The fact they haven't been fired yet is honestly astonishing.

>most of us
If you work in a job where you have to entertain the pronoun stupidity, you are replaceable and not important.

Anyone with any sense simply ignores the pronoun shit if they come across it. The fact that you seemingly entertain it speaks volumes about yourself.

financial planning

you would think so, but consider the current state of the economy.
me telling people to not eat out as much is fairly revolutionary to their budgeting skills. They keep coming back so I must be doing something right.

Do you think a financial planner makes a lot of money?
This is a weird cope; what do you do for a living where you have to entertain pronoun stupidity?

because it’s a career, and as cliche as it might sound I enjoy helping people manage their money to reach their goals in life.
Maybe one day I’ll land that cushy position, who knows?

>you’re literally the devil if you don’t respect social delusions
lol whatever helps you sleep at night. Somehow I knew you were one of the crazy frickers who entertains the social oddity.

I do avoid making a deal out of it: I don’t entertain it.
It’s amazing how you think not entertaining pronoun stupidity means I’m an evil person. You do realize that the vast majority of people DO NOT enjoy entertaining this latest social norm?
Especially Latinos.

Again, it’s incredibly funny to me that you think I’m an butthole because I don’t respect peoples pronouns.

that's a different dude entirely, anonymous posting makes this hard to track though.

>but the vast majority of people don’t believe you get to choose your pronouns. Me included.
why not?

>why should pronouns be a choice?

why not? Words are fake and change overtime.

you will never be a man

>responding badly to pushback
responding badly? I don’t have to entertain the latest social trend. How is this “responding badly”?

You’re kind of having a mental breakdown over this. It’s funny ngl.

If they don't matter then it shouldn't matter if he respects them or not.
Fricking hell, you have 0 self-awareness.

You’re mentally ill

how is me not entertaining (and not even needing to entertain for the most part) pronoun stupidity going to negatively influence my work?
I’m quite confused as to how you’ve arrived at this conclusion. Very strange logic you’re using.

you're crying about pronouns when they ultimately don't matter.

I’m merely pointing out that people who entertain the pronoun stuff are the ones perpetuating it. Does that bother you?

>the rest of us
Not him, but I live in Massachusetts, you don't speak for me, thanks.

You really think it'll never happen?

>why would it happen?
Because it clearly already is happening?

future ones.

It'll happen and you will have to make a decision right then and there that'll change the trajectory of your "career."

>LGBT people coming out is on an upwards trend, meaning the potential to meet someone in that category goes up over time
>Meaning at some point in the future, you'll will likely inevitably meet one, possibly at work

For someone in "planning", you sure aren't paying attention to the world around you changing.

To you, not to the inevitable clients that do take that seriously.

There is no chance you live in Houston and have not run into a theygay. flat out none. You can pretend it's all in Austin all you want, we all know better.

because if if you call a client the wrong pronouns on purpose every single chance you get, it will be extremely obvious what you're doing, and you will get fired for it. It sounds like you live in bumfrick nowhere middle america if you have not run into one of these people for a client yet and because you're stupid, you think "it hasn't happened so that means this doesn't apply to me". you can argue in circles all day long, the rest of us live in the real world and nobody is throwing their job away over it. Unless they're you, living in their fantasy world ofc

>Massachusetts
>not bumfrick nowhere
at least you're not in middle america. If it's not boston, nobody cares and if it IS boston, you've got plenty of theys running around there too

anon, I’ve literally never run into a theygay. Not a single one.
I don’t think you understand how exceptionally specific that demographic is. Most of my clients are old, day laborers, or are starting a family. None of them are the type to care about gender.

>Went to a dive-in program at a big law firm
>During the icebreaker, we all had to state our pronouns.

I would stab every single one of these mentally-ill degenerates if I didn't care about my life/career.

I find males to be more relaxed and laugh it off, but the legal profession is infested with these dumb c**ts who you've gotta be careful around.

>Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. - Dalrymple
It's to make you complicit in something you know to be a lie. It's to demoralize you.

>but I made the pink haired HR guy cry.
Fricking based

I just realized why you don't want to do this. You don't have a living room do you? You're talking all of this shit and you can't even afford a place with a decent fricking living room!

Entertain me anon, what job do you have that makes you exempt from being fired. Let me guess: crypto lul?

it’s not widespread at all, unless the latest market pandering for the 16-24 crowd is considered “widespread”.
In fact I really only ever see it pushed by these multinational corporations that rely on social trends to sell their products. Anything in the financial world still operates on
>M
>F
>other
But finances matter. The latest plastic toy doesn’t.

no anon, 16-24 is the marketing bracket.
16-35 is entirely too broad to be a useful demographic bucket.
>he thinks not entertaining crazy pronouns is being an butthole to a client
A client can’t force me to adhere to their social beliefs. I’m here to help them a manage their money. If they don’t want that they can find someone else.

But it doesn’t really matter considering there are no trannies where I’m from, or they don’t have money to manage. Either way, I literally never have to deal with any pronoun stupidity.

Houston

It’s bad in government jobs I hear. Anything where adhering to the latest social norm is tantamount to your career aspects.
In finance it’s all about connections or your ability to do work (lots of grunt work to become “experienced”). I think when money is on the line people are less vehement about their social prerogative.

>STILL seething

you lost.

>Only social morons entertain the pronoun stupidity.

It doesn't matter if it's literally like 4% of people at most are like this. They have power and institutional power, and they say that not saying pronouns is oppression.

And your employer can find a better employee who won't sperg out like you.

Also, I know you’re trolling but just so you know my clients come with me.
At least the ones I’ve brought to the firm. It’s not so simple as just firing me, anon.

This is what I was hinting at when I started this comment chain: if you have any sort of value in your work you don’t have to respect the latest social norms.

anon I know this is news to you, but words follow lines of evolution.
there is no world where “alot” becomes a word because it doesn’t follow any semblance of sense as far as English is concerned. Articles are almost always dropped instead of fused into a word.

none of those words have articles, anon. Every example of word creation you can find will have the article dropped, as most languages don’t have articles.
You don’t seem to understand how new words come to be.

there are unofficial rules to the evolution of words in English, anon. you don’t seem to understand that words don’t take hold unless there is a driving factor to it.

If I asked "what did they say" in a normal sentence when referring to a single person, it'd still be "correct."

there are unofficial rules to the evolution of words in English, anon. you don’t seem to understand that words don’t take hold unless there is a driving factor to it.

>t-the rules says
They ain't there. You learned basic English once and for whatever reasons decided that makes you some sort of expert on the matter, when advanced stuff tells you rules are kind of just made up and don't matter to a certain point. It ain't real.

>the fact that I received a proper English education does actually make me an authority on the matter, anon.

everyone did, dipshit.

>my basic education means not words cannot become words because it just says so ok?

you finna bouta get dabbed on

>If I asked "what did they say" in a normal sentence when referring to a single person, it'd still be "correct."
Yeah this is a correct usage of they. But in the headline of the OP article where it says "Mocking Court's Attempt to Find Them" if it's only referring to Ezra it's not the correct usage, that implies that there's multiple people the court is looking for and confusing.

In the age of dipshits with electronics, it's pretty easy to brig up text messages and other app messages.

Also testimony from parents, the girl, and other people familiar with the two.