it went too far, it lost the boobees and the fur is too shaggy like a freshly washed dog
also it confused the background scenery as a branch being held
also I'm not sure the face looks that gorilla like, and sasquatch ears are obscured by hair
Everyone has a high definition camera capable of both pictures and video in their pocket nowadays and yet all we ever get are blurry photos of nothing. If Sasquatch was real there would be new pictures and video coming out constantly, yet we're still discussing the same shit that's been talked about for decades.
actually people have caught sasquatch in HD, but you're not going to see any of it til people are on their deathbeds because they dont want a bunch of tourists or hunters or tv crews roaming on their property
it's only a matter of time though
how many times have YOU been out in the woods?
unless you're out there everyday, you're unlikely to run into one, cause they avoid people and dont hang out near trails
it's unfortunate but understandable when a 10ft apeman that can easily tear you apart is just 50ft away
most people would be scared if they went to the zoo and gorillas escaped from their enclosure
I would continue to film it with a clear aim even if it meant death because I know my body would be found and there would at last be ONE FRICKING GOOD FOOTAGE OF IT.
It's ridiculous that people put this much faith in the existence of a big bipedal monkey but those same people will foam at the mouth at the idea that Almighty God created the universe.
>If Sasquatch was real there would be new pictures and video coming out constantly
There are new videos coming out constantly, they’re just usually dismissed as fake automatically and then memory holed. 4 months on from that train sighting and no one’s taken credit for a hoax and it’s already been forgotten,
>4 months on from that train sighting and no one’s taken credit for a hoax
that one is definitely a hoax though
people know the guy who owns the suit and he does it to attract tourism
Yep. And then it's like they can't even comprehend the notion that an animal could be so elusive that encountering them is far from a common occurrence. There are lots of animals like this across the world. Being that they're partly human, heavily related to us, they're highly intelligent and keep themselves hidden. More moronation I'm sick of hearing is: "There's nothing out there for them to eat!" Are you frickin kiddin me. Deer, for one thing. All over the goddamn place. On top that they'd would omnivores, scavenge and eat anything, and because they're so much more wild, their digestive systems are most likely able to break down stuff us humans can't eat. Hell they probably eat all kinds of fresh green leaves, like deer do, like other apes and monkeys do.
>notion that an animal could be so elusive
What really makes the existence of bigfoot or other cryptids so unlikely is that yes, the creature itself could be good at hiding from you, but it would still leave an impact on its environment across a wide territory. You would find evidence of it like tracks, and shit, and the remnants of whatever they eat, and remains of any tool use or shelter/nest building etc. We don't find such environmental evidence for cryptids and it makes no sense that a large animal would be there and spend so much time doing such a perfect job of cleaning up after itself that it stays undetected
This but unironically.
Do an image search for those alleged bigfoot footprints and there's such a variety of results, all looking so different that they couldn't possibly be made by the same animal
3 months ago
Anonymous
Well that’s not a great argument, clearly people can misidentify prints and most bigfoot prints seem to be bear prints or just xl human fakes (we can spot differences in our own ancestors footprints, if bigfoot is a separate primate he will have something other than just xeroxed 150% human feet).
However! There’s still some chance of a real print being among those footprints or just not found of course. Most people’s tracking ability is zilch.
>You would find evidence of it like tracks, and shit, and the remnants of whatever they eat, and remains of any tool use or shelter/nest building etc
tons of that has been found, even bigfoot hairs and blood has been found and tested, but nobody cares
people want a body, lots of HD footage or to see one in a zoo
>even bigfoot hairs and blood
Whenever I look into this stuff it always turns out to be something else. Is this legit or just 'wooah, this things kinda different'?
3 months ago
Anonymous
blood/dna is some kind of unidentified primate that is quite similar to humans, been sequenced a few times, but they dont know too much about it other than that and science wont accept a bigfoot blood sample so that's that
hairs are different in structure, they do not taper and dna is only found in the folicle, unlike other hairs
The ultimate cope is introducing literal invisibility and dimension skipping. Yes that’s seriously something that happens in the bigfoot community.
It’s like flat earth or scientology, you just keep digging deeper
I always get a kick out of their rationale. >there have been thousands of sightings, DNA testing, footprints, real photos and videos, even bigfoot nests are commonly found
Then also >they turn invisible when spooked and are from a different dimension so of course we dont have hard evidence
3 months ago
Anonymous
To be fair those arguments are defended by different groups of people. The esoteric branch and the naturalist one aren't the same.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Youre replying to a reverse-shill dude, just filter
Yep. And then it's like they can't even comprehend the notion that an animal could be so elusive that encountering them is far from a common occurrence. There are lots of animals like this across the world. Being that they're partly human, heavily related to us, they're highly intelligent and keep themselves hidden. More moronation I'm sick of hearing is: "There's nothing out there for them to eat!" Are you frickin kiddin me. Deer, for one thing. All over the goddamn place. On top that they'd would omnivores, scavenge and eat anything, and because they're so much more wild, their digestive systems are most likely able to break down stuff us humans can't eat. Hell they probably eat all kinds of fresh green leaves, like deer do, like other apes and monkeys do.
