The Harkness Test is just as bad as the "1000 year old dragon" trope.

The Harkness Test is just as bad as the "1000 year old dragon" trope.

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    nah, its a useful guide

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        No

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        moron they are gonna yiff the demons into submission you doom us all

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes you're right but who cares?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      its all moronic because fiction is vast and complex and moreso the way fiction influences and is viewed and consumed by people, trying to figure out rules and draw lines for this stuff is fricking dumb, you can speculate on what it means about a person but there's no hard guide on the matter

      go back to the sharty

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's not a soijak

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It'd be different if he was more humanoid.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The what and the what?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Harkness Test
      Imaginary standards meant to justify fricking animals as inspired by John Barrowman's character from the Doctor Who franchise. Long story short, if it's sapient enough to communicate and give consent, then it gets a pass.

      >1000 year old dragon
      Meant to justify a potential attraction to a female character with a prepubescent or otherwise younger appearance. First thing that comes to mind is the Nowi character from Fire Emblem, but I suppose a proper Cinemaphile example, albeit a lesser extreme, would be Arissa Rrab from Green Lantern.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    If a clean, well groomed, and sapient mare trotted up and verbally expressed interest in me, that'd still be preferable over some fat chick.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      um sweety this ain't /mlp/

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The OP implies fricking lions. I just shifted to a less "I'm going to eat your soft entrails" animal, and horses are the only one of the three main human companion animals that can handle a human penis and not be bothered by it. Where as a dog would probably have a miserable time of it and a cat would probably die from internal trauma. I'd imagine the only reason you don't hear more stories of zoophiles getting kicked to death by mares is because they're so large and muscular that human dicks barely register when compared to stallions.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          The issue is that humans shouldn't be having sex with animals at all. The Harkness Test feels like an excuse to try to justify it. Just like the 1000 year old dragon trope.

          Horses should only mate with other horses.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Horses should only mate with other horses.
            Sorry homie but these mares gonna get STRIPPED

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm guessing you don't know what a mule is then.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Duh of course it's dogfricker talk, I stay away from subhumans who bring up that shit

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is nothing wrong with being attracted to cartoon characters regardless of their age because they are not real people. Deal with it.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I give it the fleece johnson test.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    And Cinemaphile complains about Twitter being censor happy.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      No one is getting censored.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *