No one gives a frick about Superman hes not a iconic figure anymore. The Flash had 2 batman in it and still no one cares.
James Gunn is going to get fired when it makes less than black adam.
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
No one gives a frick about Superman hes not a iconic figure anymore. The Flash had 2 batman in it and still no one cares.
James Gunn is going to get fired when it makes less than black adam.
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
it's not going to get made. Aquaman will flop even harder than the Flash and no DC stuff will get made for years except maybe The Batman 2.
yeah, probably.
For people who don't like DC movies...you sure fret about them an awful lot...
It'll be a better film than Man of Steel but yeah, capeshit fatigue is settling in. The only capeshit that makes any money anymore is Spider-Man and Batman (unless he's sidelined by some other hero like Superman or the Flash)
>put the guy that did dc’s worst flop (suicide squad 2) in charge of the entire dc division
gonna KEK when this fails
I liked suicide squad 2, it was ultra pozzed but self aware it didn't want to deify any character which is what happens with today's movies, they deify characters and transform them into Mary sues and Gary stus
The only chance Superman ever had to get big was SUPERMAN LIVES
>an unapologetically optimistic and wholesome Superman
general audiences will hate it
people like redlettermedia unironically caused shit like this. they influenced a lot of people to be apathetic and misersble about movies. you’re gonna think i’m a schizo but i’m not kidding. RLM unironically caused the death of movies.
>RLM unironically caused the death of movies.
based schizo
He's got a point though. I've met quite a few guys who never praise any movie. It sucks ass.
yes. they were a bunch of losers who failed in life so they created a youtube channel where they projected their insecurities and skyrocketed in popularity. every youtube movie channel copies them in some way. simon pegg and jj abrams watch them. people in Hollywood know them.
there is some truth to this. They created the armchair youtube analysis and changed online discourse around movies.
They dared to call shit movies shit, nooooo. What about the multibillion dollar companies that invested millions to create soulless focus-grouped slop 🙁
you’re exactly the kind of brainwashed homosexual i’m talking about. the movies are shit, yes, but the fat morons are responsible for it.
>make shit movie
>fat moron calls movie shit
>make a shit movie, changing nothing
>fat moron calls movie shit
>make another shit movie
>fat moron calls it shit
how?
>he who dared to reject the slop is to blame!
internet's always been full of people talking shit about everything, zoomer. go back to bed.
They like more than they hate, and what they hate is usually studio forced slop that's made to follow current trends, check every [CURRENT THING] box.
the prequels were shit, no amount of ironic memeposting on reddit will ever change that. cope harder
At some point you realize that they're miserable malcontents who have no real rhyme or reason for the things they enjoy and really just want to be pseudos who gain a feeling of superiority over others by bashing popcorn movies
I'm curious whether audiences may actually like optimism and wholesomeness again after a couple of decades of cynicism, snark and Marvel quipping.
Top Gun: Maverick and Avatar 2 did brilliantly and they both felt pretty straightforwardly optimistic and wholesome.
>Top Gun: Maverick and Avatar 2 did brilliantly and they both felt pretty straightforwardly optimistic and wholesome.
They also weren't soulless and saccharine, and cheesy, and tropey.
For James Gunn and redditors, wholesome and optimistic is just the snarky MCU tone with zany quips out the ass. Don’t expect it to be anything like top gun or avatar.
Why is he so smug?
They need to give it a rest. Their waters are too muddy with Reeves Batman, Gunn, Snyder, CW, and probably other shit all going on at the same time. Give it 5 years and just start fresh.
>Superman starts off doing Superman stuff
>takes lois to fortress for an interview and shows off all his cool silver age style stuff
>is wistful for old krypton because he feels like he doesn’t really fit in on Earth
>Brainiac Skull ship shows up and Superman gets zapped into bottle city of kandor
>wakes up in hospital inside Kandor and everyone tells him it’s better to stay there and be safe with other Kryptonians than Try and escape
>meets up with his old boy hood dog Krypto and they manage to escape
>Superman realizes that he belongs on Earth and that he shouldn’t be stuck thinking about the past on krypton
>defeats Braniac and saves Metropolis and Kandor
TFW Man of Steel is still the most enjoyable and successful Superman movie ever made.
> Superman WILL be optimistic and jovial
> Superman WILL NOT be a man of murder
> Superman WILL NOT assist his father’s suicide
> Superman WILL have a flirtatious relationship with Lois Lane
> Superman WILL be best pals with Jimmy Olsen
> Superman WILL have a bright costume
> Superman WILL wear trunks
> Superman WILL save people with a smile on his face
> Superman WILL tell others they are worth saving
> Superman WILL inspire hope
> Superman WILL break a billion dollars
> Superman WILL lead snydergays into the sun
>Superman WILL have a poop fetish
I for real laughed my broccoli head o ff at this on cap no gong on it be it do it
>on cap no gong on it be it do it
what
That's how zoomer lingo looks to me. It's like how sims language is what non english speakers hear english as
> Superman WILL NOT be a degenerate
> Superman WILL ask Peacemaker to stop spreading false rumors
> Superman WILL inspire Peacemaker to be better
Strange ways to just say: Superman WILL flop
>> Superman WILL break a billion dollars
> Superman WILL be critically acclaimed, enjoyed by general audiences, and commercially successful
> Superman WILL NOT care if you don’t like his movie, so long as you’re a good person
>Superman will suck
>RLM invented being mad/complain at movies
are all zoomers this moronic?
Won't watch unless the actor confirms he's straight.
I know this board doesn't like to have logical discussions about how the business actually works, but the reality here is that the DC brand has been completely trashed by the Snyder era and the post Snyder era with all these Walter Hamata approved DC movies. Gunn and Zazloff have to rebuild and regain audience trust, and the only way to do that is by consistently making good movies. Superman Legacy could be the greatest capeshit ever made and it still would be highly unlikely to make North of a billion. That's because audiences have been conditioned by Snyder and Walter Hamata to hate DC movies and associate them with awful films. This new DCU will need several movies in a row that are consistently excellent in order to gain trust with the audience. And contrary to what Gunn and Zazloff are saying, this new era of Warner Bros and DC starts with Superman legacy, NOT with Blue Beetle. Blue Beetle was approved by Hamata and it will flop. It's unlikely the first new DCU movies will be massive hits, but if they're excellent, then word of mouth will spread and people will begin talking about the next upcoming DC film, thats how they need to build momentum. Theres little room for error with DC anymore, if they stumble out of the gate itll be hard to recover. But Gunn has never made a bad movie and I'm not saying that as an ass kisser, dude is a legitimately talented filmmaker. I think its safe to say he's going to make the best Superman movie since the Reeves era.
Not reading your novel length defense of a multibillion dollar israelite-run business
Good points and good post
@187041125
This is why you can't have discussion here. He pretends he doesn't care, he pretends to hate these movies and studios, yet he spends all day everyday on this board and goes into these threads and watches these movies. The typical Cinemaphile contrarian