>The Wizard of Oz (1939) in color
>Godzilla, 15 years later, in B&W
why was Japan so far behind?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>The Wizard of Oz (1939) in color
>Godzilla, 15 years later, in B&W
why was Japan so far behind?
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
you realize Hollywood was still making black and white movies in the 50s right? Color cameras were expensive and bulky
>Color cameras
no such thing
idiot
cute of you to think they film in color
Early technicolor films literally required a specialist to manage the camera, stop acting like you know shit
coloring is a post-production application, jackass. only television has color applied live.
>requires the use of special cameras not used in B&W films
>i-it's entirely a post-production process
god you're moronic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor
do some reading idiot
I did, now maybe you should. Not only did they use different cameras, had a specialist on set to supervise the filming, but it also required a completely different approach to cinematography. Posting some wiki link doesn't change the fact that you're an imbecile
and you conveniently ignored where it states "shot on black and white film" in every technicolor process
irrelevant to your claim that it's entirely done in post-production, which is patently false. If it needs a special camera, that directors making a B&W film wouldn't use, then it's not purely a post-production process, idiot
actually you're the only one that claimed it was done entirely in post
>and you conveniently ignored where it states "shot on black and white film" in every technicolor process
>Color cameras were expensive and bulky
Technicolor on Wizard of Oz was a 3 strip process. That's why the camera was so bulky and noisy. 3 strips of black and white 35mm film photographed the scene behind different coloured filters.
They were recombined to make color prints.
They required massive amounts of light. It really helped if you were in California.
60s too. Pic related is from 1965 and it's top kino.
Classic Cinemaphile
sounds like cope
Japan only got color in 1951
Shit thread. Gonna sage it. Eat shit jannies ban yourselves.
you dumb Black person
they were doing black and white as far as the 60s because most pictures in color looked like cheap shit.
You were trying to make fun of something and ended up making a fool of yourself.
Still recovering from all the fire bombing I guess. The film is fine, but good lord is the audio terrible.
i dont get ops point at all but japanese 30s samurai films are highly detailed and realistic.
WWII.
japanese first colour film was 千人針 (1937)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8D%83%E4%BA%BA%E9%87%9D_(%E6%98%A0%E7%94%BB)
heres the film
https://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm29815662
Godzilla mainly works because of the black and white filming.
The extreme contrast between the dark night scenes, bright flames, dark highly reflective suit, all caught in black and white film, are what creates its entire haunting atmosphere.
The movie still looks so good.
how did they make that shit melt?
It was made of chocolate
They actually heated them up I'm guessing.
it's wax models and they shone bright studio lights onto them until they melted
SOVL
Most films were still in black and white, but I think you knew that and just wanted to post Godzilla because it's so kino.
Greatest ever spy movie, 1965, black and white:
I remember some boomer insisting that the Wizard of Oz was colorized much later and wouldn't believe it when I said it was originally released in color. I had to pull out my phone and look it up and show them. Why the frick do boomers have to always insist on being right?