>body horror is when a CGI ragdoll gets prodded for a few seconds by robots
When I read that without seeing the post you linked too, I thought you were referring to Fallout 3 and the Gamebryo engine when sometimes a ragdoll corpse would turn into an eldritch abomination.
Outside of the shit level scaling from the expansions, it's far and away the best 3D Fallout game, and it's more in-line lore wise and mechanics wise to the classics than FONV is (but muh DT (which doesn't actually work like the classic games)!).
fallout 3 gays deserve the rope
Now don't do a breakdown on what the quests actually entail.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Outside of the shit level scaling from the expansions
And the shit level scaling in the base game
And bad gun play
And bad writing
And ugly map
And shitty quests
And moronic locations
Bad game >from the expansions
Yeah man it totally jives with the setting that people are scrounging from pre war walmarts and drinking contaminated water 200 years after the bombs drop. >which doesn't actually work like the classic games
Yes it does
2 months ago
Anonymous
There was no bad level scaling in the base game. >gunplay >playing a fallout in first person
Wasn't bad writing.
Map design was better than MMO NV.
Go back to Cinemaphile back when I still lurked it, they held these same dipshit parrot opinions too.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>There was no bad level scaling in the base game.
Yes there was. It was almost as bad as oblivion. >playing a fallout in first person
It's an FPS. It's in the gamebryo engine. Also the third person shooting is even worse than the first person shooting. >Map design was better than MMO NV.
No, it wasn't. Also, "MMO NV"? New Vegas's map is just actually based on the real Las Vegas region. >Go back to Cinemaphile back when I still lurked it, >Poo in loo got bullied off of Cinemaphile
lol
>Yes it does
No, DT in FONV doesn't. At all. Because it was a similar formula but it was put into place in a different position in the calculations than it was on the original games. FONV also never did anything about the shitty FO3 skill systems, and it's reputation system was broken from the beginning, and it's ammo system was half-assed without mods to fix everything.
I modded FONV a lot, worked on it and had more hours in it than FO3 by far, and again I didn't play FO3 after the expansions came out so didn't get the atrocious level scaling from Broken Steel (and also the vanilla release FO3 had a horrible pacing regarding character growth, I remember my first play on FO3 I was almost max level before I found Dad).
Also FO3 is more consistant to the classic games lore than FONV is. If Marcus replaced Fawkes in FO3 it would've been more in line with his FO2 Epilogue than his presence in FONV is. Also again this is all console war tier parrot nonsense and basically, you're a homosexual.
>No, DT in FONV doesn't.
Doesn't what? >and it's reputation system was broken from the beginning, and it's ammo system was half-assed
Both work great actually. >Also FO3 is more consistant to the classic games lore than FONV is.
Not even slightly. The entire plot hinges on people somehow not having figured out how to filter or boil water, something the entire rest of the country has managed without issue for more than a century.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Yes it does
No, DT in FONV doesn't. At all. Because it was a similar formula but it was put into place in a different position in the calculations than it was on the original games. FONV also never did anything about the shitty FO3 skill systems, and it's reputation system was broken from the beginning, and it's ammo system was half-assed without mods to fix everything.
I modded FONV a lot, worked on it and had more hours in it than FO3 by far, and again I didn't play FO3 after the expansions came out so didn't get the atrocious level scaling from Broken Steel (and also the vanilla release FO3 had a horrible pacing regarding character growth, I remember my first play on FO3 I was almost max level before I found Dad).
Also FO3 is more consistant to the classic games lore than FONV is. If Marcus replaced Fawkes in FO3 it would've been more in line with his FO2 Epilogue than his presence in FONV is. Also again this is all console war tier parrot nonsense and basically, you're a homosexual.
Movie's even better with the rebellion scenes added back in. Shows Padme, Bail Organa and Mon Mothma were the ones who started the rebellion. No cartoons, no video games. It's all here.
Has anyone fallout 1 and 2
*played fallout
no
>peak kino that makes boomers seethe to this day
true
Anon, that's quite exactly what I meant.
fallout 3 gays deserve the rope
ah yes I love the 100 "get x for NCR" and "find x and talk about y" quests
Underage Cinemaphileermin moron.
>the main quest from fallout 3 was good because liam neeson
based moron
>Unironically making a quantity > quality argument
New Vegas trannies deserve the gas
In the end both games are ugly and have shitty gameplay.
RotS does feel like Cinemaphileerminshit.
but that red/orange color scheme is more in line with new vegas
Dogshit that you defend because you're an idiot and you liked it when you were 12? Yeah, it is.
I rewatch it and it's still great. Anakin turning into Darth Vader is awesome body horror too.
>Body horror is when a CGI ragdoll gets prodded for a few seconds by robots
lol
Cope. They would never put it in a new Star Wars film cause it's offensive to burn victims or something.
>body horror is when a CGI ragdoll gets prodded for a few seconds by robots
When I read that without seeing the post you linked too, I thought you were referring to Fallout 3 and the Gamebryo engine when sometimes a ragdoll corpse would turn into an eldritch abomination.
Cinemaphile likes the best 3D Fallout game now?
>Cinemaphile likes the best 3D Fallout game now?
Fallout 3 is shit. People pretend to like it as shitposting after some poo and loo spammed it.
Outside of the shit level scaling from the expansions, it's far and away the best 3D Fallout game, and it's more in-line lore wise and mechanics wise to the classics than FONV is (but muh DT (which doesn't actually work like the classic games)!).
Now don't do a breakdown on what the quests actually entail.
>Outside of the shit level scaling from the expansions
And the shit level scaling in the base game
And bad gun play
And bad writing
And ugly map
And shitty quests
And moronic locations
Bad game
>from the expansions
Yeah man it totally jives with the setting that people are scrounging from pre war walmarts and drinking contaminated water 200 years after the bombs drop.
>which doesn't actually work like the classic games
Yes it does
There was no bad level scaling in the base game.
>gunplay
>playing a fallout in first person
Wasn't bad writing.
Map design was better than MMO NV.
Go back to Cinemaphile back when I still lurked it, they held these same dipshit parrot opinions too.
>There was no bad level scaling in the base game.
Yes there was. It was almost as bad as oblivion.
>playing a fallout in first person
It's an FPS. It's in the gamebryo engine. Also the third person shooting is even worse than the first person shooting.
>Map design was better than MMO NV.
No, it wasn't. Also, "MMO NV"? New Vegas's map is just actually based on the real Las Vegas region.
>Go back to Cinemaphile back when I still lurked it,
>Poo in loo got bullied off of Cinemaphile
lol
>No, DT in FONV doesn't.
Doesn't what?
>and it's reputation system was broken from the beginning, and it's ammo system was half-assed
Both work great actually.
>Also FO3 is more consistant to the classic games lore than FONV is.
Not even slightly. The entire plot hinges on people somehow not having figured out how to filter or boil water, something the entire rest of the country has managed without issue for more than a century.
>Yes it does
No, DT in FONV doesn't. At all. Because it was a similar formula but it was put into place in a different position in the calculations than it was on the original games. FONV also never did anything about the shitty FO3 skill systems, and it's reputation system was broken from the beginning, and it's ammo system was half-assed without mods to fix everything.
I modded FONV a lot, worked on it and had more hours in it than FO3 by far, and again I didn't play FO3 after the expansions came out so didn't get the atrocious level scaling from Broken Steel (and also the vanilla release FO3 had a horrible pacing regarding character growth, I remember my first play on FO3 I was almost max level before I found Dad).
Also FO3 is more consistant to the classic games lore than FONV is. If Marcus replaced Fawkes in FO3 it would've been more in line with his FO2 Epilogue than his presence in FONV is. Also again this is all console war tier parrot nonsense and basically, you're a homosexual.
I saw Harry Potter when I was little and I hate that shit.
Fallout 3 was shit though compared to 1,2 and NV.
I don't know why Anglo-saxons hate prequels, i am slav, and every in my coutry love all 6 films.
piss analogy
I got a piss analogy for you. Open up, b***h.
The prequels are shit and always will be. Redlettermedia was right about everything.
The prequels are awful but the sequels are as bad
They shouldn't even call them sequels. They're just extended universe horseshit.
Movie's even better with the rebellion scenes added back in. Shows Padme, Bail Organa and Mon Mothma were the ones who started the rebellion. No cartoons, no video games. It's all here.
?si=QaBpIQPZWdGuX6jk