Supreme

Wasted potential unironically

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No real potential

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ah the Cinemaphilentrarians.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        1) 90s era edgy liefeld superman
        meh
        2) 2 years of Moore doing a homage to silver age superman
        meh
        I think they got all the potential they could possible get out of the character. It would have been cool if Moore wrote the ending but otherwise what more potential do you see with the character?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Aside from Moore himself, anyone who wants to write Superman is just going to try to get into DC and write Superman, so nobody else was lining up to write that version of Supreme. It's why Kirkman and Larsen both just wanted to bring back the original version of Supreme. Like a lot of early Image books, the idea was better than the execution.

          As things stand now, Supreme is one one of the characters that Rob Liefeld no longer owns, and the owner licensed the comic rights for Supreme and Youngblood to some other guy who's done nothing with them in years, it's possible they may have expired by now, it doesn't look like we're ever going to see these characters again.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It really suck, because I want a Moore-Supreme Compendium

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Liefelds pens plus the Alan Moore run and you say wasted? What more could you want? Six seasons and a movie?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Six seasons and a movie
      Yes.
      Imagine Supreme in the Invincible cartoon.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Six seasons of THIS?

        That might rule actually..

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You get it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just for Moore to finish his second run.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've tried to read this comic multiple times but the meta contextual themes are fricking nauseatingly tired and done at this point. I'm sure it was good when it was it out in the 90's but it's impossible to enjoy nowadays.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Speak for yourself.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Any one of us could make a Superman expy. The world is a shitty place and no one apparently has that kind of optimism anymore

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For a second i was like "When did Tom Strong wear a cape?" And then i remembered the other Alan Moore Superman expy.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Tom Strong
      Doesn't that comic promote race mixing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tom Strong is not a Superman expy.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Tom Strong
      >Superman expy
      Huh, Cinemaphile really doesn't read comics.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We just complain

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn't help that Morrison made his Superman look like Tom Strong in his Superman/Authority comic.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This one?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Grey temples
            >Short sleeves
            >Gloves and tools
            >Triangle logo
            Who was I describing again??

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I really like Tom's design.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      While Tom Strong (like much of the ABC-titles) comes from a direct lineage of what Moore was doing with Supreme (reconstruction of superhero tropes, instead of the deconstruction he's been long associated with), the character itself is a homage to pulp hero Doc Savage.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >reconstruction
        No, it's still "deconstruction". Reconstruction is not a thing.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Reconstruction happens post-deconstruction. It's the entire purpose of deconstructing something, to make something anew. It's different from glorification.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Test

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was just a Superman clone that Moore had to create because DC wouldn't allow him to use the real character in his experimental writing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All of that is incorrect.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      created by rob liefeld

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    KABOOOOOOOM

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Omni-Man looks different.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He's wearing his coalition of planets uniform

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He's wearing his coalition of planets uniform

        Someone didn't read the books detected

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They did him real dirty in that run of Glory where they made her some kind of freaky monsterwoman.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >that run of Glory where they made her some kind of freaky monsterwoman.
      Rob Liefeld has a real eye for talent, and a willingness to let people do whatever they want with his creations, even when maybe sometimes he shouldn't.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is there anything consistent about this character? Like at all?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No. And that's an important plot point in the Moore-run.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nice.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You guys are pretty supremacy ngl.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We have Captain Marvel at home.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I assume you mean Billy

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is the antithesis of wasted potential, what? Edgy Superman expy that would otherwise be forgotten getting one of the most revenant, heartfelt Superman runs of all time.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *