Correct, but some hack uses this as an excuse for lack of consistency.
You can leave a lot implied or just go for something surreal but you have to be consistent in tone and in-universe logic.
What Dolan said is more something hacks use as an excuse to do not give a frick.
Also Oppenheimers balls.
I agree when "plot" is thought of in a Robert McKee kind of way, where plot points have to happen by a certain page, the protagonist has to change at the end, most of that is horse shit and a lot of studio execs do think this way.
How long until studios start selling artslop where nothing ever happens?
artslop where nothing ever happens
But also yeah I don't want this either.
The story doesn't have to be a linear hero's journey but it needs to be eventful and engaging.
He’s right. He’s not saying plot doesn’t matter at all, but the way it’s told visually is gonna be more critical. All these gays are seething ITT but the MCU is a good example of this. Solid scripts in terms of structure and what not, hitting all the beats that you’re taught in middle school English class, but totally uninspired cinematically. Although you all probably eat that slop up I bet.
look at the greatest films of all time, they overwhelmingly consist of masterfully made movies, rather than the ones with the greatest plots, if that were true than great plot movies that aren't really that well made like fight club would be in contention (its still a great movie it's just not the best)
I mean, look at 2001: A space odyssey, it's widely hailed as a top film, and it's almost all sensory, the plot is minimal at best
It's an alien computer slab sent to uplift the protohumans like Moon Watcher to sentience. There are several, one buried in the moon that sends a signal when it is uncovered proving mankind has left Earth, TMA-1 (tycho magnetic anomaly). TMA-2 was around Jupiter and the Discovery was sent to it. Hal was given conflicting orders about secrecy and went insane. The TMA copied that guys conciousness. It is not a complicated movie at all and you are really fricking stupid for using it as an example. TENET was shit. TDKR was shit. I hope his new movie isn't shit but probably will be. You're likely just a fricking advertising bot anyway.
>It's an alien computer slab sent to uplift the protohumans like Moon Watcher to sentience. There are several, one buried in the moon that sends a signal when it is uncovered proving mankind has left Earth, TMA-1 (tycho magnetic anomaly). TMA-2 was around Jupiter and the Discovery was sent to it. Hal was given conflicting orders about secrecy and went insane. The TMA copied that guys conciousness.
How in the flying frick did you get ANY of this? What was the deal with the weird alternate dimension and the giant baby in space at the very end?
The starchild was the personality construct of Bowman? I can't remember the guys name. It was experiencing a rebirth in very unsubtle imagery.
I read the books to 3001.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>The starchild was the personality construct of Bowman?
what
>It was experiencing a rebirth in very unsubtle imagery.
I...what? This isn't English. What the hell do you mean "personality construct" and "experiencing a rebirth"?
11 months ago
Anonymous
He read the novelization of the movie and is just repeating that.
They already did that in the 70s when all the film school nerds were doing shitty boring flicks inspired by Bergman, Fellini and other European hacks. Thankfully the 80s came along.
he isn't wrong. current superhero movies are just exposition with occasional action. there is never anything visually interesting about how they are shot. nolan's batman movies are exceptions obviously
This would be a good point if his characters were any good. Can’t wait to see a bland, grey, historically inaccurate melodrama where you can’t even hear the dialogue. Glad people are waking up to how much of a hack he is, everyone seems to be way more excited about a fricking barbie movie of all things
>viewing films as plot and not an 'audiovisual experience"
that's basically how normies view movies because they don't understand anything about filmmaking or film as an artform. they literally think the actors are the ones making the movie
What a pretentious fricking homosexual.
Film is a storytelling medium. Plot is critical part of that.
How does Nolan manage to make pretentious losers here seethe every single time?
>everyone seems to be way more excited about a fricking barbie movie of all things
You're telling me people are more interested in a movie based on one of the most famous toy brands ever vs a movie based on some boring old historical figure? No way! Fricking moron.
>viewing films as plot and not an 'audiovisual experience"
that's basically how normies view movies because they don't understand anything about filmmaking or film as an artform. they literally think the actors are the ones making the movie
You mean like psycho, or the birds, maybe even the 5000 fingers of dr.T?
Speaks volumes that dr.Suess's one movie has more internal consistency than anything Nolan has done in 20 years. Maybe he should consider changing his name to "Notalent".
>TCM normie shit
You're going to outdo everyone be careful! Also if you like Hitchwiener you should understand how important visual storytelling is.
Fricking moron
Even one of the things he’s most praised on, action sequences, really aren’t all that good half the time. The fighting in dark knight rises looked horrible, batman and banes fists were miles away from eachother
He’s right. He’s not saying plot doesn’t matter at all, but the way it’s told visually is gonna be more critical. All these gays are seething ITT but the MCU is a good example of this. Solid scripts in terms of structure and what not, hitting all the beats that you’re taught in middle school English class, but totally uninspired cinematically. Although you all probably eat that slop up I bet.
Why the frick is everyone so angry? He didn't say plot was bad but that it shouldn't be the only priority making a movie, how is that a bad thing? Most of movies Cinemaphile raves about follow that pattern. Why is everyone seething?
Because Nolan said it. If anyone else said it, Cinemaphile would be praising them. But because Cinemaphile is jealous and butthurt over Nolan, they view every comment he says as an attack on them.
>Why the frick is everyone so angry?
it's the vaxx, a lot of fa/tv/irgins got the jab and are irrationally angry all the time
the schizo boards are the chillest, pol and x for once
Literally it's only television viewers and fans of serialized franchises like Marvel or manga that obsess over plot. They're the ones that look over every detail searching for plotholes because the media they interact with is linear. It's not about character development, mood, tone, visual design or poetic imagery. They're cobbled together with plot points and then the characters fill in the gaps with fight scenes or witty humor. The actual great works of cinema and literature however have loose plots. It's not about WHAT happens, it's about HOW the human beings respond to those circumstances. That is what separates art from entertainment.
In Inception he never bothers explaining how the dream machines work, and in Tenet Nolan dropped all pretenses and literally just tells the audience "don't try to understand it, feel it". When he talks about plot not being the focus he means his scripts will often strain credulity, take shortcuts, or often just leaves shit unexplained and you're supposed to just roll with it
>In Inception he never bothers explaining how the dream machines work
Kys midwit
He's not wrong. Just look at MCU films, they only care about what is happening, not how it's presented. Which is ironic considering the big advantage comic books have over novels is that it's a visual medium.
Thats why TV is better medium generally since its easier to go character driven in television than in film since you have more time to explore characters in depth. Basically good well written characters with good cast and you won.
This is also true of at least 90% of people that watch movies. They think as long as they read all the subtitles in between looking at their phones and remember what happened that they experienced a movie.
>greatest films ever have great plots
Lies. Taxi Driver barely has a plot an it's one of the greatest movies ever made. Same with movies like The Thing, or The Shining.
This frickface bong is literally doing israeli MIC propaganda and you couldn’t even listening anything worth a frick in his godawful piss filter movies of the last decade. He doesn’t get to tell people how to make films
But he makes movies that emphasize plot. Plot matters in movies that are about plot, and characters matter in movies that are about characters. You can't cower behind "IT'S AN AUDIOVISUAL EXPERIENCE, BRO."
The funny and ironic thing about this is Nolan's films are VERY Plot Driven and his characters often resemble souless husks that serve the plot as it drives the characters to their destination forward.
His films are often criticized for being very plot driven based on grand spectacle with tons of expository dialogue and one dimensional characters.
Okay it's been a minute since I saw it but I remember way too many scenes of just 2+ people talking. Like when that woman is demonstrating with the gun. Not a great audiovisual experience.
Tenet doesn't explain diddly doodle dick and its why the movie frustrated so many people. It doesn't make sense.
That gun sequence is amazing because it's both
1) A terrible scene where the entire movie grinds to a halt for an one scene character to deliver exposition directly to the audience
2) Doesn't actually help explain the mechanism and doesn't match how it works later in the story
In Inception he never bothers explaining how the dream machines work, and in Tenet Nolan dropped all pretenses and literally just tells the audience "don't try to understand it, feel it". When he talks about plot not being the focus he means his scripts will often strain credulity, take shortcuts, or often just leaves shit unexplained and you're supposed to just roll with it
>Movies are 'Audiovisual Experience'
He is god damn right. Anyone who disagrees doesn't understand how human works. You may forget about everything about X but you will never forget how X made you feel. What you feel what really stays with you.
I watched this movie at the cinema and never watch it again. Forgot everything about it, even what joker is saying here but I never forgot the feeling that I felt after 3:20. Soundtrack is a big reason for it. Joker being upside with the camera is just icing on the cake.
>Movies are 'Audiovisual Experience'
He is god damn right. Anyone who disagrees doesn't understand how human works. You may forget about everything about X but you will never forget how X made you feel. What you feel what really stays with you.
I watched this movie at the cinema and never watch it again. Forgot everything about it, even what joker is saying here but I never forgot the feeling that I felt after 3:20. Soundtrack is a big reason for it. Joker being upside with the camera is just icing on the cake.
If you want to make a memorable audio visual experience it at least has to have soul. Nolan is a soulless hack..craftsman at best…not an artist. He should give plots a try. His films are basically Hans Zimmerman visual aids
I literally said this yesterday in the "how would you fix the DC universe" thread. Just give people superman action with all the fancy special effects they have these days; thats what people want to see.
Based and avatarpilled, films are a visual medium, visuals, aesthetics, vibes, characters and emotions should have top priority, midwit plotgays need to rope
>“Whether for budgetary reasons or reasons of control, studios now look at a screenplay as a series of events and say, ‘This is the essence of what the film is.’ And that’s completely at odds with how cinema developed, right from the Lumière brothers’ train pulling into the station, as a pure audiovisual experience,” Nolan said. “But it’s a very popular fallacy — sometimes with critics as well, quite frankly — that all that matters is the scale of the story being told.”
>“People will tell you that the success of ‘Star Wars’ had nothing to do with its visual effects, and it was all down to its great story,” Nolan continued. “But, I mean, clearly that’s not the case. It is indeed a great story, but it’s also an incredible visual and aural experience. So this willful denial of what movies actually are has set in. People will say, ‘Why would you have to see something like “Aftersun” on the big screen?’ But of course you have to. It also plays wonderfully on TV, but that’s not the point.”
They probably care about the plot hitting some beats such action scenes at specific points and scenes with lines they can put in the trailer. Basically there's a certain formula to what will get and keep an audience's attention.
How is wrong exactly? Plot obsession is for soys
Correct, but some hack uses this as an excuse for lack of consistency.
You can leave a lot implied or just go for something surreal but you have to be consistent in tone and in-universe logic.
What Dolan said is more something hacks use as an excuse to do not give a frick.
Also Oppenheimers balls.
You've watched too much Mauler
>muh pretty colors
I agree when "plot" is thought of in a Robert McKee kind of way, where plot points have to happen by a certain page, the protagonist has to change at the end, most of that is horse shit and a lot of studio execs do think this way.
artslop where nothing ever happens
But also yeah I don't want this either.
The story doesn't have to be a linear hero's journey but it needs to be eventful and engaging.
what's the problem? this anon is right
look at the greatest films of all time, they overwhelmingly consist of masterfully made movies, rather than the ones with the greatest plots, if that were true than great plot movies that aren't really that well made like fight club would be in contention (its still a great movie it's just not the best)
I mean, look at 2001: A space odyssey, it's widely hailed as a top film, and it's almost all sensory, the plot is minimal at best
I legitimately have no idea how to digest movies like this. Is the plot SUPPOSED to make no fricking sense?
>most cinematically literate plotgay
I don't even know what you just said, it's just a buzzword souffle.
It's an alien computer slab sent to uplift the protohumans like Moon Watcher to sentience. There are several, one buried in the moon that sends a signal when it is uncovered proving mankind has left Earth, TMA-1 (tycho magnetic anomaly). TMA-2 was around Jupiter and the Discovery was sent to it. Hal was given conflicting orders about secrecy and went insane. The TMA copied that guys conciousness. It is not a complicated movie at all and you are really fricking stupid for using it as an example. TENET was shit. TDKR was shit. I hope his new movie isn't shit but probably will be. You're likely just a fricking advertising bot anyway.
>It's an alien computer slab sent to uplift the protohumans like Moon Watcher to sentience. There are several, one buried in the moon that sends a signal when it is uncovered proving mankind has left Earth, TMA-1 (tycho magnetic anomaly). TMA-2 was around Jupiter and the Discovery was sent to it. Hal was given conflicting orders about secrecy and went insane. The TMA copied that guys conciousness.
How in the flying frick did you get ANY of this? What was the deal with the weird alternate dimension and the giant baby in space at the very end?
The starchild was the personality construct of Bowman? I can't remember the guys name. It was experiencing a rebirth in very unsubtle imagery.
I read the books to 3001.
>The starchild was the personality construct of Bowman?
what
>It was experiencing a rebirth in very unsubtle imagery.
I...what? This isn't English. What the hell do you mean "personality construct" and "experiencing a rebirth"?
He read the novelization of the movie and is just repeating that.
A movie is gesamtkunstwerk
Plot Is an important part of that.
I wish they spent time on the plot. We all know after watching Star Wars.
Linear exposition gays eternally btfo
How long until studios start selling artslop where nothing ever happens?
In 20 years. By then we'll have moved on to something else.
Japan is way ahead of you
You mean shōnen?
They already did that in the 70s when all the film school nerds were doing shitty boring flicks inspired by Bergman, Fellini and other European hacks. Thankfully the 80s came along.
he isn't wrong. current superhero movies are just exposition with occasional action. there is never anything visually interesting about how they are shot. nolan's batman movies are exceptions obviously
This would be a good point if his characters were any good. Can’t wait to see a bland, grey, historically inaccurate melodrama where you can’t even hear the dialogue. Glad people are waking up to how much of a hack he is, everyone seems to be way more excited about a fricking barbie movie of all things
How does Nolan manage to make pretentious losers here seethe every single time?
>films NEVER had plot
>everyone seems to be way more excited about a fricking barbie movie of all things
You're telling me people are more interested in a movie based on one of the most famous toy brands ever vs a movie based on some boring old historical figure? No way! Fricking moron.
Don't sign your posts
>viewing films as plot and not an 'audiovisual experience"
that's basically how normies view movies because they don't understand anything about filmmaking or film as an artform. they literally think the actors are the ones making the movie
What a pretentious fricking homosexual.
Film is a storytelling medium. Plot is critical part of that.
>Film is a storytelling medium.
It's also a visual medium, little bro.
It's not. It's a visual medium.
If you want plot go watch TV.
yikes
If you want pretty fricking pictures, then look at an image gallery you stupid c**t. The plot stays. Without it, a film has no backbone.
Found the moron who has never watched a film before 1980. Return to Cinemaphile you asinine
You mean like psycho, or the birds, maybe even the 5000 fingers of dr.T?
Speaks volumes that dr.Suess's one movie has more internal consistency than anything Nolan has done in 20 years. Maybe he should consider changing his name to "Notalent".
>TCM normie shit
You're going to outdo everyone be careful! Also if you like Hitchwiener you should understand how important visual storytelling is.
Fricking moron
So that explains why TENИƎT was an incoherent mess.
and the plot is still shit
>audiovisual
>makes movies with terrible audio mixing
>makes movies with ridiculous visuals that are still made fun of today
Even one of the things he’s most praised on, action sequences, really aren’t all that good half the time. The fighting in dark knight rises looked horrible, batman and banes fists were miles away from eachother
In all fairness to Nolan, he didn't seem to give much of a shit about TDKR, but action sequences in Inception and Tener are also quite sterile.
He’s right. He’s not saying plot doesn’t matter at all, but the way it’s told visually is gonna be more critical. All these gays are seething ITT but the MCU is a good example of this. Solid scripts in terms of structure and what not, hitting all the beats that you’re taught in middle school English class, but totally uninspired cinematically. Although you all probably eat that slop up I bet.
>the MCU is a good example of this.
Just shut the frick up you moronic child. You have no credibility.
He's not wrong. MCU is a slightly better written of Michael Bay Transformers movies.
>MCU
>Solid scripts in terms of structure
>hitting all the beats
The absolute state of the average media consoomer
>man who can't write a coherent plot takes opportunity to criticise people who care about that sort of thing
Plotgays BTFO forever by their idol
Why the frick is everyone so angry? He didn't say plot was bad but that it shouldn't be the only priority making a movie, how is that a bad thing? Most of movies Cinemaphile raves about follow that pattern. Why is everyone seething?
>Why is everyone seething?
You're on the number one goyslop enjoyer board.
>Why is everyone seething?
boredom
Because Nolan said it. If anyone else said it, Cinemaphile would be praising them. But because Cinemaphile is jealous and butthurt over Nolan, they view every comment he says as an attack on them.
>Why the frick is everyone so angry?
it's the vaxx, a lot of fa/tv/irgins got the jab and are irrationally angry all the time
the schizo boards are the chillest, pol and x for once
>pol
>chill
sperging about pol isn’t chill
My dearest Black person in christ, your fricking tragic arse rapingly obnoxious audio mixing is not a place you should be lecturing others from.
based. if you want a story, read a fricking book
this. true kino is gas station CCTV footage where nothing happens
Unironically better than whatever your top 10 is
>Studios care too much about plot
>Here is your audiovisual experience bro
Nolan has been always been an autistic hack
>my audiovisual experience can't carry my terrible plots
>it's the executives faults
He's right, and Cameron has the same mindset. It's more important to create an experience, plot is secondary
Anyone who understands film does. It's the vidyatards and MCU virgins who overthink plot
Plebs are the ones who want big explosions and not engaging plot
GO back to watching Michael Bay movies
AmbuLAnce is better than your midwit top 5
>big explosions and not engaging plot
so, the mcu?
Literally it's only television viewers and fans of serialized franchises like Marvel or manga that obsess over plot. They're the ones that look over every detail searching for plotholes because the media they interact with is linear. It's not about character development, mood, tone, visual design or poetic imagery. They're cobbled together with plot points and then the characters fill in the gaps with fight scenes or witty humor. The actual great works of cinema and literature however have loose plots. It's not about WHAT happens, it's about HOW the human beings respond to those circumstances. That is what separates art from entertainment.
Based as frick
>In Inception he never bothers explaining how the dream machines work
Kys midwit
>guy who made Tenet complaining about plot
fricking hilarious
He's not wrong. Just look at MCU films, they only care about what is happening, not how it's presented. Which is ironic considering the big advantage comic books have over novels is that it's a visual medium.
>"muh audiovisual"
>gets absolutely btfo by movies about blue cat people who mindfrick each other with their hair
stop trying to turn avachads against nolan, disney
Character driven > Story driven
Thats why TV is better medium generally since its easier to go character driven in television than in film since you have more time to explore characters in depth. Basically good well written characters with good cast and you won.
Jes right for what he does. Inception breaks several of its own rules and really doesn't make sense when you think about it, but everyone loves it.
This is also true of at least 90% of people that watch movies. They think as long as they read all the subtitles in between looking at their phones and remember what happened that they experienced a movie.
>that fricking thread like a week ago with zoomers talking about speeding up everything they watch so they can "consume" it faster
I still have nightmares
>being mindbroken by a shitty bait thread over a week later
Fricking hell just have a nice day
>have a nice day because someone else is an annoying homosexual
I check under my bed every night for ADHD zoomers
And yet he made The Dark Knight the blandest shit ever commit to film
>greatest films ever have great plots
Lies. Taxi Driver barely has a plot an it's one of the greatest movies ever made. Same with movies like The Thing, or The Shining.
The thing has a great plot what the frick are you on about
Taxi driver is a 5/10 movie
Please tell me more about your arbitrary snowflake definition of "plot". How did you come up with it anon?
promo for Nolan juuuuuuust in time for his next movie!
Who could be behind this!
I would respect his opinion if he wasn't Christopher Nolan, the biggest plotgay in existence.
wtf is this moron saying exactly the opposite is true ever since affordable cgi
This frickface bong is literally doing israeli MIC propaganda and you couldn’t even listening anything worth a frick in his godawful piss filter movies of the last decade. He doesn’t get to tell people how to make films
Storygays btfo. Read a book.
But he makes movies that emphasize plot. Plot matters in movies that are about plot, and characters matter in movies that are about characters. You can't cower behind "IT'S AN AUDIOVISUAL EXPERIENCE, BRO."
He's just jacking over MUH THEATER EXPERIENCE in that article. That's all he does shill the theater with overpriced everything.
12 angry men
funny coming from the guy who made TDK, who birthed an entire generation of edgy plot-oriented dark fanboys
...people liked the plot in TDK? I thought everyone just really liked Heath's version of the Joker.
most movies have shit audio balancing even in theatres
The funny and ironic thing about this is Nolan's films are VERY Plot Driven and his characters often resemble souless husks that serve the plot as it drives the characters to their destination forward.
His films are often criticized for being very plot driven based on grand spectacle with tons of expository dialogue and one dimensional characters.
This wtf. Inception and Tenet are fricking stacked with verbal exposition about how their gimmicky ideas work.
>Tenet
>any exposition at all
Tenet doesn't explain diddly doodle dick and its why the movie frustrated so many people. It doesn't make sense.
Okay it's been a minute since I saw it but I remember way too many scenes of just 2+ people talking. Like when that woman is demonstrating with the gun. Not a great audiovisual experience.
That gun sequence is amazing because it's both
1) A terrible scene where the entire movie grinds to a halt for an one scene character to deliver exposition directly to the audience
2) Doesn't actually help explain the mechanism and doesn't match how it works later in the story
That and the scene with all the soldiers practicing reverse martial arts always gets me.
In Inception he never bothers explaining how the dream machines work, and in Tenet Nolan dropped all pretenses and literally just tells the audience "don't try to understand it, feel it". When he talks about plot not being the focus he means his scripts will often strain credulity, take shortcuts, or often just leaves shit unexplained and you're supposed to just roll with it
>never brother to explain
it's fiction dumdum, use your imagination
Kek. Duality of men.
Wow a meme phrase you read here. What an original comment
Who hurt you?
>Movies are 'Audiovisual Experience'
He is god damn right. Anyone who disagrees doesn't understand how human works. You may forget about everything about X but you will never forget how X made you feel. What you feel what really stays with you.
I watched this movie at the cinema and never watch it again. Forgot everything about it, even what joker is saying here but I never forgot the feeling that I felt after 3:20. Soundtrack is a big reason for it. Joker being upside with the camera is just icing on the cake.
Top Gun 2 was a better audiovisual experience than Dunkirk AND had a better plot AND was thoroughly unpretentious. What an obnoxious homosexual he is.
If you want to make a memorable audio visual experience it at least has to have soul. Nolan is a soulless hack..craftsman at best…not an artist. He should give plots a try. His films are basically Hans Zimmerman visual aids
based nolan, keep them seething about not being able to hear the dialogue
I don't think capeshit is a great example of plot...
>Nolan talking about audio
Kek.
yes? the audio in his films are a big part of why they're as well received as they are
There's some good jingles for sure, but the actual audio quality is utter trash.
not really, try to watch it on blu-ray instead of a YIFY rip
But he's an extraordinarily dull director. Zero memorable sequences (apart from the two or three he stole from elsewhere).
that's what you get when you let a bunch of stunted manchild nerds with no taste run Hollywood. he as his flaws but Nolan is the last of the real ors.
I literally said this yesterday in the "how would you fix the DC universe" thread. Just give people superman action with all the fancy special effects they have these days; thats what people want to see.
Absolutely fricking based. Plautists need to be skinned alive.
Hack fraud
Based and avatarpilled, films are a visual medium, visuals, aesthetics, vibes, characters and emotions should have top priority, midwit plotgays need to rope
>movies aren't about plot
This homie is literally just Michael Bay except he can't direct action sequences to save his life.
Plot is mostly irrelevant. Only obsessive brand-name-fans get interested in it.
Films are better just focusing on themes and visuals.
james cameron said the same thing last year
>Studios care too much about plot
Since fricking when? They're ready to give AI the reigns on writing scripts.
this is why Dunkirk is his best film
Dunkirk in IMAX is his best movie, otherwise it's Memento which ironically is super reliant on plot
Both are important. Anyone saying otherwise is moronic and a slave to base emotion and manipulation.
>“Whether for budgetary reasons or reasons of control, studios now look at a screenplay as a series of events and say, ‘This is the essence of what the film is.’ And that’s completely at odds with how cinema developed, right from the Lumière brothers’ train pulling into the station, as a pure audiovisual experience,” Nolan said. “But it’s a very popular fallacy — sometimes with critics as well, quite frankly — that all that matters is the scale of the story being told.”
>“People will tell you that the success of ‘Star Wars’ had nothing to do with its visual effects, and it was all down to its great story,” Nolan continued. “But, I mean, clearly that’s not the case. It is indeed a great story, but it’s also an incredible visual and aural experience. So this willful denial of what movies actually are has set in. People will say, ‘Why would you have to see something like “Aftersun” on the big screen?’ But of course you have to. It also plays wonderfully on TV, but that’s not the point.”
that's why the plot of his dark knight movies was shit, makes sens. bravo nolan
I wish Raimi would direct a Batman movie. Maybe he could put a horror vibe to it like in Arkham Asylum.
So how does this explain how basically no movie has stood out from the pack since 2010 or so? Atleast not in a good way.
Fury Road was the best linear plot 80's-esque movie in a generation, if not longer.
They probably care about the plot hitting some beats such action scenes at specific points and scenes with lines they can put in the trailer. Basically there's a certain formula to what will get and keep an audience's attention.