaski?
Obviously Polish.
Polish, Russian, what’s the difference? Seriously
poles are slavic germans and russians are slavic finns
You guys have no idea how much this woman disgusts me.
Looks fine to me.
I've never watched Voyager because that shit is moronic
>x-men is over. it's done.
Kelsey Grammar just cameo'd as Beast in some marvel thing, so as long as Patrick Stewart is alive, there's a chance he could be in a marvel movie.
kys and then go back
Could it be good? Sure, they could wipe the stain from the *real* "prime" timeline by firmly and unequivocally placing STD, SNW, PIC etc outside of it and ending them all(it goes without saying that Pickle Trek is already its own thing, since it's a comedy). They could proceed from a clean slate with a new late-24th TV show that has nothing to do with their "Legacy" horseshit.
But they won't, will they. They'll quadruple down, they'll use it to further validate and interconnect *real* Star Trek with their heinous imitations. Think of the reverence, the technical skill, the effort, the genuine affection that all went into a project like Trials and Tribble-ations, and tell me any of the fricking diversity hire, HR manager-tier, smug, self-satisfied c**ts currently working on Trek are capable of that? We already know they aren't, because even when Corporate hands down a mandate to try and please real fans, what they produce is Picard S3.
Star Trek is dead, it died when they cancelled Enterprise(which had many issues but at least still pretended continuity with what came before and shared some of the same creatives as 90's Trek), and it's not coming back.
>WHEEEZE
Don't you have some tide pods to snack on you brillo-haired demisexual homosexual?
>We already know they aren't, because even when Corporate hands down a mandate to try and please real fans, what they produce is Picard S3.
I saw a clip of them going back to the Enterprise D (even though that makes no sense because the secondary hull was completely destroyed and the saucer seemed like it was completely trashed by crash landing on the planet) and the old main cast is so old that it was just pathetic. None of them seemed like they were even trying to act like their characters.
Baed
>multiverse story with all the characters is fricking great idea
Not really.
What would be a great idea would be bringing back the aesthetic and tone of 90's Star Trek, and telling a good story. I don't need to see 100 different characters crossover, especially when I don't like half of them.
>all current Star Trek shows
SO, nothing worthwhile. Imagine trying to get people to pay money to watch ST:D in theaters.
I fricking hate STD shitting on Star Trek canon. I hope everyone involved in creating STD gets virulent syphilis.
>Series about the future is now stuck repeating the past forever
Pottery.
Like the song goes, I see the future repeat the past/ I see a museum of grand new stuff/ And time doesn´t stop, no no
So what were the actual good Trek movies? 2,4,6 and First Contact?
Asking for a consensus is very reddit.
Drop the last one. Die hard on a Starfleet ship, please no.
>Die hard on a Starfleet ship, please no.
>he didn't like the TNG episode where Picard goes full Diehard because he forgot his saddle while the ship was getting decontaminated
moron alert. moron alert.
Physical plots with Picard were always laughable. Like when they made him Space Indiana Jones in Ryza or during the Klingon succession where he was jumped by assassins and fought them off.
>moron alert. moron alert.
Put on a trip so we know who to ignore for the rest of the thread, tastelet.
I'm guessing you're bald. Gotta delude into thinking your kind are relevant.
Episode kicked ass when I was 10. Sorry about your shit taste. Now put the trip on and eat the eggs.
When you still had hair? Lmao.
Yes. When you get older you'll realize bald men don't feel bad about it eventually. Now, let's talk about your weight.
>hairlet
It's so over.
Yes, your attempt to distract everyone from noticing your poor taste is over. Trip up. Eggs.
>deflection
>matches the reflection off his shiny dome
Pottery
You can tell these posters are single zoomers because hairloss is really only a problem if you're single and under 35. After that no one gives a shit.
That episode was really good tho.
>I’m, uhh, Mott the barber, yeah
Why? Stewart played the Atreides Warmaster in Dune, A Knight of the Round in Excalibur and a Praetorian Guard in I Claudius
And he wasn't convincing as a warrior in any of them. His strength as an actor simply doesn't lie in him being physically imposing or doing action.
Those plots kept Stewart around. Dude really wanted to do other shit than being the boring old guy everyone called Daddy and the straight guy to everyone else's craziness on the show.
Ironically Bullock on American Dad is what Picard would have been if the show gave Stewart free reign. Dude seriously wanted to be a silver fox version of Picard that punched aliens and had freaky sex with alien chicks.
Steward was in very good shape for his age and his character has a backstory of winning marathons and getting into barfights with aliens twice his size.
I dont find it far fetched at all.
i like Star Trek Beyond, but only becasue my hotwife Sofia is in it.
Molto basado
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Don't eye roll at me. We all know the TOS movies were perfect. There's no denying it.
I agree. Some may be better than others but they are all comfy.
The official ranking is
2>6>4>3>Beyond>1>First contact>5>Star Trek>insurrection>generations>nemesis>>>>>>>>>>>>into darkness
galaxy quest is the unofficial fourth best trek movie
It's actually 1 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 6 > 5 > the rest
>Beyond>1
I love the first movie, it has some great moment but there a reason why the directors cut turned out SHORTER than the theatrical cut. It’s a solid pilot to a tv series but it misses out on what’s needed in a movies narrative.
TMP director's cut is on the shortlist for greatest science fiction films ever made
You put first contact that far down? You total gimp
I love the opening scenes of first contact, but I hate who they made Picard. Only thing I hated more was killing his family, if I was the one who took over trek back when it came back, first thing I would’ve done was decanonize the next gen movies
Why do people go on about this. The man snapped. After so much shit happening, after the entire earth got fricking destroyed, Picard showed his human side for a short while and fricking snapped. He also got brought back after raving about Moby Dick for a while. It was amazing.
This literal autistic purism where
>Ummm ackchually Picard would never get angry he would make a speech beseeching the borg to stop being mean and then he would drink Earl Grey
is the ONLY response Picard could ever have baffles me. The man is fricking pissed, the Borg reached the line in the sand and he will not tolerate this shit anymore, kill them all and let god sort out the rest
Beyond the fact that Picard dealt with a decent amount of his trauma in the show itself when dealing with Hugh. I can accept what the writers did in pushing for drama in the film, I can’t accept the ideocy of the borgs plan of having to BE AT EARTH to open the time portal, a plan like that makes it seem like they could’ve done it ANYWHERE and just gone to earth. That or the enterprise not detecting the borg beaming over when they destroyed the sphere when following them to the past. Like ANY time travel plot, it needs to much of a leap in logic to fully work, the movie just has action and memes and that’s about it.
Beyond was a decent action flick with a utilized the crew well, letting each one get a moment to shine. It had a weak villain sure, but EVERY trek film since first contact had a theme of vengeance for some reason as well
Yeah and thats completely fair, time travel always sucks even when its cool.
But having Picard go all captain Ahab is still fricking sick and completely justified. His breakdown in "Family" or whatever that episode was called is plenty of foreshadowing for him to be susceptible to what the Borg did to him and now the entire Earth.
The performances and effects of first contact have never been a problem. ALL of the next gen films suffer from terrible writing by tv people who never seemed to learn how to transfer their talents to screen writing
Are you seriously telling us it's been almost thirty years and you never fricking grasped that the time portal was a Hail Mary, not the Borg's initial plan, which was just to invade in the present and would have worked if Picard hadn't shown up and used his trauma-telepathy to blow up the Cube?
Jesus buddy, maybe nuTrek really is more your speed. That was an insult. I'm implying you're a moron. Given how obtuse you are I thought I'd better spell it out in text rather than relying on your to grasp subtext or context.
If they had a back up plan to go BACK IN TIME, then why only send ONE CUBE? We’ve seen the borg collective, they have THOUSANDS of cubes. If you’re so confident in a time travel story than maybe you just like bad stories? The effects and performances were good, but stop pretending like ANY of the next gen movies had good stories that hold up to an ounce of scrutiny
beyond is fricking shit mate
400m box office tops unless the brand gets even more irrelevant by then
Top brass want it to be the next Top Gun: Maverick.
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
Oh, thank God. For a moment I was afraid we'd have Trek look to the future, onto new stories and possibilities. I'm so relieved that we can keep circle-jerking the existing material and fan service.
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
Star Trek died in the early 2000s. There has not been one good piece of Star Trek media since enterprise ended and even that is debatable.
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows
Hard pass
Ed Speleers, Anson Mount and Jack Quaid are relentlessly handsome.
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
nice, the final turd of humiliation for every old character making space for newer progressive ones
>malt liquor, colt 45, room temperature
I don't trust anyone in charge of the franchise to understand anything about what made it work. Call me when for the 70th anniversary whoever owns it decides to celebrate the series by either making an optimistic show about morality and technology in say, the 2500s, or a movie with new characters that boldly explores what it is to be human while confronting a futuristic unknown, with the stakes simply being understanding and growth.
>Call me when for
Settle down, Shakespeare.
Bring back the original Kirk
He’s like 90 and verging on morbid obesity anon
>is set to release in 2026
Smart to do this ASAP since who knows when Shatner will croak. I just hope they find a way to control his and Janeway's weight
>>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
It's gonna be hot garbage. What the frick is wrong with Hollywood? Not everything has to be a universe ffs.
Hollywood and gaming and hell even the WWE are incapable of making new things and just relying on old things over and over
>What the frick is wrong with Hollywood? Not everything has to be a universe ffs.
Shareholders don't like it when you gamble hundreds of millions on something not guaranteed to have maximum market penetration. If people cared, they should've voted an anti-merger political climate into being. That's just how it works.
nutrek has been so successful that star trek conventions aren't a thing anymore.
Covid strikes again
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
I can’t imagine why Paramount is going bankrupt
>>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
and it will involve time travel and the borg of course
if they make a movie out of the book from this that might be cool. sounded like a good book. of course nimoy is dead
Let me guess: you’re one of those Americans with 14% Irish ancestry from 23andme and you have a leprechaun tattoo. Am I close?
let me guess, you're ESL and "dunking" on americans is literally the only joy in your life.
Have it with Scott Bakula as Admiral Archer launching NCC-1701
>Star Trek thread becomes a ukraine war general thread
cool. star trek. the most boring franchise of all time
Discovery movie with black girl magic.
>back to the Prime Timeline
The timeline that was soiled by STD, Picard and SNW? That timeline?
>Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
More soulles cg deageing multiverse crap like The Flash.
It’s gonna be heckin gay
>Starfleet Assemble!
>Endgame-style crossover
C R I N G E
R
I
N
G
E
The MCU truly ruined cinema. Do these absolute morons not understand that there's nowhere to go after a big crossover event?
maybe temporal cold war? we never got a resolution to that.but may be hard to pull off and even harder to sell to the normies after that kelvin universe thing already confused everyone.
Anything involving alternate timelines is just a lame excuse for shitty writing. There, I said it
>Anything involving alternate timelines is just a lame excuse for shitty writing.
>Sliders was my favorite show as a lad
You can frick right off
I also liked her boobies anon, but that’s no excuse for bad writing
>liked her boobies
Why are you even talking about?
Fun fact, Sliders makes GRRM seethe. He thinks they've stolen one of his pitch. They might have been inspired by it but I've read his shit and it isn't that similar.
Don’t play coy anon
Truth
>maybe temporal cold war?
Yep it's that which causes the shit show after 2009 to get wiped from existence
>sabotage wasn't in the third movie!
>yes it was [proof]
>...w-w-well it was in the f-first movie t-too....
Hey homosexual, look at what you wrote:
>sabotage is from the third
Now take the L like the good little moron you are.
it is from the third though.
>car chase
>JJ
>"erm you're talking about the third movie right there!"
Frick off.
9 months ago before the strike, Paramount was saying the new Chris Pine trek movie was a go. What happened to that?
It's a gone.
I mean I'm not bitter about that in the least, but it kind of show you how you can't take Paramount's word for it. They are so disorganized they don't know what's happening with their own franchises.
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
If they want a great crossover they should film the Star Trek: Destiny trilogy
Easily the best thing to come out of Trek since TNG series ended
>Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows
maybe even the andromeda shows up for a brief cameo.
its part of the roddenberryverse after all.
Is andromeda set far enough in the future for that to work?
Andromeda is post not-Federation collapse
No, it's the not too distant future
Next Sunday, AD
Andromeda is set thousands of years into the future
Actually it's the redhead who got fat. And I loved every moment of her gain.
>white woman and zesty homie frick... but in space?
can't wait
Just imagine how fat she'll be by the time the movie starts production. They'll have to use IMAX cameras just so she can fit in the frame.
Filmed in Brosnanvision, the widest possible aspect ratio.
Do these roundmeals taste good? Why would they be in thta form? Is it just a gimmick?
They’re good, in a trashy way.
>bringing back old characters for the special 60th anniversary
that worked perfectly for doctor who, what could go wrong?
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek
Marvel and it's consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
>and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
They haven't understood that since part way through the Enterprise series.
>STAR TREK 14 in development
>Star Trek
Zzzźzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows
OH FOR FRICKSAKE
zazzy
I fricking HATE Star Trek fans. gaygiest fan base on the planet. Remember when the Canadian special victims unit went after that massive group of pedos and they were almost all Trekkies? They made a documentary about it years ago.
Found it: https://www.popmatters.com/050914-startrek-2496108665.html
>Canadians
Well there’s your problem anon
Looking forward to an epic holodeck recreation with Riker that takes place sometime during Picard season 2.
>negresses and fat unfrickable women crying and having constant breakdowns like STD
I’d rather be forced to watch Into Darkness on repeat
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover
I expected nothing and I still ended up disappointed.
Oh my science I'm SHIDDING. I hope 6 Enterprises fight Khan!!!!
I’d rather eat a piece of dogshit than have to watch this grotesque israeli garbage.
Based Trek: The Radical Generation
Star Based: Deep Hate Nein
Star Trek: Based
star trek is
It's being floated because merger talks are in the offing and it's a value IP.
Then I hope the new owners become aware that nobody wants this.
>lets beat Disney by rushing movies to production without a good or worthy-to-make script!
frick moronic execs who play numbers games but dont value an exceptional writer or script over everything else
you deserve to fail when you play DEI democrat number games along with trying to still do "traditional" things
you dont get to have your cake and eat it
frick you moronic lefty execs and lefties without logic
this isnt the thread to talk about it but im finishing TNG
before i search, please tell me the Birthright episodes are some of the most hated episodes in the series.
those episodes seriously made me dislike Worf
Yea the klingon episodes are disliked.
i like the ones where he meet his wife, the whole duras shit and he finaly killing the guy
but every episode with the kid after that was kinda meh
this one was the first one that i can say was bad
what is weird cause the wild west episode was fun atleast
They really didn’t know what they wanted to do with worf by the end, it’s why a relationship with troi came out of nowhere. Luckily they iron out some problems with him by the time he became a cast member on DS9
>>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
oh neat they are finaly bringing kirk back to life outside of a book
hopefully shatner lives enough to see it
what pisses me off is that they never did a romulan redeption arc in the new movie universe
>"in another life we could had been friends"
we finaly got to see the another life and they didnt become friends
That would confuse the dummies movies are meant to appeal to because they only know romulans are bad guy aliens
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
That sounds awful.
Par for course for the current crop of Hollywood executives
BRUNT
F
C
A
It will suck. Guaranteed.
Put me in the screenshot.
If I gain control of Star Trek (good chance btw) then I'm going to make only the TV series and TOS movies canon (TAS included). Then I'll reboot Star Trek with TNG-DS9-VOY crossover movie and lead into a new series called Star Trek: The Prime Directive . Thank me later.
>crossover of all current Star Trek shows
DO.
NOT.
WANT.
Do we need this?
We already get that star trek is only for blacks and women so why do they need to shove it in our faces even more?
None of the garbage they have been making is profitable.
>star trek is only for blacks and women
I'm sorry you feel you need representation in media to enjoy it like some woke sjw. Maybe after your bottom surgery you'll accept things more for what they are.
>Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows
A big Endgame kind of thing would've made sense 20 years ago but general audiences don't give a shit about Star Trek or Picard in 2023 so that wouldn't work.
The best way to do a new Star Trek movie is to just do Star Trek 4 but do it as a 'soft reboot', in so much they treat it like the audience doesn't have to be familiar with the first three movies.
Almost all of Star Trek is a soft reboot, the "plot" is window dressing to telling morality plays, Spacemall not withstanding.
>Almost all of Star Trek is a soft reboot
Star Trek from 1987 - 2005 would disagree with you and that was the highpoint of the entire franchise.
2001. ENT is Nu-Trek
Just because it was shit doesn't mean it was Nu-Trek, anon.
This, NONE of these Hollywood gays realize how much good will marvel built up to do endgame. They all just want to hop right to the avengers without putting in the work of making simple movies to introduce us to likable characters.
Who the frick wants to watch a movie with the characters of modern star trek?
This shit is a cluster frick. I am not watching your woke shows to prepare for a shit movie. Go frick yourself Paramount.
>Who the frick wants to watch a movie with the characters of modern star trek?
me, Ill watch anything with Christina Chong
I like Christina, but there is a limit.
>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
>open tab
>check thread
>Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows and a celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand
>that was Tendi's endgame, ed, celebration of 60 years of the Star Trek brand all along
>zazzy
>close tab
I want to see Goth Trek.
>I want to see Goth Trek.
That was just standard late 1990's fashion
Again, what the frick is the point, star trek has already been tore down and make into a black woman thing, soooo why the frick do they need to beat us over the head with more?
Why?
None of you c**ts can even say.
FRICK that actor.
I think it is funny that Star Trek went from "you cannot kill the crytaline entity."
To
"Some people just have to die."
The Federation has fallen. Billions must die.
stop replying to obvious bait
When you have won yet still attack, that makes you the bad guy.
leave no remnant to continue an eternal insurgency
victory is not sufficient, elimination and replacement is the only answer
riverboat trek is best trek
>>the movie will bring theatrical Star Trek back to the Prime Timeline in the late 24th century
>>the movie is described as an Endgame-style crossover of all current Star Trek shows
Frick the multiverse
I present
W I D E S I S K O
ok BUT
How can the current crop of trek writers work on a movie that "celebrates the brand" when it's painfully apparent they don't understand the brand or the fans?
Random question for you all. Which is more powerful?
>Holodeck
>Holosuite
The Holodeck was on a StarFleet ship while Quark likely upgraded his suites greatly
bampu
Just woke from a dream where Kai Winn walked in on me using a male masturbator that Bashir gave me for prostate health and then scolded me for playing solo not being the will of the prophets. Then began to dominantly use it on me.
Sadly my wife woke me before anything else happened.
How often do Starfleet officers ejaculate? I imagine it's perma-nofap unless they score. Holo-masturbation is frowned upon.
It's going to be so bad. They'll make Michael Burnham the lead. You know it. And it sucks so bad. Because Tarantino wanted to make one. And they wouldn't let him. He wanted to do A Piece of the Action. It would've been great. But they chose to make a bad movie instead.