>They're going to drop the ball a 4th time
Is there a deeper suffering than being a Halloween fan?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>They're going to drop the ball a 4th time
>They're going to drop the ball a 4th time
Is there a deeper suffering than being a Halloween fan?
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>Is there a deeper suffering than being a Halloween fan?
Yeah, being a Hellraiser fan.
Such sublime suffering
Shhhh no tears
First two movies are good. 3rd is meh 4 and 5 kinda blow. Only later one I liked was hellworld because of the early 90s computer online shit
> Hellraiser fans
Explorers in the further regions of excrement. Insanity to some, loyalty to others.
With every atrocious new Halloween film that comes out, Halloween 5 just gets pushed higher and higher up the rankings.
It’s now solid mid to high tier when it used to be bottom tier. 5 bros, we’re winning the fricking long con. 5 is gonna be top percentile after this stinker drops.
Well that's because Halloween 5 was a decent movie with no critical flaws. The main problem was that the writing seemed rushed.
>Well that's because Halloween 5 was a decent movie with no critical flaws.
It's full of hokey cringe.
if you put the comedy cop guys from 5 into Kills they would unironically be the least cringe and hokey thing in the film
Halloween 5 was kino and im tired of pretending its not
>Halloween 5 was kino and im tired of pretending its not
I've only really heard people shit on it because of the cult shit which is barely in it. Its at least as good as 4.
>Halloween 5 was kino and im tired of pretending its not
>Michael was cared for by an inexplicable hermit in a cave for 1 whole year
>undermines the great ending of 4, which is one of the best endings in horror
>almost every character is a contemptible dickhead
>doesn't build up tension well, with evenly spaced "kills" like the generic slasher formula
>over-exposes the villain too early, practically right off the bat
>extremely bad attempts at comedy
>introduces the Cult of Thorn in cryptic and pointless way
>the stalking elements are poorly portrayed
>undermines the great ending of 4
I'll give you this
>which is one of the best endings in horror
ok let's not go overboard
>Michael was cared for by an inexplicable hermit in a cave for 1 whole year
An absolutely kino homage to the 1935 classic The Bride of Frankenstein
>undermines the great ending of 4, which is one of the best endings in horror
Not really. Jamie is a traumatised nutcase for the entire film and is only able to even speak again at the end. The ending of 4 factors heavily into the plot of the film.
>almost every character is a contemptible dickhead
Tina is K I N O.
>doesn't build up tension well, with evenly spaced "kills" like the generic slasher formula
I disagree. The scene with Tina in the car with Michael thinking he is her boyfriend is one of the best most well plotted sequences in the franchise.
>over-exposes the villain too early, practically right off the bat
I agree. Michael bobbing down the river is pretty funny to me. However this points to the strengths of the rest of the movie, as he is largely absent from the rest of it and stalking scenes always focus on the victims, not Michael.
>extremely bad attempts at comedy
Goofy cops are based and I’m tired of pretending they’re not.
>introduces the Cult of Thorn in cryptic and pointless way
it does not introduce the cult at all.
>the stalking elements are poorly portrayed
NO!
Every unnecessary horror sequel has to undermine the prior movie’s ending to justify its existence. Halloween 5 dampens Halloween 4’s cool ending. H4 feels stupid because of how final Michael’s death in H2 was. H2’s existence obviously cheapens the effect of H1’s ending.
After rewatching the movies so many times out of sequence (I don’t rewatch in order I just watch a random one whenever I feel like watching it in particular) I’ve gained the superpower to just treat them as their own movies in a bubble. Watching Loomis die in 5 is so much more resonant when you don’t have it on your head that he’s going to return in the next one.
That really is a super power. I really can't do this.
The entire franchise is one. I can't watch a random movie and enjoy it for what it is
5 was OK.
I even enjoy Halloween 6 better than the garbage that Halloween kills was
Even though I'm sure I've seen it, I don't remember a single thing about Halloween 5. I know 4 had Danielle Harris as a kid, but 5 is a complete memory hole.
The girl is in the mental hospital. For the most of it
The teens from high school have a barn party?
There's a barn killing
Michael was healed for a year by a forest hobo
Appreciate it, anon. Barn parties/killings are pretty commonplace in these movies, but the random hobo healing sounds kek-worthy. Since when does any slasher need medical attention? I think now I recall the girl not being able to talk.
What about the man in black shooting up the police station?
Terminator 3 is in the same situation. Might as well be a good movie now.
And some of the phase 1 of the MCU like Thor and Captain America are not even considered bad anymore compared to phase 4.
Tina's personality made her so fricking attractive to me for some reason.
For me it's
Halloween > Halloween 4 > Halloween 2 > Halloween 6 > Halloween 5
Season of the witch is a great movie
everything else can be forgetten and ignored
>it's halloween and it, uh, ends
bravo carpenter
Not his movie.
I still can’t believe how fricking bad Halloween Kills was. Like how was that ever allowed to be released?
filtered
disregarded
Being a fan of literally any franchise is "suffering." Learn to just appreciate good and not get attached to things and become a fanatic
Nah Chuckychads stay winning.
If it looks like no one's got me I know Don Mancini's got me.
If you need Chucky to validate the trans for you, then I understand (but don't share) your obsession
Chucky's child isn't trans. It's more like multiple personality disorder since it's literally two people living inside of him. Watch the movie anon. Chucky's speech at the climax is kino.
In the TV show, Chucky validates trans and says "what, I'm not a monster!".
He only presented himself as open-minded and accepting in order to manipulate a gay boy with homophobic daddy issues into killing people for him.
Make all the excuses for your woke Chucky that you need to help you cope.
>In the TV show, Chucky validates trans and says "what, I'm not a monster!".
>a serial killer says he's not a monster because he's a pronoun respecter
This was a clear joke at the expense of trannies and they've got to be coping hard to embrace it as a way of "validation."
these movies suck but not as much as the ones with michael's niece. not even donald pleasance can elevate that crap
Halloween 4 is peak cinema compared to that capeshit tier Kills
i don't think any of them are good, it just comes down to arguing how much each of them suck. i'm not going to defend halloween kills lmao
Rose-tinted glasses. I'd rather watch that Kills over the shit that the franchise turned into back then.
Cult of Thorn was a load of bollocks
cult of thorn is in neither 4 nor 5
>cult of thorn is in neither 4 nor 5
There is Cult of Thorn content in 5. The symbol is on Myer's hand and the film cuts to a stranger in a black coat multiple times. 5 sets up the Cult of Thorn stuff in 6. Despite the cult stuff, Curse of Michael Myers is still much better than 5 because the chases, stalks, actors, cinematography, music and action is better. 5 only has one very good scene and it's the chase through the cornfield.
Incorrect. The shit that is in 6 was not conceived of at the stage of 5’s creation, which went into production without a finished script. The man in black wasn’t meant to be anybody when they filmed it and neither was the symbol. The makers of 5 just put that in and trusted whoever made the next one to write lore around it.
5 only suffers from the cult moronation if your for some reason allow a retconning sequel to take precedence over a prior film
>The man in black wasn’t meant to be anybody when they filmed it and neither was the symbol. The makers of 5 just put that in and trusted whoever made the next one to write lore around it.
That doesn't make it any better. The cult thing is a natural extension of what they showed in 5. What else do you write? It was all unnecessary and bad but the only real solution for Curse of Michael Myers would be to completely ignore the thorn stuff in 5.
Nah. The 1, 2 and 4 are pretty kino. H20 had one of the greatest moments in horror cinema at the end and Rob Zombie's first would have been good if it wasn't Michael Myers.
Zombies version sucks shit. Giving Micheal a generic bad childhood and just giving us a x2 remake of the original. Tyler Manes Michael is also terrible.
>H20 had one of the greatest moments in horror cinema at the end
remind me?
IIRC he's talking about the sequence where laurie essentially is the aggressor to michael and it ends with her taking his head off with an axe
Ahhhh.
I remember reading a comic where Danny is in college and Laurie has assumed Michael's/The Shape personality every Halloween, because of psychological trauma like, 20 years ago, maybe more.
EVIL DIES TONIGHT
Well it looks like evil is kicking some ass
Sounds like a line from a trailer.
isn't this homie supposed to be a normal human being?
>isn't this homie supposed to be a normal human being?
They wanted to go with that angle, but it's also like they are edging towards making him supernatural at the same. Like they are too embarrassed to just have a supernatural element while they also realize that a simply human Myers is inferior as a monster to a supernatural Shape.
>edging towards
homie they completely gave that up for Kills there is genuinely no way on earth he is not a supernatural being in that film
Yup, he gets shot, stabbed and clubbed multiple times and just keeps lifting motherfrickers off the ground with one hand and powering through an entire town
halloween kills basically turns michael into jason when michael is more of a hunter/stalker animal who can use brute force when necessary
>michael is more of a hunter/stalker animal who can use brute force when necessary
This what is threatening. There is a predator's cunning that is apparent in the stalking and approach. It's not just kicking the door in and bashing.
Also, the fact that he has no purpose or motive.
Halloween Kills got rid of that.
>Also, the fact that he has no purpose or motive.
He needs some kind of motivation despite it being hollow or pointless. There has to been some kind of end goal, otherwise the plot doesn't build up to anything. The 'final girl' being a target works very well, which is why the sister thing works even if some people don't like it. At the same time that goal also has no real purpose to it, it's still ultimately senseless.
Oh he has a motive now. He wants to go home. That's it.
the senselessness is the point. michael is basically an animal whose whole being is hunting, stalking and killing. no one knows why his mind works that way. dr. loomis basically stopped trying to figure it out and calls it pure evil, which makes him pariah in a society that focuses on trying to rehabilitate murderers.
It’s not senseless.
In the first movie
>teenage girls AWOOGA
he’s just a mute Ted Bundy essentially. he comes into contact with several people in the film and only ends up killing 4. it’s light years away from him just treating mankind like an irl call of duty game in Kills.
>It’s not senseless.
It is. Loomis literally said he looked into his eyes and found nothing. He lacks whatever makes us human.
Which the people making these new ones took way too literally.
Michael is literally picking and choosing who he kills in ‘78 which vetoes the notion of senselessness. He clearly has SOME logic in his head. He’s not a wild animal and is making conscious decisions, even if they are ones that we aren’t aware of or privy to.
It's senseless because there's no motive. He doesn't know these people, doesn't care for them and just kills them because that's his nature. He also has no modus operandi or doesn't get any type of gratification from killing like all serial killers do. He just kills and then moves on.
I do get your point about he may have a logic to his mania that we, rational humans can't see because we have souls, so to speak, whereas Micheal doesn't.
michael being chalked up to just pure evil is potentially cope for dr. loomis' own failures in treating him but it also could be that he spoke his truth and a modern society that attempts to understand that pure evil is the one at fault. this is why the original michael myers element is very strong in the original movie because it has these layers baked in, helped out by john carpenter's strong direction and understanding of the material.
Let's just agree that the original movie is near perfect in its execution and never should've had any sequels.
it is senseless to normal people but basically something in michael's brain motivates him to hunt and kill, the same way an animal hunts because it has to. why people hate wasps because they will just fricking go after you for no reason you can understand. why a bear can be chill with humans sometimes but also eat timothy treadwell the grizzly man who lived with the bears and called them his friends.
halloween 1 and parts of 2 are really the only movies that gets the animalistic side of michael correct. once you get to halloween 4 michael just becomes jason with a white mask and a dumb cult magic backstory
>michael just becomes jason with a white mask
A terrible white mask I might add. His mask never looked good past 1 & 2 until Halloween 2018.
'81 looks more Shatner than the original
>1988
Did they have to cut the budget on the props or something, jesus. Looks awful lmao.
The original mask was just a Captain Kirk mask painted white. The mask from 1 and 2 was the same, but by 1988 it was lost (or maybe just too deteriorated) and they couldn't find a matching mask from a show that was nearly 20 years finished by then. They've basically been trying to recreate the original mask since.
He is the shape
>isn't this homie supposed to be a normal human being?
No. He tanked bullets in 1 and walked away. Unless they say he had a bullet proof vest
Explain where that was ever a thing.
They have to film this super close because it would look moronic and ridiculous if they filmed it not as close
A slow moving old Michael Myers slowly attacking a group one by one while the rest of the group watches
This has got to be one of the worst movies I've seen get a theatrical release in a clearly unfinished state
it was laughably bad, and that's saying a lot considering how fricking terrible most halloween films are
Me too.
hate when they get to be this overpowered. at that point just send the army like they did in jason goes to hell
Why are they all white?
>blumisraelite presents
Oh.
BABYCAKES
BABYCAKES
BABYCAKES
Maybe it's time to realize that slasher movies just aren't very good. People only like the first ones because they were young when they first saw them, but it was always a stupid format built upon contrivance.
the original and its sequel are solid movies. john carpenter knew how to handle the material, it was the later movies that elevate michael to basically being a superhuman with what basically boils down to magic powers
>john carpenter knew how to handle the material, it was the later movies that elevate michael to basically being a superhuman with what basically boils down to magic powers
It's almost like the entire concept of Halloween is based on superstition and magic or something.
making michael's elemental evil into cult magic is pretty stupid, at least friday the 13th doesn't attempt to explain why jason became a zombie football player after drowning as a child
>making michael's elemental evil into cult magic is pretty stupid
Yeah, that's not good. They fell into the trap where they explain things that don't need to be explained. However, Myers being a vessel for something supernatural isn't a problem.
i think the idea was always that no one really knows what drives michael's behavior and even dr. loomis' theory that he was just pure evil is just another form of cope. obviously some people don't like the answer that there is just something unknowable in michael's mind that drives him to hunt and kill people.
and it’s almost as if Halloween (1978) was not actually about the holiday but it was about a 21 year old autist voyeuristic perv who stalks and kills high school girls.
that’s the worst thing about the new movies. they have Laurie talking about michaels “legend” and talking about him as if he is Cthulhu or something.
>and it’s almost as if Halloween (1978) was not actually about the holiday but it was about a 21 year old autist voyeuristic perv who stalks and kills high school girls.
You are ignoring the angle where Loomis talks about him as though he is evil incarnate and then Myers runs off after being ventilated and falling off a balcony. If Myers was just a man, then his survival and super-strength after being catatonic for over a decade is inexplicable.
It’s possible to keep the supernatural vibe - preternatural strength, low-grade healing factor, oblivious to pain - and still keep it grounded. All they have to do is build off what Carpenter’s films suggested - that the Shape is a supernatural entity that dwells in Myers, and it feeds on misery and fear. That would explain why he doesn’t wantonly kill all the time. Killing is just a means to an end, and that end is remaining Haddonfield’s bogeyman.
i think teasing a supernatural element is good for flavor and atmosphere in the first 2 movies but spelling it out as the later movies do was a huge mistake.
Completely agree.
Also checked.
To elaborate, I’m not saying that we have some exposition dump from some mystic/occult expert or something, just that the writers need to keep that in mind when writing the character. For instance, the abominable final scene in the last one plays out totally differently if Myers enters the street, sees the mob, then just goes totally inert, because killing all those potent sources of fear would be counter to the Shape’s purposes. He gets beaten to “death,” the meat wagon picks him up, then the following morning, residents of Haddonfield wake up to the news that the ambulance never reached the hospital and Myers is nowhere to be found.
>it’s another anon writes a better script than Hollywood episode
but tbh I found that situation dumb in the first place that he would even be around those people. in the first movie, it’s just a random mask that he picked up at the store, and he gets a little flustered when Laurie pulls it off him. In kills the hack writers have him literally fricking abandon someone he’s been following for 2 films now to go and chase someone through the neighbourhood for his beloved mask. she should have tempted him with the mask and he should have ignored it.
I agree. That was dumb as frick.
Michael was A L W A Y S supernatural. There's a reason why he's credited as "The Shape". When Loomis talks about how he's the embodiment of evil and the boogeyman you're supposed to take him literally, he's not waxing poetic
Slasher was stale already in the 80s. Gore was stale by mid 00s. But then we got A24 mystery films masquerading as Horror. There's no hope for Horror until A24 and the PG13 James Wan boo shit is over.
Nah slashers are kino
This, slashers are a mid genre at best and all the best were done in the 70s-80s
the poster looks kino though
Try being a Friday the 13th fan
Friday are fine. Their movies were cheap schlock at the door so you more or less get what you wanted in the end. Meanwhile, Halloween is like an abusive relationship where they "promise to be better" and gjve a little bit of promise before things fall apart. Rinse and repeat.
But at least Halloween still gets new movies
Yeah awful moronic woke ones
Even the Jason fan films on YouTube are better than this garbage
There only needs to be one more F13/Jason movie and then it can rest forever.
They were never good so I don't understand. The movies were always about jason killing sexy teenagers in gory ways. Simple garbage for horror consumers.
F13/Jason movies don't have the legacy that the Halloween series has hanging over their heads. The series sticks to formula, throws in a gimmick, and just delivers on Jason. In those regards its a more consistent series than most horror series.
Intentional?
no. its just a fan poster.
I quite liked Halloween Kills, it was totally moronic but funny. The car door scene? Cmon if you didn't burst out laughing at that, you're a wanker.
EVIL DIES TONIGHT
40 YEARS AGO
Loomis would never do this even though he hates micheal this is silly.
Wait didn't he use Jamie as a human bait in 4-5?
>Danny McBride
At least we will get some chuckles
He's not acting in these. He writes and produces them.
I'm pretty sure he has a role in Ends
Lol Michael Myers fought fire fighters in the last one. Full on camp with no self awareness to it. If you are gonna pay to see this you're a shmuck
It's complete Schlock.. This franchise was never as good as Alien or Hellraiser and that's a low bar as these two had only two great movies.
>Hellraiser
Has 1 good movie and rest dogshit what you on about
What heavy-handed allegory are they going to go with this time around?
The director has genuinely said that it’s going to be about the coof and there’ll be a timeskip from 2018 to current day
So presumably Michael takes the coof years off to social distance lel
>takes place during covid
>Michael is such a psychopath he wears no mask at all
>michael survives six vaccinations and disappears
>I injected him six times!!!
>JAMIE NOOOOO NOOOOOO YOU’RE A CHILD YOURE THE MOST AT RISK GROUP FOR COVID NOOOOOOOO
>"He may have been wearing a mask before the pandemic began... but luckily for us, he never got vaccinated!"
And then Laurie and the gang all kill Michael with COVID.
>The anti-5 posting was from a Cursecuck all along.
Your revisionism must end Cursecuck. Your movie was incoherent, illogical, a disappointment and embarrassing to watch. The few fans you COULD have attracted left the theaters after you finished ruining the Thorne protag's story arc.
>b-but da producer's cut!
Was also terrible.
>Your revisionism must end Cursecuck. Your movie was incoherent, illogical, a disappointment and embarrassing to watch.
>>b-but da producer's cut!
>Was also terrible.
Only the Thorn lore is bad and that's because it's necessary and fricks over the mystic of the unknowable evil. Everything else about Curse is good except for the culmination of the final confrontation. 5 is just a much inferior rehash of 4 with a different babysitter and every element of it aside from cornfield chase is inferior. The script, casting and music is horrible.
>Only the Thorn lore is bad and that's because it's necessary and fricks over the mystic of the unknowable evil.
No. The Thorne storyline is fine. It was initially a great way to give the series some sort of deeper meaning and a tool to drive the plot. The problem was that it wasn't done correctly and wasn't thought of ahead of time. As a result, they had cliffhangers but no idea where they were going with with cliffhanger.
>Everything else about Curse is good except for the culmination of the final confrontation.
No it was a popcorn film with strictly inferior characters to every other movie.
>5 is just a much inferior rehash of 4 with a different babysitter and every element of it aside from cornfield chase is inferior.
No it was a pretty good movie up until the cornfield scene that obviously was too long. 5 only suffers from being rushed and making really questionable decisions. Meanwhile 6 was nearly a franchise killer.
The script, casting and music is horrible.
>Maybe in your head. The police was simply comedic relief so I don't see the problem with them
>5 only suffers from being rushed and making really questionable decisions. Meanwhile 6 was nearly a franchise killer.
This. 5 wasn’t the one that forced a timeline reboot, 6 was.
started to get into Halloween recently
no wait that was Friday the 13th
so i started to watch Friday the 13th 1 and 2 and I'm about to watch 3 now. What am I in for? 1 was okay, 2 was kinda meh
friday the 13th knows it's schlock and is all about jason dabbing on teenagers with ridiculous kills
Three is very cool and fun conspiracy horror movie without this Michael guy. It apparently flopped so they brought back the boogeyman on popular demand.
Oh frick me. I described Halloween three.
trying to turn halloween into an anthology series with goofy TV movie-style stories was a mistake as well, although season of the witch goes into my guilty pleasure category.
3 has some good characters and a bunch of goofy shots meant for 3D viewing in a theater. It's pretty good.
Friday movies suck anon. 3 is the first watchable one and it takes to 6 to get an unironically good movie.
>there are people who get histrionically angry over the reboot series yet love the absolutely dogshit Moustapha Akkad sequels with their cult of thorn nonsense and TV movie-tier cinematography
Michael motivations ranked
“shit who knows lol he’s horny I guess?” (1) “whew just got outta the joint, time to stretch my legs and kill some kids” (‘18) >>>> “he wants to kill his family” (2, 4, 5, H20) >>>> “why the frick are there black people in my home” (Res) >>>> “he is bound against his will to wipe out his entire bloodline by a curse he has no control over and also he does the bidding of his master, acting as his hitman” (6) >>>> “I wanna go home and look out my frigging sister’s bedroom window :(“ (Kills)
lol
>“he wants to kill his family” (2, 4, 5, H20)
I like this one the most. It actually ties the plot into Halloween and its origin extremely tightly. Halloween is when the barrier between the material and spiritual is thinned and things can cross over for a time. An unknowable evil possessing someone at this time checks out. The first killing is of his sister, so trying to kill the other sisters is basically ritual reenactment. That relates to cycles, like the Celtic calendar, yearly coming of Samhain, the end of the year, the slaughtering of animals before the oncoming winter, the bloodshed of the culling. The unknowable evil reenacting bloodshed deeply relates to Halloween. It's tight as frick, mythgays know.
His notive in the first one is by far the most terrifying, but it's only inferred from Loomis's conversations with the sheriff. Michael is doing precisely what he's been fantasizing about doing for his entire imprisonment.
It's not killing his family and the sexy teen bit is incidental. He just picked someone, followed them through their day, then killed everyone in their circle that he could easily get to. He then drove that target to the house where he'd displayed them all for her to discover. Michael had no intention of killing her until she'd seen that. And it had nothing to do with finding her sexy ordome sort of familial connection.
He killed the dig because he was hungry. He picked Laurie because she was convenient. It could have been anyone; she just won the lotto.
What a strange coincidence that there is a Halloween thread now. Just watched the first movie for the first time.
Shit sucked. Boring. Not scary. Horrible ADR and audio mix. Bad acting. No idea how it became such a big thing. Maybe boomers were just really easy to scare.
basic formulas work better than the overcomplicated james wan crap you see in horror movies now.
>mindbroken zoomer who watches people gunned down regularly in america doesn't find animalistic murder scary
many such cases!
Texastards exit left.
Yes the original is outdated trash by now. But people like it for historic reason. Also has a kino soundtrack. I prefer 2.
>outdated
Half the kills are ofscreen and when does kill its strangulation and Michael can't kill 2 kids and a babysitter. Atleast in 2018 he kills that kid in the car.
Michael only works if he is just some moron guy out killing random trick treaters instead of being the shape/I must kill my sister/niece bs.
>the shape/I must kill my sister/niece
you just lumped two completely different interpretations of michael myers into one
The original has a lot of dead time (no pun intended) a lot of wasted time on nonsense crap. The second half is the only good part.
Loomis is cool but most of the movie he's hanging out in the bushes or walking around
halloween 1 is the best slasher ever made imo, the soundtrack/score is amazing alone
if mikey just wanted to look out a window then why did he follow some teenage girl all the way out into the countryside in 2018 and why did he even leave his home in the original film when he was hanging out there at the start of the film?
@170922481
not giving your uncultured, baiting zoomer ass a (You)
does friday the 13th ever attempt to explain why jason who is called a little boy by his mother in the original movie then becomes a 30 year old zombie linebacker in the sequels?
>does friday the 13th ever attempt to explain why jason who is called a little boy by his mother in the original movie then becomes a 30 year old zombie linebacker in the sequels?
no
that's pretty funny honestly, basically the exact opposite of halloween's various attempts to explain michael's origin and motivations.
>this guy who drowned as like an 8 year old comes back as a middle-aged jacked zombie who can rip teenagers in half and don't ask why or how that happened because we will never tell you
Jason doesn't become explicitly undead until Part VI. In the earlier films he had just survived his drowning and lived as a mountain man for 20 years.
the part with kid Jason in the first film is a dream. 6 months later in part 2 he’s a grown man so there’s no real way to place that part in any other context than as a dream. in part 3 someone has the same kind of dream but about ms voorhees (who she’s never met or seen) so we can only conclude that they are supernatural in nature. like visions or something.
The characters in the movies also seem confused by it
Being a Texas Chain Saw fan.
This was fun and brutal.
It turned leatherface into superstrength Jason mode which is the laziest shit you can do
>this chainsaw serial killer thing is on our bus and he's killing. Let's livestream this shit
Brilliant satire. Bravo!
Idk if you're being honest or not, but it's a netflix movie, so the supposed satire and irony is completely lost in the very reality of the film's existence.
>it's a netflix movie
No, it was sold to Netflix because they couldn't get it into theaters. It was already filmed when Netflix announced it coming
>Idk if you're being honest or not, but it's a netflix movie, so the supposed satire and irony is completely lost in the very reality of the film's existence.
I don't care about the satire or irony. It was a good splatter slasher with tension and fun.
Does anybody even like Chainsaw as a franchise? The second one only works for some people because it’s so unconventional from what a typical slasher sequel should be.
I enjoyed the original series up until this new one came out.
2 is masterclass coked out 80s kino, it beat Tim Burton and Rob Zombie to the crazy spookhouse on acid setting and is basically a story of an incel getting extremely close to getting some pussy, if Leatherface had survived the ending Stretch was ready to put out after sawing up Chop Top
>yuppie zoomers attempt to gentrify Harlow and royally frick themselves with their prejudiced preconceptions of rural folk
It was a decent concept. It's just a shame that the execution was so poor.
halloween 3 is the only good one
What is your favourite Halloween film anon? And what is one think you like about it?
Maybe 4 because it had the best acting. Although from an objective standpoint, 1 is definitely better.
its going to come out when everyones over the coof and its going to either revolve around the coof or be a heavy handed allegory for The Coof
>Michael has just been standing in his sisters room for 4 years since Halloween Kills staring out the window
>The police have put signs around telling people to socially distance themselves from the Myers house
>life has gone on although the government of Haddonfield mandates everyone wear stab proof vests at all times to protect from a Getting Stabbed My Michael Myers outbreak and mandate that everyone take an experimental blood thickener to prevent bleeding out from being stabbed
>Men lose their job over refusing to take their blood thickener shots
>Kids no longer take the stab-vest mandate seriously because they're heavy and they make recess suck
>Some kids decide to frick around the myers house coincidentally the night some angry guys who lost their job decide to go frick the place up cuz they're tired of the mandates
>Michael has activated he stabs them all
>Only one kid survives to get carted to the hospital, the rest of the movie is him on a ventilator barely hanging on and sign languaging to his mother that he wishes he got the 4th blood thickener shot
Halloween Kills is so stupid it makes Halloween 2018 worse too. I would've given 2018 an 8/10 on release and now it's like a 6. Kills has some great Kills and a good score, the 1978 flashback scenes are pretty well done, but aside from that the movie has the stupidest characters of any Halloween movie.
>/pol/chuds are entering this thread
>coping
>seething
>dilating
absolutely triggered
>"Normal conversation"
>"Normal conversation"
>"Normal conversation"
>"Normal conversation"
>"THAT CHARACTER WAS EXTREMELY WOKE IT HAD A JOKE ABOUT TRANNES WOKE WOKE Black person WOKE"
>"Normal conversation"
I hate all these shitty movies except for the original and Rob Zombies remake all the rest suck
any spoilers I'll take anything
Halloween_____________ ends
How can the Halloween series possibly end satisfactorily?
To fully end ( no more sequels) fully fully end,
Michael kills Laurie and then Michael himself fully does die
But no producer or studio ever wants to do this
H20 ended just fine.
You Black folk didn’t like 2018? I thought it was pretty decent. It’s HK that dropped the ball.
I’ve only seen 1 and will probably watch 3 because I’m a carpenter fan
Why are critics and audiences so moronic? Imagine if we had a halloween anthology by Carpenter that did a different story every time. Frick sequels and the idiots who demand them
Agreed.
3 disproves your argument because it wasn’t that great. The plotting was off and definitely worse than 4
The big problem with H3 is that they tried to pivot the direction of the series with the third entry rather than the second.
Huh? When did the second one come out?