The entire movie is literally just Bryce wearing skin-tight jeans with her gigantic PAWG ass wobbling and bouncing around everywhere.
The entire movie is literally just Bryce wearing skin-tight jeans with her gigantic PAWG ass wobbling and bouncing around everywhere.
how bad is the cgi?
bollywood tier. it was some of most atrocious CGI i've ever seen. it will be memed about here when the rips/webms release.
someone post the VFX team in the end credits
its not even a meme at this point
"MPC" were also one of the VFX teams for Ferrari
what the ACTUAL frick
weeeeeeee
>alright we need a flying body for this shot
>no problem boss *opens gmod*
it does look like gmod. jfc 10/10 anon
Garry's Mod ass physics
HOLD ON A SEC there's no way these are the final versions... right? RIGHT? This is Michael Mann we're talking about... I don't believe you Anon, you sandbagging son of a b***h
BOING!!
Boop
when you car is an inflatable
that deliberate turn of the road was pretty lame, too lol
>Michael Mann
has been crapping out low-grade slop for decades now
All these old directors
>digital is so much better!
just got lazy in their old age
He's 80. Ridley Scott is like 86. They're name brands.
Is the the film devoted to mommy dumper or not?
Bryce is pretty much the main character of the movie.
>This is Michael Mann we're talking about
I don't really know what the director can even do about shit tier CGI. You want to do a practical effect, the studio says its not in the budget and that they'll do it CGI, alright, the studio hires some street shitters and they crank out a PS1 turd, you've got to be kidding me right? Oh don't worry Mr. Mann, this isn't the final version Apu and Jugdish are going to keep working on it to get it looking right before the premiere....well okay. Then you're Michael Mann sitting at the premier of your film and this turd goes up on screen and everyone laughs and you have to sit there and pretend that you aren't dying inside.
No shut the frick up I genuinely don't believe these are the finished scenes. This would be a massive scandal but I didn't hear anything about the CG.
Probably the people who watch Mann's new movies, they don't give a shit.
this is the only mention I found so far
>A shame, then, that some of the CGI in these moments feels unfinished.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/ferrari-review-michael-manns-well-193613311.html
I don't see the point of making a racing movie, but drawing all the crashes on the computer. Doesn't that lose the whole point? I understand why CGI is needed in sci-fi movies, but in a fricking movie about cars why!
As
said, it's significantly cheaper and takes much less time for the studio to outsource it to pajeets than it is to hire stunt drivers, coordinators, get insurance, build multiple cars, and crash them.
Of course, I realize it's cheaper. I mean, what's the point, then. Like Michael Mann could say I want real cars, real crashes. Otherwise, why else would he have made the movie in the first place?
>Like Michael Mann could say I want real cars, real crashes.
Yeah, then the studio heads who sign the checks say you'll get CGI and you'll pretend you like it.
>Otherwise, why else would he have made the movie in the first place?
Because its the only way he'll get to make films. Mann doesn't have the money to finance a film by himself, he needs the studio system and the studio system isn't going to let him make things the way he wants they're going have him make things the way they want it.
Mann wants to make films, he wants to get paid but he also wants the chance to work and to make art. Unfortunately the people he works for don't give a frick about anything except money and convenience.
These are weak arguments. More likely it was Mann who wanted a check and didn't care about anything else. Tarantino could make a real race in his low budget movie and Mann couldn't?
I mean fair enough, I agree with you that Mann should have put his heels down and insisted on practical effects; but what if putting his heels down means that the studio just says frick you, we aren't making the movie. I genuinely don't know how much Mann is to blame and how much modern Hollywood is to blame for tolerating this lazy CGI shit. I can't imagine Mann was happy with those effects, could he have done more to get proper practical stunts? I don't know.
Death Proof was made in 2007 and things have gotten much worse since then when it comes to CGI. In 2007 the only CGI car crash I can think of was the one from Along Came a Spider in 2001 that everyone ragged on and which looks better than either of those Pajeet made effects from Ford VS. Ferrari. Hollywood is terrible now, the CGI effects they're cranking out for cape shit keep getting worse and I think they're just going to keep making lower quality shit till audiences stop paying.
Mann probably just licensed his name to the production.
I'm stunned he didn't. Mann was always the practical effects director.
>why!
Its cheap and easy. You don't have to schedule a stunt team and a location, you just film the shot then give it over to the CGI team from Bengali Tech to hammer out. The end product may be shit but its not going to delay release of the film and that's what the studio cares about.
checked, but I think anon's point was, it's cheaper not to make the movie at all, investors could get better returns from real estate or fricking bank interest or some shit
Asks those dumb fricks who likes watching pacific rim, godzilla, king kong and fast and furious (starting tokyo drift onwards).
Pacific Rim 1 robot scenes are good.
>Coming to the worst aspect though, the CGI used on the two major crashes that underpin the film is appalling. Both involve a singular car flying through the air and, in the first instance, it appears that a comedy stuffed toy has been thrown from the car rather than a person. This takes you right out of what is supposed to be an incredibly impactful moment and almost made this writer giggle at the dreadful quality.
>In the second, while the incident itself holds significant shock value as it involved the death of nine spectators, including five children, the CGI fails to convey any of the emotion that is expected.
https://us.motorsport.com/general/news/ferrari-film-review-more-man-than-machine/10557929/
oh no, I'm beginning to believe
What about that Ford v. Ferrari joint from 2019? IIRC that was heavily simulated but it looked (and, crucially, sounded) great, imo.
(me)
actually after only sixty seconds of research I'm impressed by how much of that was real
https://beforesandafters.com/2019/11/18/the-major-vfx-moments-of-ford-v-ferrari/
I wonder whether it's cheaper now to do CGI and then put some fake bullshit press release out saying it was actually real
It's something between good and bad. Like, I like the way the scene should be set up, but the CGI messed it up. That's what these old farts don't understand. You need a CGI director to direct CGI scenes with you. And they just give it to the CGI department and they draw crap like this. You used to have special effects people on set with you and you'd figure out together what would work and what wouldn't. Now you just say, It's going to be CGI-drawn. My point is, don't blame Mann. He's old and doesn't understand how it works. Or how to work with it. He probably doesn't even know how to turn on a computer.
>tfw a scare-tactic PSA from a decade ago has better visual effects than a current year blockbuster
>they are both 6'1"
So they are 5'10" in reality?
Cavill is probably 5'11". Cena a little under . Neither are 6'1"
I've been struggling with these webms.
The first in particular looks very bad but I can't pin down EXACTLY what is wrong with it.
I think many anons are dumb homosexuals, as evidenced by the complaints about this webm which is actually perfectly fine for a lightweight race car.
I think the biggest issue with the car flipping into the air and then the crowd is that it's an impossible set of shots and we cannot comprehend something like that happening. Browsing rekt threads in /gif/ and /wsg/ you can see how ridiculous real life looks when everything goes wrong: you never see a car moving in the air like that because it isn't meant to, so when you do see it it looks ridiculous.
In the past extremely risky and expensive car stunts would only allow for limited number of and distance shots, so being able to get 5 fricking cuts close up of a car somersaulting through the air would never have happened before CGI.
So I don't think it's a CGI realism issue, but a CGI cinematography issue.
The issue is that it looks like it was rendered for the Playstation 3, Anon. Look at the puff of particles when it hits the rock.
I think it's the arc
Gravity creates an arc we all know. Baseballs, tennis balls, everything.
I think there are two things
1 the arc may be incorrect or
2 depicted so poorly it might as well be. This is why real stunts have long shots in the mix, so you can let the reality of the motorcycle dropping off a cliff sink in. Think Terminator 2 drainage chase sequence. That destruction went on forever.
Also
This webm is not starkly terrifying as juxtaposed against the race... It's just abrupt so that's a bit janky in terms of direction
Good response, thank you
that power pole must be sunk into the centre of the earth
These feel so uncanny because the graphics itself aren't that bad (some lighting issues but overall OK) but the physics are completely bonkers, almost looney tunes tier, that's why it looks like a real life cartoon
god Mann is such a hack
I blame male video gamers being a target audience for garbage CGI in movies
Fricking kek if you asked me to come up with a list of fake poo names and be as racist as possible while doing it I don't think I could have done any better
>Abasheet Nigratta
imagine the smell in those dev bays
jeets destroy everything they touch, they don't have any aptitude for tech but they have fooled the world into believing they do
just sad are they just laundering more money now ?
What about our Dua?
her entire cameo was basically shown in the trailer
Should have advertised that. There’s an audience to be had there but there’s no crossover between people who want that and people who were expecting to see Dua Lipa
That's where you're wrong. I like both
thats the first half, the second half is her in a dress with some pretty good cleavege
The theater is so dead right now I was actually considering going to see this. The Promised land doesn't come out for another two weeks. Dumpuary continues.
i looked at getting tickets for Argylle, there were A LOT of available seats
>jeans
Should have been yoga pants. Or a microskirt and fishnets.
Or just no pants
Frick no i love jeans on girls. Tight navy blue jeans with the fancy squiggly line things on her back pockets
>The entire movie is literally just Bryce wearing skin-tight jeans with her gigantic PAWG ass wobbling and bouncing around everywhere.
I don't see the problem here.
Why does Henry Cavill have such tiny babyhands?
Brutal man
It's like a girl's hand vs an average man's hand
Genes and probably juice. Apparently, it fricks up your hands or something.
isn't he like a foot taller than Cena tho?
something fishy here...
No, he isn't
They are both 6'1
Cena's also been on growth hormones for like 20 years
its better for warhammer fig painting
Cena could never paint a warlord titan with those huge sausage fingers
>make action spy film in 2024
>middle aged cat lady is the main character
huh?
I want her to sit on me so fricking bad bros
Can I get some jpegs or a webm?
>with her gigantic PAWG ass wobbling and bouncing around
sold. i'll watch it. but for free when it's leaked
Literally?
I see many other actors. Sure!y they are involved. Surely there is dialogue. Literally just bouncing ass? Literally?
is there a torrent out yet?
Wew lad. The second one was better even though it didn't reply to the correct post, because it didn't have a frivolous double-linebreak between your post-reply tag and your text body.
But we digress from the important aspect of the topic, BDH and women with juicy grabbable bits!
Yeah, I know. I'm too annoyed to frick it up a fourth time though.
brap dallas kino? yes please
Don’t care. Still calling ya Bruce
sam jackson's huge grin says it all...he cashed another big fat paycheck. thanks for the reparations, whites.
There is LITERALLY nothing wrong with actors doing movies purely for the money. At the end of the day it's just a job.
Is it a good story? If it's clever I'll support it, but from outside it looks like a casting stunt.
POST BDH ASS
You had me at "Bryce wearing skin-tight jeans".
Who's the bimbo?
That makeup is caked on there
dua lipa
It's never been clear to me what this movie is actually about. The cat is a spy? Everybody's trying to save the cat? What's the deal
I think that's why it flopped, Mission Impossible you know Tom Cruise is going to save the world but this... Henry Cavill is going to protect a cat? Why would I want that
>muh save the cat meta joke
hope it was worth the 200 million
the cat is just bryce's cat, nothing special, he's just sort of there. bryce's character's real name is R. Kylle (almost pronounced like Argylle, get it?)
it's just a shitty action movie the cat is just there for reddit points
I just watched & Frick you. I liked it.
I like it too. The plot is dumb, but it's the fun kind of dumb. Sure, it's not anything memorable, but on the whole rather serviceable film.
This movie made 15 million in it's opening weekend. This has to be an unheard of before level of bomb.
Good morning and where to meet bumbling chubby gf ok thank you