>Starts his run by making genosha unusable. >ruins the most interesting development of the most interesting villain

>Starts his run by making genosha unusable
>ruins the most interesting development of the most interesting villain
>instead of Magneto The President, he is Magneto the silver age villain twirling his moustache
>Is responsible for muties being endangered species
Why morrison is hailed again? He's the worst writer in the existence, even worse than Bendis

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Agree

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      thank you, have a nice day

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I remember reading Morrison's X-Manifesto that was posted here
    Most dumbest shit I've ever read, for some reason they really loved wanking the X-Men movie

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes, morrison never loved marvel, he hated it, and you could argue that he was sabotaging marvel for dc

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >and you could argue that he was sabotaging marvel for dc
        I've seen that conspiracy theory before, and it's kind of plausible, Morrison did permanently turn one of Marvel's flagship franchises into something much less commercial and profitable, long before any of the "Ike is trying to de-push and cancel X-Men" stuff people complain about had started.

        The issue facing X-Men at the time wasn't rehashing 90s nostalgia, Morrison's run was only 10 years out from Jim Lee, it was that the X-line was spinning its wheels creatively, most of the recent plotlines hadn't drawn much interest or were so drawn out that readers stopped caring, and the thing had become deeply self-referential to the point of new readers being lost. And even then, X-Men wasn't doing that badly in terms of sales for the main books, Adjectiveless and Uncanny were still top ten books pushing 100k per month before Morrison took over. Morrison was actually X-Men editorial realizing they were in a rut and things would only get worse so they brought him on specifically to shake things up.

        I don't know the validity of the story, but I once read that Marvel's corporate side were furious at editorial when the first X-Men film dropped. Marvel had gotten TV Guide to run a short tie-in to serve as an intro the X-Men, and the resulting story was impenetrable to anyone not already following X-Men comics, squandering a major, high-profile advertisement for comics to the general public. That in turn was a major factor in them curtailing all their on-going plotlines and bringing in new writers to have a jump-on point for readers.

        You're right that the books had been in a slow decline for years and something needed to be done, but what they ended up doing was just too drastic a change, and destroyed X-Men as a mainstream cape book.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That’s complete horse shit. Before Morrison jumped ship for Marvel he sued WB for ripping off his Invisibles for the Matrix and swore to never work for DC again. He didn’t go back until Didio offered him a dump truck full of money.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What is this supposed to prove? Because it doesn't prove love for marvel

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It disproves he was trying to sabotage Marvel, dipshit. He may not have liked Marvel as much as DC but he definitely didn’t hate them, Morrison talks about in his book Supergods how he literally wept reading Jean Grey’s death and wrote a weepy letter to Claremont after reading it.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Just to remind you, Grant would have been twenty when Jean Grey died.

              Despite his mishaps and some questionable choices JMS did seem like he liked the character, though.
              Him (and, for that matter, Jenkins) seemed to understand Peter and his appeal better than most writers that came after. Nowadays you just get oversized toddlers who barely can (or want to) write the compelling drama that makes the character appealing and just go for le epic twists and non-stop action (not necessarily good action eitehr).

              I think JMS had a good handle on Peter, I just didn't like most of his plots.

              Morrison's story was that Genosha was destroyed in a matter of minutes, before anyone could possibly have responded, and his entire run barely acknowledges any other superheroes existing at all anyway. If you want to actually get into where other characters were at that time in comics, the Avengers were dealing with Kang's invasion of Earth and multiple wars across the world that he'd started, and the F4 had been stuck in the Negative Zone around the same time.

              Despite Morrison's choice not to involve other Marvel heroes in his run, later writers kept having Emma screech "where were you?" at them and acted like we were meant to agree with her.

              It's worth remembering that Genosha had been a rogue nation and the story immediately before Morrison started was all about Magneto's plan to start a race war against the rest of the world. So most people on Earth would have shed no tears for Genosha.

              It's particularly egregious considering there are several characters who survived Genosha, including Emma, Magneto, and most of the Acolytes, who didn't do jack shit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Just to remind you, Grant would have been twenty when Jean Grey died
                Okay? Have you read Supergods?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I just think it's funny to imagine a guy in college writing a weepy letter because a character in a comic book was killed off.

                16 million mutants and they didn’t have ANY sort of military response ready for a potential attack? They deserved it

                If anyone felt like it, you could write a decent enough handwave in that Genosha had just wrapped up a pretty brutal civil war that depleted its military capabilities and that Mags, who at that point was already needing Polaris to boost his powers, was incapacitated from being stabbed, but that doesn't really explain why people like Exodus or Polaris didn't have an impact.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >but that doesn't really explain why people like Exodus or Polaris didn't have an impact.
                Austen at least tried to explain Polaris as just fleeing in a panic and only managing to save herself, it was a run where he was deliberately trying to make Lorna look bad. Exodus was presumably not even there, he wasn't there in the previous Genosha story.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >It's particularly egregious considering there are several characters who survived Genosha, including Emma, Magneto, and most of the Acolytes, who didn't do jack shit.
                I don't think Grant would have even known who the Acolytes were. He wrote Magneto as injured and in a wheelchair after Logan stabbed him at the end of the previous run, and treated Genosha as totally defenseless without him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >sabotaging marvel for dc
        it's abundantly clear his preference is for DC and its more archetypal gimmicky nonsense, and he's clearly mentally not all there, so it seems plausible to me.
        that said i wonder what a Thor run written by Morrison would be like

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      morrison is an overhyped bum who’s eternal excuse for shit big two books will always be “nooooo editorial wouldn’t let me be me”

      his formulaic drivel is garbage.

      Are these posts by the same person

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        are you trying to say that it's impossible to hate morrison? I mean look at him, what a cute baldy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          So that's a yes, then

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      just read it, god was that cringy
      >let's make the x-men cool and edgy for the kids again

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    morrison is an overhyped bum who’s eternal excuse for shit big two books will always be “nooooo editorial wouldn’t let me be me”

    his formulaic drivel is garbage.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      funny thing is, he had no editorial oversight, which is why his books at marvel sucked. but then again, his animal man run is overrated, I liked the next writer better

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >his animal man run is overrated, I liked the next writer better
        Oh nice, someone else that actually likes post-Morrison, Animal Man! I actually thought his run ended like shit and the final cop-out was lazy as frick. Then again I really liked when it went balls in on the concept of the red and had him become a weird furry that started a sex cult.

        I also like post-Moore Swamp Thing if you're curious.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yet he made the best Batman and Superman stories of the last 30 years.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        because he loves DC and hates Marvel. What part of that you fail to understand. It's easy to make a good superman and batman story, and grant wasn't the only one to do that

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >It's easy to make a good superman and batman story
          Clearly not too easy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what is the Morrison formula?

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Morrison is hailed because he "made the X-Men interesting again". What that boils down to is that X-Editorial at the time were panicing because no one was buying their attempts of rehasing 90s X-Men nostalgia.

    Honestly, the things his run had was creating new aspects of X-Men mythos, like having the institute become a school (something Morrison was barely interested in doing), which other writers were actually able to make interesting. Which is a sad statement in of itself. Morrison is not liked for "making X-Men interesting". He's liked for actualy forcing editorial to try different styles of books.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The issue facing X-Men at the time wasn't rehashing 90s nostalgia, Morrison's run was only 10 years out from Jim Lee, it was that the X-line was spinning its wheels creatively, most of the recent plotlines hadn't drawn much interest or were so drawn out that readers stopped caring, and the thing had become deeply self-referential to the point of new readers being lost. And even then, X-Men wasn't doing that badly in terms of sales for the main books, Adjectiveless and Uncanny were still top ten books pushing 100k per month before Morrison took over. Morrison was actually X-Men editorial realizing they were in a rut and things would only get worse so they brought him on specifically to shake things up.

      I don't know the validity of the story, but I once read that Marvel's corporate side were furious at editorial when the first X-Men film dropped. Marvel had gotten TV Guide to run a short tie-in to serve as an intro the X-Men, and the resulting story was impenetrable to anyone not already following X-Men comics, squandering a major, high-profile advertisement for comics to the general public. That in turn was a major factor in them curtailing all their on-going plotlines and bringing in new writers to have a jump-on point for readers.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I don't know the validity of the story, but I once read that Marvel's corporate side were furious at editorial when the first X-Men film dropped. Marvel had gotten TV Guide to run a short tie-in to serve as an intro the X-Men, and the resulting story was impenetrable to anyone not already following X-Men comics, squandering a major, high-profile advertisement for comics to the general public. That in turn was a major factor in them curtailing all their on-going plotlines and bringing in new writers to have a jump-on point for readers.
        This is true. It’s why Harras got axed and Quesada got the job. What OP isn’t getting is that context is king here, this was in the days before we had a new Marvel movie every week. The X-Men movie was seen as a serious attempt to reach a new audience, something still-in-bankruptcy-marvel desperately needed. And, let me tell you, Marvel comics the month that the first X-Men movie came out were frick awful. X-Men comics were an impenetrable mess that even people who’d been reading x-men comics for years was having a hard time with. The spider-man books were the god-awful Byrne/mackie boring mess. Quesada and Jemas get a lot of shit (sometimes rightfully so) but they were really responsible for pulling Marvel out of not only the bankruptcy gutter but also the creative gutter.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >This is true. It’s why Harras got axed and Quesada got the job.
          Yes and no. It was the official explanation given as to why Harras was fired, but internal leaks talked about it having a lot more to do with the way Ike wanted Marvel run, and with Bill Jemas wanting to play a bigger role in the creative side of Marvel, and wanting an EiC who was on board with his plans.

          >Quesada and Jemas get a lot of shit (sometimes rightfully so) but they were really responsible for pulling Marvel out of not only the bankruptcy gutter but also the creative gutter.
          Honestly a lot of the changes they made were sideways moves in terms of quality, and they hired a lot of talent who didn't like superheroes, didn't want to be writing superheroes, and tried to turn Marvel superhero books into something else entirely. Even Morrison, a guy who loves superheroes, turned X-Men into something else.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Honestly a lot of the changes they made were sideways moves in terms of quality
            Yeah, no. As someone who was reading shit like X-Men and Spider-Man in ‘99/2000 guys like Morrison and Straczynski coming in was a breath of fresh air. There’s nothing wrong with hiring people who “didn’t want to write super heroes”, I’d argue that’s a better move than hiring fanboys. Compare JMS’s run on Spidey to Slott’s.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Despite his mishaps and some questionable choices JMS did seem like he liked the character, though.
              Him (and, for that matter, Jenkins) seemed to understand Peter and his appeal better than most writers that came after. Nowadays you just get oversized toddlers who barely can (or want to) write the compelling drama that makes the character appealing and just go for le epic twists and non-stop action (not necessarily good action eitehr).

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. This. I’d take an actual writer who understands things like character and story structure and drama over a fanboy like Slott who just crashes action figures together and tries to sell it by saying “nothing will ever be the same!!!!”

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Peter, just climb the fricking tree and any bystander will think "huh that guy is fit".

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                JMS Hated OMD, he was forced to write it, and he snucked some shit to tell the readers that he doesn't want any of that

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You can cherry pick JMS Spider-Man as one of the few things that actually worked, but Morrison's X-Men was far from a breath of fresh air, it changed things far too much far too fast, and not in good ways.

              And hiring people who don't want to write superheroes to do the job of writing superheroes, and giving them very little editorial oversight is just as bad as letting fanboys run wild and do whatever they want, it's just a different kind of bad.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >JMS Spider-Man
                >Morrison X-Men
                >Bendis Daredevil
                >the entire Ultimate Universe
                >Johns Avengers
                Look, you can argue about the quality all you want but the fact is that what they did do worked. Marvel was pulled out of bankruptcy, they were succeeding enough to get a loan to make their own fricking movie, and then got bought out by Disney for four billion dollara-doos. Do you really think, if Marvel had continued on the course it was going in the summer of 2000, any of that would have happened?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Marvel was pulled out of bankruptcy by movie money that came flooding in after the first Blade movie proved to Hollywood that there was potential in these characters, they weren't lifted out of bankruptcy by Quesada-era comics selling so much better than late 90s Marvel that it somehow paid off all their debts.

                As for your list, this whole thread is about how bad for Marvel Morrison's X-Men was, Bendis' Daredevil gets more acclaim than it probably deserves, but didn't really sell better than Daredevil usually sells, and Johns' Avengers didn't really move the needle before Jemas' interference drove him away. JMS on Spider-Man and Ultimate Marvel were the two big success stories of the time, and one of those is a line of AU books mostly written by edgelords, it's embarrassing to look back on a lot of it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Quesada and Jemas didn't do the job well, though. It's a miracle that marvel survived. But frankly, the characters WERE THAT GOOD

