>They made 'Interview with the Vampire' gay

>They made 'Interview with the Vampire' gay
is nothing safe?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >More Overtly Queer Take
    I just don't find either of them very attractive, is the only thing

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Who's the Black person?

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >another random brown person in a time where they were not socially mobile
    >they're also extremely gay and that's accepted even though you'd be killed for it in reality
    Neat.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Lestat describes himself as six feet tall. He has blond hair that is not quite shoulder length, and that is rather curly, which sometimes appears white under fluorescent lighting. His eyes are gray, but they reflect the colors of blue or violet easily from surfaces around them.

      >Louis de Pointe du Lac is a vampire created by author Anne Rice who first appears in Interview with the Vampire. He is described as having white skin, the color of bleached bone, chin-length black hair, and brilliant green eyes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They nailed it

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't this take all the fricking fun out of the premise? The whole point was that it was almost gay but never went there. Like Top Gun
    >read the book

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    looks awful. decidedly not vampire kino aesthetic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The only kino vampire aesthetic is parasitic vampire; The Strain and 30 Days of Night.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >30 Days of Night
        Reminded me of an old Canadian TV series.

        https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103417/

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is an obvious troll. They couldn't make Anne Rice's shit gayer than it already was. If anything, they've just made the gayness more overt, but it was always there. It was there in the movies, it was overflowing in the books, and if you ever hear the woman talk it was pretty explicit in the intention.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/pF7UGbf.jpg

      >They made 'Interview with the Vampire' gay
      is nothing safe?

      It was always there but it was male romance, not a lustful type of gay. This new version is just mutted up goyslop for the new queer masses.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Male on male romance is 10x gayer than 2 guys fricking each other.

        The Romans knew this

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That may be true but this new version is going to be 10x worse than the original.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The movie with brad Pitt is one of the gayest things I’ve ever seen anyway

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >They made 'Interview with the Vampire' gay
    You mean more gay right? Anne Rice books are all about men fricking, shit is anime tier

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This entire thread is some moronic shill trying to fool people into not noticing they're Black personing up yet another franchise. Anne Rice was always gay as hell.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Homophobes need to stfu rosebud pride #2022

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My homie Fuller got shitcanned again
    We could have had Hannibal 2

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Would have been kino

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the only way you could make anne rice shit more gay is to retcon things so vampires can frick, it's already gay as frick

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >implying this shit could be gayer than prime Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise dressed in frilly shirts taking turns to bite each other then adopting a wean.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >>They made 'Interview with the Vampire' gay
    It always was.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yet they made a version without any twinks

    Setting it in the 20th century for easy race baiting rather than having to show scenes of mixed race plantation owners whipping slaves like was the case in the 18th century new Orleans is even more gay than that shota porn novel Ann Rice wrote l.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I still remember reading The Vampire Armand and getting to the shota handjob part Anne felt the need to describe in great detail.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    But... They were always gay in the books? The books were gay as frick.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >implying I would ever watch woke garbage with this bland aesthetic
    Vampire kino is over.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >proudly queer
    >vampires

    I've got just the man for the job.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I mean, they were always gay. They just made it gayer, and with a nog

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That's fricked.
    I read all of those Vampire novels many times 20 years ago.
    The vampires in her universe were not interested in sex. At all. They wanted nothing to do with it. Fricking anything in any sort of way gave them no pleasure. Anne did give the male vampires constant erections, but it meant nothing to them. Staring at a candle in a dark room for hours was more fun and interesting to vampires in her stories than sex.
    Gay?
    Well, it's more like her vampires became sexless. Their actual form meant nothing to them and they could become just as easily attached to a male vampire they found interesting as a female vampire.
    The only vampire that ever had any sort of sex was Lestat. And only once. He stuck his dick in a freshly made female vampire that had just turned, because she wanted him to, so she could try to feel human one more time, and it turned out that she did not like it. Neither of them felt anything.
    The only thing close to sex for them was drinking blood, and by all descriptions, it was what I imagine fricking while on molly is like.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Anne did give the male vampires constant erections, but it meant nothing to them.
      wat

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        When men turned, their dicks became erect and hard.
        When women turned, their nipples became erect, and never went down.
        But, their sexual organs meant nothing. Licking a female vampire's nipples was no different than licking her elbow.
        Also, their skin was extremely tough and rigid, ranging from thick leather flexibility to near stone. So, if a human male tried to bang a willing female vampire, it would be extremely unpleasant. And male vampire dicks had about as much flexibility and feeling as a dildo made out of stone.
        Vampires did not piss or shit, so their body was under massive pressure all of the time from ingesting blood.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it was already gay as frick

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hate to break it to you mate but i'm pretty sure it was always gay

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >proudly queer
    >EVERYONE LOOK AT ME!! LOOK LOOK — I LOVE FECES AND BLOOD AND CUM AND STRANGE MEN AND DISEASES AND PARASITES AND MONKEYPOX
    > SO FRICKING PROUD!! I DID IT. I BECAME A BIOLOGICAL INVALID AND GROOMING PEDOPHILE RAPIST
    >IM JUST SOOOOOOO FRICKING PROUD!!!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sure, but what do you gain by getting this angry about it?

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Now:
    >Interview with a Vampire is queer as frick and why it's a good thing
    Later:
    >Extreme homophobia gets Interview with a Vampire cancelled after one season

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *