>TMNT Mutant Mayhem is the 4th most profitable film of 2023. It made a net profit of 204.5 million.
Source: https://deadline.com/2024/05/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-mutant-mayhem-movie-profits-1235902581/
It will never stop being funny to me how disconnected Cinemaphile is from the real world. You fools actually still believe this movie was a failure for Paramount, lol?
But April is a fat pig in that movie.
And it's clear normal people don't share that sentiment considering how much money it's made and it's good critical and audience receptions
Used "it's" instead of "its"
whoopsie
But April's not Bebop?
>merchandise makes up a good chunk of the revenue
Gee, I wonder if it's counting all TMNT merch sold that year. Wouldn't be absurd if a fluff piece used dishonest accounting like that other fluff piece that tried to frame that Mutant Mayhem made all the money the franchise made in its lifetime?
moron.
They did this will paw patrol as well this year.
Unless they also do it with other animated or family films on the list (top 3 were always going to be Spiderverse, Barbie, and Mario) then I suspect paramount paid deadline to make a fluff piece before they get sold
Deadline is doing a thing where they count down the top 10 most profitable films of last year. That author just so happens to write a lot of Deadline articles relating to the business side of film and television. P.S. Paw Patrol was number 10. They haven't announced the top 3 yet, but it's a safe bet Barbie and Mario are in the mix
This is undoubtedly a planted Paramount shill article. He already wrote a very undiscerning one on this movie last year
It's not a coincidence the only other film on his list to account for merch revenue was also a Paramount release. The fact that knows the split between Paramount and Spin Master on Paw Patrol suggests he's getting info directly from them. As he doesn't disclose that and therefore it's not officially from Paramount, I'm not sure they're legally obligated to tell him the truth.
It's also not a coincidence this is dropping just as the company is in midst of being bought out. If he didn't include merch revenue, there would be zero Paramount releases on Deadline's list. That wouldn't make Paramount's movie business a very attractive purchase.
>TMNT Mutant Mayhem is the 4th most profitable film of 2023. It made a net profit of 204.5 million
Source: https://deadline.com/2024/05/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-mutant-mayhem-movie-profits-1235902581/
It will never stop being funny to me how disconnected Cinemaphile is from the real world. You fools actually still believe this movie was a failure for Paramount lol
Whoops accidentally copy-pasted my original post. Anyways, I think a 1 billion jump in merch sales for a franchise that has made 10 billion in it's lifetime is significant whether you want to admit (which I know you don't, lol) or not. Also the piece covers home media sales, but you would know that if you read it you moron
https://deadline.com/2023/08/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-retail-sales-1235519233/
Oh, look. It's from the same author. OP is a fricking moron.
>IT MADE MONEY THAT MEANS IT'S GOOD AND YOU'RE WRONG
Be less of a homosexual OP. TMNT regularly makes a billion in merch sales and Mutant Mayhem barely managed to squeak by it's production budget on ticket sales, and Deadline's math conveniently leaves out the fortune Paramount spent on advertising the damned thing. You think Paramount is going bankrupt because they are so profitable and good at handling money and investments, OP?
The advertisement budget is considered can any of you morons read? Also, TMNT doesn't make a billion yearly lol. This ain't no Star Wars
>TMNT doesn't make a billion yearly lol. This ain't no Star Wars
According to Paramount's shill articles, it more or less did.
>Since 2012 and not including 2023, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles global merchandise sales have amassed $8 billion, per industry sources. This was accomplished during Paramount’s ownership of the TMNT IP that they it acquired in 2009.
That was $8 billion over a decade that includes the pandemic and the void years after Rise was cancelled.
What I found telling is that Paramount didn't offer any comparisons to how this did in comparison to the Bay movies. Nor did they say how much of this merch was tied to the new movie versus general legacy Turtles content. Boxoffice wise, we know this did substantially worse, but did those ugly turtle toys also outsell these ugly turtle toys?
>Deadline's math conveniently leaves out the fortune Paramount spent on advertising the damned thing
Anon, I...
>Cinemaphile tard trying to sound smart again
While I think including merch may be fudging things a bit, they DO include ad costs in the chart if you bothered to actually read it.
And even without merch, it'd still profit, although it'd be a much smaller amount
It wouldn't actually, because international ticket cuts are way more in favor of the theaters. You can pretty much cut that amount in half and that's still being generous.
They already accounted for ticket cuts in the "theatrical revenue" section. They got 80+m back from the 180m box office
Don't care.
I know it flopped
>Television and streaming
Ah yes, Paramount paying Paramount.
Christ , Nick bought that entire property for 60 million. What a steal.
lol homosexual
I only care about my opinion. frick you and everyone on the internet.
okay but is it a good movie? worth a watch?
Yeah it's fun.