Not to mention that they might have senses of hearing and smell so much better than ours that, coupled with full-timing innawoods, they can literally smell our tech.
morons. Sasquatch isn't real because of basic facts concerning biological functions. If something that big really wandered the wilds, we would know it existed before ever even seeing it. An animal that large would need lots of space and food sources. So far nothing has been found.
> need lots of space and food sources
Ever been to the Pacific Northwest? Or are you still at your parent's house? >So far nothing has been found
What, like a corpse? No one has found the body of Alexander the Great or Amelia Earhart. I guess they didn't exist either.
There is sooooooo much forested land in California and Oregon, really dense forests with absolutely no roads. I've been to humboldt county CA, it's an extremely dense forest up there, probably areas of that forest that no one has ever seen...
Ah yes, I love it when I see real videos of "wild animals" and immediately all I can think of is how fricking fake and unnatural they look. Oh wait, maybe that's just a conman in a shittu cheap suit >these morons who made this video literally said they were going out into the wilderness to film a hoax
This is a good example of why shakycam became such a meme in horror. You can’t see how fake and gay the effect is from a blurry handheld. It’s real obvious on steadycam.
Reminded that Planet of the Apes was released in the same year as the PG film, and picrel is the best monkey suit that the greatest costume designers and special effects creatives in a big budget Hollywood produced studio could create.
The creature in the PG film has visible musculature move under its skin/fur, its gait is fundamentally nonhuman and the limb to torso proportions are inconsistent with that of a human.
The best and brightest Hollywood designers with unlimited budget could just glue prosthetics and fur to the faces and arms of the actors playing monkeys, they couldn't design some internal contraption to simulate musculature movement.
Uhm actually chud, the PG film is fake as f*uck and is just a human in a monkey suit. I can tell cause it looks like a man wearing a suit, cause after all we know that the only anthropomorphic beings in the world are humans, every other living being doesnt walk on two legs like that
Except Planet of the Apes isn't meant to show wild animals that are 7 feet tall. The Apes are groomed, with styled hair, and have clothing on covering most of their bodies so you wouldn't see "musculature." It's simply more probable that a guy going out to the woods to, by his own admission, film a bigfoot movie, would have prepared a believable bigfoot costume rather than him actually stumbling across and filming by PURE coincidence the only bigfoot footage.
the point of the effects in planet of the apes was to allow the actors to emote and be expressive in closeups. the point of the patterson gimlin suit was to look okay from far away while being filmed on out of focus super 8 while the cameraman had a seizure. what you're calling "musculature" is simply the blurring caused by the camera being yanked around by a person having a seizure.
>NTA but the most notable DNA example that was handwaved was from a bed of nails that a bigfoot stepped on and bled over. >Some people were staying in a cabin in the middle of bumfrick and one night huge rocks start getting tossed through their window and horrible screams, then the next morning they find this upside down table with nails with a gigantic bloody footprint on it. >Then YEARS later after reporting this some scientists went to get the table with the footprint and they found literal monkey DNA except they said there was a 1 /40,000 chance that it could be human if they had severe mutations like messed up chromosomes and shit so the consensus was it was a 9-foot tall mutated ugly dude from the goonies on meth 600 miles away from the nearest human settlement in the middle of the mountains.
Your totally frickin wrong because we have video stabilization now.
Threadly reminder that these morons were actually trying to film some bigfoot and they found it the first day after a few hours walking around and literally a mile from a parking lot.
Uhm... How...lucky. And convenient
actually people have caught sasquatch in HD, but you're not going to see any of it til people are on their deathbeds because they dont want a bunch of tourists or hunters or tv crews roaming on their property
it's only a matter of time though
how many times have YOU been out in the woods?
unless you're out there everyday, you're unlikely to run into one, cause they avoid people and dont hang out near trails
>all these seething troons
Yeah so what he snapped his forearms in half so he could have long ass arms that bend? Or maybe they were robot arms. Not to mention that quick head turn.
Only recently did I read about the entire incident. Apparently, they were following, running after "bigfoot" for maybe a couple of miles before this footage was taken. At some point one of them even got, something like, 7 meters(25 feet) away from it.
In more than a decade of hiking, and seeing all sorts of animals in the wild, never did I see an animal walk away so nonchalantly, after supposedly being hunted for miles. Especially not one that's famously elusive and impossible to catch.
This is the only feasible board to have discussions about interesting stuff. /misc/ is deranged and /x/ is scarily dysfunctional. Cinemaphile is the remnant of what I consider "old Cinemaphile".
I half suspect Ari wanted to make a legit serious bigfoot movie and instead felt pressured to make it a comedy. I'm probably wrong. The way Eisenberg and the cast talked about it made it seem like they were making a serious movie though.
I just dont think this stuff is good because it continues to treat sasquatch as a joke and set up people's expectations for what a sasquatch face looks like
people end up treating this crap as reality and frame of reference
>the moment I see the humping
oh... >see the wood knocking shot where they stupidly hit trees in a group
Okay... dumb but possibly Wes Anderson esque enough to work as a fun movie.
Still somewhat bummed we may never have a serious bigfoot movie.
>world shuts down for coof >Donald Trump no longer the president everyone opens back up and forgets it even happened >this movie is real
The 2020s are hilarious.
>Patterson's expensive ($369) 16 mm camera had been rented on May 13 from photographer Harold Mattson at Sheppard's Camera Shop in Yakima, but he had kept it longer than the contract had stipulated, and an arrest warrant had been issued for him on October 17; he was arrested within weeks of his return from Bluff Creek. After Patterson returned the camera in working order, this charge was dismissed, in 1969.
Why not shoot on Super8?
These sounds of Bigfoot communicating were caught at night by guys camping up in the mountains over 50 years ago.
It's great audio. I'm still sceptical, but can't think what else it might be, some of the noises are almost demon like
wait... so Patterson was a writer and he wrote a book about bigfoot and then he was a ble to videorecord bigfoot? o wow, what a coincidence... i truly believe it 100,000 %
Patterson conducted a variety of interviews with witnesses, and he asked them to draw what they observed, which he than used as inspiration for his own versions in order to help tell their tales. Normal behavior, and certainly not conclusive evidence of a "hoax".
NTA but the most notable DNA example that was handwaved was from a bed of nails that a bigfoot stepped on and bled over.
Some people were staying in a cabin in the middle of bumfrick and one night huge rocks start getting tossed through their window and horrible screams, then the next morning they find this upside down table with nails with a gigantic bloody footprint on it.
Then YEARS later after reporting this some scientists went to get the table with the footprint and they found literal monkey DNA except they said there was a 1 /40,000 chance that it could be human if they had severe mutations like messed up chromosomes and shit so the consensus was it was a 9-foot tall mutated ugly dude from the goonies on meth 600 miles away from the nearest human settlement in the middle of the mountains.
also throwing this out there: Monster Quest is a K I N O series
3 months ago
Anonymous
No offense but do you have anything that's not a YouTube video
3 months ago
Anonymous
>History channel show
Jesus christ lmao
It’s not a YouTube video it’s an episode of monster quest, that show existed long before fricking YouTube.
Michael Trachtengert I believe is the guy who got attacked.
I’m sure you can read more about this somewhere I posted this episode because I know they go over the bed of nails blood tests.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Have you ever looked into the evidence mentioned on the history channel or are you satisfied with the history channel being enough evidence?
3 months ago
Anonymous
keep moving the goalposts, shill
3 months ago
Anonymous
Is that a yes or a no?
3 months ago
Anonymous
shill for what?
Ask a bigfoot believer and you always get shit like >humans don't move like that! >the footprints are are real!
but then you ask them for proof and they just tell you to trust the science. Embarrassing.
Not an argument. You gonna debunk the DNA tests and find our 9-foot tall mutated perp because he has 2 counts of attempted murder, if he’s not a bigfoot.
And why does the left consider male children to be women but has a panic attack when bigfoot DNA is discovered?
3 months ago
Anonymous
I'm more right wing then you could ever be you schizo moron
You're so stupid you don't realize the point you're making is that believing in bigfoot is like believing trannies are women.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I’m not even claiming bigfoot is 100% real but you’re ignorant if you intentionally ignore all these unexplainable phenomena.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Such as
3 months ago
Anonymous
shill for what?
3 months ago
Anonymous
The big government conspiracy that's keeping bigfoot a secret for some unknown reason
>Went out in costumes to film a "bigfoot movie" >just happened to spot one and film it
If you wanted to film a bigfoot movie, wouldn't you need a costume for that?
also >Release a book a year before seeing your out bigfoot about how hot female bigfoots are
Patterson was a hoaxer and slimy but his taste in big hairy women was based as frick
Yeah he couldnt have ever seen bigfoot prior to making the PG tape. I personally brought filming equipment back in the 70's everywhere I went. It was the style at the time. That explains why Patterson brought filming equipment to some desolate area of a forest. No way in hell he ever came across a bigfoot - the same bigfoot - in that area previously and sought to capture it on film as proof.
>I personally brought filming equipment back in the 70's everywhere I went. It was the style at the time.
Is that why Patterson's filming equipment was so expensive he took out a loan for it beforehand?
but sure, everyone was walking around with film cameras in the 70s, not including the tripod mount he had time to set up and use.
Indeed, it was totally by chance that he saw a bigfoot while lugging that equipment around. Totally has nothing to do with receiving prior reports about the bigfoot creature from others or his own past experiences.
>jews on wikipedia say bigfoot is fake! they also say male children are women! hail Science!
There’s ~~*“””science”””*~~ and science. (Actual) science can’t debunk the dermal ridges found on the Patterson Gimlin casts decades after the footage was released or these injuries similar to human injuries found on similar casts. On these casts no one knew the foot had an injury until an anthropologist was like oh this guy had a case of “bumble foot” or whatever the disease was decades after the fact.
Ask a bigfoot believer and you always get shit like >humans don't move like that! >the footprints are are real!
but then you ask them for proof and they just tell you to trust the science. Embarrassing.
>Patterson goes into the woods to film a bigfoot movie >gets into costumes with his friend >they happen to film a real bigfoot
Okay
where's the bigfoot suit for their movie? why when gimlin pulled out a gun to shoot did patterson freak out and say not to?
Sounds like patterson filmed this for their movie, rewatched it, and thought "this could fool a ton of people" and just went with it
because it's an interdimensional being and thats really gonna frick up some worldviews. we need them to fight the jellyfish ufo's when they mount their invasion.
he monke
Looks like shit. Patty looks nothing like that
It fricked up the entire face.
booba too small
oh wow
>upscaled with AI
lmfaooooo
inb4 knees and angles
it went too far, it lost the boobees and the fur is too shaggy like a freshly washed dog
also it confused the background scenery as a branch being held
also I'm not sure the face looks that gorilla like, and sasquatch ears are obscured by hair
Everyone has a high definition camera capable of both pictures and video in their pocket nowadays and yet all we ever get are blurry photos of nothing. If Sasquatch was real there would be new pictures and video coming out constantly, yet we're still discussing the same shit that's been talked about for decades.
They died out in the 90s-00s
Last viable colony died in the Mt. St Helens lava tubes.
actually people have caught sasquatch in HD, but you're not going to see any of it til people are on their deathbeds because they dont want a bunch of tourists or hunters or tv crews roaming on their property
it's only a matter of time though
how many times have YOU been out in the woods?
unless you're out there everyday, you're unlikely to run into one, cause they avoid people and dont hang out near trails
if you've ever cleared trees, you'll know these sounds are legit and that thing is strong
>runs away as soon as it stands up
*sigh*
it's unfortunate but understandable when a 10ft apeman that can easily tear you apart is just 50ft away
most people would be scared if they went to the zoo and gorillas escaped from their enclosure
I would continue to film it with a clear aim even if it meant death because I know my body would be found and there would at last be ONE FRICKING GOOD FOOTAGE OF IT.
good for you but i'd say 99% of us are choosing life bro
Sasquatch isn't a skunk ape. Those are two different things.
Once cloaking suits become mainstream it's over for squaches
They’ll still be able to smell us.
Maybe. They have scent masking sprays NOW though
they have telepathic awareness of recording devices
It's ridiculous that people put this much faith in the existence of a big bipedal monkey but those same people will foam at the mouth at the idea that Almighty God created the universe.
>If Sasquatch was real there would be new pictures and video coming out constantly
There are new videos coming out constantly, they’re just usually dismissed as fake automatically and then memory holed. 4 months on from that train sighting and no one’s taken credit for a hoax and it’s already been forgotten,
>4 months on from that train sighting and no one’s taken credit for a hoax
that one is definitely a hoax though
people know the guy who owns the suit and he does it to attract tourism
Sasquatch hiding israelite shill
it's fake man
too lanky, limb proportions are human
bigfoots are real, but that video sure aint one
/x/
Yep. And then it's like they can't even comprehend the notion that an animal could be so elusive that encountering them is far from a common occurrence. There are lots of animals like this across the world. Being that they're partly human, heavily related to us, they're highly intelligent and keep themselves hidden. More moronation I'm sick of hearing is: "There's nothing out there for them to eat!" Are you frickin kiddin me. Deer, for one thing. All over the goddamn place. On top that they'd would omnivores, scavenge and eat anything, and because they're so much more wild, their digestive systems are most likely able to break down stuff us humans can't eat. Hell they probably eat all kinds of fresh green leaves, like deer do, like other apes and monkeys do.
>notion that an animal could be so elusive
What really makes the existence of bigfoot or other cryptids so unlikely is that yes, the creature itself could be good at hiding from you, but it would still leave an impact on its environment across a wide territory. You would find evidence of it like tracks, and shit, and the remnants of whatever they eat, and remains of any tool use or shelter/nest building etc. We don't find such environmental evidence for cryptids and it makes no sense that a large animal would be there and spend so much time doing such a perfect job of cleaning up after itself that it stays undetected
Yeah nobody ever finds bigfoot footprints good point.
Finally an expert on the topic. Thank you for your much needed input.
This but unironically.
Do an image search for those alleged bigfoot footprints and there's such a variety of results, all looking so different that they couldn't possibly be made by the same animal
Well that’s not a great argument, clearly people can misidentify prints and most bigfoot prints seem to be bear prints or just xl human fakes (we can spot differences in our own ancestors footprints, if bigfoot is a separate primate he will have something other than just xeroxed 150% human feet).
However! There’s still some chance of a real print being among those footprints or just not found of course. Most people’s tracking ability is zilch.
Sure thing moron
>You would find evidence of it like tracks, and shit, and the remnants of whatever they eat, and remains of any tool use or shelter/nest building etc
tons of that has been found, even bigfoot hairs and blood has been found and tested, but nobody cares
people want a body, lots of HD footage or to see one in a zoo
>even bigfoot hairs and blood
Whenever I look into this stuff it always turns out to be something else. Is this legit or just 'wooah, this things kinda different'?
blood/dna is some kind of unidentified primate that is quite similar to humans, been sequenced a few times, but they dont know too much about it other than that and science wont accept a bigfoot blood sample so that's that
hairs are different in structure, they do not taper and dna is only found in the folicle, unlike other hairs
They have never found any hair or blood
What a weird body.
Would.
Are they so elusive that they are hardly ever seen or are new videos coming out constantly? Pick one
The ultimate cope is introducing literal invisibility and dimension skipping. Yes that’s seriously something that happens in the bigfoot community.
It’s like flat earth or scientology, you just keep digging deeper
I always get a kick out of their rationale.
>there have been thousands of sightings, DNA testing, footprints, real photos and videos, even bigfoot nests are commonly found
Then also
>they turn invisible when spooked and are from a different dimension so of course we dont have hard evidence
To be fair those arguments are defended by different groups of people. The esoteric branch and the naturalist one aren't the same.
Youre replying to a reverse-shill dude, just filter
>flat earth ... you just keep digging deeper
That reminds me, what do flat earthers believe about underground? does it just keep going infinitely?
where are the skeletons? where are the fossil remains? where's the scat?
Other bigfoot collect them and hide them/bury them you moron.
They most likely bury their dead. Like we do.
Excellent point.
Not to mention that they might have senses of hearing and smell so much better than ours that, coupled with full-timing innawoods, they can literally smell our tech.
morons. Sasquatch isn't real because of basic facts concerning biological functions. If something that big really wandered the wilds, we would know it existed before ever even seeing it. An animal that large would need lots of space and food sources. So far nothing has been found.
> need lots of space and food sources
Ever been to the Pacific Northwest? Or are you still at your parent's house?
>So far nothing has been found
What, like a corpse? No one has found the body of Alexander the Great or Amelia Earhart. I guess they didn't exist either.
There is sooooooo much forested land in California and Oregon, really dense forests with absolutely no roads. I've been to humboldt county CA, it's an extremely dense forest up there, probably areas of that forest that no one has ever seen...
Is that Kate?
Stablized version is much more interesting than this AI slop
yeh this one make it look pretty obvious it's a guy in a suit walking
Ah yes, I love it when I see real videos of "wild animals" and immediately all I can think of is how fricking fake and unnatural they look. Oh wait, maybe that's just a conman in a shittu cheap suit
>these morons who made this video literally said they were going out into the wilderness to film a hoax
That suit was impossible to make
How do I do something like this?
First you’re gonna need to grow a lot of hair.
>people still think Bigfoot is real
Big foot. More like Titfood
This is a good example of why shakycam became such a meme in horror. You can’t see how fake and gay the effect is from a blurry handheld. It’s real obvious on steadycam.
Reminded that Planet of the Apes was released in the same year as the PG film, and picrel is the best monkey suit that the greatest costume designers and special effects creatives in a big budget Hollywood produced studio could create.
The creature in the PG film has visible musculature move under its skin/fur, its gait is fundamentally nonhuman and the limb to torso proportions are inconsistent with that of a human.
The best and brightest Hollywood designers with unlimited budget could just glue prosthetics and fur to the faces and arms of the actors playing monkeys, they couldn't design some internal contraption to simulate musculature movement.
Uhm actually chud, the PG film is fake as f*uck and is just a human in a monkey suit. I can tell cause it looks like a man wearing a suit, cause after all we know that the only anthropomorphic beings in the world are humans, every other living being doesnt walk on two legs like that
>musculature movement
Never reproduce.
Except Planet of the Apes isn't meant to show wild animals that are 7 feet tall. The Apes are groomed, with styled hair, and have clothing on covering most of their bodies so you wouldn't see "musculature." It's simply more probable that a guy going out to the woods to, by his own admission, film a bigfoot movie, would have prepared a believable bigfoot costume rather than him actually stumbling across and filming by PURE coincidence the only bigfoot footage.
the point of the effects in planet of the apes was to allow the actors to emote and be expressive in closeups. the point of the patterson gimlin suit was to look okay from far away while being filmed on out of focus super 8 while the cameraman had a seizure. what you're calling "musculature" is simply the blurring caused by the camera being yanked around by a person having a seizure.
>NTA but the most notable DNA example that was handwaved was from a bed of nails that a bigfoot stepped on and bled over.
>Some people were staying in a cabin in the middle of bumfrick and one night huge rocks start getting tossed through their window and horrible screams, then the next morning they find this upside down table with nails with a gigantic bloody footprint on it.
>Then YEARS later after reporting this some scientists went to get the table with the footprint and they found literal monkey DNA except they said there was a 1 /40,000 chance that it could be human if they had severe mutations like messed up chromosomes and shit so the consensus was it was a 9-foot tall mutated ugly dude from the goonies on meth 600 miles away from the nearest human settlement in the middle of the mountains.
Your totally frickin wrong because we have video stabilization now.
Presidential.
anyone else see this and think
>that's way too humanlike to be a monkey
it's literally just a guy in a monkey suit, it's so fricking obvious
lmao this is so fake. literally a guy in monkey suit
has yet to be debunked btw
>I know better than practical FX experts who say it's impossible! I so smart!
literally the average American male build
did boomers really fall for this shit
>this Bigfoot had some big ol tilbitties.
>bigfoot can look right into the camera…
You can clearly see a crease being formed on the thigh, he is probably wearing something like fishing waders underneath the monkey suit
Threadly reminder that these morons were actually trying to film some bigfoot and they found it the first day after a few hours walking around and literally a mile from a parking lot.
Uhm... How...lucky. And convenient
>all these seething troons
Yeah so what he snapped his forearms in half so he could have long ass arms that bend? Or maybe they were robot arms. Not to mention that quick head turn.
Only recently did I read about the entire incident. Apparently, they were following, running after "bigfoot" for maybe a couple of miles before this footage was taken. At some point one of them even got, something like, 7 meters(25 feet) away from it.
In more than a decade of hiking, and seeing all sorts of animals in the wild, never did I see an animal walk away so nonchalantly, after supposedly being hunted for miles. Especially not one that's famously elusive and impossible to catch.
Just something that I thought was strange.
>omg this is so fake lolz!
explain this then. https://youtu.be/7FAydEpJVM8?si=d1VgHhwnGi-8NPLX
>triggered because people point out the obvious and laugh at morons
whats it like having Black person tier IQ?
explain it. right now
explain what? a funny looking bear has evidence for it's existance, and bigfoot is clearly a fatass in a costume.
EXPLAIN THE BEAR YOU FRICKING homosexual! EXPLAIN IT RIGHWRT NOW! RIGHTHE FRICKIGNG NOWR!!
HMMMMM NOT EWXPLAINING HMMM?!!?!
exactly
I kneel, you're too powerful
what kind of slim black chinese president is that
>this made boomers shit and piss and cum their pants in fear
I like the tasteful turn to the camera for two seconds. This is such bullshit.
fascinating, if only someone was brave enough to go live up there for a year with a camera, a shed full of canned food and starlink
>still no audio/podcast board
Where am I supposed to post to post?
This is the only feasible board to have discussions about interesting stuff. /misc/ is deranged and /x/ is scarily dysfunctional. Cinemaphile is the remnant of what I consider "old Cinemaphile".
>/misc/ is deranged
/rad/ idea
AI doesn't have actual bigfoot photos to train off. Can't be trusted.
Nobody understands how “a.I” geeation works, don’t bother
Where is the Sasquatch Sunset thread? Jesse Esisenberg and trailer is out.
wtf would anyone watch that?
if it doesn't teach people about the reality of sasquatch encounters it's trash
harry and the hendersons is better
I half suspect Ari wanted to make a legit serious bigfoot movie and instead felt pressured to make it a comedy. I'm probably wrong. The way Eisenberg and the cast talked about it made it seem like they were making a serious movie though.
I bet it’s “serious” in the sense that it’s a humorous examination of the human condition but we Squatch.
Why do people insist that bigfoot is real? I have literally met bigfoot in person and he HIMSELF admitted that he wasn't real.
>upscaled
that's completely made up details like that fricked up hand holding the branch
>that's completely made up details like that fricked up hand holding the branch
This. Op has subhuman intelligence.
>they can't accept the authenticity of any photograph no matter how clear.
also they have no idea what a real bigfoot looks like, so they can't tell
I just dont think this stuff is good because it continues to treat sasquatch as a joke and set up people's expectations for what a sasquatch face looks like
people end up treating this crap as reality and frame of reference
>the moment I see the humping
oh...
>see the wood knocking shot where they stupidly hit trees in a group
Okay... dumb but possibly Wes Anderson esque enough to work as a fun movie.
Still somewhat bummed we may never have a serious bigfoot movie.
>Still somewhat bummed we may never have a serious bigfoot movie.
when AI gets good, it'll happen
So now Sasquatch has to be Lovecraftian, just like aliens?
>world shuts down for coof
>Donald Trump no longer the president everyone opens back up and forgets it even happened
>this movie is real
The 2020s are hilarious.
has anyone been able to find out what music that is from the trailer?
>Patterson's expensive ($369) 16 mm camera had been rented on May 13 from photographer Harold Mattson at Sheppard's Camera Shop in Yakima, but he had kept it longer than the contract had stipulated, and an arrest warrant had been issued for him on October 17; he was arrested within weeks of his return from Bluff Creek. After Patterson returned the camera in working order, this charge was dismissed, in 1969.
Why not shoot on Super8?
He didn’t want to get sued for retroactive plagiarism by JarJar Abrams.
No corpse ever found? Doesn't exist.
They evolved to have no bones to avoid detection. I’m pursuing a similar strategy.
This is often repeated but it doesn't make it any less dumb and short-sighted.
no interesting recordings of anything will seem real ever again
>Bigfoot went from a primate in the woods to an inter-dimensional being that can travel through space time
My favorite is the tulpa hypothesis.
enhance...
You got me fricker
image stabilisation confirms it is a human in a suit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q60mSMmhTZU
Mind showing me this suit? Or better yet, show me a suit today that is as realistic as the one allegedly in the PG film
>bigfoot have tree branches for hands
Amazing.
?si=M0IN37Zm_067a9s6
These sounds of Bigfoot communicating were caught at night by guys camping up in the mountains over 50 years ago.
It's great audio. I'm still sceptical, but can't think what else it might be, some of the noises are almost demon like
Big if true
Fricking spooky as hell.
at least we can all agree that UFOs are very much real
sure as long as you don't claim them to be alien space craft
Patterson drew a female bigfoot a year before his hoax
Wow what a scandal. have a nice day "skeptic" homosexual coward.
Go back to /x/
you reddit Black personr ruined that board and turned it in to a troony and fur gay enclave.
wait... so Patterson was a writer and he wrote a book about bigfoot and then he was a ble to videorecord bigfoot? o wow, what a coincidence... i truly believe it 100,000 %
Patterson conducted a variety of interviews with witnesses, and he asked them to draw what they observed, which he than used as inspiration for his own versions in order to help tell their tales. Normal behavior, and certainly not conclusive evidence of a "hoax".
this one's awesome
now check how the msm covered it (3 dogshit still pics of blobs)
It's interesting how Patterson died just a few years after this and Gimlin is still alive.
For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.
All I need is physical evidence. One bone would be proof
There are bones but they always get dismissed or memoryholed
Link a bone that's been tested to be of Bigfoot origin
NTA but the most notable DNA example that was handwaved was from a bed of nails that a bigfoot stepped on and bled over.
Some people were staying in a cabin in the middle of bumfrick and one night huge rocks start getting tossed through their window and horrible screams, then the next morning they find this upside down table with nails with a gigantic bloody footprint on it.
Then YEARS later after reporting this some scientists went to get the table with the footprint and they found literal monkey DNA except they said there was a 1 /40,000 chance that it could be human if they had severe mutations like messed up chromosomes and shit so the consensus was it was a 9-foot tall mutated ugly dude from the goonies on meth 600 miles away from the nearest human settlement in the middle of the mountains.
I remember that one.
Source?
hol up I gotchu
also throwing this out there: Monster Quest is a K I N O series
No offense but do you have anything that's not a YouTube video
It’s not a YouTube video it’s an episode of monster quest, that show existed long before fricking YouTube.
Michael Trachtengert I believe is the guy who got attacked.
I’m sure you can read more about this somewhere I posted this episode because I know they go over the bed of nails blood tests.
Have you ever looked into the evidence mentioned on the history channel or are you satisfied with the history channel being enough evidence?
keep moving the goalposts, shill
Is that a yes or a no?
Not an argument. You gonna debunk the DNA tests and find our 9-foot tall mutated perp because he has 2 counts of attempted murder, if he’s not a bigfoot.
And why does the left consider male children to be women but has a panic attack when bigfoot DNA is discovered?
I'm more right wing then you could ever be you schizo moron
You're so stupid you don't realize the point you're making is that believing in bigfoot is like believing trannies are women.
I’m not even claiming bigfoot is 100% real but you’re ignorant if you intentionally ignore all these unexplainable phenomena.
Such as
shill for what?
The big government conspiracy that's keeping bigfoot a secret for some unknown reason
>History channel show
Jesus christ lmao
They did a massive test of Bigfoot hairs and it all turned out to be bear and cow hair
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100498/
>Went out in costumes to film a "bigfoot movie"
>just happened to spot one and film it
If you wanted to film a bigfoot movie, wouldn't you need a costume for that?
also
>Release a book a year before seeing your out bigfoot about how hot female bigfoots are
Patterson was a hoaxer and slimy but his taste in big hairy women was based as frick
Yeah he couldnt have ever seen bigfoot prior to making the PG tape. I personally brought filming equipment back in the 70's everywhere I went. It was the style at the time. That explains why Patterson brought filming equipment to some desolate area of a forest. No way in hell he ever came across a bigfoot - the same bigfoot - in that area previously and sought to capture it on film as proof.
Why is he the only one if it was so common to bring film equipment everywhere?
>I personally brought filming equipment back in the 70's everywhere I went. It was the style at the time.
Is that why Patterson's filming equipment was so expensive he took out a loan for it beforehand?
but sure, everyone was walking around with film cameras in the 70s, not including the tripod mount he had time to set up and use.
Indeed, it was totally by chance that he saw a bigfoot while lugging that equipment around. Totally has nothing to do with receiving prior reports about the bigfoot creature from others or his own past experiences.
Why did he go out there in costume to film a bigfoot movie, then?
he clearly wasn't out there hunting for the thing.
He was trying to pull a Fossey.
Would
Bob Gymlan bros...we have PROOF.
Bigfoot (real)
It’s a real “big foot” but it’s more comically convenient that the world thinks it’s fake.
Seeing isn’t actually believing. AI is going to put out some convincing stuff. Careful.
>upscaled
You mean add a “character from a 2002 dreamworks movie” filter.
If you try to make bigfoot AI in Dall-E it almost always copies the mid-walk pose from this footage
Fake detail
Fake costume
Fake creature
>jews on wikipedia say bigfoot is fake! they also say male children are women! hail Science!
There’s ~~*“””science”””*~~ and science. (Actual) science can’t debunk the dermal ridges found on the Patterson Gimlin casts decades after the footage was released or these injuries similar to human injuries found on similar casts. On these casts no one knew the foot had an injury until an anthropologist was like oh this guy had a case of “bumble foot” or whatever the disease was decades after the fact.
>words words words
Kys schizo boomer
Ok, insane troony that wasn’t a meme or joke I was conveying information.
My uncle took this back in 82
But who took the picture?
Same.
hold on... 2 ur butts...
A rare pic of both sides of the secret war.
>there are people who 100% really believe this shit
Ask a bigfoot believer and you always get shit like
>humans don't move like that!
>the footprints are are real!
but then you ask them for proof and they just tell you to trust the science. Embarrassing.
I fricking hate AI and I hate modern progress. I wish solar storm will come and erase everything. I want to see all tech trannies seethe and cry
Bigfoot sure gets around
he has a wide gait.
>implying theres just one
>Patterson goes into the woods to film a bigfoot movie
>gets into costumes with his friend
>they happen to film a real bigfoot
Okay
where's the bigfoot suit for their movie? why when gimlin pulled out a gun to shoot did patterson freak out and say not to?
Sounds like patterson filmed this for their movie, rewatched it, and thought "this could fool a ton of people" and just went with it
here is an incredible video just released, I don’t know if this link will work
?tag=12
I also found this photo in the comments
Why do none of these people in the woods have guns?
Shoot the thing and keep shooting till its dead and drag its corpse into town.
Because everytime they've been shot it ended up being a guy in a suit.
They'll get him one day though.
Why would scientists be covering up the existence of an undiscovered ape species?
because it's an interdimensional being and thats really gonna frick up some worldviews. we need them to fight the jellyfish ufo's when they mount their invasion.
And because Colonel Sanders puts an addictive chemicals is his chicken that makes you crave it fortnightly.
thats just msg bro and it's awesome. completely unrelated to the impending alium happening.