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Sales literally tripled on Amazing Spider-Man when JMS took over. The Ultimate Universe is, to this day, used as an entry point for casuals.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >X-Men comics were an impenetrable mess
          Is that not true now? I've been wanting to get into contemporary X-Men again after 25, 30 years of not reading comics but it's a nightmare of figuring out what is what. I've been stalking the listings in my free time and after a couple months, this is the best I've come up with-
          >House of X/Powers of X
          >Dawn of X trades Vol. 1-16
          >somewhere around here is X of Swords shit
          >somewhere around here is Hellfire Gala
          >Reign of X trades Vol. 1-14 (?, not sure how many there are)
          >Trials of X trades begin
          And that's likely incomplete. It's full-on asinine with the ______ of X names. It's like trying to discern which order to watch the Resident Evil movies on title alone.
          >Pantomime of X
          >Orange Peel Zest of X
          >Weird Al Yank-of-X
          And none of it tells me how far back I have to go for anything to make sense, how much other stuff I need to get my hands on. I have the Claremont run Masterworks 1-14 so at least I have some runway before this doomed flight takes off.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            homie, just start with #1, are you daft. I preschool kid is capable of getting x-men, but somehow, you need a fricking chart

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Krakoa shit could not be made easier to get into. Just look it up on wikipedia.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I don't understand the timeline. How many Jean Grey deaths in was this?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >How many Jean Grey deaths in was this?
          One. And that one had been retconned to not really be her.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Geniunly the Morrison run fricked X-men harder than any other run. Even the utter stagnation of the 90s was better than what he did.

        That's not entirely true, X-men was still marve's number 1 book, and under Morrison the sales had a dip anyways

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >even worse than Bendis
          now, hol' on there, pardner

          Holy checked.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >hat that boils down to is that X-Editorial at the time were panicing because no one was buying their attempts of rehasing 90s X-Men nostalgia.
      false

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Magneto the silver age villain twirling his moustache
    Good. Same goes for Waid and Doom.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Morrison just clarly never had the same love for Marvel and it's character that he had for DC

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Starts his run by making genosha unusable
    True

    >ruins the most interesting development of the most interesting villain
    True, but they didn't really have anywhere else interesting they were going with it

    >instead of Magneto The President, he is Magneto the silver age villain twirling his moustache.
    True, he was very out of character at that point.

    >Is responsible for muties being endangered species
    What? No. Despite Genosha, Morrison's time with X-Men is when Xavier's school "came out", when mutants were depicted as becoming a subculture, when there started being mutant neighborhoods, when there were mutant international corporations. The growth of mutants under Morrison was something editorial specifically wanted to undo, hence Bendis' House of M and the actual storyline that made them a literal endangered species.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      was his run when "mutants = black people" as a civil rights metaphor got switched to 'mutants = gays"?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The mutant metaphor was for passing israelites, not black people.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You can't forget
    >BRO
    >WHAT IF MUTANTS WERE HATED BECAUSE............
    >EVIL BACTERIA

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      *gasp*

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wait, is Beast back to being hot cat Beast again?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Is responsible for muties being endangered species
    He turned mutant population into millions in the first place

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      only to kill them. brilliant move grant'
      thankfully district x managed to do something interesting, no thanks to you grant

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >only to kill them
        Which had little consequences in his own run. In fact, I'm convinced he didn't conceive Genosha as being 90% of the mutant population.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You gotta understand that Morrison hates Marvel and wants to completely destroy it

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why do no Super Heroes notice when millions of people get wiped out?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Morrison's story was that Genosha was destroyed in a matter of minutes, before anyone could possibly have responded, and his entire run barely acknowledges any other superheroes existing at all anyway. If you want to actually get into where other characters were at that time in comics, the Avengers were dealing with Kang's invasion of Earth and multiple wars across the world that he'd started, and the F4 had been stuck in the Negative Zone around the same time.

      Despite Morrison's choice not to involve other Marvel heroes in his run, later writers kept having Emma screech "where were you?" at them and acted like we were meant to agree with her.

      It's worth remembering that Genosha had been a rogue nation and the story immediately before Morrison started was all about Magneto's plan to start a race war against the rest of the world. So most people on Earth would have shed no tears for Genosha.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I still find it exceptionally stupid that not one of the 16 fricking million mutants could stop one sentinel.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Majority of the mutants have either useless powers or a power that decrease their quality of life. The more important question is why did the powerhouse like Magneto, Polaris, and Exodus did nothing.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I mean even if powerhouse like this only represented 0.001% of the mutant population, that's still over a hundred of the frickers that should have been able to do something.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Polaris freaked out and panicked after she saw a shit ton of people die and was barely able to save herself.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Trying to stop a massive intergalactic war after Kang killed millions of people blowing up both the UN and Washington DC, and was primed to kill far more

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ITT Hickmangays

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    16 million mutants and they didn’t have ANY sort of military response ready for a potential attack? They deserved it

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Why morrison is hailed again? He's the worst writer in the existence, even worse than Bendis
    actual midwit take here

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What if the X-Men but nobody is in character and cheats on everyone else and I have my revoltingly ugly OC's featured all the time (also have Quietly so he can draw everything looking like dogshit) and the bad guy is drugs, also drugs, drugs, drugs, drugs.
    Frick off Morrison. Frick off anyone who likes this one trick pony homosexual troony drug addict.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Quitely is the best comic book artist of this century.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        too bad morrison gives him a bad name

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        According to who? Your fricking seeing eye dog?

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >making love
    Damn Charles, why not give those poor mutants some privacy for the last few moments of their life?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      charles is bald, watchers are bald. coincidence?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Morrison apes certain writers and starts big gay drama with other writers. The X-Men run is only liked because it's Morrison, not because it's good. Tell someone who never read it that it was written by Millar or Bendis and they will shit on it.

    Morrison fanboys are fricking insufferable.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The thing that gets me is that you're expecting me to believe that out of 16+ million mutants, none of them have the power to kill a giant robot?

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Emma always asks "Where were the Avengers," but why are the X-Men sitting in their mansion watching the Genoshan genocide happen given a pass?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The X-men were drinking their wine in their mansion and wondering how they can scapegoat the Avengers and humans for what happened to Genosha despite the fact that it was all orchestrate by Xavier's evil twin sister.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This was before Beast was a shithead. No way he'd let the X-Men scapegoat the Avengers and his bro Wondey.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Beast honestly is more fun in the avengers. With the x-men hes just science man.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Most mutants are more fun when they're allowed to be outside of the X-Men's clutches.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If Cassandra is supposed to Xavier's twin sister why does he look like a guy in his early 50s while she looks like she'll break a hip if the wind blows too hard?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Cassandra is using an Xavier cloned body but modified to be female. Xavier officially had the Five give him a younger body whenever he is resurrected.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Even before then. Everyone forgets that Xavier isn't some doddering grandpa, he's only about 20 years older than O5.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the "first of the second generation" shit was just a way to explain how Apo was the first mutant and that there were a few older than him. But Orando was too dumb to understand that and made some really stupid backstory about mutants living billions of years ago.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cassandra is gonna need to see someone for her back for how hard her psychotic ass is carrying that book.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hank is also just a big cat for no reason. It's pretty stupid

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn't that was because Sage fricked with his X-Gene in X-Treme to save his life and caused a secondary mutation.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh. Maybe? It was still fricking stupid regardless.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That was a retroactive explanation that was written months later. Claremont had originally claimed Beast for his book's cast, but Morrison also wanted him, and had his run begin with Hank having turned into a cat. Claremont had already started writing his book's opening arc, but had to write Hank out by the end of that story, and also used it to set up his turning into a cat, and Morrison didn't even really explain it.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I usually love Morrison but his X-men run just kind of sucks. It feels like it's written by jaded version of himself or something.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What's weird is that mutants in-universe don't really seem to care that much that 16 million mutants just died, it was only AFTER Morrison left that writers retroactively had the X-Men treat the Genosha genocide as a big deal, even though they had them blame humanity in general for it even though it was all Cassandra Nova's fault.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Have they ever been called out on that? Makes no sense

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, logically it should be a 9/11 x holocaust events for mutant, 16 millions is a big number.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        In perspective, Genosha would be the equivalent of the complete depopulation of Wisconsin and Michigan within a few minutes.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          or about a bit under half of Canada

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The entirety of Somalia. The entire metro area of Bangkok, Thailand. New York City, twice.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >even though it was all Cassandra Nova's fault.
      Technically it was the fault of Trask's literal who dentist cousin whom Cassandra talked into committing genocide.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't she just use him to gain access to the facility through backdoor genetic biometrics, then killed him once she was able to replicate his DNA?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          She still needed him to give the order iirc. Didn't even brainwash him, she just talked him into it and he was like "well, maybe genocide isn't so bad".

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >no one expected it
    Sounds like Genosha's defence forces sucked at their job.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *