Russia was America's geopolitical rival, adding Chekhov as a crewmember was intended to show that humanity had grown beyond its internal hatred. It has nothing to do with homosexualry or woke shit.
>Troons are Christian Cucks' political rival, adding Angel as a member was intended to show that humanity had grown beyond its internal hatred. It has nothing to do with homosexualry or woke shit.
star trek is literally a liberal show. It's 60s liberalism so its not disgusting as troony loony modern liberalism. but its frickin liberal don't you know that? I like 60s star trek anyways.
Star Trek is a show that combines traditionally liberal ideas, admiration for the military and military culture, open-mindedness towards other points of view, an intense drive towards exploration and expansion, and overall a generally utopian idea of mankind's potential. Lefties like it sure, but there's a lot to like there for people with all sorts of political views.
>In what way did that show espouse the virtues of laissez faire capitalism and minimal government?
You never heard mention of the government which means it must be hella minimal; and they laissezed the capitalism faire without intervention until it failed on its own merit with no bailout. It didn't faire too well.
He was a cynical addition to get a younger demo. Koenig was picked due to his similarity to Davy Jones. But hey, if you want to think he was a woke casting, go ahead and be a daydream believer.
TOS paid lip-service to liberal values but the vast majority of the actual nitty-gritty of each episode is conservative, traditionalistic and old-school in style if you've actually watched all of TOS and not just watched a video essay on it. Kirk is a self-proclaimed "soldier" and military man first and foremost that quotes the US Constitution and militarily intervenes in foreign conflicts, he is not the ultra-pacifist, tea-sipping homosexual that Picard is.
He's not woke at all you fricking idiot.
in 1967 russians were as hated as troons are now
Russia was America's geopolitical rival, adding Chekhov as a crewmember was intended to show that humanity had grown beyond its internal hatred. It has nothing to do with homosexualry or woke shit.
>Troons are Christian Cucks' political rival, adding Angel as a member was intended to show that humanity had grown beyond its internal hatred. It has nothing to do with homosexualry or woke shit.
Anon has a point here!
star trek is literally a liberal show. It's 60s liberalism so its not disgusting as troony loony modern liberalism. but its frickin liberal don't you know that? I like 60s star trek anyways.
>not disgusting as
a matter of opinion
yes, it is my opinion.
both are disgusting
you just had more time to be dissuaded by the propaganda
Star Trek is a show that combines traditionally liberal ideas, admiration for the military and military culture, open-mindedness towards other points of view, an intense drive towards exploration and expansion, and overall a generally utopian idea of mankind's potential. Lefties like it sure, but there's a lot to like there for people with all sorts of political views.
>towards exploration and expansion
but now we know we wont go past mars, so we must explore our bodies
>It's 60s liberalism
In what way did that show espouse the virtues of laissez faire capitalism and minimal government?
>In what way did that show espouse the virtues of laissez faire capitalism and minimal government?
You never heard mention of the government which means it must be hella minimal; and they laissezed the capitalism faire without intervention until it failed on its own merit with no bailout. It didn't faire too well.
Everything is relative. A 60s liberal would almost certainly be seen as an evil conservative neo-nazi by today's standards.
Funny how you homosexuals move the goal post when it's your thing being targeted lol
what side are you on?
That is extremely woke.
No.
Congratulations for falling for the lamest bait.
>this guy
>not the black female communications officer
uhura was literally a secretary running the phone, so no
having a black woman on a ship doing anything other than cooking was progress at the time.
No. He was casted to cash in on The Monkees craze. They made him a Russian to show in the future, humans have united.
Uhura never saved the day
she was set dressing under male gaze
she saves the men in a TAS ep and shes got some good parts in the movies
so after TOS, making Chekhov the first woke casting
i would argue takei was much more of a diversity hire.
No, because the japanese were subjugated by the bomb, he is like the americans chaufer and we know asians are not good drivers
He was a cynical addition to get a younger demo. Koenig was picked due to his similarity to Davy Jones. But hey, if you want to think he was a woke casting, go ahead and be a daydream believer.
what about the first gay?
also Koenig
He was the homosexual cumming Queen
not the character, who was the first gay character?
no it was Spock entertaining the idea of trusting aliens
since woke didn't exist until after 2011, no clue, as no one watched nutrek.
it was Polically Incorrect back then
>it was endlessly mocked back then
coming from a gay
reminder that ther first interacial kiss was not under consent
TOS paid lip-service to liberal values but the vast majority of the actual nitty-gritty of each episode is conservative, traditionalistic and old-school in style if you've actually watched all of TOS and not just watched a video essay on it. Kirk is a self-proclaimed "soldier" and military man first and foremost that quotes the US Constitution and militarily intervenes in foreign conflicts, he is not the ultra-pacifist, tea-sipping homosexual that Picard is.
>tea-sipping homosexual that Picard is.
dickless Picard?
gay geezers!
No.
not an argument
Hey, I don't always need to explain myself.
We know you are a gay homosexual, so you are exempt, yes.