They won't even get a cameo on the new Harry Potter HBO series she's writing

I hope all those twitter likes were worth it, I don't know why anyone would try to distance themselves from Rowling, the women lays golden egges whenever she wants.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Those ungrateful shits should literally be groveling at her feet for making them super rich and famous. Instead they stab her in the back for a few virtue signaling points. Fricking pathetic.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no kidding
      what is Ron's official status on trannies?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >no kidding
        >what is Ron's official status on trannies?
        Transphobic (he said Rowling was a good person)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        they're mental harry!

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        but what about Ron Weasley

        >In 2020, when Rowling first began facing backlash and accusations of transphobia, Grint said in a statement that he ‘firmly stands with the trans community’. The actor said: “Trans women are women. Trans men are men. We should all be entitled to live with love and without judgment."
        >Now 35, he spoke to The Sunday Times in 2022 about his relationship with the author of the popular stories. “I liken JK Rowling to an auntie. I don’t necessarily agree with everything my auntie says, but she’s still my auntie,” he said. “It’s a tricky one."
        He's a judas like the rest of them

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >trans women are women
          No, they're at best trans women

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's a shame as Grint was the most based one following the movies. I suppose I don't blame him for playing by the israelites' rules since he is beholden to their whims and if he sides with JK fully he will never get another acting role as long as he lives.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >and if he sides with JK fully he will never get another acting role as long as he lives.
            Yeah he's really been burning up the screen the last fifteen years anon, there was... and, erm... and wasn't he in that thing...no I'm thinking of someone else.

            These little rats all have frick off money because of her and have no fear of losing their jobs

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There was a rumor a while ago, and I guess this confirms it, that HBO wanted to make a several seasons sequel series with the original cast with Rowling writing, Radcliffe and Watson said they would only come back if Rowling wasn't writing or producing the show.
      This made HBO give up on the sequel and order a reboot with a whole new cast with Rowling writing and producing.
      Those fricking actors really thought they were more valuable than the only women in history to become a billionaire by writing books.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They’re still young and have their careers to think about. She’s older and could retire tomorrow. Besides, it’s basically just third and fourth wave feminists disagreeing with each other. Who gives a shit if on this one issue they disagree if they agree on everything else.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >careers

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >They’re still young and have their careers to think about.
        they have frick you money, enough to retire and never work again while still living leagues better than 99% of the planet

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That doesn’t mean they want to. Go get yourself fired for your boss, I bet you won’t. Because at the end of the day they’re just coworkers. We have no clue how they were on set, maybe they think she’s an annoying c**t to deal with and already didn’t like her off of that, or vice versa. It’s most likely they’re just sheep regurgitating what everyone in Hollywood is saying, but I’d be damned if I ruin my life for some coworker.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >for making them super rich and famous
      They want to continue to remain rich and famous and will say / do anything to keep it so.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The majority of the public hates trannies. They could just stay neutral on trannies and take the job and be richer

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Majority of the public hates transphobes.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            provably wrong

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, since 90% of those "transphobes" aren't transphobes by definition, and a lot of people keep their true opinions down.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >By defintion
              Most of them just human civilization and only target trannies because they can get away with it, yes. Still universally hated.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You hate people that are scared of trannies? What sort of monster are you that you'd want to punish people for feeling scared of abusers?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Hate is a strong word. When you remove weeds from a garden, that is not hate. When you kill vermin living in your home, that is not hate. Killing subhuman transphobes is just work.

                I mean, for frick sake, imagine being afraid of trannies.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah you can't imagine the feelings of others because you are a troony, therefore an abuser.

                If I walk down the street at night and a woman changes sidewalks to avoid me, probably because she's scared, since I'm not an abuser, I don't think of removing her or making it illegal for her to be scared. But since for you it reminds you that you are not really a woman and that is your abuse you will try to destroy everything including your penis and testicles.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not a troony. I simply understand most transphobes are not human.

                She should not be scared since you are a pathetic cretin and she can easily kill you

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Rowling hasnt become any less rich and famous
        And if you dont want to become infamous then you could just say nothing
        Fact is a lot of young british people are just very pozzed

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It’s all the narrative about trannies. If JK and others stopped talking about them then nobody would give a shit. By talking about them you give them credibility as a group. It would be like if every boomed suddenly started complaing about skaters. Every teen would want to be one to be part of the counter-culture. That’s what being a tabby a gay is today, it’s a fight against the system. At least that’s they way theses me dumbass kids see it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Skaters didn't cut their dicks and breasts off. Troondom might be a fad, but it's a genuinely mentally ill one.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              a tiny minority of adults doing weird shit has existed forever, it's only a thing now due to the media becoming totally unprofitable unless driving rageclicks towards advertising and the gay lobby running out of things to campaign for.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Skaters didn't cut their dicks and breasts off
              they did and they called it cky

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Being a skatter is inflicting worse mutilation on your body for less gain than any transexual.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It’s all the narrative about trannies. If JK and others stopped talking about them then nobody would give a shit. By talking about them you give them credibility as a group.
            pretty much, this board is really the only place I ever hear about trannies, because morons can't stop bringing them up in random threads completely unprompted, while insisting that they're everywhere and being forced on them. trannies are not even close to being 1% of the population and I've never had to actually deal with one in the real world.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >If JK and others stopped talking about them then nobody would give a shit

            That's just not true. They're already targeted more as a commodity to be sold to. So, don't expect it to retreat back into the shadows anytime soon.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Emma Watson has literally never said anything about Rowling, she just said that she supports trans people. Because Rowling has TDS she presumably just assumed that that post was actually about her.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Still waiting for Emma Watson to apologize.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    but what about Ron Weasley

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You just know everyone is going to be Black personfied

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if i were a billionaire id find better uses of my time than arguing on twitter about what amounts to generation z/a's version of the emo scene.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Millennials make up the bulk of the troony fad thobiet

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Emma Watson
    Wasn't she a huge feminist or something? Why would she defend trannies when they go against nearly everything she stands for?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no one is actually transphobic, just like no one is actually racist. you can be transphobic and racist online all you want but in the real world the natural response is to treat people with respect (as long as it's mutual)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      These "people" are just band wagoners, they don't hold real views

      It's also because they don't get their income from royalties

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >implying feminists actually give a flying frick about other women
      They can pretend all they want, but a leopard can't change its spots.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Rowling seems to care alot about women issues but it's more likely her hatred toward men is just significantly stronger.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    she's an absolute lunatic and the hbo series will be full of race swap and even a gay homosexual sex scene with dumbledore. You won't win this chuds.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lotta people are delusional about some boomer billionaire feminist libtard
      she loves the whole agenda except for trannies

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    THis senile women is just talking shit, if she truly believed what she preaches then there wont be any gender swapped gay characters in her work, she would demand in the contract that every single character will be portrayed exactly as the book counterpart, but she just likes those checks she keeps getting and you idiots fall for it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      she has her own views and is rich enough to ignore whatever fake "outrage" exists

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        She's a blairite centrist, she has no views.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      if you're so invested in a series of children's stories that you care about one or two being gay then your might actually be gay yourself

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      She is a turbo leftie, I honestly feel that she wouldn't care about trannies if they weren't harassing her personally.
      But at this point, let them fight, maybe she'll get Jim Sterlling to kill himself just by tweetting.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        most of her outspokeness on the subject is in direct response to the leading scottish party's attempt to distract from its decade long reality check of actually having to administer a country instead of mastubating to braveheart.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      She is a turbo leftie, I honestly feel that she wouldn't care about trannies if they weren't harassing her personally.
      But at this point, let them fight, maybe she'll get Jim Sterlling to kill himself just by tweetting.

      It was already explained 7 years ago, rowling is ok with race swapping characters, she's ok with retroactively turning characters gay she is even ok with trannies in general (she said that herself), she's only seething when trannies try to take the same rights as women and not because it's unnatural or something but because that would threaten the integrity of her feminist world

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >jpg
        >already annoying to read

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >post from 2017
        >screenshot from ca. 2003
        How?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        m8 just doesn't want some bloke in a skirt hanging around in womens changing rooms the same as every other woman doesn't, it's perfectly understandable.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's pathetic considering the rest of her "ideology". Shows it was just typical "frick you, got mine" mentality.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            most ideology is.
            >oi vote labour for the good of tje common man
            no you work in the public sector and want a pay rise
            >oi vote conservative cause oi believe in free markets
            no you want a triple locked pension and the value of your house protected

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm aware. I still think it's sick and disproves her own morality.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well, she and her ideologues created this monster. Live with it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          And when men didn't want useless blabby women walking around their workplaces and golf clubs, what would Rowling have said then?
          >waaaaah that's not faaaaair 🙁 You gotta let us innnnnnn
          They brought this shit on themselves.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the thing that was always interesting to me about harry potter, was the girl's dorms at hogwarts had a magic charm around them to stop horny boys sneaking in, but there wasn't one in the opposite direction, so girls could come in to the boys dorm freely to get gangbanged. really makes you think.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just can't wait for the crusty sex scene with dumbledore with righties tuning in just to own the libs lmao

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    JKR should just write a thinly veiled anti-trans direct continuation to the series canon. Like Harry’s son fighting a polyjuicing mindraping groomer cult at hogwarts that’s backed by the faculty. It’s amazing that she’s exercised the restraint given how obsessed she’s become.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Emma just made some tweet in 2017 saying "I love everyone" and then last year again at some award show said "I love everyone"
    She never took a hard position against rowling or anyone.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I can't ever be on JK's side. Ever. Nothing about her opinions on trans has anything to do with common sense. It is all based on her delusion of women being victims of the world based on her feminism bullshit. Everything she argues falls back to her seeing men oppressing women. Frick her.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Voting in America disagrees.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i saw graham linehan on oxford street once

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    FOOL
    She must know that Emma Watson never apologizes even for her most egregious mistakes.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it’s still gonna be filled with Black folk and leftist stuff you know that right

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    emma has gin money now she doesn't need handouts from some terf

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is she showing her breasts to her brother? Wtf look there's nothing under her open blouse.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This anti-troony crusade is the best thing that came out of Harry Potter.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, that's the early video games.

      Close second though.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The fact she hasn't written anything even a quarter as well received as Harry Potter is a bit telling.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Harry Potter was mostly just pure luck. The early books were mediocre children stories. She got high on her own supply and somehow convinced herself people liked Harry Potter for anything other than the base premise being executed with remote competence.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *