>The jury remained deadlocked once deliberations resumed; consequently, a mistrial was declared on November 30, 2022.
>The jury foreman said that the panel of six men and six women leaned towards acquitting Masterson on all counts because they found the testimonies of the complainants inconsistent and implausible; for instance, one Jane Doe testified in court that Masterson threatened her with a gun during the attack, but a firearm was not mentioned when she reported to the police: "The big big problem for her, credibility-wise, was the gun present in the testimony but not in the early reports," the jury foreman said.
>A new trial was held in April and May 2023, and on May 31 Masterson was convicted of two of the three counts of forcible rape.
*Clap clap clap clap clap*
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
>Jane Doe
Stupid b***h gets raped all the time. Does she even exist. Oh and frick all women! Kiss my ass b***h
She also gets murdered so often.
When will she learn?
It's just a really common name, moron.
Imagine if he legit dead ass didn't rape them and he has to live with the fact that he's an innocent man having his life ruined
That's exactly what happened.
What he's accused of, fricking blackout drunk women, isn't rape. So yes he's innocent of rape. But I doubt he even did what he was accused of. You certainly can't prove it. Weinstein was the dawn of new day. You can be sent to prison for life at any time for made up rape charges.
>fricking bklackout drunk wome isnt rape
what
it's skeevy behaviour and if he gets her preggers she's at risk of death, imo it should be reckless endangerment and carry a similar punishment. MORE if she does get pregnant, and if she dies in childbirth then it's manslaughter. but Americans (and the west in general) are weird prudes and have some kind of spiritual issue with sex. maybe it's their freedom fetish, but whatever they gotta burn a motherfricker for LIFE when I've legit heard cops tell someone "it's your fault for being in a sketchy neighbourhood" over assaults and robberies, but women are above all that shit apparently.
like if I got raped up the ass I'd be pissed off and want revenge, but I'm pragmatic enough to understand it's just a beating, and the punishment shouldn't be LIFE.
No cap that would dead ass b wack asf fr
That's how men live in america these days. You don't have to imagine this shit.
>Nightmares start when you awake
Lmao get over yourself, the average man on a day to day has none of these problems. This is rich liberal people shit.
>be man
>don’t be famous
>don’t frick women who know your name
Or
>be man
>frick one woman
>have no money
Only safe way to play
one of the wisest posts on Cinemaphile history.
>if
He did something bad. Otherwise 3 women from his past wouldn't be after him.
>He did something bad. Otherwise 3 women from his past wouldn't be after him.
this is what women say when men suffer domestic abuse. When a crazy woman cuts a man's dick off she must have had a good reason. Because men are always guilty until proven innocent.
Let's go with spiteful exs for 1000.
Look at Aziz Ansari. Woman had a bad date, and she complained about it as tho she had been abused.
QRD?
He did something bad according to them.
I’ve pissed off numerous people by doing various shitty things to them. But none of those things were illegal.
And a couple were really more a matter of opinion as to how shitty they were
I’d agree if he was a regular guy, but when you’re famous, or people perceive you as famous or rich, that line gets blurred hard. People nowadays do literal anything for money or fame. But who knows, he could also be a fricking scumbag too.
There has to be some sort of evidence, maybe it’s being kept from the public. If he denies everything and there’s no evidence then there is no case against him.
My guess is that the women did one of these rape kits or the scientologists freaks setup the entire thing and filmed it.
>SA kit
look at this kit, hasnt even caught up with the latest kindergarten tier censorship project
>My guess is that the women did one of these rape kits
they never did, that's the main issue with everything. they were all girlfriends or flings of his.
no there's literally nothing but stories from 20 years ago
#BelieveAllWomen
yuh that shit would no cap not be bussin fr
Um, I bet you can’t think of a single person who was actually cancelled sweaty
I'd go full Max Cady and in 30 years break into whatever old folks home they're rotting in and rape them for real.
it can be forgiven... you can endure through anything knowing you are innocent.
this unironically happens to black men every year
the crazy thing is, you can be innocent, lose 20 years of your life in prison and the govt doesnt owe you anything. just a "lol sry woops!"
this guy spent 46 years in prison before he was proven innocent
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/04/us/longest-wrongful-prison-sentence/?src=longreads
also, laws about unlawful imprisonment vary state by state. the federal govt isnt responsible. so most states dgaf and will actively try to stop someone from proving their innocence because it can only hurt the state and their legal system. these states end up getting sued and losing millions so many states give unlawfully jailed people a pittance, 20k a year or something similar in the hope that they accept the sum in exchange for not suing.
Well those innocent black gentlemen must be released from prison immediately not the white r*pists.
>Hollywood sex pest and Scientology member goes to jail
You are going to jail soon also.
Frick whatever background you have.
Get shanked in the show b***h
Why are you being so assblasted? Did Danny visit or something?
sorry your mom died or whatever but you're a psycho
shutup you moronic femoid
too close to home there lil buddy? get over it, you'd be a basketcase loser either way
Are we getting a 12 angry men adaptation out of this?
>the jury didnt vote correctly so we are going to do this all over again with a more vetted sample.
American justice system for you
The fricked thing is that a judge can overrule a guilty verdict if they find the jury to have improperly conducted themselves or failed to observe the proper procedure.
Like if there’s no evidence whatsoever.
why didn't the judge do that for the george floyd case where the jury convicted the cop of everything despite those charges being contradictory to one another
>random sample of 12 people decide whether a man with a wife and kids gets sent to prison for the rest of his life based off how much they're convinced by hearsay
i dont get it. long time ago Cinemaphile didnt like this homosexual at all, shit we laughed at the charges and shitposted saying Topher Grace was right. Suddenly he is going to jail for rape and all these apologizers came out of nowhere
>Topher Grace was right
Never trust a man named Christopher who voluntarily goes by "Topher"
at some level whatever twitter and reddit are saying, Cinemaphile will say the opposite. and vice versa, like the guy who sang a song in his backyard about feeling ripped off for his labor and all the homosexuals on reddit and twitter said it was white supremacy.
May not Surprise you but many of this websites users are oppositional defiant disorder freakshows who only receive joy from shitting on the status quo.
Of course he’s a dirtbag but he’s being convicted with zero evidence.
Zero.
It has less to do with him and more to do with a gross miscarriage of justice.
Nobody gives a shit about him. We are talking about the legal precedent of sending a man to prison with an extremely long sentence for hearsay from decades previous.
when he was convicted with zero physical proof I think people are right to question which way our legal system is going
is burden of proof no longer a real thing?
>I don't like him therefore he should serve 30 years in prison for something someone said that can't be backed up by evidence
He's still a homosexual but going to jail for 30 years based on zero evidence should scare any man.
should scare everyone. at least here in the US.
>Be blackout drunk
>Clearly remember that you were raped and remember exactly who raped you and the details
How can these two things be simultaneously possible?
They’ll say anything to get a conviction. Even lie.
frick him, hes guilty
fricking contrarians up in this board
>some morons are capable of siding with rapist just to be contrarian
kek
They're not contrarian they just never have sex so can't imagine a scenario where any man would ever be in a situation involving women
>all the scientologists on this board gloating over their betrayer getting punished
>all the femoids who truly believe that tears are actually evidence of anything
>both of these groups just hurling insults and gaslighting anyone who finds the trial suspect
Yep, its psyop time.
That tweet says everything you need to know. So your boyfriend at the time "raped" you "repeatedly"???
How is that supposed to work? He raped horribly you once but she still kept meeting him again and again?
No fricking way
Probably "I was scared of what he would do if I broke up with him"
She liked when he got rough during sex, but years later she decided that actually that was rape.
They came for Danny.
They are coming for you.
That's right you cishet male reading this.
THEY are coming for you next.
I mean that's what this is all about isn't it. So what are the random anons out there hiding. How many of them have assaulted women in the past. Now they're scared their own skeletons will be dragged out of the closet.
Bitches be crazy. My condoms go straight down the toilet, I don’t care if you’re not supposed to do it. Maybe some crazy b***h will fetch it out of the waste basket and stick the semen in her vegana.
>NOOO we didnt like the outcome of that, let's do it two more times again until its the one we want
nice justice system
Incels be like
>but we should be allowed to rape!
brainlets be like
>its ok to arrest people with no proof a crime was comitted
>its ok to set legal precedents like this
We should tho
>Jurors voted seven times (...) without being able to reach consensus on any of the three counts, the foreman said. Two jurors voted for conviction on the first count, four voted for conviction on the second count and five voted to convict on the third count.
This was a jury of six men and six women... only on the third count did they manage to get five votes for guilty. I'm supposed to believe that after the mistrial prosecution suddenly pulled a conviction out of their hat on second try? Frick that shyt, where's the justice in that? If there was any doubt these bytchez were lying during the first trial, how the frick did he end up convicted now?
I think in the first trial they didn't allow the girls to testify that Danny Masterson had drugged them (because there was no evidence for it other than their own reports that they felt "drowsy" after a few drinks, imagine that) but the second trial it was allowed as if it was an established fact.
its a pretty big claim that someone drugged someone with no evidence
these trolls always say Scientology stopped them from going to the police. (which makes no sense).
and thats nice really..... but they are still really saying there is no proof any of this happened.
>innocent
>innocent
>guilty, i guess
>YES! USE THAT ONE!
SHE REGRETTED IT 20 YEARS LATER YOU SICK FRICK
Fricking 5 different women came out against him and accused him of rape and faced basically Scientology fricking up their lives to make sure the shitbird got put away.
Since when did Cinemaphile start shilling for Scientology? Wise Beard Man would be disappointed
The old user base left a long time ago.
imagine being on the board of scientology and having to pull strings with influential people and politicians and the brocolli cut gay from that 70s show keeps jamming you up
Danny betrayed the chruch you fool. They let him go down. Encouraged it even.
cool. now prove the crimes happened. thats how the law works. you have to prove guilt.
some people dont want the legal system to change from prove guilt to prove you are innocent.
it has nothing to do with this lame actor.
imagine white knighting for 5 prostitutes, have a nice day simp, this has nothing to do with scientology.
All religious sects tend to pull strings to get anyone semi influential out of trouble. Like that old Christian boomer doctor who kept using his cum to artificially inseminate people to create his own kids in random women who went to him. His church said there’s no way he’d do that because he was a prominent figure in whatever little bumfrick part of the county he lived in and faced zero charges.
xzd he didnt do it because he didnt heckin do it ugh women they are not like us cartoon forum nazis :3
you just described the entire case
>xzd he do it because he do it :3
So, what fans think matter or are we all just wasting time with these threads?
So they can subject you to one trial after another until you are declared guilty in one of them?
dont they have double jeopardy
maybe it doesnt apply if the first was a mistrial
or maybe double jeopardy is state-by-state.
who fricking knows with amerilards
until you're either declared not guilty or guilty, yes.
At some point in my twenties, I was dating simultaneously, fricking all of their brains out. I am absolutely positive that I’d suddenly be accused of “rape” if they all found out and got in touch with each other.
Four women simultaneously frick my phone gayging brains out
>Cinemaphile now likes israelites cause they hate women more
Why do women like looking at gangbang rape porn so much if they are going to sue you if it ever happens to them irl?
>Cinemaphile
>defending Scientology
What a dark time. Those motherfrickers killed Mudkips.
What evidence can exist 20 years later, genuinely? Did they do a rape kit and collect DNA evidence and physical evidence back then but waited this long to prosecute on it? What happened?