Sounds likea shitshow. The first movie's Riddler was basically already Hush so what's the point? >Robin
I'd love to see them try this and not be a disaster. >Clayface
If they skip the clay powers and just make him someone who transforms using face masks, it could be kino. But it sounds like a mess, anyway.
But the whole shtick is gay ultra realism, right? How on earth would they make Clayface fly with that in mind? I actually hate this ultra realism shit and want more classic serious but also very silly and fantastical Batman like the Chuck Dixon/classic runs of the character. Ironically, those old comics had better and more mature writing than these Hollywood joints.
No, the comic industry is going really strong with Gems like these
Who the FRICK writes this? They clearly don't know who the frick it is they're writing about. Slade, of all people, caring about that.
>How on earth would they make Clayface fly with that in mind?
He’ll just be generic Golden Age version where he’s angry horror actor that wears a creepy mask.
>I actually hate this ultra realism shit
Same. Also tired of Year One or Year 2 Batman! What liked about Affleck Batman. He’s was angry vet. After Joker killed Robin he stopped giving a frick about not killing bad guys
Ben was easily the best Batman ever put on film. I never liked Bale, too British and sort of effeminate in a way. Batfleck was orgasmically good if you've read old Batman comics. He nailed the Bruce/Batman dichotomy perfectly, had the best and most accurate suit and the best body. What a CRIME he didn't get a solo.
With a few exceptions, WB/DC had an embarrassiert of riches in terms of casting, and yet managed to toss it all into the wood chipper by wasting them on directionless, hurried, half-baked attempts to catch up to Marvel. The whole DCEU is the textbook example for future generations of creators on how to mismanage and piss away a golden goose. Star Wars, Star Trek, Indiana Jones, etc etc will also be lessons for the future, but not in the same way. They pissed away great IPs in the name of wokery and messaging. DC pissed it away with sheer incompetence and directionlessness.
>golden age clayface
so just a generic killer? What's the point then? Doesn't the batman have quasi fantastical elements with catwoman? Like when she was able to traverse a building so well. She can't possibly be more nimble than Bruce who trained his whole life to be Batman
>How on earth would they make Clayface fly with that in mind?
He’ll just be generic Golden Age version where he’s angry horror actor that wears a creepy mask.
>I actually hate this ultra realism shit
Same. Also tired of Year One or Year 2 Batman! What liked about Affleck Batman. He’s was angry vet. After Joker killed Robin he stopped giving a frick about not killing bad guys
The realism isn't the problem. The problem is they suck at writing including writing realism. These white liberals in charge are just moronic but that's why they are liberals. There was nothing realistic about Battinson taking machine gun fire in some scenes no problem then getting knocked out by gunfire in others. It's just convenient writing no logic to it.
Liberals never experienced actual violence. Why do they think a batman with permanent fisticuffs wouldn't just be able to kill people with a single punch? People died from less
He takes a shotgun blast to the back shoulder no problem in another scene.
4 months ago
Anonymous
The suit carries him.
4 months ago
Anonymous
He got shot in rib cage suit area here:
[...]
The realism isn't the problem. The problem is they suck at writing including writing realism. These white liberals in charge are just moronic but that's why they are liberals. There was nothing realistic about Battinson taking machine gun fire in some scenes no problem then getting knocked out by gunfire in others. It's just convenient writing no logic to it.
Still took a nap
4 months ago
Anonymous
what do you mean? he clearly stumbles
4 months ago
Anonymous
Yea. And in this scene he gets knocked out
[...]
The realism isn't the problem. The problem is they suck at writing including writing realism. These white liberals in charge are just moronic but that's why they are liberals. There was nothing realistic about Battinson taking machine gun fire in some scenes no problem then getting knocked out by gunfire in others. It's just convenient writing no logic to it.
And in webm related he just takes a head shot no problem
>be me >white male lone wolf >"man I really wish I could do a terryism, if only I had a whole dumpster full of international-assassin-tier firearms, I'd kill so many LGBTQIA+ BIPOCS" >but then!
I'd love to see them go crazy with pig since he is not that hard to adapt, just make the whole Dollotron thing a useless aim for him to follow instead of zombie henchmen and give us a crazy and eccentric motherfricker that loves opera and talks about mother goat but who am I kidding? They are probably going to make him a fat angry dude that is going to be easily beaten in the first two minutes of the film.
They're doing a 'Wrongfully Accused' type movie to keep with the Noir influence. I knew it the second they confirmed Clayface was in the movie. Hush with the help of Clayface will take on Bruce Wayne's face and frame him for some crime. Now Batman has to completely forgo the Bruce Wayne persona to solve the mystery and clear his name.
I have a feeling he will. Seems like he'll serve as a stepping stone to more fantastical villains that could be in the next movie like Mr. Freeze or Poison Ivy. Although if this is going to be a trilogy I'm guessing they'll use the Court of Owls for 3.
Yeah and Penguin out of all people. Reevesverse penguin is just a generic italian mob boss why would anyone watch this shit?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Because they're mindless consumer cattle who can't call out the shit they watch as being bad because it's made by big studios so it must be le good also they're vaxxed to the maxx.
You could make a great movie with Pyg as the villain. You could make a great movie with Scarecrow, or Clayface, or even fricking Hush boring as he is. BUT ALL OF THEM?
>for what purpose this batman is young and a noob
Batman wasn't deep into his career when he find Robin though. Modern Batman takes him in in Year 3 and the first Batman movie was set in Year 2.
yea probably because they want to cram all that accumulated over decades bullshit into the comicbook timeline
no reason to go with this idiocy in a movie
I don't understand how they go from trying to make an even more grounded Batman than Nolan's to using villains like Clayface and Pyg. I hate grounded realistic movie Batman, so I'm interesting, but that is such a massive swing in tone I feel like.
Even someone running around in a pig mask is wildly different to the first Batman movie though which didn't even want the Riddler to wear anything but a green coat and some glasses.
Clayface originally didn’t have powers. He was just a Boris Karloff horror actor out for revenge. His name was literally Basil Karlo. The one we all know abd from animated series was second Clayface from the Silver Age Matthew Hagen. Because radiation, because everything was radiation in the 50s, he turned into a giant clay monster
I saw someone saying that Dano Riddler was basically Riddler/Hush so it's weird that they'd do Hush now. I'm hoping that they do Clayface, Dick Grayson, and Matches Malone.
Riddler thought Batman was helping him the entire movie & was more about exposing the corruption in Gotham. Bush would be a personal villain who actually just hates Bruce Wayne himself. I think it’s plenty different, besides visually Hush & Riddler looked alike
Fantastical villains in realistic settings could be kino like Clayface or Madhatter. Tired of scarecrow and we basically already had the hush with the riddler. My pitch would be: >Movie about Bruce going through psychosis that features Man-bat and clayface while being treated by Hugo Strange >Mad Hatter as some pedophile/Charles Manson hybrid. Hatter is obsessed with Batman as his new "Alice" >Solomon Grundy played as is and introduce fantastical elements into the ReevesVerse.
They could merge realism with the fanastical if they just explained it as Bruce going through psychosis or he was hit with a large dose of the fear toxin. That way you could have a ton of wacky shit like in Arkham City when Bats is fighting Mad Hatter's rabbit gang on a giant storybook or whatever
I'd just prefer if they cast this guy and went full DCAU/Arkham and did actual BATMAN movies and not gay action hero guy in a weird suit. Just dye his hair black. He already plays Batman-lite on Reacher and has the body type of DCAU Bruce.
Explain how he's unfitting for the role considering he has the body and acting ability. This gay thinking outside of the box has produced nothing but shit, you look at a guy and see that he looks like the drawing on the comic book? Cast him. End of.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Pattinson is perfect for Batman. It just that Reeves is a total midwit that wants to turn Batman and his rogues gallery into the Zodiac killer
4 months ago
Anonymous
Feel so bad for Pattinson being saddled with that dogshit material. You can tell he really loves the character and cares a lot about making something good it's just unfortunate he got partnered with Hack Reeves. There were rumors that they clashed a lot during filming and I wonder to what extent those rumors are true.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Pattinson is based and while I think he's a bad fit for Batman, he'd be a killer Bond. Plus there's this utter based moment of his
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Explain how he's unfitting for the role considering he has the body and acting ability
He doesn't have either of those things.
4 months ago
Anonymous
He clearly does. Some fricking Oscar winning moron isn't needed for Batman, get someone who looks cool and acts reasonably well enough for the part. Which Ritchson fits to a T.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>considering he has the body and acting ability.
I hope you're baiting because otherwise you're genuinely moronic.
fricking exactly, you dumb limp wristed fanboys already have your shitty comics and animations, movies' point is to present a different view on the character and their world
4 months ago
Anonymous
>you like this thing and want to see it accurately presented on screen? you're le wrong and it must be different because....IT JUST HAS TO OKKAY
Get this lady for Selina and Bill Skarsgaard for a fun and Nicholson-like Joker. I hope Gunn cancels Patbat and makes Batman kino where he finally looks like this.
They will never do an actual batman movie. The closest thing will be if they drag Tim Burton to do a Batman Returns sequel for nostalgiabait. Or an animated movie but that would suck since Conroy is gone
Pattinson is perfect for Batman. It just that Reeves is a total midwit that wants to turn Batman and his rogues gallery into the Zodiac killer
Is he, though? I'd wager he's better for James Bond than Batman. Too weird looking, not chad enough, has none of the larger than life characteristics, horrible body too. Just because he's a good actor that doesn't mean anything. He can never be good because he just doesn't look like Bruce Wayne. Alan Ritchson with dyed hair is the only actor out there I am convinced can pull it off. Also, enough Brits for superhero casting. Batfleck was the best because he was an actual yank playing an American billionaire. I say this as a bong too lol
I think a fantastical setting could work for the sequel. Gotham should still be mostly submerged in water so imagine a dark and grungy modern gothic city filled with subterranean creatures. Imagine clayface or a disfigured looking killer croc emerging from some flooded, dilapidated section 8 housing. Gangs would get more desperate and unhinged so you could have more fantastical looking gangs and gang leaders. Minor villains like Mad Hatter or Pyg taking advantage of the chaos and trafficking and brainwashing people who slip through the cracks which Batman has to uncover
>can't do joker again because he's way too overused >Reeves thinks audiences want le dark and gritty bullshit so they have to make every villain into a zodiac killer type figure >already decided they want it be grounded so can't do any fantastical things which would actually set it apart from the Nolanverse
If reeves just added a bit of a fantastical element to The Batman it would be kino. The world building is the best it ever could be especially with a flooded Gotham as a realistic reason for an unusually high crime rate and supervillains to exist. A rotten, Gothic city submerged under water and fantastical villains like Clayface, mad-hatter and even the joker.
Just do something original. I don't care if they make batman kill this time around. Make the joker female and make him Bruce's love interest to explain why he just doesn't kill the joker. Make Batinsson an actual vampire. Who cares? Anything except Nolan but even grittier. Why are hollywood israelites so unoriginal?
This is Earth-2 they can do a new story. We already have the League why not The Court this time? With the same art direction as the previous film, the suits would look amazing. SEXO even.
I'd love to see more weird horror/fantasy stuff from Batman that you see in the comics or the animated series. It feels like the only unexplored thing they haven't done in the movies. Things like Clayface, Man-Bat, Doctor Death, and so on.
The first one felt too bloated with story beats and threats, this sounds like more of the same sadly. Focus on one villain. I wanted more violence from Batman, the beginning scene and his assault on Penguin's club was great. Show more of that and Bruce losing control.
Sounds likea shitshow. The first movie's Riddler was basically already Hush so what's the point?
>Robin
I'd love to see them try this and not be a disaster.
>Clayface
If they skip the clay powers and just make him someone who transforms using face masks, it could be kino. But it sounds like a mess, anyway.
You're gay if you think they should gound clayface
But the whole shtick is gay ultra realism, right? How on earth would they make Clayface fly with that in mind? I actually hate this ultra realism shit and want more classic serious but also very silly and fantastical Batman like the Chuck Dixon/classic runs of the character. Ironically, those old comics had better and more mature writing than these Hollywood joints.
Who the FRICK writes this? They clearly don't know who the frick it is they're writing about. Slade, of all people, caring about that.
>How on earth would they make Clayface fly with that in mind?
He’ll just be generic Golden Age version where he’s angry horror actor that wears a creepy mask.
>I actually hate this ultra realism shit
Same. Also tired of Year One or Year 2 Batman! What liked about Affleck Batman. He’s was angry vet. After Joker killed Robin he stopped giving a frick about not killing bad guys
Ben was easily the best Batman ever put on film. I never liked Bale, too British and sort of effeminate in a way. Batfleck was orgasmically good if you've read old Batman comics. He nailed the Bruce/Batman dichotomy perfectly, had the best and most accurate suit and the best body. What a CRIME he didn't get a solo.
With a few exceptions, WB/DC had an embarrassiert of riches in terms of casting, and yet managed to toss it all into the wood chipper by wasting them on directionless, hurried, half-baked attempts to catch up to Marvel. The whole DCEU is the textbook example for future generations of creators on how to mismanage and piss away a golden goose. Star Wars, Star Trek, Indiana Jones, etc etc will also be lessons for the future, but not in the same way. They pissed away great IPs in the name of wokery and messaging. DC pissed it away with sheer incompetence and directionlessness.
Hey, another Batfleck fan. If we ever find a third we could start a club.
Count me in. Batfleck til I fricking die.
Best looking big-screen Batman, but worst acting one.
>golden age clayface
so just a generic killer? What's the point then? Doesn't the batman have quasi fantastical elements with catwoman? Like when she was able to traverse a building so well. She can't possibly be more nimble than Bruce who trained his whole life to be Batman
What ultra realism? Action sequences were Batman tas level of cartoonishnes and a 5'1 50 kg woman that sends 6 foot men flying with her kicks.
They weren't.
Dude took a bomb to the face then slammed into a bridge at 200 mph without any problem. It's actually the least realistic Batman yet.
The realism isn't the problem. The problem is they suck at writing including writing realism. These white liberals in charge are just moronic but that's why they are liberals. There was nothing realistic about Battinson taking machine gun fire in some scenes no problem then getting knocked out by gunfire in others. It's just convenient writing no logic to it.
Liberals never experienced actual violence. Why do they think a batman with permanent fisticuffs wouldn't just be able to kill people with a single punch? People died from less
A 9mm to the head still hurts like a motherfricker even if your helmet is armored
He takes a shotgun blast to the back shoulder no problem in another scene.
The suit carries him.
He got shot in rib cage suit area here:
Still took a nap
what do you mean? he clearly stumbles
Yea. And in this scene he gets knocked out
And in webm related he just takes a head shot no problem
His helmet is just leather
actually the mask is made of a composite that becomes rigid upon impact.
like a penis?
Yeah, yeah. It's called...ehm...reactive cavernous trauma...mitigation fabric. It's from japan. Ninjas use that and batman imported it to Gotham.
Clay face dealing with the fact that he's made of clay could be kino if done right. Give me clay face body horror
So are we finally getting a proper live-action depiction of the bat-family now?
What on earth is this? Who even reads this? Last I heard, comics as an industry was deader than dead.
No, the comic industry is going really strong with Gems like these
He threw away all his guns in a public dumpster?
>be me
>white male lone wolf
>"man I really wish I could do a terryism, if only I had a whole dumpster full of international-assassin-tier firearms, I'd kill so many LGBTQIA+ BIPOCS"
>but then!
Is this supposed to be a parody?
It's clearly a joke.
No it's not, It was made in reaction to the Pulse nightclub shooting
Let's be honest, if Batman was actually treated realistically, he'd detest alphabet people and view them as degenerative parts of a rotting society.
what a bunch of homosexual shit
>love in it's purest form
Nothing pure about whats in a gay club yeesh have those people ever gone in one
The pedo really threw his guns in the ally where any Black person would pick them up?
Yea in a general trash dumpster instead of a metal only
Is that how all those guns made their way into the garbage that then was found by Batman in the Gotham Knights Anime shorts?
Edit this so he dumps them outside a loony bin saying "have at em boys! Hahaha!"
that's the plot of knightfall
goyslop homies
the batman was already garbage and felt like 3 movies stuffed into one, but now they're going to shovel 5 more characters in?
I hope you heard me clapping in the back over the din of all these morons
>Professor pyg
Oh no no no
Pyg was kino as frick in Gotham
Why? First movie already had a problem of too many plot hooks that were unnecessary.
>too many plot hooks
There was what, three of them?
>Professor pyg
Wtf, that sounds like a Batman 66 villain. Are they gonna bring back Aunt Harriet too?
He's pretty fricked up
>put a leg in a man's arms
Simpsons did it first.
>bunch of boring le grim second rate villains
>scarecrow again
the only interesting one is clayface
I'd love to see them go crazy with pig since he is not that hard to adapt, just make the whole Dollotron thing a useless aim for him to follow instead of zombie henchmen and give us a crazy and eccentric motherfricker that loves opera and talks about mother goat but who am I kidding? They are probably going to make him a fat angry dude that is going to be easily beaten in the first two minutes of the film.
They're doing a 'Wrongfully Accused' type movie to keep with the Noir influence. I knew it the second they confirmed Clayface was in the movie. Hush with the help of Clayface will take on Bruce Wayne's face and frame him for some crime. Now Batman has to completely forgo the Bruce Wayne persona to solve the mystery and clear his name.
Will Clayface have powers? I like your prediction
That even a question? Course he won’t have powers. Muh realism
I have a feeling he will. Seems like he'll serve as a stepping stone to more fantastical villains that could be in the next movie like Mr. Freeze or Poison Ivy. Although if this is going to be a trilogy I'm guessing they'll use the Court of Owls for 3.
> I have a feeling he will.
They’re going to go from muh realistic noir Batman “Seven” rip off to a dude made out of clay? That’s a big leap. No way it’ll happen
Clayface could be a gothic horror monster, that wouldn't be so out of place compared to the first movie.
The Penguin trailer referred to itself as the next part of Matt Reeves' Crime saga. Wouldn't surprise me if there's a plan for six movies.
>just more crimeslop made by pseuds who want nothing to do with the character of Batman and actually adapting his lore and world
Frick this shit. nolan all over again.
Yeah and Penguin out of all people. Reevesverse penguin is just a generic italian mob boss why would anyone watch this shit?
Because they're mindless consumer cattle who can't call out the shit they watch as being bad because it's made by big studios so it must be le good also they're vaxxed to the maxx.
Reeves might want 6 movies but I doubt Pattinson would.
I want this Clayface or say goodnight, Reeves
?si=qC_rxByBtME-CLY2&t=110
You could make a great movie with Pyg as the villain. You could make a great movie with Scarecrow, or Clayface, or even fricking Hush boring as he is. BUT ALL OF THEM?
This either going to be PURE kino or PURE slop. Either way it will be entertaining.
has anyone made slopkino yet?
Batman and robin by Joel Schumacher
It'll be utter lame slop like the first one which had the Dano (classic) meme factor that was the only memorable thing about it.
>professor pig
zoomer cringe
>scarecrow
ok
>clayface
whatever
>hush
cringe
>dick gayson
for what purpose this batman is young and a noob
>for what purpose this batman is young and a noob
Batman wasn't deep into his career when he find Robin though. Modern Batman takes him in in Year 3 and the first Batman movie was set in Year 2.
yea probably because they want to cram all that accumulated over decades bullshit into the comicbook timeline
no reason to go with this idiocy in a movie
Hush is one of the worst comics I ever read. Granted I stopped reading comics shortly after Hush came out.
People only liked it because of Jim Lee’s art
yea because they have bad taste
I don't understand how they go from trying to make an even more grounded Batman than Nolan's to using villains like Clayface and Pyg. I hate grounded realistic movie Batman, so I'm interesting, but that is such a massive swing in tone I feel like.
Pyg is just a crazy guy who mutilates his victims. If they turned Riddler into Zodiac they can play Pyg like a serial killer
Even someone running around in a pig mask is wildly different to the first Batman movie though which didn't even want the Riddler to wear anything but a green coat and some glasses.
Clayface originally didn’t have powers. He was just a Boris Karloff horror actor out for revenge. His name was literally Basil Karlo. The one we all know abd from animated series was second Clayface from the Silver Age Matthew Hagen. Because radiation, because everything was radiation in the 50s, he turned into a giant clay monster
Seems weird to do a movie with a version of Clayface that only existed in two issues in the 40s.
That leaker is a known bullshitter.
I saw someone saying that Dano Riddler was basically Riddler/Hush so it's weird that they'd do Hush now. I'm hoping that they do Clayface, Dick Grayson, and Matches Malone.
Riddler thought Batman was helping him the entire movie & was more about exposing the corruption in Gotham. Bush would be a personal villain who actually just hates Bruce Wayne himself. I think it’s plenty different, besides visually Hush & Riddler looked alike
They did make Riddler personally hate Bruce Wayne.
isnt Hush like post Jason?
Fantastical villains in realistic settings could be kino like Clayface or Madhatter. Tired of scarecrow and we basically already had the hush with the riddler. My pitch would be:
>Movie about Bruce going through psychosis that features Man-bat and clayface while being treated by Hugo Strange
>Mad Hatter as some pedophile/Charles Manson hybrid. Hatter is obsessed with Batman as his new "Alice"
>Solomon Grundy played as is and introduce fantastical elements into the ReevesVerse.
>basically already had the hush with the riddler
he was more like anarky tbqh
They should do some shit where Batman is jumping around on the keys of a giant typewriter.
>The Batman 2
it's literally not happening
Gunn won't let that happen.
Good. Awful and unmemorable slop in the gay dark and realistic vein. Make actual Batman kino or frick off, DC.
They could merge realism with the fanastical if they just explained it as Bruce going through psychosis or he was hit with a large dose of the fear toxin. That way you could have a ton of wacky shit like in Arkham City when Bats is fighting Mad Hatter's rabbit gang on a giant storybook or whatever
I'd just prefer if they cast this guy and went full DCAU/Arkham and did actual BATMAN movies and not gay action hero guy in a weird suit. Just dye his hair black. He already plays Batman-lite on Reacher and has the body type of DCAU Bruce.
This is the kind of braindead fancasting that makes you glad no one listens to nerds.
Explain how he's unfitting for the role considering he has the body and acting ability. This gay thinking outside of the box has produced nothing but shit, you look at a guy and see that he looks like the drawing on the comic book? Cast him. End of.
Pattinson is perfect for Batman. It just that Reeves is a total midwit that wants to turn Batman and his rogues gallery into the Zodiac killer
Feel so bad for Pattinson being saddled with that dogshit material. You can tell he really loves the character and cares a lot about making something good it's just unfortunate he got partnered with Hack Reeves. There were rumors that they clashed a lot during filming and I wonder to what extent those rumors are true.
Pattinson is based and while I think he's a bad fit for Batman, he'd be a killer Bond. Plus there's this utter based moment of his
>Explain how he's unfitting for the role considering he has the body and acting ability
He doesn't have either of those things.
He clearly does. Some fricking Oscar winning moron isn't needed for Batman, get someone who looks cool and acts reasonably well enough for the part. Which Ritchson fits to a T.
>considering he has the body and acting ability.
I hope you're baiting because otherwise you're genuinely moronic.
fricking exactly, you dumb limp wristed fanboys already have your shitty comics and animations, movies' point is to present a different view on the character and their world
>you like this thing and want to see it accurately presented on screen? you're le wrong and it must be different because....IT JUST HAS TO OKKAY
Kys
eat shit, transvestite nerd
Get this lady for Selina and Bill Skarsgaard for a fun and Nicholson-like Joker. I hope Gunn cancels Patbat and makes Batman kino where he finally looks like this.
Meant her for Selina, btw. Maybe David Thewlis would be a good Alfred with Shea Wigham or David Morrisey as Jim Gordon.
is that the ass lady
would watch
Catwoman should have long hair and be beautiful not this modern dyke shit.
They will never do an actual batman movie. The closest thing will be if they drag Tim Burton to do a Batman Returns sequel for nostalgiabait. Or an animated movie but that would suck since Conroy is gone
Sad but true.
Is he, though? I'd wager he's better for James Bond than Batman. Too weird looking, not chad enough, has none of the larger than life characteristics, horrible body too. Just because he's a good actor that doesn't mean anything. He can never be good because he just doesn't look like Bruce Wayne. Alan Ritchson with dyed hair is the only actor out there I am convinced can pull it off. Also, enough Brits for superhero casting. Batfleck was the best because he was an actual yank playing an American billionaire. I say this as a bong too lol
Haven't seen someone this good looking in film since the 2000s
CUTE ROBIN
CUTE ROBIN
CUTE ROBIN
SHOTAKINO SHOTAKINO SHOTAKINO
Hush sucks, people only like him because mummies are cool.
I think a fantastical setting could work for the sequel. Gotham should still be mostly submerged in water so imagine a dark and grungy modern gothic city filled with subterranean creatures. Imagine clayface or a disfigured looking killer croc emerging from some flooded, dilapidated section 8 housing. Gangs would get more desperate and unhinged so you could have more fantastical looking gangs and gang leaders. Minor villains like Mad Hatter or Pyg taking advantage of the chaos and trafficking and brainwashing people who slip through the cracks which Batman has to uncover
What movie will Reeves blatantly ripoff this time?
Also Robin will be a nig because that's been the plebbit dream for years.
>can't do joker again because he's way too overused
>Reeves thinks audiences want le dark and gritty bullshit so they have to make every villain into a zodiac killer type figure
>already decided they want it be grounded so can't do any fantastical things which would actually set it apart from the Nolanverse
If reeves just added a bit of a fantastical element to The Batman it would be kino. The world building is the best it ever could be especially with a flooded Gotham as a realistic reason for an unusually high crime rate and supervillains to exist. A rotten, Gothic city submerged under water and fantastical villains like Clayface, mad-hatter and even the joker.
Just do something original. I don't care if they make batman kill this time around. Make the joker female and make him Bruce's love interest to explain why he just doesn't kill the joker. Make Batinsson an actual vampire. Who cares? Anything except Nolan but even grittier. Why are hollywood israelites so unoriginal?
With Muttwoman gone, who will be Bats chick?
female joker
>tfw we are not getting an uncut graphic scene of the Court of Owls extracting the powerful seed of Bruce Wayne to breed the perfect Talon
Why live.
That is Ras. The Cowls didn't care about Bruce's seed I thought?
This is Earth-2 they can do a new story. We already have the League why not The Court this time? With the same art direction as the previous film, the suits would look amazing. SEXO even.
I'd love to see more weird horror/fantasy stuff from Batman that you see in the comics or the animated series. It feels like the only unexplored thing they haven't done in the movies. Things like Clayface, Man-Bat, Doctor Death, and so on.
>Battinson and shota Dick
hot
Battison has to be bara or is not going to work.
The first one felt too bloated with story beats and threats, this sounds like more of the same sadly. Focus on one villain. I wanted more violence from Batman, the beginning scene and his assault on Penguin's club was great. Show more of that and Bruce losing control.
All they need to do is put Man Bat waking up after the flood disaster as some antedeluvian super predator and film Predator 2 but better.
And make it female while you are at it. So we can jerk off to something.