The flopping of Madame Web proves that sex doesn't sell. Hollywood got the message loud and clear. Brace yourselves for another 10 years of frumpy old hags playing girlboss.
 |
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
The flopping of Madame Web proves that sex doesn't sell. Hollywood got the message loud and clear.
>This is not how she dress in the movie
dishonest filmsking is what's killing hollyweird
Where in the actual product is the sex appeal?
The four hotties that had to appear half-naked to promote this piece of shit
so the promotion is worth watching but the movie probably isn't because
>four
Three four however many hollyprostitutes are in this thing frick if I know I'm not watching it
How moronic and zoomer are you to not realize/know that sex appeal was a constant marketing strategy for decades
>dude sexy character
>here's my $50 plus tip for a ticket
Porn sick coomer mentality.
moron doesn't know how to delete posts lmao
>porn sick coomer has no reading comprehension after frying their brain on porn
Story as old as time
moronic and reddit spacing
Many such cases
>dude sexy character
>here's my $50 plus tip for a ticket
Porn sick coomer mentality. Do you jerk off in your seat like an animal as well?
Oh there was four, but only one was a hottie
Nah there's at least two, femdon and the blonde
How porn sick do you have to be to see a shitty movie because the star is attractive
>porn sick
Stop talking like a twitter feminist
>is that an attractive character?
>Ooooohoijhhooohoh goooooooood I'm cooooooooooooooming
>t. Mentally ill porn sick coomer
>an attractive actress in a film? eugh so boring, why bother when i can watch gangbangs online with a 30 second search
it works both ways friend, especially so considering sex sold best when online porn didn't exist and sexually suggestive content still sells well in places where porn is slightly more difficult to access eg, South Korea and kpop
It's the other way around, a jaded coomer would never get turned on by some movie cleavage, a normal person will. Back when pornography wasn't as widespread some movies where an average girl showed her ankles for 10 seconds would basically be marketed as porn
>a moderately attractive woman!
>hearts thumps out of chest
>wolf howl
>hubba hubba!
>starts smacking self in head with shoe
>here's my money Mr shlomo!
>coomers think everyone acts like this because they are so porn sick
Oh look a homosexual mocks attraction to women and passes it off as ackshually healthy heterosexuality
>homosexual
You mean an actual degenerate who's feeling guilty and/or is trying to lump all heterosexual men in with them so that it becomes a societal problem rather than a personal one. All of their SSDs need to be checked.
she is so autistic and so beautiful. it's amazing.
porn was already big, its just Hays code that fricked shit up
>and a strange half-animal girl
don't remember that shit in fear and desire
Attractive things attract, that's what they do. That's why it doesn't make sense that they get bogged down in movies and shows.
>oh my god is that cleavage?????
>awahoooga
>whistle
>here's my 100 dollarydoos mr shekelberg!
>coomer mentality
Best you ignore the moron, he has no sense of logic since he doesn't interact with society
I hope this isn't another tourist season, the last one was awful
>gives money to maybe see boobs
>calls others morons
Just type boobs into Google you shitskin moron
Why do zoomers hate sex so much?
It's human nature to hate what they envy because they don't have it
I can't reconcile the fact that they say a large percentage of zoomers identify as some form of queer but at the same time many of them are scared of anything remotely sexual.
are you guys sexual degenerates or prudes?
unless they all call themselves queer because they're asexual. that's like saying your hair color is bald tho.
Because it's not that binary. It's a 15 year age gap
Low testosterone they can barely get erections
saturated with images of it from a young age. probably gets annoying after a while
Inverted SJWs, complete with their unwillingness to engage with anything other than a strawman.
I'm not the one buying tickets to a shitty capeshit movie just to see cleavage. Grow the frick up, this is an 18+ website you fricking coomer.
So are you a shill or a turd worlder where porn is illegal?
Have you considered that people like charming women in their media, and that sex appeal is a big part of a woman's charm? Have you considered that maybe a character that you know is more sexy than just some random picture? Have you considered that just like the woke, you're a disingenuous frick who's just trying to boil the frog?
I'm seeing the same shit that happened in 2014 with slightly different rhetoric (complete with idiots buying into the idea that these dipshits are normies and not a lunatic fringe), and I don't like it. We don't need another decade of sanctimonious nutcases sucking the fun out of everything.
Ignore him anon he's just trying to fit in
>boomer
>zoomer
>coomer
>third worlder
>sick freak
are you at the end of your wits? the only thing that's clear in your ramblings is that you are going crazy at the possibility a woman in a movie has boobs.
I've never seen someone so mad at nothing.
you sound like you have deep seated trauma b***hoid, get help
Coomers upset at being called coomers. Enjoying paying to watch slop you stupid fricking paypigs
>paying
kek
and who the frick ever said anything about paying?
what a little tard you are.
thats how studios used to get people to buy tickets. congrats on being born yesterday
>people were moronic back then
>Why aren't you moronic like them?!
Of course a moron wouldn't understand
how low test do you have to be to not like breasts
That's how it supposed to be, you fricking troony
Magic Mike sold solely based on its sex appeal to women.
>tradlarp incels hasnt heard that sex sells before
at least you arent a mid coomer doomer boomer on god frfr
people have literally been doing this since movies are a thing
>why would I want to see a film starting attractive women
>just watch porn lol
Porn addicts aren't going to want to see an attractive woman not get fricked you moron. Porn has rotted your mind if you can't appreciate this.
It has hot people in it, but the trailer is strangely sex-less, at least narratively.
I don't understand how nobody told her beforehand that her undies are showing as clear as day. Anything front and below the bust just screams thong. Same with Dakota's dress.
It's either part of the dress (they call it a "nude skin" iirc) or she purposely wore tan undies to blend
You really are mentally deficient lmao
What's your nearest psych ward? They ought to do a study on you to develop the next leading form of euthanasia
It looks like the corset is stuck to the dress, but the undies seem a separate thing in a different tint. It would've worked better to have it all one piece without the stupid see-through and tan-like lines. Overall it also feels too formal for a superhero movie where they essentially play very young adults, except for Dakota I mean.
That said though her dress is an even worse disaster, same underwear situation and a necklace that doesn't fit with the design at all. She should fire her stylist.
>still posting images for ants
stop dude stop
This is such a desperate promotion. Too bad actual movies can't have sexy women anymore.
Awful example. People aren't going to go to theatres to watch trashy, borderline smut. 365 days would have flopped in theatres too, but it was a massive success online.
>sex doesn't sell
Oh? So the porn industry isn't a multi-billion dollar business?
thank you my man
Mogged
left is cute girl in skimpy dress
right is weird androgenoid alien in chainmail
big squishy breasts
fricking hell dex you trying to get a look at my lunch of what
art hoe vs farm girl
Combine Dakota’s face with Sidney’s body and it’s perfect.
it's called a bodice, moron.
the entire structure is made with boning
everything she wears is designed by gucci she is a lifestyle model or something like that. It's definitely taken a more scandalous turn since alessandro michele left. He worshipped her.
look at that dude's skull cap
They must have been really embarrassed when they found out later.
I don't understand how nobody told anon beforehand that his autism is showing clear as day. Anything in his post just screams autism. Same with OP
also
>image for ants
STOP POSTING SMALL IMAGES YOU NEWhomosexual PLEBS
Very nice tiddy
I'm gonna gumb
great sage please teach me your secrets
where do you find such photographs of large size with no watermarks? do you receive from the gods during meditation?
finding the right forum for celebs and making an account
>right forum for celebs
the ones I knew are all closed down or inactive. zoomers only use social apps on their phones.
I would be happy if I could just find a site like the old lazygirls.info, which wasn't even very good.
picturepub net
keep it on the downlow bro
thanks mate! I'll need to make a new throwaway email before I can actually check the pics tho.
why the secrecy tho? zoomers wouldn't join even if they knew how.
i know, that's why i pay Cinemaphile pass
IF WE DON'T CLONE HER WE FAILED AS A CIVILIZATION
she has a mild palsy probably from drugs
t. mild palsy probably from drugs
>The four hotties that had to appear half-naked to promote this piece of shit
and who would the other 3 be that are half naked in this movie?
Are you moronic? Pic is how she looks in the movie. As sexless as possible.
If she looked in the movie like she looked on the red carpet, the movie wouldn't bomb nearly as hard.
>the actual product
>red carpet event
Pick one you imbecile
Is that literally the same thing they had Emma Stone wear in ASM?
>pleated skirt
>knee socks
>sexless
Why would you blatantly lie like this
It's a literal school girl uniform.
Not a loose school girl uniform, just a uniform.
Also not only is there no cleavage, but even the silhouette of her boobs is almost completely hidden.
>Not a loose school girl uniform, just a uniform.
Yeah thats what I said
If you think that's sexful, then you're probably a shitskin from a country where women wear burqas.
Even well-fitting jeans are a million times sexier than that type of skirt.
>Even well-fitting jeans are a million times sexier than that type of skirt.
Wrong. More for me.
>Even well-fitting jeans are a million times sexier than that type of skirt.
>prefers shapeless stick thighs you see on literally any average schoolgirl over bulbous boobs nearly spilling out of the dress
>calls others gay
It does. The problem is that the movie is critically being crushed to smithereens which is a death sentence for Superhero movies.
>flopping
it hasn't even gotten the weekend to flop yet
selling teases to a world of infinite free hardcore porn is like selling refrigerators to eskimos
Flopping her large breasts
It's not like they played into her sex appeal. It's just a barely coherent mess and another low effort entry by Sony of America.
why are women directors like this?
We went through both a sexual revolution and also a feminization of society. The net impact is an oversexed society that hates and micromanages male heterosexuality.
burka heroes
Why is this image not using a picture of Kate Bishop in her superhero costume like the other three pictures? What are you trying to pull here?
What point are your trying to make here anon? Exposed thumb is sexy?
Answer the question.
You are right about contemporary capeshit being the culmination of American Puritan "ideals" and thuse utterly sexless. And yes, Brie and whatshername on the top certainly were neutered significantly for those roles.
However, Salma Hayek is in her mid-to-late 50s now, she isn't quite the same as she was in From Dusk Till Dawn. Sure, she still looks great for her age, but her settling into more modest-dressing roles seemes adequate. You wouldn't demand Judy Dench being sexualized in every role, would you (Cats 2019 being the obvious exception, of course)?
As for that Hailee Steinfeld costume - I kinda like it. There's a certain tomboy-energy to a cute girl in a slick suit. More about perceived personality than outright physical sex-appeal.
please stop being a reasonable person with reasonable opinions on my Cinemaphile
>American
>Puritan
Ah yes. It's the puritans who are behind this. Certainly not the leftards.
>It's the puritans who are behind this. Certainly not the leftards.
There's no difference between those in America anymore. "Twitter leftists" have compeltely adopted the Puritan mindset, if for different reasons.
>cats have 4 legs, they eat and poop
>dogs have 4 legs, they eat and poop
>let's call cats "dogs" from now on
>dogs have 4 legs, they eat poop
fify
Except that dogs having 4 legs is not the reason or cause for cats having 4 legs.
Whereas leftists in America (and America exclusively) gaining Puritan values is demonstrably a direct result of those Puritan values completely having taken over the American conscience over the last two decades.
This. This is what people don't get. Americans just hate sex. Liberalism or conservatism are just post-hoc rationalizations for a forgone conclusion, that sex is bad.
No, moron. Feminists and other degenerates just hate the things men like. Leftards never see women's promiscuity as a problem (even though that's self-contradictory, since women want dicks anyway), it goes always one way. A puritan would scorn both sides.
>Feminists and other degenerates just hate the things men like
That's not how it works. Sex-positive feminists dominated the movement in the 1960s, 70s and 80s. Are you going to tell me that men didn't like sex back then?
>Leftards never see women's promiscuity as a problem
Except a good portion of that crowd, especially online, does, and quite literally tries to shame girls who dress in a sex-positive way.
>b-b-but 50 years ago
moron
>Except a good portion of that crowd, especially online, does, and quite literally tries to shame girls who dress in a sex-positive way.
Only AFTER men take notice.
>Sex-positive feminists dominated the movement in the 1960s, 70s and 80s
"Sex positive feminism" (what a typically dreadful phrase) is a very, very recent thing. Liberal movements of the past were fundamentally and ideologically different from anything existing now.
Don't you bring your weird ahistorical fanfic in here.
>"Sex positive feminism" (what a typically dreadful phrase) is a very, very recent thing.
