>"They give you wind beans they do. You certainly shouldn't eat beans, James. I dread to think of When the Wind Blows."
I got up out of my sex dungeon throne, turned 360 degrees, and walked out.
>"They give you wind beans they do.
>"They give you wind beans they do. You certainly shouldn't eat beans, James. I dread to think of When the Wind Blows."
I got up out of my sex dungeon throne, turned 360 degrees, and walked out.
These kind of 80s nuke doomerisms are kind of weird in retrospect.
Even if every single nuke in the world went off, each hitting their own unique target with 0 percent failure rate, there would still be hundreds of cities with +50,000 population unaffected. The idea that nukes could cause the end of humanity, let alone the world, is not true.
Hiroshima is nicer than most American cities.
>unaffected
Until the radiation poisoning.
Not a real thing. Over 1000 nukes have been detonated in tests without causing a noticeable spike in radiation deaths.
>1000 nukes have been detonated in controlled, isolated environments and not a single person has been harmed
Maybe that's because they were detonated in controlled, isolated environments? I think the only people who have ever been affected by nuclear testing were those aboriginals that had never seen civilization before who had their hunting grounds nuked, and even then, they were smart enough to recognize that something was poisoning the water and killing all the animals, so they just moved on.
Not quite. Here’s one quick example.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daigo_Fukury%C5%AB_Maru
Well I’m sure glad that all these cancer patients died with the comfort of knowing that they statistically did not qualify as any “noticeable spike.”
And the crew to this film.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conqueror_(1956_film)
>Although the number of cases among the cast and crew is in line with the average for adults in the US at the time
?
It was a new threat and most of what people knew of nukes was propaganda and over exaggerated
>”Nukes are good actually, you won’t even taste the radiation.”
Hi feds. This is how you spend Christmas, huh?
Wouldn't the feds want everyone afraid of nukes so they can hold power with them?
They gotta be scared enough for them to not to want to be nuked personally, but not so scared that they demand every nuke dismantled.
Russian "our nukes don't work anymore, so all nukes must be shit" cope
Read up on Nuclear Winter you illiterate moron
it's been deboonked
Kinda sucks for the people that are around the cities getting nuked, though. At least, going by stuff like Barefoot Gen.
Or is that fake like the Holocaust now?
I know you're baiting to lure the schizos who say atomic bombs are a hoax like the moon landing, but you should kys regardless of that.
>Verification not required
the point of the movie is that the government lies for their own convenience rather than guiding and educating the people
What did the government lie about in the movie?
hiding under a door would save you from radiation poisoning
It woulda. Notice how they don’t get radiation poisoning until AFTER they stop hiding under the door and drink water that has been contaminated by fallout. Which, they wouldn’t have done if they had drunk the under the door water stash they were supposed to have stocked for hiding under the door with
>spoiler
I'd agree that that's what primarily did them in. Especially since they'd be frequently be taking in radioactive material from a source where it's likely gathering and building up.
All totally fair points, though one has to wonder how well an actual lean-in would really work in practice. I remember it not doing shit in Threads(though that one was very hastily made and admittedly incomplete).
They should've went into the basement they had but alas, it was not in the pamphlets.
Actually I think a good inner core of a house is supposed to be comparatively safe, even when weighed against a basement.
Ok nuke fetishist
me raping you to death would leave you affected
>Even if every single nuke in the world went off, each hitting their own unique target with 0 percent failure rate, there would still be hundreds of cities with +50,000 population unaffected. The idea that nukes could cause the end of humanity, let alone the world, is not true.
Yeah but it would kill tens of millions of people and set humanity back 100 years. The fact a nuclear war isn't capable of murdering all of us just means we're so weak we can't even end ourselves even if we try. The 25% of the population that survives has miserable next 50 years ahead of them.
I doubt it would set humanity as a whole back 100 years.
Of course, it would depend on what gets hit.
If Taiwan or some other major microchip manufacturer got hit, then yeah.
But if it was something between only two powers, like Nato and Russia or India and Pakistan, then despite tons of human suffering, I'd say humanity as a whole would keep on trucking along.
>Yeah but it would kill tens of millions of people and set humanity back 100 years
Good
SHUT UP YOU STUPID b***h AND GET IN THE SHELLTAH
crumbs!
Guys what should I keep in my Inner Core Or Refuge?
Pocket pussy
A limited amount of recreational materials are highly important, thankyou.
Don't you start stimulating, James.
did he know all along?
That they were dying of radiation poisoning? I’m sure even if he had a suspicion, he was so far into his forcible denial that he might as well have not known. There’s a reason why his personal motto is that modified line from Charge of the Light Brigade.
But also, I doubt that little pamphlet of his actually spelled out what radiation sickness exactly was, or its symptoms. Just the cut and dry “practical advice” on how to avoid it.
MY HAIR'S COMING OUT
It'd be funny if it was an American missile.
all dead
Watch out, Radioactive Man!
A RAT IN THE LAVATORY
Must be a mutant.
Rain! We can save it!
It's the correct thing.
OW, MY FATBOYS!
>dog skeleton covers its eyes