>gave him homosexual chicken feathers
>made him fat
>made him purely a coward scavanger
>made him literally gay
>made him lose to SpinoCHADeus
And now he loses to a fricking bear. Why do they try to ruin t-rex so much?
 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
T-rex bros...
How big were bears in dinosaur times though? If I recall correctly most animals were fricking huge and dangerous back then, even sloths were as big as trees
homie that was like 1-2 million years ago. Not fricking dinosaur times.
Ok but how big were the bears that actually were around in the dinosaur age then?
Mammals didn't exist back then. Proto-mammals which were still somewhat related to dinosaurs were tiny
Even proto-bears?
Explain this then:
Bears didn’t exist 65 million years ago. There were early mammals but the biggest in record was about the size of a beaver.
That sounds about right for dinosaur times. Bears were bigger because the air was heavier or something back then
Oxygen is the word you're looking for
Would be so based if megafauna just reappeared from holes in the ground and started destroying civilization
they specifically jobbed to humans, and the survivors in Africa aren't exactly doing hot.
That's what the Godzilla and the other big ones are about
Dinosaur times? Bro, bears weren't a thing until millions of years after the dinos were wiped out. So they say. Our ancestors couldn't have even begun to progress unless the hoards of terrible lizards were dead.
Goddamn, evolution is based. Praise SOL
>dinosaur times
This is the guy who has giant meltdowns when he sees feathered dinosaurs in media.
I don't get what your point is even supposed to be
"Dinosaur times" is the kind of language a child -or a manchild with low-functioning autism - uses. No adult who knows anything about paleontology uses that term. If you don't even know the term "Mesozoic" you shouldn't be allowed to talk about dinosaurs.
What does it matter, do you also insist that people refer to dogs as "Canis lupus familiaris", redditor?
I insist that they refer to dogs as dogs. If someone uses juvenile terms like "pupper" or "doggo" (the equivalent to "dinosaur times") I would also call them moronic.
Why is that juvenile? Its the times when dinosaurs were around, just like people refer to the times when romans were around as "roman times". You are just being pretentious and whiny.
Because it's what a literal child would say when talking about dinosaurs.
A literal child would also get upset that the modern depiction of dinosaurs no longer matches their depiction in his favorite movies/shows/books/drawings. A functioning adult would not.
Why do you support the feminization of dinosaurs?
who says feathers are feminine?
also I don't "support" anything other than the truth. if we found undeniable proof that dinos were literally gay homosexuals I'd have to accept that. because facts don't care about your feelinga
Feathers aren't "feminine" you terminally online /misc/cel moron.
I don't deny science just because it upsets me and my autistic obsession with dinosaurs.
Are you seriously trying to pretend that a dinosaur covered in fluffy colorful feathers is not more feminine than a featherless reptile?
It's fricking nature, anon. It's only "feminine" if you choose to view it that way. It's an adaptation for survival, nothing more, nothing less.
Is a vulture feminine? Is an eagle? Is a hawk?
Because smaller animals need less food to survive. After something like a massive asteroid impact, food is going to be scarce for a while.
I imagine other mammalian adaptations such as live birth and milk probably played a role, too.
>Is a vulture feminine? Is an eagle? Is a hawk?
They're all more feminine than a crocodile
Only if you see everything through a lens of "masculine" and "feminine" like some kind of moron compensating for his small dick.
Fricking feminine ass Romans and their feminine fricking eagle, amirite? They should have used a crocodile, that would have been so much cooler and more manly. Fricking gays.
Why are you even here? is reddit down or something?
>if you aren't a braindead boomer /misc/tard who throws fits about fricking dinosaurs you belong on reddit
have a nice day election tourist.
I really hope we do one day bring back dinosaurs just so to see them rip apart homosexuals like you. Nothing can be a more shameful death than getting mauled by a giant duck.
IF homosexual cultures like the Romans were compensating for their dick size, they were most definetly compensating for the fact that they were fricking little boys 247.
>the peak of Western civilization was so gay
Insightful input, Rabbi.
>colorful feathers
Almost always a male trait when only one sex has them.
>The most powerful and dominant group of killers the planet has ever conjured before mankind were actually all a bunch of savage flamboyant wieners with teeth.
Not the kind of win you feather gays think it is. No matter how the science try to spin it, you can’t stop dinosaurs from looking based.
I love how this is basically the "b-b-but they don't look COOL with feathers" argument a child would use but with the word cool swapped for based.
But bears didn't have feathers?
I don't think bears were around but I remember the old science museum in SF before they tore it down to build an aids memorial with a lawn on the roof had a room with lots of models of giant insects which scared the shit out of 6 year old me
the short-faced bear. 12 foot tall standing up. the largest known ancient bear.
i can see him taking on a dino. and he probably did. any stegosaurus walking by got fricked in the ass.
Jesus I knew American education was bad but really?
That was in the ice age. Mammals got no bigger than cats while Dinosaurs were still around.
So why would they survive while way stronger animals died out?
do they really not teach you this at school? the lack of food killed of the big ones.
Why would there be a lack of food though? you just told me that the smaller animals survived, so why didn't the big ones eat them?
Something the size of a T. Rex is not going to be able to subsist in the long term off of tiny little animals. There's a reason why big predators generally eat big prey. They need a lot of food, and every hunt expends energy. I'd wager a T. Rex or other large predatory dinosaur would expend more energy trying to catch small surviving mammals than they would gain from eating one. All of the larger herbivores would be the first ones to starve, because the impact would have not only directly resulted in vast swathes of their food sources burning to the ground, the impact winter afterwards would kill most of the large plants the large herbivores subsisted off of.
Small animals can also hide in places the larger ones can't reach. Some could burrow, and some could likely climb trees. And there's also the fact that, at least soon after the impact, these animals wouldn't exactly be thriving. They'd be surviving, and doing better than most others, but they probably wouldn't be common enough to keep the big predators alive.
The same way their synapsid ancestors survived the Permian extinction.
Why was everything so big back then?
Love the bear's face.
>Why was everything so big back then?
Higher oxygen levels.
Why do higher oxygen levels make everything bigger?
In dinosaur times the bear’s ancestor was like a tree shrew thing
?si=dtJ2DMc0WXX09ziK
>now
This is clearly from decades ago when people still thought dinosaurs were moronic, slow, cold-blooded lizards.
Anyway, imagine being over the age of 12 and still getting upset about dinosaurs not being the same as they were in your shitty picture book from 1985. Pathetic.
You know there is no scientific evidence from outside china that supports the feathered dino theory, plus the art of feather dinos used in scientific journals is literally drawn by a furry artist named Emily Willoughby? This is not a conspiracy theory, its an open collaboration between furry freaks and chinese investors.
>NO YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, FEATHERED DINOSAURS ARE A CHINESE PLOT
The only thing more pathetic than getting upset about autism lizards is ascribing advances in science to some kind of chink/furgay conspiracy simply because you don't like change (due to your autism).
look it up.
homosexual, the first fossil of a feathered dinosaur ever discovered (Archaeopteryx) was found in fricking Germany. Paleontologists suspected dinosaurs may have had feathers since the 1800s.
nah
I wasn't too sure at first but these responses convinced me that he's probably right.
>muh china
Fricking moron.
Death to America.
You sound like Chris Chan complaining about how they changed Sonic's arms blue, but with Dinoautism instead
What about the fossils with feathers?
moronic. You know what else is bulky and slow moving? Hippos. Now tell me with a straight face a grizzly would beat a hippo, much less a hippo the size of a bus
hippo top speed: 19 mph. the fastest olympic athlete on the planet maxes at 8 mph.
>Usain Bolt's top speed during his world record run was 27.33 miles per hour (mph) , which he reached around the 60-80m mark. This is equivalent to: 44.72 km/h.
T-Rex top speed: 15-20 mph
Liberal homosexuals will never take away the based dinosaurs of my youth
kek
you made this?
I made it
Amazing, anon. If you have any sort of art page I'd love to see more.
nice
>manlet think Smash Bros style physics equates to real life.
That game really gave you sexless midgets a huge confidence boost didn’t it?
>now he loses to a bear
that image is clearly from the 50s or something. see no feathers so it's an outdated reconstruction.
why are you trying to present this like it's a new thing?
answer: because you're an emotional homosexual who thinks the mean palaeontologists are out to get your childhood toy monster
Exactly! Get with the times chud, its 2023. Dinosaurs are trans and feathered now!
Doesn’t matter whether it looks like a giant chicken or not because we know that the animal is the equivalent to a giant pitbull with a bite force 10x stronger than a hippopotamus. It would tear a grizzly in half like a moronic child with a teddy bear.
what matters is that the images is not the current thinking nor is a new thing. so it's got nothing to do with the trend you're talking about
Shouldn’t even matter what it looks like here anyways cause it’s not even the right fricking size. Most Normies don’t care what T-Rex currently looks like. All they know is a bad ass giant lizard with tiny arms that could easily frick up a bear with ease. As for the mythological fantasy aspect, the mammals like Bears and Gorillas would actually get more fricked up by T-Rex if they were bigger. That pic and shit like King Kong were made by a bunch of furrgays that seeth at the sight of giant kino reptiles actually existing. Thank god for Primal showing us the reality of how mammals would be getting cucked by these mofos.
Fang got buttfricked by the giant gorilla tho
The Niggorilla rigged the match by drinking the magic demon semen that shouldn’t have even been in my paleo kino. Cope harder butt munky.
>Monkey had to drink the writer’s magic syrup in order to take on a midget T-Rex
That shit was stupid and you fricking know it, as with all the other magic nonsense they put in that show.
Remember a decade ago when we used to mock sjws for their irrational outrage over absolutely inconsequential shit? Now the right-wing thinks dinosaurs are a homosexual plot to feminize boyhood interests.
Normal ass people don’t fricking care. Some of the dumbest looking animals on the planet like bears and hippos kill more people than sharks and crocs do.
your reddit gold, sir
>your reddit gold, sir
"Fools Gold"
someone posted the Reddit thread of this image last time and the comments are good for a kek, so many pissed off sois
reddit is so goddamn cringe
>science says T-Rex looks stupid now which means the mass killing animal can’t be taken seriously by the humans that would absolutely get horrifically slaughtered by it regardless of what the damn thing actually looks like
Holy shit dilate harder you actual homosexual.
>NOOOOO MY HECKIN DINOS :~~* THEY AREN'T COOL LIKE IN MY BOOMER BOOKS AND JURASSIC PARK ANYMORE :'''~~*~~* MUH CHILDHOOD :~~*
your sóy vanilla latte sir (from organic fair trade coffee beans)
>S-S-S-SOI!!!! Y-YOU'RE SOI!!! NOW CHANGE MY DINOS BACK RIGHT NOW YOU MEANIE!!!
go back to r*ddit already
Evolution is just a theory.
The people that take this thread seriously would unironically believe that a cat could actually murder a full grown man in a fight to the death.
NuDinos look very surrealist and alien in comparison to the giant lizard ones. I think they’re better monsters.
An imporntant factor people forget is that even with feathers most Dinosaurs wouldn’t even have ones like bird feathers because those types evolved for aviation first, then readapted into the later bird species for other means. The larger, feathered dinos like T-Rex could have a more streamlined and scaly looking feather texture similar to a penguin or cormorant.
T-Rex wouldn't even have feathers, there's skin impressions of it and it was scaly. Combine that with the facts of thermal gigantism and the place and time it lived it would have died of overheating if it was feathered
I really don’t care what the evidence ends up saying when it’s all said and done, all I know is your legit moronic if you actually think the science says Dinosaurs actually looked like pic related.
That's not what science says though, moron. Having feathers doesn't mean it was toucan sam with teeth. I swear to god /misc/tards are only capable of thinking in hyperbole.
>twisting my comment to get the same side of the argument out
Keep staying classy Cinemaphile
I think it's most probable that the majority of dinosaurs did have feathers, but they weren't necessarily the kind we associate with birds - probably more similar to downy feathers than flight ones. But dinosaurs wouldn't have had to have them all over their bodies.
It's entirely possible that T. Rex had no feathers on most of its body, but had some in a few places (maybe a crest for mating displays or something).
>majority
No, the vast majority of dinosaurs, both in speculation and literal skin examples, were featherless. Almost no herbivores had feathers and most carnivores aside from a few families had no feathers, either. Nothing before the Middle Jurassic likely had feathers, either.
Are you seriously trusting a book published by Disney?
>published by Disney
Yup now it all makes sense. Only a furrgay from Disney could make up some bullshit like this.
>noooo you can't update the shape of a creature we only have dust of and that lived millions of years ago!!!
If you guys weren't whinny babies about it and actually honest you'd shill for the old design of picrel, not just for the one you saw as kids
I don't know why they insist on using the word "feather" when it's closer to hair. As mentioned before, the biggest tyrannosaurs won't have too much hair (if any), because they would otherwise overheat