Holy shit, you're moronic. No, it isn't. Remember the bra-burning? The protests against dress-codes? That was second wave-feminism.
Large-scale outspoken anti-sex feminism is what's a recent thing. As is this whole "media need to cater to my sensibilities" bullcrap on Twitter. Back in the day nobody would even have thought about complaining about how a film chose to present any female characters, one way or the other.
You guys really think Twitter writes movies, huh?
No. But certain "movies" (unlike actual films) do definitely target the twitter-using (or general social media) demographic. Capeshit in particular is all about hype culture - which is why they rely so much on an A-list cast in the first place.
But more than that, capeshit targets the average American, so it tries to appeal to the values most Americans share, regardless of political affiliation. And Puritanism, shockingly, is such a value.
Salma Hayek only hit the wall and bogged herself late last year. Prior to 2023 she still looked good enough to play milfy sex appeal characters.
These women are nothing without their sex appeal. Goddamn.
>These women are nothing without their sex appeal.
Bullshit.
Brie is a genuinely good actress, despite winning an Oscar. She doesn't present herself in an overly sexualized way most of the time anyway. At least not as much as other actresses do. And she seems like a genuinely good and well-meaning (if slightly autistic) person.
Hayek is a decent actress in her own right, it was Hollywood that reduced her to her sex-appeal in the roles she got there. What stands out the most about her is her devotion to UNICEF and international aid efforts.
Heilee Steinfeld got popular as a teen actress, and generally isn't over-sexualized. She mostly gets booked for her "cuteness" rather than her sex-appeal.
No idea about the other one.
>The flopping of Madame Web proves that sex doesn't sell.
What sex? That movie was PG and sterile as frick.
/thread
>flopping
The fricking film isn't even out yet.
>the elderly israeli perverts in charge think that anyone cares
it proves that america is turning to jeysus
>Brace yourselves for another 10 years of frumpy old hags playing girlboss.
If Madame Wall bombs, why would they keep making that kind of movie? The complete lack of logic makes me think a woman wrote the post in the OP. I'm really sick of this goyslop appearing on my board, so I'll be filtering every thread about the movie, and any thread about any of the actresses appearing in the movie. Please doubt I'll be doing this, but you NPCs will be speaking to each other in the void.
Porn is so readily available nowadays that movies need to offer more than just sex appeal. This movie had nothing else going for it.
>This movie had nothing else going for it.
This is 99% of all movies. And yet, horror still has breasts in it... mostly.
>movie not even released yet
>flopping
you incels will literally make stuff up to cry about instead of finding some grass to touch
Today is release day
Besides that the film has had minimal marketing and has shit reviews, it's gonna flop
Is this the half naked I am hearing about because that's more covered than fully dressed
It gets even worse when you consider the potential sex appeal in that skin-tight suit, but in reality she only has it on for 120 seconds in the movie.
if syd was topless throughout the whole thing i'd pay for an IMAX ticket every day
>brown hands typed this post
REDEEM IMAC TICKET b***hSIR
>Purposely make a shitty movie about characters nobody gives a damn about
>Fill it with hot women
>The shitty movie flops
>Hurrr see? Everybody hates looking at beautiful women, here's more fat trannies for you!
They did it on purpose.
Take your meds
You're an idiot.
>The flopping of Madame Web proves that sex doesn't sell.
Putting it on the red carpet is not putting in the movie.
Furthermore, you can think of sex in media like gravy. If the pot roast is cooked to perfection, the gravy can elevate it from a 9/10 to an 11/10, If the pot roast is overcooked and half-rotted, the gravy is not going to save it. It's just going to make you wish that it was on a better pot roast.
>You used a food analogy! You must be morbidly obese!
Everybody eats, schizo. And gourmet cooking is also a part of the arts, which makes it even more natural for comparisons to movies, books, etc.
You can't use sex as a crutch and expect it to create a massive hit. You can use it as rocket fuel for a movie, show, game, or comic with good fundamentals.
These guys are so porn sick they can't engage with anything that isn't porn or porn related.
add a glimpse of their c**ts and see how many tickets you sell
first question: why does the mere mention of boobs in a movie triggers you so deeply? what the frick is wrong with you?
and second: why the frick would you think that looking at your favorite actress' boobs is the same as looking at some porn trash prostitute's boobs?
porn slaves are worthless women, why do you think people care about fappening leaks if there's so much porn around already?
How much of a simp do you have to be to pay to watch this crap.
You really are a shitskin.
This is a new level of moronic autism
I call it "frickwit"
>coomer upset
Keep crying and passing yourself you porn sick freak
In for
she win
it proves if you cast sexy people and don't show off their sexiness, it will flop. It's about reminding the talent that they aren't important and hollywood will gladly waste their time to put them in their place.
seriously
>we need to cast someone as an EMT
>lets pick dakota johnson
>have you ever seen an emt that is a 5'7" 135lb female?
>no bro but she put asses in seats!
is this how it went?
Chances are the producer saw the bikini pic
>The flopping of Madame Web
according to what I heard, the 3 girls are in spider costumes with spider powers for like 5 seconds in future visions and that's it.
I wonder what the frick are they going to do for the rest of the movie?
just run from the villain? why cram 3 spider women in a movie if not a single one of them is gonna do spider shit?
>Is that a boob?! I'm cooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmming
> the coomers itt
See you later you stupid fricking paypigs, simps and porn addicts. You stupid fricking lot of morons
I'm starting to think you're either a very ugly, unfrickable girl or a jelly troony.
no sane straight man hates sexy women so much.
I saw the booba. I'm cooming right now.
It sells if you put actual sex in the movie, moron. I bet a porn parody of this will make more money.
Only if they cast decent lookalikes
This isn't an airport, no need to announce your departure
except there was no 'sexo' in the film you dipshit, which invalidates your argument
maybe if there was more sexy sydney or cleavage then sure
but they were macguffins and covered up
I can see her macguffins right there. It's not going to save it.
FILTHY EVIL prostitute! I CURSE YOU prostitute! I CURSE THIS prostitute TO HELL! *THROWS HOLY WATER AT THE SCREEN* GO TO HELL prostitute!
*DRAWS FLIES ON HER*
HAHAH YOU FILTHY prostitute! THE FLIES SURROUND YOU! GO WASH YOUR c**t!
YESHUA IS KING
>The flopping of Madame Web
WOW! What's the box office take? Oh, wait, you don't have that! Sounds like you're just another homosexual making a homosexual post. I suspect it will flop, but your brain already went there and starting giving fever dream situations because of it. Lay off the drugs, son.
>I suspect your 100% correct but I'm going to fling shit at you anyway
k
I know buddy, it's valentine's day and you're lonely as frick, but sperging out here won't make you feel better.
are you the sexophobic gay btw? did you pretend to stop posting to change attack angle?
Anyone But You did really well despite being a dogshit predictable romcom
No Hard Feelings did surprisingly well despite being a low budget sex comedy starring a washed up Jlaw
Madame Web failed despite being a capeshit spin-off of a popular brand.
The difference? The former 2 films had nudity. The latter had coomb8 actresses but no nudity. Audiences don't want to be blue balled. If you're selling sex, sell fricking sex.
It's proves no one cares about movies
>proves that sex doesn't sell
it never did
if it did, showgirls would have made billion dollars.
I love Sydney and I wish she were my gf.
>all these mid women
They didn't make it sexy enough, they are still really covered up in it despite their red carpet appearance.
isn't this the actress that keeps taking her clothes off and fricking her co stars and then shooting sex scenes in movies
This movie is about wearing clothes
It doesn't seem like a "sex sells" type of movie, what really from the trailer makes you think that? Just because she is hot on the red carpet doesn't mean. What from the trailer even looked remotely sexy?
shut up homosexual
get the bawds half dressed on screen or no ticket sales
simple as
>Lovia Gyarkye of The Hollywood Reporter said the film "doesn't meet even the lowest expectations" and wrote: "It is an airless and stilted endeavor driven by a mechanical screenplay… The film operates on a need-to-know basis, forcing people to explain themselves through inelegantly breathless exposition." The Guardian's Benjamin Lee awarded the film one star out of five and said it was "as dumb and schlocky as the worst of the genre, with lousy network TV effects, uninvolving action and unfunny and inelegant dialogue."
Damn
Sweeney's other film did well just recently.
I legit didn't realize my camera was this zoomed in. I was holding it over the crowd.
nice job, parker
>frumpy old hags playing girlboss
Thats literally dakota
>The flopping of Madame Web proves that sex doesn't sell.
Approximately how much sex was in Madame Web? None? Got it.
But there isn't that much "sex" sold in Madame Web, it just has a very attractive cast with Sweeney, Dakota, Moner and Emma Roberts. They don't even appear in their tight superhero outfits outside of a brief vision scene.
Sydney Sweeney has a movie she stars in that has more sex sold in cinemas right now, and it has done very well.
>Brace yourselves for another 10 years of frumpy old hags playing girlboss
what's the difference? who the frick want's to watch girlboss movies anyway?
I like how OP's claim requires that "covered up frumpy girls" gets like 500 chances, but "somewhat less covered up kind of more hot girls" gets ONE chance with a truly terrible movie and that's it.
Why would it? Porn is everywhere now and they didn’t have any coomer scenes in the movies
9.5/10
If their outfits looked like this they would've earned a quarter billion by now.
Bros, they're on to us...
>sexo.jpg
>612x756
More like anto.jpg
In The Voyeur we can see her breasts and she gets fricked by a nig.
She's finished.
thanks I'll check it out!
>proves that sex doesn't sell
They literally uglified her in the film, anon. She's barely recognizable and doesn't show much of her body there. If anything, it flopped because there's no sexual appeal anywhere in it (at least as dar as I can tell from the marketing).
It will do about as well as marvels did, there are plenty of pajeets and nigs in Europe who will watch this.
Where the frick is the camrip you stupid homosexuals?
Even our boy hates it
Angry Hose has lost all credibility because of Alex. They hate every movie they see. This review doesn’t hold any water when they review every movie the exact same. Alex’s negativity had tainted the show
Alex is like me
We hate 90% of modern media, be it games or movies/shows
i hate 99% of modern media
>We hate 90% of modern media
Same.
>2023 liked zero movies
>2022 liked zero movies
>2021 liked zero movies
>2020 liked zero movies
>2019 liked zero movies
>2018 liked Upgrade(nothing else)
So i have to go back to 2018 to find a movie i like and it is the only one that year. Let's continue.
>2017 liked Blade Runner 2049(nothing else)
>2016 liked zero movies
>2015 liked Mad Max:Fury Road(nothing else)
>2014 liked Edge of Tomorrow(nothing else)
So 10 years back and i've liked like only 4 movies.
>inb4 you're just a sci-fi guy that's why you like so few movies
No, i am not ''just a sci-fi guy''. Believe me. I like movies all around. Sci-fi is just the only gerne that still makes movies that catch my eye. Modern comedies are dead. Modern thrillers are dead. Modern dramas are dead. Modern horror is dead. Modern action is dead.
>liked Blade Runner 2049
>liked Mad Max:Fury Road
>liked Edge of Tomorrow
Wow. You have REALLY terrible taste. And by that I mean irredeemably bad, abysmal, completely warped, child-minded, uninformed and trash taste.
I've sometimes felt that way but Tue good news is I still periodically discover older movies that I didn't know about and are great so I never run out of new (to me) things to watch.
They liked Sisu.
Stop liking slop goyem.
FOUR HOURS?!
meh. she is no megan fox
>she is no megan fox
And that's a good thing.
bad boys 2 megan
Honestly, I never got the Megan Fox hype. She was willing to show off just a bit of skin in that Transformers bullshit and all the teenage boys went crazy about her. But her face never looked that great, and she seemed pretty bland personality-wise.
Yeah, Sydney's breasts are real.
Jesus.
I like how she had to turn on the airbrush IG filter as well, as if her caked up face isn't uncanny enough.
what an age to be alive
any latino links?
Sex sells well, but people aren't looking for sex when they watch movies anymore. Besides, whatever that movie is I guarantee it's shit.
Try not making something that's shit.
Whey are troons so seemingly against heterosexual male libido?
Bros she still hasn’t swiped right on me yet, she’s my perfect Sydney doppelgänger
>white women & dogs
Every. Single. Time.
Sex positive. Except in films or video games.
It's funny how they'll cheer women on for dressing in the old costumes on OF, but are against the actresses in the movies doing that.
>but are against the actresses in the movies doing that.
Prove it. Show where these sex positives were against this and wielded their power to stop it.
Captain Marvel, dipshit. Now, go ahead and argue dishonestly so I can ignore you.
How? The sex positives own Disney? The famously family-friendly corporation of 100 years?
Brie and the producers said they weren't wearing her original costume because they wanted to avoid the inherent sexualization of it. Yet, girls on OF wear that costume all the time and they're lauded by other women for it.
Face it; it's hypocrisy.
And if you want to go the family friendly route, then go to the beach and see women wearing much less in front of children.
t. lifeguard
So now you're conflating the actions of two entirely different groups of people and calling all of them hypocrites broadly.
Also it's weird that you think it's wrong to "avoid the inherent sexualization" in a genre made for children.
>So now you're conflating the actions of two entirely different groups of people and calling all of them hypocrites broadly.
Yes. Now what? You do it all the time, I bet.
>Also it's weird that you think it's wrong to "avoid the inherent sexualization" in a genre made for children.
The very same people who say women should be able to dress how they want in public (basically naked) do not get to say anything about how characters should be dressed in comic book movies.
Eat a dick.
Sydney, I am begging, BEGGING you to do a period drama where we get to watch you in a corset. Even if you're just breathing for an hour and a half, I would be there opening day.
she has 0 brain activity in there, doesnt she? if you were at the event i am sure you could tell her anything and she would absolutely believe it. I'd have her on her knees in the bathroom stall so easily
Women like that have never had to think after puberty hit, they're basically like children mentally because of this.
>she has 0 brain activity in there, doesnt she?
She's a woman so duh
She's a high school valedictorian iirc so she can't be that bad
If she wore outfits like that instead of the frumpy ugly clothes maybe you could have point, there was nothing sexy or sexual about the trailers
Shit films are shit films
I don’t pay for anything anyway
And I’ll watch syd in whatever she’s in because I like her
Sony haven’t made a good movie in 50 years
Where was the ass and cleavage? Nothing. This movie was basically a mother's day film. The only redeemable thing it had was tummy kino and it only lasted for 10 minutes at most.
No it just proves that Disney-Marvel-capeshit is dead
I'll enjoy and buy a product the day we get back good product with sex appeal
So is this trolling or are you guys really this uninformed about the movies you spend hours a day moaning about?
Most of the situations people are mad about here are entirely imaginary
where was the sex in the movie?
Me with sydney, its half the movie
>I lost the argument and have no response but... uh... REEEEE MUH POLLLLLLLL
moron
>crying about /misc/
Take the L and kys, troony.
me on the left
You realize attractive women existing is not enough to make "sex appeal"? They have to be presented as attractive as well.
Sex sells, but a team of girls is boring. Lesbians are boring.
sydney is the only sexy b***h, dakota is an old ugly hag and the other two are brown and black
homosexual post
who took a shit on that boat
Cute Maisie Williams pic!
Gay
>movie is banking on sex appeal
>casts actresses uglier than what you see on the street every day
If you want to bank on sex appeal show a fricking WOMAN with some real breasts, hips, and thighs.
>Movie came out a few hours ago
>Flopped
You can see the future? Was your mother researching spiders in the Amazon right before she died, by any chance?
Everyone saying this movie has flopped is taking RT critics' score as gospel.
The movie flopped because capeshit is radioactive right now. Put them in any other movie and it's a smash.
I fricking love women and hate them bros
Pretty much the relationship of men with women. You love them for their bodies but hate them for the rest of their existence.
I have never seen a sydney kino yet I open every thread with her
must've been a terribly uninteresting episode as I haven't seen a single webm from it
her?
Millennials only get off to getting cucked and zoomers don’t have sex so who was this movie made for? Gen x men are all kept on short leashes by their crazy wives so not them either
I would spend all my savings on her if she does BLACKEDRAW
just watch gabbie carter its as close as you're gonna get
Capeslop is dead, doesn't matter who they put in it.
These movies could still easily clear a billion if they would just characters audiences actually like and stop pretending the multiverse is at all a fascinating and new idea.
Explain her other romcom with the Top Gun dude selling like hotcakes then, it proved that sex DOES sell moron