Explain what? Read the thread or read a fricking book. The OP video is misleading. It’s not a “video” of real atoms, it’s a CG artists interpretation of what it might be like. The shit I took earlier was more impressive than this video.
>electron microscope needs a computer to generate the image
STOP THE PRESSES
STOP THE ANTIVAXX RALLIES
WE HAVE BEEN LIVING A LIE ALL THESE YEARS OMG JEEBUS IT'S LIKE THAT ONE TIME WHEN SOMEONE TOLD ME THAT TH EARTH IS OLDER THAN 6000 YEARS!!!
99% of the first world thinks this is a "photo" and not a computer generated image. "science communicators" are disingenuous homosexuals who want nothing but clicks and scientists are fine with this because interest ensures continued funding
9 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, It’s sad that the most legitimate field of study has to resort to visualizations to get anyone to care about them but that’s the price you pay as you deal with increasingly abstract and complex information.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>the most legitimate field of study
That's not philosophy >to get anyone to care about them
Maybe nobody cares about space because it has no impact on our lives, is completely dead and empty for unimaginable stretches of distance forever and ever, and the entire field of study thereof has proven to be completely useless, yet we keep funding it instead of using those resources on something earthly >good news! there's an epic exoplanet FBKSD9235, it's ten gorillion trillion light years away and we will literally never ever ever in our history learn anything else about it or get any closer to it, and even if we did, it's just a big ball of gas with nothing of interest, import, or use on it
Amazing! Please have 10 more billion dollars (sorry we had to cut the space budget to fund ukraine)
Right now Russians are going to the moon. Again. Why? There's fricking nothing on it!
Why does Elon Musk want to terraform and colonize Mars? The real answer is that he doesn't, it's all marketing to sell cars, but why does normie want him to? Does it not occur to him that colonizing literally any desert, or Antarctica, would be 10 trillion times cheaper and also not completely impossible?
all residual romantization of space, all effects of sci-fi media
space matters so little it may as well not be real.
i fricking hate space
Please come back down to Earth
9 months ago
Anonymous
People like you should be banned from the internet and made to live in a cave.
This, I was gonna say I’ve never seen a picture of a fricking atom before but these israelites in some shitty uni are using atoms to make stop motion? Kek, my fricking swinging wiener.
This, I was gonna say I’ve never seen a picture of a fricking atom before but these israelites in some shitty uni are using atoms to make stop motion? Kek, my fricking swinging wiener.
Those aren’t fricking atoms that’s CG. What you’re seeing is literal CG. I bet they even have a disclaimer about the video saying these are visual interpretations of some graph or whatever. This isn’t a fricking camera feed of fricking real atoms……
okay what are they atmons sitting in they are making waves wtf this is fake as dog shit frankly the video sucks donkey dick
lol this is so fake and the earth is flat science is more stupider then I thought
least moronic people on Cinemaphile, literally all it takes is to be barely literate to know it’s not possible to photograph fricking atoms…….
y u not mention me, im the smartest man alive sucka im wise like socrat cause i admit i dont know shit
unlike redditards who watch 1 neil degrasse tyson interview and think they know all the secrets of the universe
because normies (and I use this word positively, as in, we, us, normal people, who aren't obsessed with muh science and don't worship it) think of atoms as little balls, so that's what they show
Because real atoms are not something that have a visual interpretation. They don't have an appearance or a color or a shape, they are energy. Electrons aren't tiny balls that are orbiting the protons, they are fields. Atoms are essentially invisible. You think if you "zoom in" super real hard enough you will see the tiny balls, like they show in movies and stuff with CG, but no
They just wanted publicity so they made a cg cartoon about a boy made out of tiny metal balls
>y u not mention me, im the smartest man alive sucka im wise like socrat cause i admit i dont know shit
unlike redditards who watch 1 neil degrasse tyson interview and think they know all the secrets of the universe
Checked, based Black
Wait. If those dots are atoms, the clear background is made of what?
do you see the ripples in the video around every atom? it's other atoms out of focus. the frames are basically the peaks of a lot more atoms underneath. in the "how it was made" video they mention 5000 atoms
Those aren’t fricking atoms that’s CG. What you’re seeing is literal CG. I bet they even have a disclaimer about the video saying these are visual interpretations of some graph or whatever. This isn’t a fricking camera feed of fricking real atoms……
I found the cinematography to be rather pedestrian. The play of light and shadow is typically one of the highlights of black & white photography, here it's all rather... flat.
It’s not science as we once knew it (science being a synonym for truth basically, the study of reality) now SOIENCE!!!!!! is just political lies and garbage. Modern “”””””””””scientists”””””””””” claim men are women and that anyone who disagrees should be killed.
because normies (and I use this word positively, as in, we, us, normal people, who aren't obsessed with muh science and don't worship it) think of atoms as little balls, so that's what they show
Because real atoms are not something that have a visual interpretation. They don't have an appearance or a color or a shape, they are energy. Electrons aren't tiny balls that are orbiting the protons, they are fields. Atoms are essentially invisible. You think if you "zoom in" super real hard enough you will see the tiny balls, like they show in movies and stuff with CG, but no
They just wanted publicity so they made a cg cartoon about a boy made out of tiny metal balls
>Electrons aren't tiny balls that are orbiting the protons
they don't "orbit" the atomic nucleus like a 2d drawing of an atom might make you believe but they certainly behave as particles and also behave as waves. Wave-particle duality is literally day 1 material for any course you dumbfrick >electrons are fields
particles could be described as vibrations of a field but thinking they themselves are the field is a such a hilariously knuckle-dragging misunderstanding
you are missing the point
whether or not they are particles or waves or both, the point is that you can't visualize them
because the idea of visualization applies to things that can be hit by light and reflect it back to create an image, and atoms can't do that, and so the video is as misleading and incorrect as the iconic atom symbol with the orbiting balls
that is true, both electrons and an atom's much larger nuclei are way too small for any wavelength of light to diffract off of.
doesn't change the fact that you typed "(electrons) are fields," lmao
i also said that i know nothing
i am willfully ignorant which grants me the gift of humility
look at your arrogance
you learned just a little bit about particles and already you're this obnoxious
Midwits care about science a lot, but they don't understand it, so to them it's a new religion in lieu of old ones which they discarded
im on the left of the bell curve im the based caveman who cannot nor needs to understand
the truest way to live
It's literally a microscope which scans a surface with a tip, it's like a vinyl player that returns an image of the surface instead of music.
>surface of an atom
Atoms have soft surfaces as defined by the repulsory van der waal forces they generate. It's literally repelling the tip of the machine by the same method a table repels your hand.
The whole anti science thing started out on pol because of then vaccines. This comes from a board that thought the mask had nanomachines in them implanted by the government.
It's funny seeing pseuds on Cinemaphile treat IBM like a soi silicon valley startup when they are probably one of the most bare-metal practical tech companies out there.
Fricking hacky. The cinematography is fricking shit and the story feels like it was written by a toddler.
that's crazy, very impressive
kek dumb midwit
explain?
Explain what? Read the thread or read a fricking book. The OP video is misleading. It’s not a “video” of real atoms, it’s a CG artists interpretation of what it might be like. The shit I took earlier was more impressive than this video.
no
>It’s not a “video” of real atoms, it’s a CG artists interpretation of what it might be like
it is ltierally not a CGI
it's imagery generated by a computer
>electron microscope needs a computer to generate the image
STOP THE PRESSES
STOP THE ANTIVAXX RALLIES
WE HAVE BEEN LIVING A LIE ALL THESE YEARS OMG JEEBUS IT'S LIKE THAT ONE TIME WHEN SOMEONE TOLD ME THAT TH EARTH IS OLDER THAN 6000 YEARS!!!
i didnt even remotely go there
im just saying it's disingenuous to be like "we photographed the atoms, these tiny metal balls are atoms"
It's literally a microscope which scans a surface with a tip, it's like a vinyl player that returns an image of the surface instead of music.
Its not, this is like people who day space pictures are fake because there was color assigned to the non visible spectrum.
99% of the first world thinks this is a "photo" and not a computer generated image. "science communicators" are disingenuous homosexuals who want nothing but clicks and scientists are fine with this because interest ensures continued funding
Yes, It’s sad that the most legitimate field of study has to resort to visualizations to get anyone to care about them but that’s the price you pay as you deal with increasingly abstract and complex information.
>the most legitimate field of study
That's not philosophy
>to get anyone to care about them
Maybe nobody cares about space because it has no impact on our lives, is completely dead and empty for unimaginable stretches of distance forever and ever, and the entire field of study thereof has proven to be completely useless, yet we keep funding it instead of using those resources on something earthly
>good news! there's an epic exoplanet FBKSD9235, it's ten gorillion trillion light years away and we will literally never ever ever in our history learn anything else about it or get any closer to it, and even if we did, it's just a big ball of gas with nothing of interest, import, or use on it
Amazing! Please have 10 more billion dollars (sorry we had to cut the space budget to fund ukraine)
Right now Russians are going to the moon. Again. Why? There's fricking nothing on it!
Why does Elon Musk want to terraform and colonize Mars? The real answer is that he doesn't, it's all marketing to sell cars, but why does normie want him to? Does it not occur to him that colonizing literally any desert, or Antarctica, would be 10 trillion times cheaper and also not completely impossible?
all residual romantization of space, all effects of sci-fi media
space matters so little it may as well not be real.
i fricking hate space
Please come back down to Earth
People like you should be banned from the internet and made to live in a cave.
it's mid
not even a single quip
Pure propaganda, 4/10
its gay and cringe and no one cares beside giga physic autists, with physic autists already on a spectrum of their own
Fake. "Atomic particles" have never actually been seen by human eyes, assisted or otherwise.
This, I was gonna say I’ve never seen a picture of a fricking atom before but these israelites in some shitty uni are using atoms to make stop motion? Kek, my fricking swinging wiener.
least moronic people on Cinemaphile, literally all it takes is to be barely literate to know it’s not possible to photograph fricking atoms…….
y u not mention me, im the smartest man alive sucka im wise like socrat cause i admit i dont know shit
unlike redditards who watch 1 neil degrasse tyson interview and think they know all the secrets of the universe
Because I was typed and sent that post before I updated the thread and your post appeared, idiot.
type faster then butthole there was plenty of time
hahaha
>y u not mention me, im the smartest man alive sucka im wise like socrat cause i admit i dont know shit
unlike redditards who watch 1 neil degrasse tyson interview and think they know all the secrets of the universe
Checked, based Black
Wait. If those dots are atoms, the clear background is made of what?
Atoms that are further away
your wiener
it's called the ether, nobody has figured out what it actually is or how it works, just that it is there
shut the frick up moron
do you see the ripples in the video around every atom? it's other atoms out of focus. the frames are basically the peaks of a lot more atoms underneath. in the "how it was made" video they mention 5000 atoms
the music fricking sucks
This, the reddity twee-corporate "oh my science!" music at the beginning especially kind of ruined it
You try playing an atom-sized musical instrument, it's fricking hard man. I heard they had to get Warwick Davis for it.
Is this shotacon?
The fakest thing I’ve ever seen.
absolute schizo shit
Cinemaphile in shambels
science wins again!
If light is made of atoms than how come the atoms have lighting on them
Those aren’t fricking atoms that’s CG. What you’re seeing is literal CG. I bet they even have a disclaimer about the video saying these are visual interpretations of some graph or whatever. This isn’t a fricking camera feed of fricking real atoms……
cope and seethe, you are probably a christisraelite and an antivaxxtard at the same time
Why yes how could you tell? Those are CG images and not real atoms, also men aren’t women, you creepy pedophile.
light isn't made of atoms
shieeeeet
The particle of light is a photon but particles aren't really a good visualisation of anything, only useful when doing calculations.
okay what are they atmons sitting in they are making waves wtf this is fake as dog shit frankly the video sucks donkey dick
lol this is so fake and the earth is flat science is more stupider then I thought
Y’all homies need to do a google search on scanning tunneling microscopes
It insists upon itself.
>it’s a CG interpretation of 1s and 0s
as I thought
I found the cinematography to be rather pedestrian. The play of light and shadow is typically one of the highlights of black & white photography, here it's all rather... flat.
They are so fricking disingenuous. Why is "science" like this, unironically?
It’s not science as we once knew it (science being a synonym for truth basically, the study of reality) now SOIENCE!!!!!! is just political lies and garbage. Modern “”””””””””scientists”””””””””” claim men are women and that anyone who disagrees should be killed.
because normies (and I use this word positively, as in, we, us, normal people, who aren't obsessed with muh science and don't worship it) think of atoms as little balls, so that's what they show
Because real atoms are not something that have a visual interpretation. They don't have an appearance or a color or a shape, they are energy. Electrons aren't tiny balls that are orbiting the protons, they are fields. Atoms are essentially invisible. You think if you "zoom in" super real hard enough you will see the tiny balls, like they show in movies and stuff with CG, but no
They just wanted publicity so they made a cg cartoon about a boy made out of tiny metal balls
>Electrons aren't tiny balls that are orbiting the protons
they don't "orbit" the atomic nucleus like a 2d drawing of an atom might make you believe but they certainly behave as particles and also behave as waves. Wave-particle duality is literally day 1 material for any course you dumbfrick
>electrons are fields
particles could be described as vibrations of a field but thinking they themselves are the field is a such a hilariously knuckle-dragging misunderstanding
you are missing the point
whether or not they are particles or waves or both, the point is that you can't visualize them
because the idea of visualization applies to things that can be hit by light and reflect it back to create an image, and atoms can't do that, and so the video is as misleading and incorrect as the iconic atom symbol with the orbiting balls
that is true, both electrons and an atom's much larger nuclei are way too small for any wavelength of light to diffract off of.
doesn't change the fact that you typed "(electrons) are fields," lmao
i also said that i know nothing
i am willfully ignorant which grants me the gift of humility
look at your arrogance
you learned just a little bit about particles and already you're this obnoxious
now THIS is a midwit post
Midwits care about science a lot, but they don't understand it, so to them it's a new religion in lieu of old ones which they discarded
im on the left of the bell curve im the based caveman who cannot nor needs to understand
the truest way to live
What surface? Surface an atom? my brother..
>surface of an atom
Atoms have soft surfaces as defined by the repulsory van der waal forces they generate. It's literally repelling the tip of the machine by the same method a table repels your hand.
>"moving atoms"
>ok so we move molecules one at a time
>we move molecules around
thats like saying a exkavator is moving atoms when digging a hole.
Yes. It is. Humans have achieved the ability to move fundamental parts of the universe around like toys. It's both astounding and frightening.
How many atoms did IBM steal?
the concept of bouncing particles off another to discern its position and speed is foreign to people using eyeballs
>Male protag.
Movies that could not be made today?
thread theme
wow such impressive cinematography from scientists, best movie from them since the moon landing!
Someone edit the stick man to be CIA man instead.
>main character is white
Boybros... we got too wienery...
Atombros we fricking WON.
>Nolan: *makes world's biggest movie with IMAX*
>IBM: Hold my beer
The whole anti science thing started out on pol because of then vaccines. This comes from a board that thought the mask had nanomachines in them implanted by the government.
just believe bro
Warwick Davis' best performance to date
gem
This video doesn't really explain Scanning Tunneling Microscopy at all. Who made this?
it's incredible how fricking stupid the people on this board are
I'm so smart dude I'm making up particles to explain my theories but we'll find them one day for sure, I fricking love being smart
It's funny seeing pseuds on Cinemaphile treat IBM like a soi silicon valley startup when they are probably one of the most bare-metal practical tech companies out there.