>Casting is underway for Jimmy Olsen. He will played by an actor of open ethnicity in his 20s.
>Casting is underway for Perry White. He will be played by a black actor in his 50s.
>Casting is underway for Eve Teschmacher, Lex Luthor's assistant and a social media influencer. She will be played by an actress of open ethnicity in her 20s.
>Casting is underway for Jack Hawksmoor, a member of the The Authority who derives superhuman abilities from a symbiotic bond with cities. He will be played by a black actor.
>Casting is underway for Engineer, a member of The Authority whose body has been enhanced with advanced nanotechnology. She will be played by a hispanic actress.
>Casting is underway fo the Doctor, a member of The Authority who is a powerful shaman.
>Casting is underway for Broukhim, a Middle Eastern dictator.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
is underway for Jimmy Olsen. He will played by an actor of open ethnicity in his 20s.
Codeword for he's going to be another swarthoid.
The actor reportedly circling the role is white, you whiny homosexuals.
You can't stop me from hating dyslexic casting directors.
>black in Supergirl
>black in new animated series
>black in new animated movie
Sure bud, I am so sure he will be white. Of course.
Perry and jimmy better be fricking white.
Listen israeliteboy, you want a billion dollar movie? Appease me.
It literally says Perry is going to be black you blind moron
Then I guess I won’t be seeing it. Have fun making less than a billion, hope they keep the budget low.
>The actor reportedly circling the role is white
who's the actor rumored? The actors rumored for Clark and Lois turned out to be completely true.
You are a child raping homosexual if you honest to god think Jimmy is going to be a ginger.
If they wanted a black actor they would simply specify black actor like always.
Snyder actually casted him right, only for him to kill him later.
>they say “open” ethnicity for characters they intend to be white while they straight up just say black for others
is underway for Jimmy Olsen. He will played by an actor of open ethnicity in his 20s.
Look at how shocked I am.
I hate gunn like you wouldn't believe
What do you like?
He told you, “you wouldn’t believe”
Its too early to be so cheeky, anon.
>hey look it's another "turn your ginger into black" day
I am not even ginger, why it annoys me so much
Jimmy is already black-coded, been this way since Supergirl. April is black-coded as well?
I love Gunn like you wouldn't believe
So they're saving Middy for the Authority film.
i'm tired of brown people stealing characters.
Nothing about Powergirl?
the movie will already have a lot of gays how about giving a little to the male audience?
is underway for Engineer, a member of The Authority whose body has been enhanced with advanced nanotechnology. She will be played by a hispanic actress.
is underway fo the Doctor, a member of The Authority who is a powerful shaman.
Eternals vibe lol
Making the authority minorities would be the funniest outcome.
They largely were already.
Did we skip Warren's relaunch a few years back?
Yes.
the only nipples that will appear in Gunn's DCU will be the men and the leotards are out of the question because Warner
you realize the DCEU had topless women and full frontal cooch? Both thanks to Gunn?
>full frontal cooch
When was that?
>open ethnicity
>black
>open ethnicity
>black
>hispanic
>shaman??
>middle eastern
It's so over...
The reason why most things say open ethnicity now is because you "white" people can't determine what the hell white even is. Are italians white? Obviously yeah, but also no by some idiot's standards. Are israelites? Duh, but also no apparently. You only have yourselves to blame by disowning each other. How do I know what I'm saying is the truth? I'm a hirer for a career and we talk about this kind of stuff all the time in the industry.
>Obviously yeah, but also no by some idiot's standards. Are israelites? Duh, but also no apparently
These are not the people who can afford to leave the house. Just like the type of black people who think white people voicing black cartoon characters is racist can’t afford to leave the house.
All of these people are online all day because they’re unemployed and too broke to do anything else.
Tell you what, israeliteanon, I'll make you a deal.
If you get Seth Rogan and Sarah Silverman to both shut up and frick off forever I will change my position from hostile to ambivalent.
Deal?
>Perry White. He will be played by a black actor in his 50s.
Really? His name is literally "White"
>Really? His name is literally "White"
Perry White was Lawrence Fishburne in Man of Autism.
Once a character has been made black, it's racist yo go back. The Great Comet on Broadway is a great example.
>set in 1800s russia, based on a part of war and crime
>josh groban plays the lead
>he leaves so they decide one of the black guys from hamilton should play him
>ticket sales plummet
>like a lot
>that guy is let go
>broadway legend mandy patinkin gets the role
>starts going on talkshows talking about how he loves being part of the dhow and how fun rehearsals are
>ticket sales goes up
>outrage, how dare you replace a black actor witj a white one
>outrage so big patinkin leaves the show and apologizes, saying it was wrong and he should have never taken the part
>show goes under
Shame, it was an interesting and unique show
Yo, that sounds bullshit. After some research, it sounds more like the producers left a young and inexperienced (Black) actor in the lurch after the production failed to bring in any results. If that's the case though, calling them 'racist' for casting a more experienced (White) actor as his replacement sounds moronic though. Like it's as they know it's the only way for them to get the Twitterarti to show up.
He was an actor from the biggest Broadway show in 100 years. Hardly young and inexperienced.
If it was the biggest, why did it flop? Genuine question, as I know it struggled.
The show he was in before(Hamilton) was the biggest. the one that flopped was not.
Plenty of black people have White as a surname
> His name is literally "White"
He doesn't know
Shut up homosexual
Compelling, well thought out response. Thank you, anon.
As opposed to “he was black in Snyder’s movie so now he’s black”? I found it to be suitable.
Look, I can't even stand Snyder's movies. I personally wish they did a hard reset. I'm not inclined to give him credit as much as pointing out that there is a.) precedent, and b.) to point out that Gunn is already walking such an odd line of this mishmash canon of part Snyderverse/part new canon, that you might be doing yourself a favor to expect to see more from that universe than you and I (apologies if I am inferring incorrectly) might ideally prefer. I don't think Fishburne did anything bad with the role, and if Gunn can get someone to play it competently, I don't think Perry being black again is a hill worth dying on, especially considering the last couple of attempts to introduce a big screen Superman. I will be thrilled if THAT ends up being the biggest problem to have with the movie.
Jesus fricking Christ you massive israeliteshilling homosexual. If he isn’t keeping Cavill he’s not keeping anything. It would be moronic to keep fishburn in the role.
Anon, he did The Suicide Squad and Peacemaker, which is confirmed to be getting a S2. Unless you really think he is starting from scratch on that, part of the old universe will be coming over. Hopefully it is just parallel versions of the old characters with tweaked versions of the events that brought them to where they are. I am not saying that Fishburne is being brought back. I am simply saying that Fishburne did nothing wrong with Perry, and that if Gunn finds another competent black actor to take over the role, they probably wont either. More than anything what I am trying to impress upon you is that for all of the the seeming pitfalls that a Superman reboot seem to come with, the race of the actor who may may deliver an average at best performance as Perry White is hardly the biggest hitch to hook your concern wagon to.
Those didn’t cross over with the previous DCU other than Harley and that’s because it cost more to replace her than keep her.
There was also Boomerang and Waller, and the latter is getting her own TV show next year.
Correct. That by extension ties it to the original Suicide Squad, and all the ramifications of that...like Batfleck, which ties it to BvS, MoS, and JL.
Thus, why I preferred a hard reboot over what they seem to be attempting.
Oh, also Flagg.
Whose grandfather is going to be a character in Creature Commandos.
Boomer is dead anon.
He's considered an outdated design.
i mean, is better than casting manchester black with a black guy.
is underway fo the Doctor, a member of The Authority who is a powerful shaman.
Can't wait to watch Superman beat the shit out of David Tennant.
Reminder that when this movie inevitably flops they'll chalk it up to "Superman is unpopular" instead of the terrible casting choices and story beats, and it'll be another 15 years before another Superman movie is attempted.
They do it every time. Rather than give the audience what they want they give the audience divisive shit, call them whiny babies, claim the property is toxic and then double down or shelve it.
if a movie flops then that means the fans don't like the character and said character is unpopular
nobody is trying to pander or waste time on the internet to grasp cultural nerd zeitgeists for money
Gr8 b8
Except nobody is complaining about the two most important characters and the only ones anyone outside irrelevant internet echo chambers will particularly care about.
Superman IS unpopular, and this will flop because Gunn has explicitly said he wants to call back to boring shit like the Reeve movies in this incarnation instead of just letting him be a pulp sci fi action hero.
Superman is unpopular because no one is making good Superman media anymore. No one is making good Superman media because people keep thinking they need to reinvent and redefine the character in some profound or significant way. People keep trying to reinvent Superman because they look at Superman's unpopularity and assume it's because people find him boring. People assume Superman is boring because he's unpopular and they haven't read the comics. It's a vicious cycle and a consequence of having so many different interpretations of the character that are at conflicting odds with each other.
>No one is making good Superman media because people keep thinking they need to reinvent and redefine the character in some profound or significant way.
Reminder that Man of Steel is the single most successful Superman product in revenue by miles and is the second highest earning Superman movie adjusted for inflation (or third if you count). Meanwhile attempts to have throwback Superman like Returns crashed and burned because no one likes them.
>third if you count
*BvS
successful Superman media =/= good Superman media
Injustice is the biggest example of people taking a mistake too far, now everyone thinks Superman becoming evil is such a neat and novel concept.
>successful Superman media =/= good Superman media
You JUST equated the two when you said that Superman isn't popular because his media isn't good.
I fail to see your point as he's currently neither. No one is begging for a sequel to Man of Steel.
>No one is begging for a sequel to Man of Steel.
Anon...
Snyder fans don't count as people, and what they want isn't a sequel to Man of Steel, they want Watchmen League: Flashpoint on Infinite Boogaloos.
yes because its a subversion of a the boring concept of his traditional personality
you see a lot of evil supes archetypes because the boring invincible hero is not interesting to people anymore
No one has done it decently. The television shows have done best, and enjoyed a lot of seasons.
But people don't like Returns' Man of Sulk, or
Snyder's Man of Autismo.
>But people don't like Snyder's Man of Autismo.
Why Superman fans believe that the only Superman that has got fans in the 21th century has no fans?
You've told me everything I need to know about your opinion with this post. Superman's "traditional" personality isn't interesting to people anymore because writer's keep handling it like shit.
Returns also made him a rapist & Lois a five-head jilted b***h in mommy's clothes.
so classic Superman then, Superman would cosmically frick with his friends and Lois was a misogynistic stereotype with no redeeming qualities. This applies in both the Silver Age and the Reeve series.
Do all Superman haters have daddy issues that just spew bullshit?
It's a pretty accurate summation of the average issue of Superman's Pal or Superman's Girlfriend, that isn't about them briefly getting a power.
Superman literally erased Lois's memory in his first movie.
I guarantee you no one cares about the characters here to be upset about the racebending.
I do
>Metropolis is located in Africa
You can't make this shit up....
That young man needs a haircut.
That’s a dude!
>The Authority
Holy crap why are they trying to force Wildstorm shit into this movie.
Mr. Jim Lee
>bring in the authority
>don't use the two most prominent and bulletproof characters
So they can kill them off.
No, look at the character descriptions. Those are placeholder / code names. It's pretty clearly the Elite. They're doing What's So Funny About Truth, Justice, and the American Way.
It's been done already, but I can definitely see how Gunn would want to do it in live action to make his big thesis statement about his DCU. The story is pretty much a direct repudiation of Snyder's philosophy, to the point where Snyder once accidentally quoted the villain in his own defense.
>The story is pretty much a direct repudiation of Snyder's philosophy,
Oh noes Superman didn't smile all the time & tell me to drink my milk.
>“Once you’ve lost your virginity to this fricking movie and then you come and say to me something about, like, ‘My superhero wouldn’t do that,’ I’m like, ‘Are you serious?’ I’m, like, down the fricking road on that,” Snyder said.
>“It’s a cool point of view to be like, ‘My heroes are still innocent. My heroes didn’t fricking lie to America. My heroes didn’t embezzle money from their corporations. My heroes didn’t commit any atrocities.’ That’s cool. But you’re living in a fricking dream world,” he added.
>literally the fricking basedjak vs chad meme with a strawman in one corner and an invincible invulnerable hero in the other
>considered the peak of Superman stories by modern supergays
It's so fricking over.
>“It’s a cool point of view to be like, ‘My heroes are still innocent. My heroes didn’t fricking lie to America. My heroes didn’t embezzle money from their corporations. My heroes didn’t commit any atrocities.’ That’s cool. But you’re living in a fricking dream world,” he added.
God damn I hate this idiot. Yes my heroes haven't done those things. Because people who do those things aren't heroes. What a goddamn edgy brainlet moron.
I'm constantly in awe of how stupid Snyder is.
Watchmen convinced Snyder Superman was Dr. Manhattan and Batman was some horrible cross between Nite Owl and Rorschach. When he got his hands on the DCU, it was doomed.
High IQ take.
Isn't he a huge fan of Excalibur? I haven't seen that film, but isn't a big Arthurian thing that Arthur himself is incorruptible? And a few of his best knights like Gawain? I know Lancelot fricked around, but he's normally the odd man out, right? Did Excalibur exhibit any of that?
this story is dogshit and trying to adapt it will just kill the Superman IP further for the next 10 years.
>It's pretty clearly the Elite
sort of, everything so far sounds like it's the authority taking the elite's place. the only one of the elite i think we'll actually see is manchester just because he's far more memorable than jenny ever was
Reminder that in the comic, the Elite kill a group of terrorists with nuclear-scale superpowers who were about to murder everyone in Tokyo. When Manchester Black points out that they had nuclear scale powers and were about to kill millions of people, Superman's response is "End justify the means. Clever. What's next "Wir Brauchen Lebensraum?""
Superman literally says that killing six super-powered terrorists who are about to murder millions of people makes you just as bad as Hitler.
This and so fricking obvious I don't get how people aren't seeing it
do supergays actually think that drawing him as the chad and everyone else as the crying wojak will make people like the character? It's more likely to annoy general audiences as they file out to watch Marvel Quipfest #87 where the heroes smile and laugh as they butcher minions.
>heroes smile and laugh as they butcher minions
What's wrong with that?
Nothing's wrong with that. Beloved cultural icons like James Bond, Indiana Jones, and Luke Skywalker do that. It's standard for any action or adventure type story.
But it's extremely opposed to the version of Superman people who like "What's So Funny"/"Superman vs the Elite" exalt. There's literally a scene in the comic where Superman laments that kids want to impersonate the Elite in their games because they think it's "fun to kill." Like motherfricker you never played army with your friends when you were a kid? Boomers never played Cowboys and Indians and bought toy guns? Millennials and zoomers don't play any video games? The most popular fictional franchise of all time, primarily aimed at children, isn't Star Wars?
Insisting on these insipid "morals" that were in truth the result of editorial mandates just comes across as totally disconnected from how real people actually act.
>There's literally a scene in the comic where Superman laments that kids want to impersonate the Elite in their games because they think it's "fun to kill." Like motherfricker you never played army with your friends when you were a kid?
Yeah, its incredibly silly.
As opposed to Man of Autism and his Batman, who stomp around sullenly butchering minions.
Considering that you are mentioning what its unambiguously the most succesful Superman film since 1980, yes, they don't care about that.
Yes, it was more successful than the butchered trio of movies that resulted from Donner leaving, what a low fricking bar.
Its more succesful that Donner's second film, only Superman The Movie is more succesful.
And yes, the bar is low, that is the reality here, Superman has doing awful with the general public for decades
Donner's second film is a patched together Frankenstein's monster more studio butchered than JUSTice League. The Richard Lester ending is miserable, and it's a laff that they tried to keep it canon for Superman Returns.
Same reason they forced Wildstorm shit into the regular DCU with New 52, Jim Lee, did you think that Deadpool-knockoff-looking motherfricker Grifter kept showing up because of fan demand? lol
I have never seen a shilling campaing as blatant and long as the one that people have been doing for more than a year for Gunn's Superman.
And we will have at least another couple of years before the release, enough for even more people to grow tired of the endless posting.
Who wants this movie?
It's just gonna be jokes every 30 seconds that shits on the source material.
is Gunn also going a supergirl movie? That's the only I really care about
>caring about female heroes
Supergirl seems to be an easier character to write than superman
I see
>Supergirl seems to be an easier character to write than superman
you would think that, but they haven't been able to make a consistent personality for Supergirl in years.
Modern writers are so moronic it's sad
Yes, but it's based off woman of Tomorrow.
>>is Gunn also going a supergirl movie?
>Gunn
>Supergirl
Do you really have any hope?
MCU Gamora is practically naked compared to Supergirl in The Flush.
No one is putting Supergirl in a skirt at this point bro. She's gonna wear the pants like in the show and movie.
or some abomination like Cyclone in Black Adam.
Oh God no
what do you mean, she wears a skirt in her show
>tfw we'll NEVER get the white supergirl suit in a LA supergirl movie, or any supergirl media
even if you cover up the tummy they won't use it, even though it's her best suit
I remember that in the last two issue of supergirl (1996) she wore a shirt with long sleeves that also covered the stomach. I feel like if you changed a few things (not a fan of the golden belt, could make the sleeves a little shorter) you could make a "modest" white supergirl costume normalgays can accept
I bet that was all Marvel and Feige.
Well all know if Kal landed in California all the Earth would look like Mordor with the planet's core exposed.
i got your jimmy olsen right here
He already played Lex Luthor in BvsS!
I love it. We can even get the All Star/Golden Age reference.
>Casting is underway for Engineer, a member of The Authority whose body has been enhanced with advanced nanotechnology. She will be played by a hispanic actress.
oh please please please please
I'm half expecting it to be Saldana
Low effort moron. Once a character has been nog washed, he's not coming back
You guys like bone, don't you?
No
frick you
Which direction would you want the film to take?
What's So Funny About Truth, Justice & the American Way?
>Superman is always in the right
>he can save everyone without compromising his values
>Elite are cynical morons who are too weak to save the world
Superman and the Authority
>Superman admits his methods aren't working
>ready to pass the torch to the next generation of heroes
>Authority are antiheroes at worst who can be trusted to solve the world's problems
I want the Elite to come off as Dumb Kids trying to act Big, except for Black; who's an actual goddamned psychopath that even the others are a bit intimidated by.
How you stop Six Nuclear Scale Powerered terorrists from killing people is as important as the act of stopping them itself. Especially if it was within the Elite's ability to stop it with no deaths, no casualties, which given their abilities was something they absolutely could do. Instead, if memory serves they blasted up Tokyo, executed the six of them and started talking about causing even more damage if Superman didn't shut the hell up.
Literally no one in the world would ever fault a cop or soldier for shooting a terrorist who was about to detonate a nuke in Tokyo. Treating this is a meaningful moral show is absurd in a bad way and contributes to why Superman is a dead IP.
Look at the success of the quippy mass murdering special forces soldiers the MCU calls superheroes if you want an idea of how much the public cares about no-kill codes. The ultimate irony here is that Gunn's whole career is proof that the Elite won in real life.
I think it's just about repositioning cynical superheroes as the main ones as they are in our culture. Hence Superman's arrival as a contrast and source of conflict. It also gives Gunn a chance to keep his humor with an edgy group of characters whilst not polluting Superman's vibe with potty humor like Peacemaker
this is awful
realistic and boring I couldn't read half of the first issue
Blow your brains out troony
The second one literally just came out, and it was just a recycled set up for 5G.
>Casting is underway for Jimmy Olsen.
Put him in a bow tie.
>the amount of porn between Jimmy and Clark that will be produced if they add a twink that looks like this in the role
wtf i love James Gunn now
They make take a pause on twinks after The Flush, I feel.
That's an incredibly generous use of 'twink'. Actual twinks in capeshit are pretty thin on the ground now that Holland has graduated to twunk and is ageing out of the category entirely.
The sexual tension between Ezra Miller and also Ezra Miller in The Flush was palpable.
He seemed mostly bored with Iris.
Now this I believe. Maybe I'll drunk watch for some laughs when it's streamable.
just don't take a drink every time the director calls for an Orbital Camera shot.
sounds like dramamine may also be required
Seriously don't do it unless you can handle your booze.
Iris was in the movie for like five minutes really.
>Iris was in the movie for like five minutes really.
No, she is in 5 minutes outside the court. Then she and Barry hang out in his apt for an overlong scene, and you can tell she's 100% safe sexually.
Cope and Seethe.
I swear I don't remember Iris West being in the movie at all. I know she was in but she is such a non character I barely remember her.
You’re literally coping with your deflections homosexual
No one would give a frick what color King Lear or Alexandre Dumas was in a movie either, they needed a Jamie Foxx movie to give them a hint who the latter even was.
That’s untrue and you know it
Gerard Depardieu was gonna play Dumas, but people said 'Non, non, non'. Despite Dumas being only a quarter Black. I'm sure if a full-blooded geezer wanted to do it that would totes be fine, tho!
*did play
I am praying to god we get a ginger twink to play Jimmy, Superman Returns Jimmy was perfect Jimmy casting and I'm afraid they'll never top it.
The new Superman looks like he serves the Demiurge.
Movie Manchester Black is going to look like this.
Manchester looks too much like Constantine and I'm pretty sure Constantine will be a major player in the DCU eventually after Swap Thing and when they start adding more magic based heroes to the mix
It’s gonna be a romance flick since Gunn loves that Lois/Clark/Superman shit
>Eve Teschmacher, Lex Luthor's assistant and a social media influencer
This is what mercy graves is sacrificed for?
? This isn't a new character. Using Eve just suggests his assistant might not be loyal.
>Want an Authority movie/TV show for years
>It happens by making them into The fricking Elite
Absolutely. Haram.
The female cast will only have Lois Lane?
Good luck Warner
is underway for Eve Teschmacher, Lex Luthor's assistant and a social media influencer. She will be played by an actress of open ethnicity in her 20s.
I have a bad feeling about this.
is underway for Engineer, a member of The Authority whose body has been enhanced with advanced nanotechnology. She will be played by a hispanic actress.
if Gunn chooses a skeleton it will be really funny, he will look like a troony with that metal skin, no hips stick legs invible booba this movie has everything to be like Flash.
She's wasted on a Superman movie when she could appear in an R rated one instead and she keeps the nude body paint look
So my question is, will Superman be a Jerk, Loser or Doofus? My money is on doofus.
The Authority pretty well sort themselves out into one of those 3 categories already.
Gunn is incapable of directing superheroes as anything else. So I suspect Clark will be some hayseed rube.
Guarians of the Galaxy:
Starlord: Doofus and Loser
Gamora: Jerk
Drax: Doofus and Loser
Mantis: Doofus
Nebula: Jerk and Loser
Rocket: Jerk
Groot: Doofus
Squad:
Harley Quinn: Doofus
Peacemaker: Jerk
Ratcatcher: Loser
Rick Flagg: Jerk
King Shark: Doofus
Polka-Dot Man: Loser and Doofus
and on and on...
Ratcatcher was le bored zoomer
I'm excited to see if he can write something else. I always thought his movies and Peacemaker were all in a very similar mold of characters. Could be great, could get exposed.
I feel making Gunn the creative guide of the New-New DCEU is akin to making Garn Ennis the head of DC comics.
>*Garth Ennis.
In fact it feels like it would be exactly the same as Garth being in charge overall at DC comics.
Chances of Bueno Excellente and all those other degenerates to appear in the DCU? I would not rule out a section 8 HBO max show to compete with The Boys.
Would Gunn make a superhero who's a rape joke?
How could he not?
Doofus. Gunn has called Superman "a big old galoot."
>She will be played by a hispanic actress.
when you read latina or hispanic understand gal gadot look alike
We'll still get innumerable COOM threads about her, just like the last several DC movie turds.
>Bueno Excellente and Section 8 become DCU canon under Gunn
Would not be shocked?
You don’t understand. We NEED black folk in movies. Blacks cannot watch movies without them in it
Diversity is our strength
I prefer the MCU's "let's promote our black heroes", over DC's "Batman is the only white good guy in the city and the JSA are now DIVERSE".
And yet you're the one having a tantrum about not having enough representation.
I’m agreeing with you. We need to racebend white characters. It’s the only way to be progressive. Black people need to replace white characters
White people don't need fictional heroes, anon. Black people do.
I haven't expressed an opinion on the topic. You, on the other hand, are obviously having a tantrum because there isn't enough white representation.
Would it be a "tantrum" to be displeased with Othello being played by a white actor?
Not enough Americans even know who Othello is, someone would have to tell them to be upset.
So you’re a spineless homosexual? Got it
Othello’s ethnicity is vital and core aspect for the story. Jimmy’s isn’t. Jack Hawkmoor’s isn’t. Perry’s isn’t. Their ethnicity doesn’t matter one bit.
In that case why should Mr. Terrific be black? Pretty sure races isn't essential for his story.
You could cast Mr. Terrific as white, sure. Terry was a white character to begin with. If you want to turn Michael Holt into a white dude then that begs the question why do you need to take one of the few black characters and turn them white when dozens of already white characters could do the same things he does, is it something besides a white fragility and baaaaaawwwwww muh double standard?
>Diversity is our strength
Just like Austria-Hungary, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda, Chud. Get used to it.
You have a fricking strike that will go on all year. Nothing will happen.
Superman Legacy's script is finished you dunce
the first draft is finished
>yeah bro ethnicity just like doesnt matter bro we just want the best actor bro
>also this supporting character editor MUST be an american black
>He will played by an actor of open ethnicity in his 20s.
Translation. Probably not a redhead. Oh well. It's to be expected in todays Hollywood.
Tell me, do you still cry yourself to sleep every night over Adventures of Lois and Clark casting two different actors for Jimmy and neither were red haired?
>Casting is underway for Broukhim, a Middle Eastern dictator.
Why are they trying to do geopolitics in a Superman movie? Just have him fight mad scientists and super criminals.
>Why are they trying to do geopolitics in a Superman movie?
For the Authority. It's their thing to kill dictators.
Unlike Superman who wants to surrender to them and stop helping their victims except for a action of performative rage
You morons haven't read anything with the Authority on it ever, have you?
Nope.
Yeah but it feels different to have him fighting Hitler or commies than some fake middle eastern country that's meant to represent people who aren't any threat to the US in real life.
Yeah if you take Superman and his powers seriously you end up with stuff like this. Which is why stories about him have too ignore it.
Are you Snyder?
Literally the opposite of snyderman…
So if Superman is going to be in opposition to the Authority and trying to stop them from killing this guy? Seems like a weird position to put Superman in. Or will they have him disarm a "terrorist nation" like in the Byrne run? Feels kind of fascist in the post-9/11 world. If you start asking these questions about Superman and his responsibilities you just tie him in knots.
>d. If you start asking these questions about Superman and his responsibilities you just tie him in knots.
You can make him based like Miracleman and just have him taking over the world and making it a better place
>You can make him based like Miracleman and just have him taking over the world and making it a better place
That's why you have the Authority in it.
>That's why you have the Authority in it.
So the movie is going to be about Superman being too powerful and the authority keeping him in check? Doesn't sound like it will be considering Superman in the newcomer and the Authority are established heroes in this film.
No, what makes you think I'm Snyder?
>No, what makes you think I'm Snyder?
You dared to have a opinion in Superman that is deeper than "MUH HOPE"
No, you will have the Authority as the group of antiheroes who keep dictators and such in check by killing them.
I wonder how Superman is going to fit into a story like that. Is it going to be The Authority doing regime change on a fictional Middle Eastern country and Superman wants to stop them because the WMDs are bogus? James Gunn does seem to be stuck in the early 2000s mentally.
This would be so fricking funny.
> Superman defends dictators. And you must love him for it!!
Current flyovers seem kinda pro-Dictator lately, not gonna lie. And he was raised a flyover (pun intended).
Ukraine can get fricked.
Superman stopping the evul Americans from stopping Suh'dam and smiling over the ending credits as he gasses rebellious minorities.
I mean, Superman fans unironically love that
Superman has always been political.
Can they get the casting director to cast an actual superman type actor. Another Brandon Routh shit tier looking actor is the last thing DC needs and the fans need right now.
>it's not going to be comic accurate and will have racist casting
And Gunngays deluded themselves into thinking this would be good.
I have made a fancast. Warner Bros should just hire me already.
>Tom Taylor
What?
That's his real name!
shit taste/10
have a nice day coomer
>scared of boobs
Kek
boobs doesn't equal talent
Sure. But you seem to be afraid of them. Why?
Not him, but all of your shitty casting is "LOOK AT MY HEAVING BOSOMS!", pajeet.
>but all
Can you count. Also, this is perfect!
I prefer ass
Female fragility.
>Asher Angel
>Asher Angel
Why do I have the feeling the asian one is not a regular actress?
Mylana Vyckvaporub is a shitty actress
Who
titty monster next to Chris Wood
>Caroline Vreeland
Never heard of this lady before.
Let's give her a quick Goog and AYE CURAMBA!
>black Jimmy Olsen
>black Perry White
Why? I'm black, and I just want this film to be good. Why would Gunn risk pissing off fans? It's such an unnecessary change, too.
How many people actually refused to see Snyder’s movies because Perry was black in them? I rest my case.
People refused to see Snyder movies because the MCU was offering a better product at the time
More like because the audience were high on action movie comedy at the time. Now that the Marvel formula has gone stale Snyder's work is poised to make a tremendous impact.
If this isn't cope I don't know what is then
The only cope is coming from homosexuals like you. The DCEU's profits plummeted as soon as they tried copying Marvel slop. Audiences have made it clear that they want to see something different from DC
>People refused to see Snyder movies
All of those movies made over 600 millions. Meanwhile, DC without snyder can't even reach 400 millions.
Before or after pandemic?
Before. See Shazam and Harley Quinn.
Shazam wasn't a Snyder project
Yes.. that's why it made 300 mil
Seriously the revisionism about Shazam being a success need to die. It single handely lowered the average gross of the entire DCEU
As opposed to Flash?
Who was defending Flash? That movie is a even worse disaster but it doesn't means that Shazam was a hit.
Shazam made more profit than Man of Steel and BvS.
I meant just Man of Steel, oops
>BvS - 104 Million
>Shazam - 74 Million
More than MoS true, but not BvS
Which is nothing compared to Civil War.
Which felt short against Civil War.
Why do they gotta turn Perry black man?
>Casting is underway for Broukhim, a Middle Eastern dictator.
Brown people are the villains? rare Gunn W
he just had black High Evolutionary
>Jack Hawksmoor, a member of the The Authority who derives superhuman abilities from a symbiotic bond with cities. He will be played by a black actor.
>derives superhuman abilities from a symbiotic bond with cities.
>He will be played by a black actor.
>black actor.
Oh he'd better be called "The Hood", "Ghetto Blaster" "Asphalt Jungle" maybe "The Living Projects"
You have a symbiotic bond with your Mom's basement.
You’re a israelite so there’s that
Baptist (lapsed) unfortunately, I would probably enjoy manipulating your virginity from the shadows.
>enjoy manipulating your virginity from the shadow
Kek. Oji-san from Cinemaphile can do that!
In Millar run, after the Authority is defeated by Seth, a UN sactioned Authority appears for a few issues and their Jack Hawksmoor replacement was a black guy called Street.
Aww so pedestrian. Hoping Gunn goes full Troma with a name. Maybe name him Harlem at least.
Hopefully Amazon will buy WBD early enough to mandate half the characters be gay.
I can use the heat from the DC fanboy seething to warm myself all winter.
>Influencer Ms. Teschmacher
I hate presentism so fricking much. Why can't they make some of these DC films based on '30s and '40 heroes anachronistic period pieces like the Burton Batman movies?
I don't hate the idea of Gunn's new universe but as a longtime DCgay I'm not really excited about it. The DCAU should have been a model for those clueless executives
The truth is the Timm-verse JLA is dry and boring, the JLU is a little more fun but it's main value is nostalgia bomb for DCgays like yourself.
Few of the characters are really developed well enough to interest adults.
DCAU was absolute hell for Superman fans.
>first crossover arc has Superman being a fricking loser and idiot who gets defeated by the Joker and literally cukcolded by Batmam
>The DCAU should have been a model for those clueless executives
Why Superman fans worship a verse that cucked Superman all the time?
DCAU fricking nerfed Superman. N O
DC Universe needs nerfing for movies. The minute Lanterns start tractor beaming planets or Superman throws a moon at someone, people will just shrug.
The final Zod fight had no tension because Zod couldn't even mess up Superman's hair.
Then Supes gets tired of his shit and just executes him.
>The minute Lanterns start tractor beaming planets or Superman throws a moon at someone, people will just shrug.
Bruh one of the favorite moments of the MCU was when Thanos destroyed a moon
> The final Zod fight had no tension because Zod couldn't even mess up Superman's hair.
What version of MOS did you watch? Zod was beating the crap out of Superman
I've seen the movie several times, Zod pushes him through buildings that might as well be foam and bubble wrap. Not a hair out of place, not a bruise, scratch, nothing.
Its fine for the FINAL BOSS to be able to wreck a moon, but having 5 guys on your team of good guys who can do it is stupid.
Hell, he doesn't even get dirty. Superman gets like winded ONCE in the whole movie, when their biggest bruiser wails on him. Then he gets up unbruised or blemished, and its a nothingburger.
I think this is a problem with Snyder's style more than anything. Man rarely includes battle damage of any kind unless it's from bladed weapons.
this is a problem with most capeshit. Battle damage like this is literally nowhere in modern movies
>Why can’t they make Supermab movies set in the 30s?!?!
Because nobody wants to see that. Period movies are always a tough sell outside of WW2 war movies and there it’s the war and Nazis that make it interesting to people, not the time period
There were rumours that the Black Supes movie that was in development before Zaslav came into power was going to be a period piece set in civil rights era. I don't know if the movie is still in production or not.
Civil rights era black Superman actually has merit and subject matter that could make people want to see it. MUH 30s Mad Scientist and robots and shiiiiiieeet wouldn’t. The former has actually intrigue and unconventional progressive social message premise to it making it interesting to audiences. Empty vapid niche nostalgia for a period 80-90 years removed from today where the era offers nothing but different aesthetics is not going to interest audiences.
>Empty vapid niche nostalgia for a period 80-90 years removed from today where the era offers nothing but different aesthetics is not going to interest audiences.
It worked for Lovecraft County.
That was not the appeal of Lovecraft country
>Civil rights era black Superman actually has merit and subject ma
SNOOOREEEEEEEEEEE
That’s the most moronic shit ever. I’m so sick of you homosexuals sucking black ducks every moment of your life.
You sure do spend a lot of time thinking about big black dicks for someone who’s supposedly so sick of them
>It's a "What's so funny about Truth, Justice, and the American Way?" adaptation
What's so funny about a "What's so funny about Truth, Justice, and the American Way" adaptation?
Something something strawman
WSFATJATW is one of the worst Superman stories. Literally only exists as a soijak vs chad bashfic.
I don't see how it conflicts with the essence of Superman. His whole goal is to try and save as many people as he possibly can and he's even taken away his own powers and made himself mortal after accidentally killing a villain for good reasons.
This movie will flop. The only real Superman is the one portrayed by Henry Cavill and directed by Zack Snyder. Let him finish his story.
Pajeet, my son.
And he did. He made Darkseid a basic b***h, everyone is terrified of Superman, the end.
>Even third worlders are clamoring for Snyder
He truly is the future of DC
Seriously, considering how much DC struggles with international audiences, Pajeets loving Snyder is actually a good thing from a marketing POV
Anon, they pay for tickets with Rupees. RUPEES.
And? Money is money.
Its not like if DC is doing great either way, what is to lose?
How much is worth a rupee?
10 rupee = 1 toilet paper roll
Reminds of the star wars Restore the EU people.
How violent will Superman's threats be in this movie?
Probably not at all given that Gunn is going for le wholesome chungus man
>Casting is underway for Jimmy Olsen. He will played by an actor of open ethnicity in his 20s.
Already dropped. Enjoy your 5th flop in a row, DCucks.
This movie is going to flop because it’s targeted for a niche subset of superman fans that overhype their character, have ridiculously specific expectations for him, think he’s literally Jesus and that a “good” superman movie (whatever that means) will inspire the world and save America. It’s like an inverse of the snyderverse.
The DCAU is trash beyond the first iteration of BTAS. Anyone that was not Batman got humiliated and made to look like a complete fricking moron and should never be brought up again
>He's a big ol' galoot. He's a farmboy from Kansas who's very idealistic. His greatest weakness is that he'll never kill anybody. He doesn't want to hurt a living soul. I like that sort of innate goodness about Superman; it's his defining characteristic.
Being a Superman fan is suffering.
Superman shouldn't kill humans, but IMO he absolutely should kill guys like Zod who are as strong or stronger than him.
Man snydercucks are annoying
It's Snyder GODS to you
The seething in this thread is incredible. /misc/gays need to get the frick out and go back.
As long as by /misc/you mean the people genuinely defending corporate race and gender changes.
Those of us who want perry white to be white are the ones who belong on Cinemaphile. Anyone who defends it is clearly just in this for culture wars.
So I take it you on principle hate Dean Cain Superman because he’s part Asian then, Perry talked about Elvis instead of Caesar all the time, Jimmy wasn’t ginger, Lex Luthor wasn’t bald, etc. etc. etc.? And you must HATE how Marlon Brando was nothing like Joe-El of the comics. How the Donner movies revamped Zod entirely. And so forth. Or are you just a hypocrite and a tad bit racist when it’s only the colour of your skin that’s always a bad change by default?
Whoever bet that this movie will fail might as well get their money know.
Seriously, anyone has any idea of what Legacy even IS?
Well, Gunn has detailed that it won't be an origin story, but will cover Superman reflecting on his dual "ancestries."
Obviously Lois and Clark have been cast, with other characters confirmed with the casting details above.
The presence of the Authority characters does back up the prevalent rumor from the past couple of weeks that they would be in the movie. Anything beyond that though feels like speculation, which I don't know if you'd have any interest in.
It's a 2 hour long attack on Superman as a character is what it is. The sole reason this movie exists is so Gunn can get his grubby little mitts on Supes and make him a joke, like he tried to do in Peacemaker.
Why Superman fans are the ones trying to hype out this film
Again, they are the ones who told me that Worlds Finest in the DCAU was amazing for Superman when it was a special about how Superman gets cucked and humilliated.
>Why Superman fans are the ones trying to hype out this film
It's almost like we've had a bit of a draught of big screen depictions of the character that we like and are hopeful that this one may be assuage that. At the same time, I don't know if anyone is hyping it as much as hopeful that it turns out well.
What I find interesting is that you don't seem too high on Big Blue, and are coming off like a bit of a Doomer.
Imagine shilling an IP which continues to be shit year after year and be proud of it.
>shilling
Anon, I just said I hope the movie turns out well. I don't know how that equates shilling. Unless shilling is just shorthand for "liking thing" these days.
The movie will flop.
I won't watch any DC movie until the following demands are met.
1. Gunn is fired.
2. Snyder is reinstalled as the lead director.
3. Cavill plays Superman.
good for you
You didn't watch Flash, the movie with the actor who Snyder personally choose to play Flash. Why would I believe you?
Because the Flash was recommended by Gunn as the best superhero movie ever. Which meant it was going to be shit.
Movie has been in development since Snyder was in charge.
>The Flash was recommended by Gunn as the best superhero movie ever
Do you expect him to talk shit about a movie for the studio that hired him and that is part of the cinematic universe he is at helm right now? Are you moronic?
It was "developed" long after Snyder left too. Stop blaming Snyder.
It's been for like ten years in production.
So Snyder had nothing to do with the majority of the development, and Snyder had nothing to do with the release.
Yet it's his fault.
Kek.
Snyder picked Ezra Miller personally to play Barry Allen.
Yes I do expect creators to be honest. But clearly Gunn cares more about making money than producing quality content and being transparent with his fans.
Gunn lied to his fans (all 11 of them), and they think it's okay because he lied to benefit the company (who was ultimately responsible for this dogshit in the first place)? Does this even make sense to you?
I love how sneedercucks always post this image as if it was the direct competition instead of the same company. Yes, the DCEU did better than the DCEU post sneeder but failed to be a direct competition to the MCU.
Because managing to go from failing at reaching the competente to be a bottom tier property is absolutely a downfall?
And that why we have to rehire Sneeder, to go from ba to mediocre again.
Yes. Because WB should look at facts rather than fantasies
Frick you Pajeet, Snyder is no longer welcome.
Hey Zaslav how it's the money going on?
Good, we are going to sell all of our properties to Amazon by the end of the year.
If this was accurate the right side would have phase 3 MCU movies because it was the competition at the time.
Oh it's you again. The only options aren't "shit on the movie" and "say it's the best superhero movie ever", you fricking idiot. Gunn could have just said it was a fun movie that people should see. Or even say nothing like he did with Shazam.
Was Gunn at helm when Shazam 2 premiered on cinemas?
Yes, he's been in charge since late last year.
The source is I made it the frick up
ZASLAV GIVE US BACK THE SNEEDERVERSE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I wonder if Snyder wasn’t working at Netlix Zaslav would’ve asked him
Something is telling me Snyder isn't welcome at WB studios.
You don't think it has to do with the fact that he nurtured a fricking cult that badgered them for years into releasing a movie they had already decided not to, which further led to that cult expectantly rationalizing that if the studio listened this time that they would again, causally deciding to hold that studio, and all live action adaptations of one of their most underdeveloped shared universe of IPs completely hostage until they got specifically what they wanted, despite that thing that they wanted being the last thing on Earth desired by the studio if they have any hope of positively altering the macrosocio perspective of those IPs, do you?
I would not wish the burdens of the primary public relations agency meant to contend against the flood of comments from #RestoreTheSnyderverse accounts under every DC-related announcement from WB, or their employees, on my worst enemy.
Snyder was a fricking cancer to WB and DC.
I'm so sick of open ethnicities taking all the jobs away from us closed ethnicities.
why are indians so fricking obsessed over snyder shit
Have you seen indian cinema? Snyder basically did what they always did.
Notice how nearly every Snydergay post is ESL shit
DC is literally collapsing after Snyder left and everyone is still seething over him lol
>DC is literally collapsing after Snyder left
>after Snyder left
>after Snyder left
how this is a gotcha? Snyder left DC with a record of all his movies making over 600 millions, then Aquaman appeared and it seemed like everyone was going to be fine with DCEU getting their first billion.
But then they made Shazam and never got even 400 millions.
How its Snyder's fault that his succesors picked by WB are so fricking incompetent?
Because Snyder was competing against Feige MCU and his 600 millions meant nothing at the grand scheme of things.
And now WB can't even catch up to that.
That's my whole point, blaming Snyder is ridiculous because the worst mistakes aren't even his.
>And now WB can't even catch up to that
And bringing Snyder back won't fix shit. It's time to move on.
>because the worst mistakes aren't even his.
Snyder oversaw the miscasting of the DCEU, a bunch of complete trash.
That shit is wholly on him.
Gadot is legitimately one of the worst actors working right now.
By the time Snyder got around to making 600 millions, it was no longer impressive for a superhero movie. Even shit like Dark World hit that figure that year, he never got close to Iron Man 3 in same year.
Snyder never got close to the MCU period.
Even his cut of JL wasn't going to approach even the first Avengers flick.
DC had its two biggest successes after Snyder was retired, Aquaman won by being indistinguishable from the MCU, and Joker was the meme hit of the decade.
Everything before and after was complete trash, barring the original WW, also an MCU flick-lite.
>Joker
>DCEU
They will say that it made a billion because "it was a really good film" and ignore that its because the Joker is popular with the general audiences
>They will say that it made a billion because "it was a really good film" and ignore that its because the Joker is popular with the general audiences
Joker was even able to sell the worthless trash that is the first Squad movie, he's literally WB's Alpha IP.
Yeah, that is why the guys blaming Snyder for everything bad in the company are so silly denying this.
A sullen tired Ben Affleck as Batman
Handsome but dull as shit Cavill-man scripted autistic
A literal stick with zero talent at all as israeli Princess Diana
Aquaman reduced to a dimwitted dudebro joke
Flash as a neurotic 5th gender homosexual
Angry token Black
Snyder built the foundations, and they were rubbish. He cast Pa Kent well them made him borderline sociopathic. He shot Jimmy in the face after a minute of screen-time.
The DCEU was as doomed as the Titanic.
>A sullen tired Ben Affleck as Batman
Made $874 million.
>Handsome but dull as shit Cavill-man scripted autistic
Made $668 million (still the second highest grossing Superman film ever adjusted for inflation and more than contemporary A-list Marvel movies like Iron Man 2, First Class, The Wolverine, and Thor 2).
>A literal stick with zero talent at all as israeli Princess Diana
Made $800 million.
>Aquaman reduced to a dimwitted dudebro joke
Made $1.1 billion.
The fact that he casted charisma vacuums could be around by competent directors like Jenkins and Wan. What made the series irredeemable were A. the DC brand is worthless, and B. they kept making quipshit post-Aquaman that no one wanted to see. They're on their sixth bomb in a row. Blue Beetle will be seven and Aquaman 2 will probably be eight.
Spaghetti is a competent director and the Flash still bombed.
>(still the second highest grossing Superman film ever adjusted for inflation and more than contemporary A-list Marvel movies like Iron Man 2, First Class, The Wolverine, and Thor 2).
LMAO at this string of cope-caveats. He took the most iconic superhero on the planet, and barely eked out victory over the worst MCU movie. When a movie starring the second most iconic superhero in the world (Joker is not a hero) made a mere $750 million, Sony went into Full Panic Mode.
And then throwing the Trinity out there and falling below a weird Stark/Rhodey buddy movie....shameful. It got it's dick handed to it by Civil War.
Keep coping.
>He took the most iconic superhero on the planet, and barely eked out victory over the worst MCU movie
Superman is a loser who hasn't reached those numbers since 1980. Superman is hated by general audiences.
No, Lester-Man and Singer-Man and Snyder-Man are despised, because they are shitty autistic losers.
Optimistic nice-guy Superman was the highest grossing movie evar the year it came out. WB has been wiping it's ass on that ever since.
>Optimistic nice-guy Superman was the highest grossing movie evar the year it came out.
Superman I was successful because it was literally the most expensive film ever made at the time and featured mega stars Marlon Brando and Gene Hackman all over the advertising. All of its marketing centered on either them or the special effects. That's why people watched it.
Wholesome Chungus Reeves maintained his role into the following three movies and none of them approach Man of Steel's gross.
>Superman I was successful because it was literally the most expensive film ever made at the time and featured mega stars
None of the Snyder films were cheap, Man of Steel was Avengers-tier expensive.
In fact Man of Steel is more expensive THAN the first Avengers movie.
Was it literally the most expensive movie ever, and the first of its kind? If not then it's not comparable to Superman I.
It's the most expensive cape move in decades, it was more expensive than the Nolan Films, it was more expensive than The Avengers.
It's wholly comparable.
Only Sony is worse for pissing away budget than WB when it comes to films.
Iconicity isn't popularity. Superman being an "icon" has never translated to people wanting to watch his movies and shows, read his books, or play his games. The proof is in the fact that, as much as you're coping about how MOS actually failed, the hard truth is that it's to this day the highest grossing Superman movie ever in raw dollars and the second highest after inflation adjustment (unless you count BvS, in which case it's third). The IP had four box office bombs immediately before it (Superman 3, Supergirl, Superman 4, Superman Returns) and came out in an era where DC movies that weren't Batman were regarded as jokes (Green Lantern, Jonah Hex, Catwoman).
If anything him being "well known" has been detrimental because Superman circa 2013 was a fricking joke because of Superman Returns. I don't know if you're old enough to even remember this but literally no one liked Superman more than Batman or Wolverine (to say nothing of Spider-Man) in 2012.
>but literally no one liked Superman more than Batman or Wolverine (to say nothing of Spider-Man) in 2012.
That's purely because those 3 characters had a string of movies that actually honored those characters and played to their strengths, whereas Superman got treated to horrible character butchering shitfests, all the way through Snyder.
The Man of Steel trailers notably made Man of Steel look like Donner-Man.
What a fricking misdirection.
It barely beat Hanwiener, a movie about drunk-ass black Superman with an absolutely abysmal ending. Man of Autism vastly underperformed, it fell on it's face when word got out on it.
Remember the review embargoes?
Remember the presales a year in advance of the movie?
Remember the trailers that had the only 7 minutes of the movie with a positive tone in them?
WB Marketing did everything in their power to slip Snyder's turd into audience's punch bowl unsuspected.
Hanwiener was an original film with the very bankable Will Smith in the starring role and a novel premise that interested people. This is before he became a weird cultist and was instead a widely-beloved cultural icon coming off of hits like the Men in Black series, Independence Day (second highest grossing movie ever when it came out), the Bad Boys series, I Am Legend, and I Robot.
I don't know why a nobody as Superman just barely surpassing Hanwiener after four bombs is supposed to be an embarrassment. The first Iron Man was enough of a breakout success to launch a cinematic universe and it didn't even come close to Hanwiener. Frick, after inflation adjustment films that people are cooming over today like GOTG 3 and Spiderverse 2 don't come close to Hanwiener's gross either.
Hanwiener was a direct parody of Superman.
It starred no one else of not but Smith, and it had a shit-tastic 3rd act.
Man of Steel COULD have easily made a billion, it was well on track with a phenom opening weekend.
But then everyone spread word it was a trick, the review embargo ended, and it was all over for Zack's shitty interpretation of Superman.
Or it should have been, but WB made the stupid choice not to Superman Returns it into the bin and start over.
>Man of Steel COULD have easily made a billion
Based on what, Superman never making more than a billion in his entire history?
Based on it's opening weekend figures. It opened 25 million ahead of Wonder Woman domestically.
>Man of Steel COULD have easily made a billion, it was well on track with a phenom opening weekend.
Superman fans are really this delusional about this character that gets constantly mocked by actual cool people
This is what normal people think of Superman
>Tarantino
>A normal person
He's explored realms so deep up his own butthole few mortals can compare.
This means that even a person as experienced as Tarantino thinks Superman is a butthole?
Damn, imagine what normies must think then
Why you think normies are going to follow the same line of thought of Tarantino'?
>Hanwiener was a direct parody of Superman
Yes, parodies of Superman are consistently more popular than Superman. In the same way that a character inspired by the Shadow is much more popular than the Shadow.
>Aquaman won by being indistinguishable from the MCU
Aquaman was largely based on Snyder’s vision and what he had set up
It fricking wasn't
Source: my ass
Source: the fricking movie motherfricker
>no dolphin clicking bullshit when they're underwater
>no moronic accent on Mera
>doesn't reference anything from ZSJL
>is generally a lighter movie than anything Sneeder has ever made
Wonder Woman is about as far from the MCU as you can get.
Nah, Wonder Woman was such a wholesome happy film. Scenes as warm like the time where a entire village was gassed or Wonder Woman killed a entire army
>See guys, Snyder movies made 600 millions at box office, how much has made Shazam, Black Adam or Flash?
>Why should I care about the MCU being the direct competitor of the DCEU?
>Snyder has nothing to do with the Flash movie being a box office bomb.
>Yes I know he handpicked Ezra to play Flash but that has nothing to do with the Flash movie being a box office bomb at all.
>>Yes I know he handpicked Ezra to play Flash but that has nothing to do with the Flash movie being a box office bomb at all.
The Flash is a bomb because the CGI is dogshit. Literally every fricking review is destroying the CGI.
Even if Erza is also unpopular, he is nowhere to be the worse issue of the film
Pajeets are coping
Is James Gunn really not gonna talk about the DCU at SDCC?
He'll look stupid if WBD sells next year and he's out on his ass again.
A good shepherd of the DC IP wouldn't want his "Jerks, Losers and Doofuses" formula around the Superfriends.
>all of this cope
Snyder's DC is still better than whatever turd this new universe is gonna be
I expect both of them to get all the key characterizations wrong.
>Muh wholesome chungus man didn't smile while murdering Zod!!
Frick off. Snyder fully understood and even improved the character. Same with Batman and his nonsensical no kill rule.
That neck snap death was moronic
>Frick off. Snyder fully understood and even improved the character.
The same way he improved Batman by turning into Gun-man.
>How dare he develop a character organically through the story instead of sticking to stale comic book tropes
Snyder did not improve Batman at all
Oh and as for "Major A list Stars in supporting roles" Man of Autism had Costner, Fishburne and Russel Crowe.
They did not skimp on star power.
HE is Superman, no one else. If you tards still don't get it, don't worry. You WILL.
>refused to come back until he was sure Snyder wouldn't be involved anymore
My hero!
>Baseless schizobabble
Silence, WORM
He wouldn't even shave a moustache to work with SHITner, how can you be so garbage you make your star choose Mission Impossible over being SUPERMAN?
>SHITner
SNEEDon
By being contractually obligated to do reshoots for M:I and thus keep the moustache on, as well as Paramount not allowing him to shave it off even when iirc WB offered to pay compensation for it
>He wouldn't even shave a moustache to work with SHITner
You do know he didn't shave the moustache for the reshoots done by Whedon, right? Are you just being purposefully moronic?